Families Benefit After Utilization of a Clinic-Based Food Pantry Irrespective of Food Insecurity Experiences in a Pediatric Obesity Treatment Program.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1177/08901171241229828
Lilianna Suarez, Sarah Armstrong, Rachel Fleming, Janna Howard, Rushina Cholera
{"title":"Families Benefit After Utilization of a Clinic-Based Food Pantry Irrespective of Food Insecurity Experiences in a Pediatric Obesity Treatment Program.","authors":"Lilianna Suarez, Sarah Armstrong, Rachel Fleming, Janna Howard, Rushina Cholera","doi":"10.1177/08901171241229828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the congruence between food insecurity screening outcome and clinic-based food pantry utilization and to examine caregiver reported comfort, motivation, and benefits of utilization.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed-methods study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic pediatric obesity treatment clinic.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Convenience sample of caregivers.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Clinic-based food pantry offered irrespective of food insecurity screening outcome.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Food insecurity screening (Hunger Vital Sign) and severity, self-rated caregiver health, willingness to disclose food insecurity and receive food, and food-related stress.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Chi-square and t-tests were utilized to examine associations and descriptive analysis explored benefits. Rapid qualitative analysis was utilized to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers of 120 children were included (child mean age 11.8; 56.7% female, 67.6% Non-Hispanic Black), with 47 of 59 eligible completing follow-up surveys and 14 completing in-depth interviews. Approximately half (N = 30/59, 50.8%) of families utilizing the food pantry screened negative for food insecurity. Families utilizing the food pantry were more likely to report severe food insecurity (N = 23/59; 38.9%) compared to those declining (N = 3/61; 4.9%, <i>P</i> < .001). Caregivers accepting food were able to meet a child health goal (N = 30/47, 63.8%). Caregivers reported feeling comfortable receiving food (N = 13/14) and felt utilizing the food pantry led to consumption of healthier foods (N = 7/14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Families who screened both positive and negative for food insecurity utilized and benefited from a clinic-based food pantry. Clinics should consider strategies offering food resources to all families irrespective of screening outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241229828","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the congruence between food insecurity screening outcome and clinic-based food pantry utilization and to examine caregiver reported comfort, motivation, and benefits of utilization.

Design: Mixed-methods study.

Setting: Academic pediatric obesity treatment clinic.

Subjects: Convenience sample of caregivers.

Intervention: Clinic-based food pantry offered irrespective of food insecurity screening outcome.

Measures: Food insecurity screening (Hunger Vital Sign) and severity, self-rated caregiver health, willingness to disclose food insecurity and receive food, and food-related stress.

Analysis: Chi-square and t-tests were utilized to examine associations and descriptive analysis explored benefits. Rapid qualitative analysis was utilized to identify themes.

Results: Caregivers of 120 children were included (child mean age 11.8; 56.7% female, 67.6% Non-Hispanic Black), with 47 of 59 eligible completing follow-up surveys and 14 completing in-depth interviews. Approximately half (N = 30/59, 50.8%) of families utilizing the food pantry screened negative for food insecurity. Families utilizing the food pantry were more likely to report severe food insecurity (N = 23/59; 38.9%) compared to those declining (N = 3/61; 4.9%, P < .001). Caregivers accepting food were able to meet a child health goal (N = 30/47, 63.8%). Caregivers reported feeling comfortable receiving food (N = 13/14) and felt utilizing the food pantry led to consumption of healthier foods (N = 7/14).

Conclusions: Families who screened both positive and negative for food insecurity utilized and benefited from a clinic-based food pantry. Clinics should consider strategies offering food resources to all families irrespective of screening outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿科肥胖症治疗项目中,家庭在使用诊所食品储藏室后获益与否与食物不安全经历无关。
目的:评估食物不安全筛查结果与诊所食物储藏室利用率之间的一致性,并研究护理人员报告的利用食物储藏室的舒适度、动机和益处:设计:混合方法研究:地点:学术性儿科肥胖症治疗诊所:干预:干预措施:无论食物不安全筛查结果如何,均提供诊所食物储藏室:食物不安全筛查(饥饿生命体征)和严重程度、照顾者自评健康状况、披露食物不安全状况和接受食物的意愿以及与食物有关的压力:分析:利用卡方检验和 t 检验来检验相关性,并通过描述性分析来探讨受益情况。利用快速定性分析确定主题:共纳入了 120 名儿童的照顾者(儿童平均年龄为 11.8 岁;56.7% 为女性,67.6% 为非西班牙裔黑人),符合条件的 59 人中有 47 人完成了跟踪调查,14 人完成了深入访谈。在使用食物储藏室的家庭中,约有一半(N = 30/59,50.8%)的食物不安全筛查结果为阴性。与拒绝使用食物储藏室的家庭(N = 3/61;4.9%,P < .001)相比,使用食物储藏室的家庭更有可能报告存在严重的食物不安全问题(N = 23/59;38.9%)。接受食物的照顾者能够达到儿童健康目标(N = 30/47,63.8%)。照顾者表示接受食物时感觉很舒服(13/14),并认为利用食物储藏室能让他们吃得更健康(7/14):结论:筛查出食物无保障的阳性和阴性家庭都利用了诊所的食物储藏室,并从中受益。无论筛查结果如何,诊所都应考虑向所有家庭提供食物资源的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
A Health System-Community Partnership to Advance Health Equity. Collaborating for Health Equity: A Perspective of an Federally Qualified Health Center's Community Partnerships and Initiatives. In Briefs. The Role of Health Systems in Cross-Sector Collaboration in Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Promoting Health and Well-Being. The Role of Health Systems in Cross-Sector Collaboration in Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Promoting Health and Well-Being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1