Gene expression, micro-CT and histomorphometrical analysis of sinus floor augmentation with biphasic calcium phosphate and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: A randomized controlled clinical trial

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1111/cid.13303
Sirida Arunjaroensuk DDS, MSc, Katanchalee Nampuksa MSc, Naruporn Monmaturapoj PhD, Pasutha Thunyakitpisal DDS, PhD, Thantrira Porntaveetus DDS, PhD, Nikos Mattheos DDS, PhD, Atiphan Pimkhaokham DDS, PhD
{"title":"Gene expression, micro-CT and histomorphometrical analysis of sinus floor augmentation with biphasic calcium phosphate and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: A randomized controlled clinical trial","authors":"Sirida Arunjaroensuk DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Katanchalee Nampuksa MSc,&nbsp;Naruporn Monmaturapoj PhD,&nbsp;Pasutha Thunyakitpisal DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Thantrira Porntaveetus DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Nikos Mattheos DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Atiphan Pimkhaokham DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1111/cid.13303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare the gene expression, micro-CT, histomorphometrical analysis between biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) of 70/30 ratio and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in sinus augmentation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-four patients in need for sinus floor augmentation through lateral approach were randomized into BCP 70/30 ratio or DBBM. After at least 6 months of healing, a total of 24 bone specimens were collected from the entire height of the augmented bone at the area of implant placement and underwent micro-CT, histomorphometric and gene expression analysis. The 12 bone specimens of BCP 70/30 ratio were equally allocated to micro-CT and histologic analysis (test group, <i>n</i> = 6) and gene expression analysis (test group, <i>n</i> = 6). Similarly, the 12 bone specimens of DBBM were also allocated to micro-CT and histologic analysis (control group, <i>n</i> = 6) and gene expression analysis (control group, <i>n</i> = 6). The newly formed bone, remaining graft materials and relative change in gene expression of four target genes were assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The micro-CT results showed no statistically significant difference in the ratio of bone volume to total volume (BV/TV ratio) for the two groups (BCP 41.51% vs. DBBM 40.97%) and the same was true for residual graft material to total volume (GV/TV ratio, BCP 9.97% vs. DBBM 14.41%). Similarly, no significant difference was shown in the histological analysis in terms of bone formation, (BCP 31.43% vs. DBBM was 30.09%) and residual graft area (DBBM 40.76% vs. BCP 45.06%). With regards to gene expression, the level of ALP was lower in both groups of bone grafted specimens compared with the native bone. On the contrary, the level of OSX, IL-1B and TRAP was higher in augmented bone of both groups compared with the native bone. However, the relative difference in all gene expressions between BCP and DBBM group was not significant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The BCP, HA/β-TCP ratio of 70/30 presented similar histological and micro-CT outcomes in terms of new bone formation and residual graft particles with DBBM. The gene expression analysis revealed different gene expression patterns between augmented and native bone, but showed no significant difference between the two biomaterials.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare the gene expression, micro-CT, histomorphometrical analysis between biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) of 70/30 ratio and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in sinus augmentation.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-four patients in need for sinus floor augmentation through lateral approach were randomized into BCP 70/30 ratio or DBBM. After at least 6 months of healing, a total of 24 bone specimens were collected from the entire height of the augmented bone at the area of implant placement and underwent micro-CT, histomorphometric and gene expression analysis. The 12 bone specimens of BCP 70/30 ratio were equally allocated to micro-CT and histologic analysis (test group, n = 6) and gene expression analysis (test group, n = 6). Similarly, the 12 bone specimens of DBBM were also allocated to micro-CT and histologic analysis (control group, n = 6) and gene expression analysis (control group, n = 6). The newly formed bone, remaining graft materials and relative change in gene expression of four target genes were assessed.

Results

The micro-CT results showed no statistically significant difference in the ratio of bone volume to total volume (BV/TV ratio) for the two groups (BCP 41.51% vs. DBBM 40.97%) and the same was true for residual graft material to total volume (GV/TV ratio, BCP 9.97% vs. DBBM 14.41%). Similarly, no significant difference was shown in the histological analysis in terms of bone formation, (BCP 31.43% vs. DBBM was 30.09%) and residual graft area (DBBM 40.76% vs. BCP 45.06%). With regards to gene expression, the level of ALP was lower in both groups of bone grafted specimens compared with the native bone. On the contrary, the level of OSX, IL-1B and TRAP was higher in augmented bone of both groups compared with the native bone. However, the relative difference in all gene expressions between BCP and DBBM group was not significant.

Conclusions

The BCP, HA/β-TCP ratio of 70/30 presented similar histological and micro-CT outcomes in terms of new bone formation and residual graft particles with DBBM. The gene expression analysis revealed different gene expression patterns between augmented and native bone, but showed no significant difference between the two biomaterials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用双相磷酸钙和去蛋白牛骨矿进行窦底增量的基因表达、显微 CT 和组织形态计量学分析:随机对照临床试验。
目的:本随机对照临床试验旨在比较 70/30 比值的双相磷酸钙(BCP)和去蛋白牛骨矿物质(DBBM)在上颌窦增量术中的基因表达、显微 CT 和组织形态分析:24 名需要通过侧方入路进行上颌窦底增量术的患者被随机分为 70/30 比值的 BCP 和 DBBM。在愈合至少 6 个月后,从植入种植体区域的整个增量骨高度采集 24 块骨标本,并进行显微 CT、组织形态计量学和基因表达分析。BCP 70/30 比例的 12 块骨标本被平均分配进行显微 CT 和组织学分析(试验组,n = 6)以及基因表达分析(试验组,n = 6)。同样,12 块 DBBM 骨标本也被分配进行显微 CT 和组织学分析(对照组,n = 6)以及基因表达分析(对照组,n = 6)。对新形成的骨、剩余的移植材料和四个目标基因表达的相对变化进行评估:显微计算机断层扫描结果显示,两组骨量与总体积之比(BV/TV 比)无统计学差异(BCP 41.51% vs. DBBM 40.97%),残余移植材料与总体积之比(GV/TV 比,BCP 9.97% vs. DBBM 14.41%)也是如此。同样,在骨形成(BCP 31.43% vs. DBBM 30.09%)和残余移植物面积(DBBM 40.76% vs. BCP 45.06%)方面,组织学分析也没有显示出明显的差异。在基因表达方面,两组骨移植标本的 ALP 水平均低于原生骨。相反,OSX、IL-1B 和 TRAP 的水平在两组增量骨中都高于原生骨。然而,BCP组和DBBM组之间所有基因表达的相对差异均不显著:结论:BCP、HA/β-TCP 的比例为 70/30 与 DBBM 相比,在新骨形成和残留移植物颗粒方面具有相似的组织学和显微 CT 结果。基因表达分析显示,增量骨和原生骨的基因表达模式不同,但两种生物材料之间无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Featured Cover A transcrestal sinus floor elevation strategy based on a haptic robot system: An in vitro study Influence of repeated implant‐abutment manipulation on the prevalence of peri‐implant diseases in complete arch restorations. A retrospective analysis Biocompatibility and dimensional stability through the use of 3D‐printed scaffolds made by polycaprolactone and bioglass‐7: An in vitro and in vivo study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1