The effectiveness of prehabilitation interventions on biopsychosocial and service outcomes pre and post upper gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2310765
Robyn J Stiger, Mark A Williams, Owen D Gustafson, Alyson Woods, Johnny Collett
{"title":"The effectiveness of prehabilitation interventions on biopsychosocial and service outcomes pre and post upper gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review.","authors":"Robyn J Stiger, Mark A Williams, Owen D Gustafson, Alyson Woods, Johnny Collett","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2310765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review synthesised the evidence for the effect of prehabilitation interventions on biopsychosocial and service outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted. 10 databases were searched to December 2023. Prospective experimental studies exploring prehabilitation interventions in adults undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery were included. Prehabilitation was any preoperative intervention to improve physical or psychological outcomes. Included studies required a comparator group or alternative preoperative intervention as well as baseline, presurgical and postoperative assessment points. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (v.2). Data synthesis was narrative (SWiM guidance).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6028 studies were screened, with 25 studies included. Prehabilitation interventions were: inspiratory muscle training (five studies <i>n</i> = 450); exercise (nine studies <i>n</i> = 683); psychological (one study <i>n</i> = 400); and nutritional (ten studies <i>n</i> = 487). High quality studies showed preoperative improvements in impairments directly targeted by the interventions. Generally, these did not translate into functional or postoperative improvements, but multimodal interventions were more promising.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence supports prehabilitation as safe to preserve or improve preoperative function. Heterogeneity in outcomes and variable study quality means definitive conclusions regarding interventions are not yet possible, limiting implementation. Agreement of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness evaluation is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5676-5699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2310765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This review synthesised the evidence for the effect of prehabilitation interventions on biopsychosocial and service outcomes.

Materials and methods: A systematic review was conducted. 10 databases were searched to December 2023. Prospective experimental studies exploring prehabilitation interventions in adults undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery were included. Prehabilitation was any preoperative intervention to improve physical or psychological outcomes. Included studies required a comparator group or alternative preoperative intervention as well as baseline, presurgical and postoperative assessment points. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (v.2). Data synthesis was narrative (SWiM guidance).

Results: 6028 studies were screened, with 25 studies included. Prehabilitation interventions were: inspiratory muscle training (five studies n = 450); exercise (nine studies n = 683); psychological (one study n = 400); and nutritional (ten studies n = 487). High quality studies showed preoperative improvements in impairments directly targeted by the interventions. Generally, these did not translate into functional or postoperative improvements, but multimodal interventions were more promising.

Conclusion: Current evidence supports prehabilitation as safe to preserve or improve preoperative function. Heterogeneity in outcomes and variable study quality means definitive conclusions regarding interventions are not yet possible, limiting implementation. Agreement of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness evaluation is required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上消化道手术前后康复干预对生物心理社会和服务结果的影响:系统综述。
目的:本综述综合了康复前干预对生物心理社会和服务结果影响的证据:材料和方法:进行了系统性综述。检索了截至 2023 年 12 月的 10 个数据库。纳入了对接受上消化道手术的成人进行康复前干预的前瞻性实验研究。术前康复是指任何旨在改善生理或心理结果的术前干预。纳入的研究需要有一个比较组或其他术前干预措施,以及基线、术前和术后评估点。研究质量采用科克伦偏倚风险工具(v.2)进行评估。数据综合采用叙事方式(SWiM 指南):共筛选出 6028 项研究,并纳入 25 项研究。术前康复干预包括:吸气肌训练(5 项研究 n = 450);运动(9 项研究 n = 683);心理(1 项研究 n = 400);营养(10 项研究 n = 487)。高质量的研究显示,干预措施直接针对的损伤在术前有所改善。一般来说,这些改善并没有转化为功能或术后改善,但多模式干预更有前景:目前的证据表明,术前康复训练对保持或改善术前功能是安全的。结果的异质性和研究质量的参差不齐意味着尚无法就干预措施得出明确结论,从而限制了干预措施的实施。临床结果和成本效益评估需要达成一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal associations between stroke-related neurologic deficits and course of basic activities of daily living up to six months after stroke. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the patellofemoral pain severity scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Spanish version of the King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Scale (KPPS). Understanding recovery of people recovering from COVID-19 receiving treatment from primary care allied health professionals: a mixed-methods study. The effectiveness of prehabilitation interventions on biopsychosocial and service outcomes pre and post upper gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1