Do you want to be a urologist? Gender differences for medical student perception of urology.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.5489/cuaj.8486
David Chung, Suvig Dua, Michael Morra, Karim Sidhom, Kunal Jain, Gregory Hosier
{"title":"Do you want to be a urologist? Gender differences for medical student perception of urology.","authors":"David Chung, Suvig Dua, Michael Morra, Karim Sidhom, Kunal Jain, Gregory Hosier","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gender inequality has been prevalent in the history of medicine, specifically within surgical specialties. Though there have been advances, urology has remained overwhelmingly male-dominant, with slow growth in female recruitment. This survey study evaluated whether gender-related differences in the perception of urology are present among future applicants that could account for gender disparity seen in recruitment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymized, online survey was distributed to medical students enrolled at the Max Rady College of Medicine during the 2022-2023 semester. Attracting and deterring survey statements were created using current literature to guide topics of interest. Participants rated each statement using a five-point Likert scale with optional supplemental qualitative responses. Likert ratings were compared using a Mann-U-Whitney calculation between self-identifying male and female participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 90 responses over six weeks, achieving a response rate of 23%. Female students, compared to their male peers, were deterred by factors such as working in a male-dominated specialty (p<0.001) and working with primarily male patients (p<0.001). There were no significant gender-related differences for statements pertaining to interest in surgery, work-life balance, or exposure to urology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this survey study, the biggest deterrents reported by female medical students to entering urology were working in a male-dominated profession and seeing primarily male patients. There were no significant gender-related differences for questions relating to interest in surgery, work-life balance, and exposure to urology.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":"131-134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11034965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8486","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gender inequality has been prevalent in the history of medicine, specifically within surgical specialties. Though there have been advances, urology has remained overwhelmingly male-dominant, with slow growth in female recruitment. This survey study evaluated whether gender-related differences in the perception of urology are present among future applicants that could account for gender disparity seen in recruitment.

Methods: An anonymized, online survey was distributed to medical students enrolled at the Max Rady College of Medicine during the 2022-2023 semester. Attracting and deterring survey statements were created using current literature to guide topics of interest. Participants rated each statement using a five-point Likert scale with optional supplemental qualitative responses. Likert ratings were compared using a Mann-U-Whitney calculation between self-identifying male and female participants.

Results: We received 90 responses over six weeks, achieving a response rate of 23%. Female students, compared to their male peers, were deterred by factors such as working in a male-dominated specialty (p<0.001) and working with primarily male patients (p<0.001). There were no significant gender-related differences for statements pertaining to interest in surgery, work-life balance, or exposure to urology.

Conclusions: In this survey study, the biggest deterrents reported by female medical students to entering urology were working in a male-dominated profession and seeing primarily male patients. There were no significant gender-related differences for questions relating to interest in surgery, work-life balance, and exposure to urology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你想成为一名泌尿科医生吗?医科学生对泌尿科认知的性别差异:前瞻性调查研究。
导言:在医学史上,尤其是在外科专科中,性别不平等现象十分普遍。尽管泌尿外科有了进步,但仍以男性为主,女性招聘人数增长缓慢。这项调查研究评估了未来申请者对泌尿外科的认知是否存在与性别相关的差异,这种差异能否解释招聘中出现的性别差异:方法:我们向 2022-2023 学年就读于马克斯-拉迪医学院的医学生发放了匿名在线调查问卷。利用当前的文献资料创建了吸引和阻止调查语句,以指导感兴趣的话题。参与者使用五点李克特量表对每个陈述进行评分,并可选择补充定性回答。通过曼-尤-惠特尼(Mann-UWhitney)计算法对自我认同的男性和女性参与者的李克特评分进行了比较:我们在六周内收到了 90 份回复,回复率为 23%。与男生相比,女生因在男性占主导地位的专业工作等因素而望而却步(pConclusions:在这项调查研究中,女医科学生表示进入泌尿科的最大障碍是在男性占主导地位的专业工作,以及主要为男性患者看病。在有关对外科手术的兴趣、工作与生活的平衡以及接触泌尿外科的问题上,性别差异并不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
期刊最新文献
Case - Emergent management of severe penile and scrotal edema due to prolonged metallic ring entrapment. Case - Ureteric entrapment following oblique lateral interbody fusion. Increased oscillation rate may improve morcellation efficiency in HoLEP. Population-based dietary risks for kidney stones: Implications for dietary counseling and prevention. Predicting cancer detection rates from multiparametric prostate MRI: Beyond the PI-RADS classification system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1