Objective: We report the results of a quality improvement initiative to reduce the time to full enteral feeds and number of central line and parenteral nutrition days in premature infants in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) by 20%.
Study design: In 2020, a multidisciplinary team at our NICU initiated a quality improvement project to improve enteral feeding in infants with a birthweight <1800 g. The key drivers were early donor human milk consent, trophic feeds initiation, and modification of the enteral feeding guidelines. The interventions included prenatal donor human milk consents, mandatory staff education, and NICU newsletter reminders. Retrospective baseline data were collected May 1, 2020, to November 23, 2020, and prospective data were collected November 24, 2020, to September 30, 2022.
Results: Special cause variation was detected for time to achieve full enteral feeds, central line days, and parenteral nutrition days with 30%, 44%, and 42% improvements, respectively. There was no increase in feeding intolerance or necrotizing enterocolitis.
Conclusion: Small changes in feeding guideline processes improved enteral feedings in preterm infants without increase in morbidities. Our process measures are practical and easy to implement in most NICU settings.
{"title":"Quality improvement initiative to achieve early enteral feeds in preterm infants at a level IV neonatal intensive care unit.","authors":"Usha Prasad, Kendall Johnson, Stephanie McGuire, Kathleen Haines, Annmarie Spizzoucco, Shabnam Lainwala","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11236","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report the results of a quality improvement initiative to reduce the time to full enteral feeds and number of central line and parenteral nutrition days in premature infants in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) by 20%.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In 2020, a multidisciplinary team at our NICU initiated a quality improvement project to improve enteral feeding in infants with a birthweight <1800 g. The key drivers were early donor human milk consent, trophic feeds initiation, and modification of the enteral feeding guidelines. The interventions included prenatal donor human milk consents, mandatory staff education, and NICU newsletter reminders. Retrospective baseline data were collected May 1, 2020, to November 23, 2020, and prospective data were collected November 24, 2020, to September 30, 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Special cause variation was detected for time to achieve full enteral feeds, central line days, and parenteral nutrition days with 30%, 44%, and 42% improvements, respectively. There was no increase in feeding intolerance or necrotizing enterocolitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Small changes in feeding guideline processes improved enteral feedings in preterm infants without increase in morbidities. Our process measures are practical and easy to implement in most NICU settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142558379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rebecca Pulvirenti, Miriam Duci, Cecile Lambe, Annika Mutanen, Henrik Arnell, Merit M Tabbers, Francesco Fascetti-Leon
Background: The administration of home parenteral nutrition improves quality of life for patients with intestinal failure, thus fostering their will to actively participate to social activities. Nevertheless, sports participation can be risky for patients with a central venous catheter (CVC). Despite literature thoroughly proving the positive impact of sports on motor-psychosocial development, no consistent evidence assessing its role on central-line complications is available. This study aimed to report the European centers' approach to children with intestinal failure on home parenteral nutrition and interested in playing sports, further assessing complications and how to prevent them.
Materials and methods: A questionnaire focusing on children with intestinal failure regarding physical activity was circulated to 20 centers. Questions assessed the centers' policy for CVC management, the sports-related recommendations for patients on home parenteral nutrition and complication rates.
Results: Sixteen (80%) centers filled in the questionnaire. Twelve centers reported not to have a standardized formal protocol for catheter care during sports. All centers encouraged patients to perform mild/moderate exercise, whereas high-contact sports were allowed by one center only. Specific dressings were suggested to protect the vascular access device, especially for water sports. Only one sports-related complication (rupture) was reported.
Conclusion: This survey emphasizes that sports should not be restricted in patients with intestinal failure and represents a blueprint for sports-related recommendations for these patients. Prospective studies assessing complication rates are advisable to ensure an improved access to sports for these patients.
{"title":"Playing sport as a central-line carrier: a survey to collect the European pediatric intestinal failure centers' view.","authors":"Rebecca Pulvirenti, Miriam Duci, Cecile Lambe, Annika Mutanen, Henrik Arnell, Merit M Tabbers, Francesco Fascetti-Leon","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11235","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11235","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The administration of home parenteral nutrition improves quality of life for patients with intestinal failure, thus fostering their will to actively participate to social activities. Nevertheless, sports participation can be risky for patients with a central venous catheter (CVC). Despite literature thoroughly proving the positive impact of sports on motor-psychosocial development, no consistent evidence assessing its role on central-line complications is available. This study aimed to report the European centers' approach to children with intestinal failure on home parenteral nutrition and interested in playing sports, further assessing complications and how to prevent them.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A questionnaire focusing on children with intestinal failure regarding physical activity was circulated to 20 centers. Questions assessed the centers' policy for CVC management, the sports-related recommendations for patients on home parenteral nutrition and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen (80%) centers filled in the questionnaire. Twelve centers reported not to have a standardized formal protocol for catheter care during sports. All centers encouraged patients to perform mild/moderate exercise, whereas high-contact sports were allowed by one center only. Specific dressings were suggested to protect the vascular access device, especially for water sports. Only one sports-related complication (rupture) was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey emphasizes that sports should not be restricted in patients with intestinal failure and represents a blueprint for sports-related recommendations for these patients. Prospective studies assessing complication rates are advisable to ensure an improved access to sports for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142558378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aynur Aktas, Declan Walsh, Danielle Boselli, Lenna Finch, Michelle L Wallander, Kunal C Kadakia
Background: Malnutrition is common in hospitalized patients with cancer and adversely affects clinical outcomes. We evaluated the prevalence of malnutrition risk, dietitian-identified malnutrition (DIMN), and physician-diagnosed malnutrition (PDMN) at admission.
Methods: This retrospective study included adults diagnosed with a stage I-IV solid tumor malignancy and admitted to Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center from January 2016 to May 2019. Malnutrition risk was determined by a score ≥2 on the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) administered by a registered nurse during the intake process. Registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) assessments were reviewed for DIMN and grade (mild, moderate, or severe). PDMN included malnutrition International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes in the discharge summary. Univariate models were estimated; multivariate logistic regression models identified associations between clinicodemographic factors and malnutrition prevalence with stepwise selection.
Results: A total of 5143 patients were included. Median age was 63 (range 18-102) years, 48% were female, 70% were White, and 24% were Black. Upper gastrointestinal (21%), thoracic (18%), and genitourinary (18%) cancers were most common. A total of 28% had stage IV disease. MST scores were available for 4085 (79%); 1005 of 4085 (25%) were at malnutrition risk. Eleven percent (n = 557) had malnutrition coded by a physician or documented by an RDN; 4% (n = 223) of these were identified by both clinicians, 4% (n = 197) by RDNs only, and 3% (n = 137) by physicians only.
Conclusion: Malnutrition appears to be underdiagnosed by both RDNs and physicians. Underdiagnosis of malnutrition may have significant clinical, operational, and financial implications in cancer care.
{"title":"Screening, identification, and diagnosis of malnutrition in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Aynur Aktas, Declan Walsh, Danielle Boselli, Lenna Finch, Michelle L Wallander, Kunal C Kadakia","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11233","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malnutrition is common in hospitalized patients with cancer and adversely affects clinical outcomes. We evaluated the prevalence of malnutrition risk, dietitian-identified malnutrition (DIMN), and physician-diagnosed malnutrition (PDMN) at admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included adults diagnosed with a stage I-IV solid tumor malignancy and admitted to Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center from January 2016 to May 2019. Malnutrition risk was determined by a score ≥2 on the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) administered by a registered nurse during the intake process. Registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) assessments were reviewed for DIMN and grade (mild, moderate, or severe). PDMN included malnutrition International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes in the discharge summary. Univariate models were estimated; multivariate logistic regression models identified associations between clinicodemographic factors and malnutrition prevalence with stepwise selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5143 patients were included. Median age was 63 (range 18-102) years, 48% were female, 70% were White, and 24% were Black. Upper gastrointestinal (21%), thoracic (18%), and genitourinary (18%) cancers were most common. A total of 28% had stage IV disease. MST scores were available for 4085 (79%); 1005 of 4085 (25%) were at malnutrition risk. Eleven percent (n = 557) had malnutrition coded by a physician or documented by an RDN; 4% (n = 223) of these were identified by both clinicians, 4% (n = 197) by RDNs only, and 3% (n = 137) by physicians only.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Malnutrition appears to be underdiagnosed by both RDNs and physicians. Underdiagnosis of malnutrition may have significant clinical, operational, and financial implications in cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emma Bidgood, Joanna Huang, Elise Murphy, Ralley Prentice, Beth Hede, David Russell
Background: Peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) provides an alternative nutrition support strategy to centrally administered PN for specific patients requiring short-term PN. Previous studies have demonstrated limited use of PPN and variable complication rates. This study aimed to evaluate PPN complications and usage at this center.
Methods: This was a single-center retrospective observational study of all adult patients who received at least 1 day of PPN from June 2018 to December 2023. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including complications, indications for PN and reason for PPN, duration of therapy, reason for cessation of PPN, nutrition status, energy and protein provision, and central line insertion rates.
Results: 381 patients were included, the median age was 62 (interquartile range = 28-74) years, and 235 were men (61.7%). The most common indication for PN was ileus (n = 153, 40%) followed by gastrointestinal obstruction (n = 93, 24%). The median time receiving PPN was 3 (2-4) days. Patients received a median of 65% (55%-75%) of energy and 58% (50%-69%) of protein requirements with PPN. Malnutrition was diagnosed in 47.5% (n = 181) of this cohort. Total complication rates were 8.7% (n = 33), with cannula infiltration being the most common complication (6.6%, n = 25). 213 (56%) patients proceeded to central line insertion.
Conclusion: PPN proved to be a safe and effective therapy for short-term PN when managed by a nutrition support team. PPN has the potential to attenuate short-term nutrition deficits and prevent central venous access device insertion in selected patients, making it a valuable nutrition support therapy.
{"title":"Peripheral parenteral nutrition: A retrospective observational study to evaluate utility and complications.","authors":"Emma Bidgood, Joanna Huang, Elise Murphy, Ralley Prentice, Beth Hede, David Russell","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11237","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) provides an alternative nutrition support strategy to centrally administered PN for specific patients requiring short-term PN. Previous studies have demonstrated limited use of PPN and variable complication rates. This study aimed to evaluate PPN complications and usage at this center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective observational study of all adult patients who received at least 1 day of PPN from June 2018 to December 2023. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including complications, indications for PN and reason for PPN, duration of therapy, reason for cessation of PPN, nutrition status, energy and protein provision, and central line insertion rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>381 patients were included, the median age was 62 (interquartile range = 28-74) years, and 235 were men (61.7%). The most common indication for PN was ileus (n = 153, 40%) followed by gastrointestinal obstruction (n = 93, 24%). The median time receiving PPN was 3 (2-4) days. Patients received a median of 65% (55%-75%) of energy and 58% (50%-69%) of protein requirements with PPN. Malnutrition was diagnosed in 47.5% (n = 181) of this cohort. Total complication rates were 8.7% (n = 33), with cannula infiltration being the most common complication (6.6%, n = 25). 213 (56%) patients proceeded to central line insertion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPN proved to be a safe and effective therapy for short-term PN when managed by a nutrition support team. PPN has the potential to attenuate short-term nutrition deficits and prevent central venous access device insertion in selected patients, making it a valuable nutrition support therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Iasmin M Sousa, Jarson P da Costa Pereira, Rodrigo A B Rüegg, Guilherme C F Calado, Jadson G Xavier, Nithaela A Bennemann, Maria K do Nascimento, Ana P T Fayh
Background: A-mode ultrasound (US) is a potential method for directly measuring muscle thickness in patients with cancer, but its utility remains underexplored. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using A-mode US to assess muscle thickness, compare it with computed tomography (CT)-derived results, and assess its ability to diagnose sarcopenia.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with hospitalized patients with cancer. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was derived from CT scans. Biceps muscle thickness (BMT) and thigh muscle thickness (TMT) by A-mode US were assessed. BMT + TMT were also combined as an additional phenotype. Muscle strength was assessed using handgrip strength (HGS) test. Sarcopenia was defined as low muscle mass (CT- and US-derived) + low HGS.
Results: We included 120 patients (53.3% women, 45% older adults, and 85.8% with disease stages III-IV). TMT alone and the combined approach (BMT + TMT) were weak and positively correlated and significantly associated with muscle CSA, explaining 35% of CSA variability (R2 = 0.35). TMT individual and combined with BMT exhibited the highest accuracy for men (area under the curve >0.70). Sarcopenia diagnosed by BMT + TMT exhibited the highest frequency (34%) and moderate agreement with CT-derived sarcopenia (κ = 0.48).
Conclusion: A-mode US has the potential to be a feasible tool for diagnosing sarcopenia in clinical practice at the bedside for patients with cancer despite the need for further improvements in the tool's accuracy. Our main findings suggest that combining measurements of BMT and TMT may enhance its clinical significance in diagnosing sarcopenia.
背景:A型超声波(US)是直接测量癌症患者肌肉厚度的一种潜在方法,但其实用性仍未得到充分探索。我们旨在评估使用 A 型超声波评估肌肉厚度的可行性,将其与计算机断层扫描(CT)得出的结果进行比较,并评估其诊断肌肉疏松症的能力:方法:我们对住院的癌症患者进行了横断面分析。肌肉横截面积(CSA)由 CT 扫描得出。通过 A 型 US 评估肱二头肌厚度(BMT)和大腿肌肉厚度(TMT)。BMT+TMT还被合并为一个额外的表型。肌肉力量通过手握力量(HGS)测试进行评估。肌肉疏松症被定义为低肌肉质量(CT 和 US 导出)+ 低 HGS:我们共纳入了 120 名患者(53.3% 为女性,45% 为老年人,85.8% 为疾病 III-IV 期)。单独 TMT 和联合方法(BMT + TMT)与肌肉 CSA 呈弱正相关,且有显著相关性,可解释 35% 的 CSA 变异(R2 = 0.35)。对男性而言,单独的 TMT 和结合 BMT 的 TMT 具有最高的准确性(曲线下面积大于 0.70)。通过 BMT + TMT 诊断出的肌肉疏松症出现频率最高(34%),与 CT 导出的肌肉疏松症的吻合度中等(κ = 0.48):尽管该工具的准确性有待进一步提高,但在临床实践中,A 型 US 有可能成为癌症患者床旁诊断肌肉疏松症的可行工具。我们的主要研究结果表明,结合测量 BMT 和 TMT 可提高其在诊断肌肉疏松症方面的临床意义。
{"title":"Comparing A-mode ultrasound and computed tomography for assessing cancer-related sarcopenia: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Iasmin M Sousa, Jarson P da Costa Pereira, Rodrigo A B Rüegg, Guilherme C F Calado, Jadson G Xavier, Nithaela A Bennemann, Maria K do Nascimento, Ana P T Fayh","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11234","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11234","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A-mode ultrasound (US) is a potential method for directly measuring muscle thickness in patients with cancer, but its utility remains underexplored. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using A-mode US to assess muscle thickness, compare it with computed tomography (CT)-derived results, and assess its ability to diagnose sarcopenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with hospitalized patients with cancer. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was derived from CT scans. Biceps muscle thickness (BMT) and thigh muscle thickness (TMT) by A-mode US were assessed. BMT + TMT were also combined as an additional phenotype. Muscle strength was assessed using handgrip strength (HGS) test. Sarcopenia was defined as low muscle mass (CT- and US-derived) + low HGS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 120 patients (53.3% women, 45% older adults, and 85.8% with disease stages III-IV). TMT alone and the combined approach (BMT + TMT) were weak and positively correlated and significantly associated with muscle CSA, explaining 35% of CSA variability (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.35). TMT individual and combined with BMT exhibited the highest accuracy for men (area under the curve >0.70). Sarcopenia diagnosed by BMT + TMT exhibited the highest frequency (34%) and moderate agreement with CT-derived sarcopenia (κ = 0.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A-mode US has the potential to be a feasible tool for diagnosing sarcopenia in clinical practice at the bedside for patients with cancer despite the need for further improvements in the tool's accuracy. Our main findings suggest that combining measurements of BMT and TMT may enhance its clinical significance in diagnosing sarcopenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142522554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rebekah Sandhu, Treeva Elliott, Whitney Hussain, John Engbers, Rosemin Kassam
Home enteral nutrition (HEN) provides nutrition through a tube to individuals at home who cannot meet their needs by mouth. Systematic reviews have explored the experiences of HEN subpopulations, such as those with head and neck cancers. Given HEN services care for adults with various underlying conditions, a synthesis of the experiences of all adults using HEN and their caregivers is warranted. The purpose of this study is to summarize the experiences of HEN adult users and their caregivers regardless of underlying condition. Medline, PsychINFO, EmBase and CINAHL were systematically searched in January 2024. Studies with qualitative results and adult participants and focused on HEN were included. Studies with participants in nursing facilities, results using word counts, or not in English were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) qualitative checklist. Study design and participants' details were extracted. Themes were collated using the JBI meta-aggregative method. Forty studies (n = 732) were included. Three synthesized findings were identified: positive experiences (very low ConQual score), negative experiences (low ConQual score), and facilitators and coping mechanisms (moderate ConQual score). Although more negative than positive experiences were reported, users and caregivers who developed coping mechanisms or accessed supports viewed HEN as a worthwhile experience. Those with few supports or coping mechanisms did not. Based on this review, it is proposed that before starting HEN, users and caregivers should be made aware of the available supports and coping mechanisms. As negative experiences arise, healthcare providers should help users and caregivers access supports to improve their experiences.
家庭肠内营养(HEN)通过插管为无法通过口服满足需求的患者提供营养。有系统的综述探讨了家庭肠内营养亚人群(如头颈部癌症患者)的经历。鉴于 HEN 服务照顾的是患有各种基础疾病的成年人,因此有必要对所有使用 HEN 的成年人及其照顾者的经历进行总结。本研究的目的是总结使用 HEN 的成人及其护理人员的经验,而不考虑潜在的疾病。我们在 2024 年 1 月对 Medline、PsychINFO、EmBase 和 CINAHL 进行了系统检索。纳入的研究均为定性结果,且有成人参与,重点关注 HEN。排除了有护理机构参与者、使用字数统计结果或非英语的研究。研究质量采用约翰娜-布里格斯研究所(JBI)定性检查表进行评估。提取了研究设计和参与者的详细信息。采用 JBI 元归纳法对主题进行整理。共纳入 40 项研究(n = 732)。确定了三个综合结果:积极经验(ConQual 得分很低)、消极经验(ConQual 得分很低)以及促进因素和应对机制(ConQual 得分中等)。虽然报告的负面经历多于正面经历,但建立了应对机制或获得支持的使用者和护理者认为健康教育网是一次值得的经历。而那些缺乏支持或应对机制的人则不这么认为。根据本综述,建议在开始使用 HEN 之前,应让使用者和护理人员了解可用的支持和应对机制。当出现负面体验时,医疗服务提供者应帮助使用者和护理者获得支持,以改善他们的体验。
{"title":"Exploring the lived experiences of adults using home enteral nutrition and their caregivers: A meta-aggregation qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Rebekah Sandhu, Treeva Elliott, Whitney Hussain, John Engbers, Rosemin Kassam","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11225","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11225","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Home enteral nutrition (HEN) provides nutrition through a tube to individuals at home who cannot meet their needs by mouth. Systematic reviews have explored the experiences of HEN subpopulations, such as those with head and neck cancers. Given HEN services care for adults with various underlying conditions, a synthesis of the experiences of all adults using HEN and their caregivers is warranted. The purpose of this study is to summarize the experiences of HEN adult users and their caregivers regardless of underlying condition. Medline, PsychINFO, EmBase and CINAHL were systematically searched in January 2024. Studies with qualitative results and adult participants and focused on HEN were included. Studies with participants in nursing facilities, results using word counts, or not in English were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) qualitative checklist. Study design and participants' details were extracted. Themes were collated using the JBI meta-aggregative method. Forty studies (n = 732) were included. Three synthesized findings were identified: positive experiences (very low ConQual score), negative experiences (low ConQual score), and facilitators and coping mechanisms (moderate ConQual score). Although more negative than positive experiences were reported, users and caregivers who developed coping mechanisms or accessed supports viewed HEN as a worthwhile experience. Those with few supports or coping mechanisms did not. Based on this review, it is proposed that before starting HEN, users and caregivers should be made aware of the available supports and coping mechanisms. As negative experiences arise, healthcare providers should help users and caregivers access supports to improve their experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142504874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dong Jin Park, Seung Min Baik, Hanyoung Lee, Hoonsung Park, Jae-Myeong Lee
Background: This study aimed to understand the collective impact of trace elements, vitamins, cholesterol, and prealbumin on patient outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU) using an advanced artificial intelligence (AI) model for mortality prediction.
Methods: Data from ICU patients (December 2016 to December 2021), including serum levels of trace elements, vitamins, cholesterol, and prealbumin, were retrospectively analyzed using AI models. Models employed included category boosting (CatBoost), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). Performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The performance was evaluated using 10-fold crossvalidation. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method provided interpretability.
Results: CatBoost emerged as the top-performing individual AI model with an AUROC of 0.756, closely followed by LGBM, MLP, and XGBoost. Furthermore, the ensemble model combining these four models achieved the highest AUROC of 0.776 and more balanced metrics, outperforming all models. SHAP analysis indicated significant influences of prealbumin, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and age on predictions. Notably, the ratios of selenium to age and low-density lipoprotein to total cholesterol also had a notable impact on the models' output.
Conclusion: The study underscores the critical role of nutrition-related parameters in ICU patient outcomes. Advanced AI models, particularly in an ensemble approach, demonstrated improved predictive accuracy. SHAP analysis offered insights into specific factors influencing patient survival, highlighting the need for broader consideration of these biomarkers in critical care management.
{"title":"Impact of nutrition-related laboratory tests on mortality of patients who are critically ill using artificial intelligence: A focus on trace elements, vitamins, and cholesterol.","authors":"Dong Jin Park, Seung Min Baik, Hanyoung Lee, Hoonsung Park, Jae-Myeong Lee","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11238","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to understand the collective impact of trace elements, vitamins, cholesterol, and prealbumin on patient outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU) using an advanced artificial intelligence (AI) model for mortality prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from ICU patients (December 2016 to December 2021), including serum levels of trace elements, vitamins, cholesterol, and prealbumin, were retrospectively analyzed using AI models. Models employed included category boosting (CatBoost), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). Performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The performance was evaluated using 10-fold crossvalidation. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method provided interpretability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CatBoost emerged as the top-performing individual AI model with an AUROC of 0.756, closely followed by LGBM, MLP, and XGBoost. Furthermore, the ensemble model combining these four models achieved the highest AUROC of 0.776 and more balanced metrics, outperforming all models. SHAP analysis indicated significant influences of prealbumin, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and age on predictions. Notably, the ratios of selenium to age and low-density lipoprotein to total cholesterol also had a notable impact on the models' output.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study underscores the critical role of nutrition-related parameters in ICU patient outcomes. Advanced AI models, particularly in an ensemble approach, demonstrated improved predictive accuracy. SHAP analysis offered insights into specific factors influencing patient survival, highlighting the need for broader consideration of these biomarkers in critical care management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142504875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Providing optimal nutrition support in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a challenging and dynamic process. Energy, protein, fluid, electrolyte, and micronutrient requirements all can be altered in patients with acute, chronic, and acute-on-chronic kidney disease. Given that renal dysfunction occurs in up to one-half of ICU patients, it is imperative that nutrition support providers understand how renal dysfunction, its metabolic consequences, and its treatments, including renal replacement therapy (RRT), affect patients' nutrition needs. Data on nutrient requirements in critically ill patients with renal dysfunction are sparse. This article provides an overview of renal dysfunction in the ICU and identifies and addresses the unique nutrition challenges present among these patients, including those receiving RRT, as supported by the available literature and guidelines.
{"title":"Nutrition support for patients with renal dysfunction in the intensive care unit: A narrative review.","authors":"Joanna L Otis, Nicholas M Parker, Rebecca A Busch","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11231","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11231","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Providing optimal nutrition support in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a challenging and dynamic process. Energy, protein, fluid, electrolyte, and micronutrient requirements all can be altered in patients with acute, chronic, and acute-on-chronic kidney disease. Given that renal dysfunction occurs in up to one-half of ICU patients, it is imperative that nutrition support providers understand how renal dysfunction, its metabolic consequences, and its treatments, including renal replacement therapy (RRT), affect patients' nutrition needs. Data on nutrient requirements in critically ill patients with renal dysfunction are sparse. This article provides an overview of renal dysfunction in the ICU and identifies and addresses the unique nutrition challenges present among these patients, including those receiving RRT, as supported by the available literature and guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142504877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alev Yıldız Ilıman, Merve Yurttaş, Dursun Fırat Ergül, Salim Tutkaoğlu
Background: Despite the high risk of bacterial contamination, no studies have been found that evaluate the optimal hanging time of open-system enteral sets under room temperature and intensive care conditions. This study aims to determine the differences in microbial loads of solutions taken from open-system enteral feeding sets hanging for 24 h under room temperature and intensive care conditions.
Methods: This study is a descriptive type of research. The study sample consisted of a total of 40 samples, with 20 samples under room temperature (25.2-23.3°C) and 20 samples under intensive care conditions (21.1-24.2°C). A simple random sampling method was used for sample selection. The assessment of microbial quality was based on the US Food and Drug Administration online Bacteriological Analytical Manual.
Results: In this study, it was determined that 5% of the samples taken from intensive care and 15% of the samples taken at room temperature exceeded the accepted limit for aerobic mesophilic bacteria count. The count of catalase and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp was 5% in intensive care samples and 40% in room temperature samples. The total coliform count was not detected in intensive care samples but was 35% in room temperature samples. Escherichia coli was not detected in either group.
Conclusion: Differences in microbial loads were observed when commercial enteral solutions were administered using open-system enteral feeding sets under room and intensive care conditions for 24 h. Therefore, large-scale studies are needed to determine the safe use of open-system enteral feeding sets under room temperature conditions.
{"title":"Comparison of microbiological loads of enteral products at two different ambient room temperatures.","authors":"Alev Yıldız Ilıman, Merve Yurttaş, Dursun Fırat Ergül, Salim Tutkaoğlu","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11230","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the high risk of bacterial contamination, no studies have been found that evaluate the optimal hanging time of open-system enteral sets under room temperature and intensive care conditions. This study aims to determine the differences in microbial loads of solutions taken from open-system enteral feeding sets hanging for 24 h under room temperature and intensive care conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a descriptive type of research. The study sample consisted of a total of 40 samples, with 20 samples under room temperature (25.2-23.3°C) and 20 samples under intensive care conditions (21.1-24.2°C). A simple random sampling method was used for sample selection. The assessment of microbial quality was based on the US Food and Drug Administration online Bacteriological Analytical Manual.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, it was determined that 5% of the samples taken from intensive care and 15% of the samples taken at room temperature exceeded the accepted limit for aerobic mesophilic bacteria count. The count of catalase and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp was 5% in intensive care samples and 40% in room temperature samples. The total coliform count was not detected in intensive care samples but was 35% in room temperature samples. Escherichia coli was not detected in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in microbial loads were observed when commercial enteral solutions were administered using open-system enteral feeding sets under room and intensive care conditions for 24 h. Therefore, large-scale studies are needed to determine the safe use of open-system enteral feeding sets under room temperature conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142504873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mostafa Shahraki Jazinaki, Abdolreza Norouzy, Seyyed Mostafa Arabi, Mohammad Reza Shadmand Foumani Moghadam, Ali Jafarzadeh Esfahani, Mohammad Safarian
Background: The two-step Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) approach was recently introduced to malnutrition diagnosis in a hospital setting. This study compares the diagnostic performance of this approach that uses the Nutritional Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002) as a screening tool and the direct application of GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria in hospitalized patients.
Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 290 adult and older adult patients who were hospitalized. A trained nutritionist implemented the two-step GLIM approach, including NRS-2002 (in the first step) and GLIM criteria (in the second step) for each patient. Then, the accuracy, kappa index, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC), sensitivity, and specificity of malnutrition diagnostic performance of the two-step GLIM approach and NRS-2002 were evaluated compared to the direct use of GLIM criteria.
Results: The NRS-2002 identified 145 (50.0%) patients as at risk of malnutrition. The prevalence of malnutrition using the two-step GLIM approach and GLIM malnutrition diagnosis criteria were 120 (41.4%) and 141 (48.6%), respectively. The kappa index showed substantial and almost perfect agreement for NRS-2002 (κ = 68%) and the two-step GLIM approach (κ = 85%) with GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria, respectively. Furthermore, the AUC ROC (0.926; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.96) and accuracy (92.8%) of the two-step GLIM approach compared to the GLIM criteria indicated an acepptable ability to distinguish between malnourished and well-nourished patients.
Conclusion: The two-step GLIM approach using NRS-2002 as a screening tool (in step one) had acceptable malnutrition diagnostic performance compared to the direct application of GLIM criteria in hospitalized patients.
{"title":"Two-step GLIM approach using NRS-2002 screening tool vs direct GLIM criteria application in hospital malnutrition diagnosis: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Mostafa Shahraki Jazinaki, Abdolreza Norouzy, Seyyed Mostafa Arabi, Mohammad Reza Shadmand Foumani Moghadam, Ali Jafarzadeh Esfahani, Mohammad Safarian","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11229","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The two-step Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) approach was recently introduced to malnutrition diagnosis in a hospital setting. This study compares the diagnostic performance of this approach that uses the Nutritional Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002) as a screening tool and the direct application of GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria in hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved 290 adult and older adult patients who were hospitalized. A trained nutritionist implemented the two-step GLIM approach, including NRS-2002 (in the first step) and GLIM criteria (in the second step) for each patient. Then, the accuracy, kappa index, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC), sensitivity, and specificity of malnutrition diagnostic performance of the two-step GLIM approach and NRS-2002 were evaluated compared to the direct use of GLIM criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NRS-2002 identified 145 (50.0%) patients as at risk of malnutrition. The prevalence of malnutrition using the two-step GLIM approach and GLIM malnutrition diagnosis criteria were 120 (41.4%) and 141 (48.6%), respectively. The kappa index showed substantial and almost perfect agreement for NRS-2002 (κ = 68%) and the two-step GLIM approach (κ = 85%) with GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria, respectively. Furthermore, the AUC ROC (0.926; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.96) and accuracy (92.8%) of the two-step GLIM approach compared to the GLIM criteria indicated an acepptable ability to distinguish between malnourished and well-nourished patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The two-step GLIM approach using NRS-2002 as a screening tool (in step one) had acceptable malnutrition diagnostic performance compared to the direct application of GLIM criteria in hospitalized patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142504887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}