Assessment of patients' knowledge and preferences for the use of orthodontic aligners.

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1177/14653125241229456
Joice Paim, Luiz Felipe Duarte de Souza, Tiago Fialho, Daniela Bezerra de Menezes Borba, Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas, Paula Cotrin, Vivian Binder Neis, Eduardo Ohira
{"title":"Assessment of patients' knowledge and preferences for the use of orthodontic aligners.","authors":"Joice Paim, Luiz Felipe Duarte de Souza, Tiago Fialho, Daniela Bezerra de Menezes Borba, Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas, Paula Cotrin, Vivian Binder Neis, Eduardo Ohira","doi":"10.1177/14653125241229456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the knowledge and preference of patients treated at a Dental School in Jaraguá do Sul, Brazil, about using aligners and the reasons for choosing this device as a treatment option.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 82 participants aged 18-45 years recruited at a screening clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was completed in person using a tablet with digital forms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost half of the participants (49%) knew about aligners; 40% were aged 18-24 years, and 77% were female. When observing the images of the types of orthodontic appliances, the aligners had an acceptance rate of 80%. Among the reasons that led to the preference for choosing aligners, 68% cited aesthetics and 42% comfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recently, clear aligners have become a popular choice for orthodontic treatment, particularly among adults. Despite their popularity and effectiveness, many patients still need more information about aligner treatment. Over half of the respondents did not know what orthodontic aligners were. Younger participants had more knowledge about aligners than older participants. Patients still need more knowledge about the types of appliances available for orthodontic treatment. When presented with images of the kinds of devices available, almost 80% of participants showed greater satisfaction with aligners.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"251-257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125241229456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the knowledge and preference of patients treated at a Dental School in Jaraguá do Sul, Brazil, about using aligners and the reasons for choosing this device as a treatment option.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Participants: A total of 82 participants aged 18-45 years recruited at a screening clinic.

Methods: A questionnaire was completed in person using a tablet with digital forms.

Results: Almost half of the participants (49%) knew about aligners; 40% were aged 18-24 years, and 77% were female. When observing the images of the types of orthodontic appliances, the aligners had an acceptance rate of 80%. Among the reasons that led to the preference for choosing aligners, 68% cited aesthetics and 42% comfort.

Conclusion: Recently, clear aligners have become a popular choice for orthodontic treatment, particularly among adults. Despite their popularity and effectiveness, many patients still need more information about aligner treatment. Over half of the respondents did not know what orthodontic aligners were. Younger participants had more knowledge about aligners than older participants. Patients still need more knowledge about the types of appliances available for orthodontic treatment. When presented with images of the kinds of devices available, almost 80% of participants showed greater satisfaction with aligners.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估患者对使用正畸矫治器的了解和偏好。
目的评估在巴西南哈拉瓜一所牙科学校接受治疗的患者对使用矫正器的了解和偏好,以及选择这种设备作为治疗方案的原因:设计:横断面研究:在筛查诊所共招募了 82 名 18-45 岁的参与者:方法:使用带有数字表格的平板电脑亲自填写问卷:结果:近一半的参与者(49%)知道矫治器;40%的参与者年龄在18-24岁之间,77%为女性。在观察各类正畸矫治器的图像时,排列矫治器的接受率为80%。在选择矫治器的原因中,68%的人认为美观,42%的人认为舒适:近来,透明矫治器已成为正畸治疗的热门选择,尤其是在成年人中。尽管透明矫治器很受欢迎且效果显著,但许多患者仍然需要更多关于矫治器治疗的信息。超过一半的受访者不知道什么是矫治器。年轻的受访者比年长的受访者更了解矫治器。患者仍然需要更多关于可用于正畸治疗的矫治器类型的知识。当看到可供选择的矫治器类型的图片时,近 80% 的参与者对矫治器表现出更高的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontics
Journal of Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthodontics has an international circulation, publishing papers from throughout the world. The official journal of the British Orthodontic Society, it aims to publish high quality, evidence-based, clinically orientated or clinically relevant original research papers that will underpin evidence based orthodontic care. It particularly welcomes reports on prospective research into different treatment methods and techniques but also systematic reviews, meta-analyses and studies which will stimulate interest in new developments. Regular features include original papers on clinically relevant topics, clinical case reports, reviews of the orthodontic literature, editorials, book reviews, correspondence and other features of interest to the orthodontic community. The Journal is published in full colour throughout.
期刊最新文献
Microleakage under metal and ceramic brackets after acid etch or laser surface treatment before bonding: An in vitro study. Remote appointments in Orthodontics and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Part 1 service evaluation. Remote appointments in orthodontics and oral and maxillofacial surgery: Part 2 clinician perceptions. Vertical and sagittal changes produced by an expander with differential opening versus a fan-type expander: A post-hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Clinical crown height changes in adult patients after non-extraction, orthodontic treatment: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1