Sevda Adar, Duygu Keskin, Ümit Dündar, Hasan Toktaş, Hilal Yeşil, Selma Eroğlu, Nuran Eyvaz, Ersin Beştaş, Ali Demircan
{"title":"Effect of Robotic Rehabilitation on Hand Functions and Quality of Life in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Sevda Adar, Duygu Keskin, Ümit Dündar, Hasan Toktaş, Hilal Yeşil, Selma Eroğlu, Nuran Eyvaz, Ersin Beştaş, Ali Demircan","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the impact of robotic hand rehabilitation on hand function and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Children with cerebral palsy aged 7-16 yrs were divided into robotic rehabilitation ( n = 9) or conventional rehabilitation ( n = 10) groups for hand rehabilitation of 30 sessions. The primary outcomes were the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity and Box and Block Test. The secondary outcomes were the Manual Ability Classification System, modified Ashworth scale, hand grasp and finger strengths, ABILHAND-Kids, Functional Independence Measure for Children, and PedsQL Quality of Life Inventory-CP Module.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the robotic rehabilitation group, a significant improvement was found in all parameters after treatment ( P < 0.05), except for the Functional Independence Measure ( P = 0.081). In the conventional rehabilitation group, there was significant improvement after treatment in the modified Ashworth scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity, hand grasp strength, Box and Block Test, ABILHAND-Kids, and PedsQL Quality of Life Inventory-CP Module ( P < 0.05). Before and after treatment, all outcome parameters in the groups were similar ( P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic hand rehabilitation is effective in improving motor function, manual dexterity, spasticity, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. However, it was not demonstrated to be superior to conventional rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"716-723"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine the impact of robotic hand rehabilitation on hand function and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy.
Design: Children with cerebral palsy aged 7-16 yrs were divided into robotic rehabilitation ( n = 9) or conventional rehabilitation ( n = 10) groups for hand rehabilitation of 30 sessions. The primary outcomes were the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity and Box and Block Test. The secondary outcomes were the Manual Ability Classification System, modified Ashworth scale, hand grasp and finger strengths, ABILHAND-Kids, Functional Independence Measure for Children, and PedsQL Quality of Life Inventory-CP Module.
Results: In the robotic rehabilitation group, a significant improvement was found in all parameters after treatment ( P < 0.05), except for the Functional Independence Measure ( P = 0.081). In the conventional rehabilitation group, there was significant improvement after treatment in the modified Ashworth scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity, hand grasp strength, Box and Block Test, ABILHAND-Kids, and PedsQL Quality of Life Inventory-CP Module ( P < 0.05). Before and after treatment, all outcome parameters in the groups were similar ( P > 0.05).
Conclusions: Robotic hand rehabilitation is effective in improving motor function, manual dexterity, spasticity, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. However, it was not demonstrated to be superior to conventional rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).