Families Benefit After Utilization of a Clinic-Based Food Pantry Irrespective of Food Insecurity Experiences in a Pediatric Obesity Treatment Program.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1177/08901171241229828
Lilianna Suarez, Sarah Armstrong, Rachel Fleming, Janna Howard, Rushina Cholera
{"title":"Families Benefit After Utilization of a Clinic-Based Food Pantry Irrespective of Food Insecurity Experiences in a Pediatric Obesity Treatment Program.","authors":"Lilianna Suarez, Sarah Armstrong, Rachel Fleming, Janna Howard, Rushina Cholera","doi":"10.1177/08901171241229828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the congruence between food insecurity screening outcome and clinic-based food pantry utilization and to examine caregiver reported comfort, motivation, and benefits of utilization.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed-methods study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic pediatric obesity treatment clinic.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Convenience sample of caregivers.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Clinic-based food pantry offered irrespective of food insecurity screening outcome.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Food insecurity screening (Hunger Vital Sign) and severity, self-rated caregiver health, willingness to disclose food insecurity and receive food, and food-related stress.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Chi-square and t-tests were utilized to examine associations and descriptive analysis explored benefits. Rapid qualitative analysis was utilized to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers of 120 children were included (child mean age 11.8; 56.7% female, 67.6% Non-Hispanic Black), with 47 of 59 eligible completing follow-up surveys and 14 completing in-depth interviews. Approximately half (N = 30/59, 50.8%) of families utilizing the food pantry screened negative for food insecurity. Families utilizing the food pantry were more likely to report severe food insecurity (N = 23/59; 38.9%) compared to those declining (N = 3/61; 4.9%, <i>P</i> < .001). Caregivers accepting food were able to meet a child health goal (N = 30/47, 63.8%). Caregivers reported feeling comfortable receiving food (N = 13/14) and felt utilizing the food pantry led to consumption of healthier foods (N = 7/14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Families who screened both positive and negative for food insecurity utilized and benefited from a clinic-based food pantry. Clinics should consider strategies offering food resources to all families irrespective of screening outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"661-671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241229828","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the congruence between food insecurity screening outcome and clinic-based food pantry utilization and to examine caregiver reported comfort, motivation, and benefits of utilization.

Design: Mixed-methods study.

Setting: Academic pediatric obesity treatment clinic.

Subjects: Convenience sample of caregivers.

Intervention: Clinic-based food pantry offered irrespective of food insecurity screening outcome.

Measures: Food insecurity screening (Hunger Vital Sign) and severity, self-rated caregiver health, willingness to disclose food insecurity and receive food, and food-related stress.

Analysis: Chi-square and t-tests were utilized to examine associations and descriptive analysis explored benefits. Rapid qualitative analysis was utilized to identify themes.

Results: Caregivers of 120 children were included (child mean age 11.8; 56.7% female, 67.6% Non-Hispanic Black), with 47 of 59 eligible completing follow-up surveys and 14 completing in-depth interviews. Approximately half (N = 30/59, 50.8%) of families utilizing the food pantry screened negative for food insecurity. Families utilizing the food pantry were more likely to report severe food insecurity (N = 23/59; 38.9%) compared to those declining (N = 3/61; 4.9%, P < .001). Caregivers accepting food were able to meet a child health goal (N = 30/47, 63.8%). Caregivers reported feeling comfortable receiving food (N = 13/14) and felt utilizing the food pantry led to consumption of healthier foods (N = 7/14).

Conclusions: Families who screened both positive and negative for food insecurity utilized and benefited from a clinic-based food pantry. Clinics should consider strategies offering food resources to all families irrespective of screening outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿科肥胖症治疗项目中,家庭在使用诊所食品储藏室后获益与否与食物不安全经历无关。
目的:评估食物不安全筛查结果与诊所食物储藏室利用率之间的一致性,并研究护理人员报告的利用食物储藏室的舒适度、动机和益处:设计:混合方法研究:地点:学术性儿科肥胖症治疗诊所:干预:干预措施:无论食物不安全筛查结果如何,均提供诊所食物储藏室:食物不安全筛查(饥饿生命体征)和严重程度、照顾者自评健康状况、披露食物不安全状况和接受食物的意愿以及与食物有关的压力:分析:利用卡方检验和 t 检验来检验相关性,并通过描述性分析来探讨受益情况。利用快速定性分析确定主题:共纳入了 120 名儿童的照顾者(儿童平均年龄为 11.8 岁;56.7% 为女性,67.6% 为非西班牙裔黑人),符合条件的 59 人中有 47 人完成了跟踪调查,14 人完成了深入访谈。在使用食物储藏室的家庭中,约有一半(N = 30/59,50.8%)的食物不安全筛查结果为阴性。与拒绝使用食物储藏室的家庭(N = 3/61;4.9%,P < .001)相比,使用食物储藏室的家庭更有可能报告存在严重的食物不安全问题(N = 23/59;38.9%)。接受食物的照顾者能够达到儿童健康目标(N = 30/47,63.8%)。照顾者表示接受食物时感觉很舒服(13/14),并认为利用食物储藏室能让他们吃得更健康(7/14):结论:筛查出食物无保障的阳性和阴性家庭都利用了诊所的食物储藏室,并从中受益。无论筛查结果如何,诊所都应考虑向所有家庭提供食物资源的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
What has Changed in Federal Health Policy and What Priorities Have Remained Intact? Advancing Lifestyle as Medicine Through Occupational Health. Hypertension Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control Among Community-Dwelling Adults in Low-Resource Neighborhoods of Chicago, Illinois. Assessing Two Decades of Progress in Health Behavior Research: A Comparative Analysis of Published Research in 2003 and 2023. A Brief Motivational Enhancement Intervention to Promote COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination Among People Who Inject Drugs: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Connect2Test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1