Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria in older adults who are institutionalized: Agreement with the Subjective Global Assessment and its impact on 5-year mortality.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1002/ncp.11120
Guilherme F Graciano, Isabella R Souza, Maria Isabel T D Correia, Lucilene R Anastácio, Bárbara C Santos
{"title":"Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria in older adults who are institutionalized: Agreement with the Subjective Global Assessment and its impact on 5-year mortality.","authors":"Guilherme F Graciano, Isabella R Souza, Maria Isabel T D Correia, Lucilene R Anastácio, Bárbara C Santos","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess the prevalence of malnutrition according to Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Mini Nutritional Assessment-Full Form (MNA-FF), and different combinations of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in older adults who are institutionalized, and the impact of malnutrition on 5-year mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nutrition status was assessed by the SGA, MNA-FF, and 15 GLIM criteria combinations. The Katz scale was used to assess the level of dependence. The SGA was considered the reference method, and the agreement (Kappa test), sensitivity, and specificity values were calculated for each GLIM criteria combination. The variables associated with 5-year mortality were assessed using multivariate logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eleven participants (mean age: 81y; interquartile range: 76.0-87.0; 90.9% women) were included; the prevalence of malnutrition according to the SGA and MNA-FF were 49.5% (n = 55) and 8.1% (n = 9), respectively. The prevalence of malnutrition varied from 1.8% to 36.0% considering GLIM combinations. Eight GLIM criteria combinations had a fair agreement with SGA (κ: 0.21-0.40), and two had sensitivity >80%. Regarding mortality, 43 participants (38.7%) died within 5 years. Malnutrition according to the SGA (odds ratio [OR]: 2.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-7.46) and the Katz scale score (OR: 4.64; 95% CI:1.84-11.70) were independent predictors of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of malnutrition varied according to the assessment tools. Malnutrition diagnosed by the SGA, but not by the GLIM criteria or MNA-FF, was associated with 5-year mortality in older adults who were institutionalized.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1388-1395"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of malnutrition according to Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Mini Nutritional Assessment-Full Form (MNA-FF), and different combinations of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in older adults who are institutionalized, and the impact of malnutrition on 5-year mortality.

Methods: Nutrition status was assessed by the SGA, MNA-FF, and 15 GLIM criteria combinations. The Katz scale was used to assess the level of dependence. The SGA was considered the reference method, and the agreement (Kappa test), sensitivity, and specificity values were calculated for each GLIM criteria combination. The variables associated with 5-year mortality were assessed using multivariate logistic regression models.

Results: One hundred eleven participants (mean age: 81y; interquartile range: 76.0-87.0; 90.9% women) were included; the prevalence of malnutrition according to the SGA and MNA-FF were 49.5% (n = 55) and 8.1% (n = 9), respectively. The prevalence of malnutrition varied from 1.8% to 36.0% considering GLIM combinations. Eight GLIM criteria combinations had a fair agreement with SGA (κ: 0.21-0.40), and two had sensitivity >80%. Regarding mortality, 43 participants (38.7%) died within 5 years. Malnutrition according to the SGA (odds ratio [OR]: 2.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-7.46) and the Katz scale score (OR: 4.64; 95% CI:1.84-11.70) were independent predictors of mortality.

Conclusion: The prevalence of malnutrition varied according to the assessment tools. Malnutrition diagnosed by the SGA, but not by the GLIM criteria or MNA-FF, was associated with 5-year mortality in older adults who were institutionalized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机构养老老年人营养不良标准全球领导力倡议:与主观全面评估的一致性及其对 5 年死亡率的影响。
研究背景本研究旨在根据主观全面评估(SGA)、迷你营养评估全表(MNA-FF)和全球营养不良领导倡议(GLIM)标准的不同组合,评估机构养老的老年人中营养不良的发生率,以及营养不良对5年死亡率的影响:营养状况通过 SGA、MNA-FF 和 15 种 GLIM 标准组合进行评估。卡茨量表用于评估依赖程度。SGA 被视为参考方法,并计算了每种 GLIM 标准组合的一致性(Kappa 检验)、灵敏度和特异性值。使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估了与 5 年死亡率相关的变量:共纳入 111 名参与者(平均年龄:81 岁;四分位数间距:76.0-87.0;90.9% 为女性);根据 SGA 和 MNA-FF 标准,营养不良发生率分别为 49.5%(n = 55)和 8.1%(n = 9)。根据 GLIM 标准组合,营养不良发生率从 1.8% 到 36.0% 不等。八种 GLIM 标准组合与 SGA 的吻合度较高(κ:0.21-0.40),其中两种标准组合的灵敏度大于 80%。关于死亡率,43名参与者(38.7%)在5年内死亡。根据 SGA 得出的营养不良(几率比[OR]:2.82;95% 置信区间[CI]:1.06-7.46)和卡茨量表评分(OR:4.64;95% CI:1.84-11.70)是预测死亡率的独立因素:结论:营养不良的发生率因评估工具而异。通过 SGA 诊断出的营养不良与入住养老院的老年人的 5 年死亡率有关,而通过 GLIM 标准或 MNA-FF 诊断出的营养不良则与之无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
What is the role of parenteral nutrition in the management of the patient with severe acute pancreatitis? A liberalized diet does not improve caloric intake during neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplants: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Eating behaviors of children with intestinal failure and those who achieve enteral autonomy: An observational cross-sectional study. Exploring healthcare facilities' blenderized tube feeding policy trends: A survey of registered dietitian nutritionists. Long-term enteral nutrition with a nasogastric tube can be safe and effective: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1