Employing a Risk Assessment Tool for Shared Decision-Making in Breast Cancer Screening.

IF 0.6 Q4 NURSING Creative Nursing Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1177/10784535241228582
Louisa Krueger
{"title":"Employing a Risk Assessment Tool for Shared Decision-Making in Breast Cancer Screening.","authors":"Louisa Krueger","doi":"10.1177/10784535241228582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The existing guidelines for breast cancer screening incorporate assessing individual risk but contain no universally recommended risk assessment tool in the primary care setting. <b>Local Problem:</b> A family planning program utilizing nurses and nurse practitioners for assessment, education, and referral lacked a risk assessment tool for assessing breast cancer risk. <b>Methods:</b> A breast cancer risk assessment tool was implemented in practice. <b>Interventions:</b> The interventions involved assessing the patient's risks, providing education on risk reduction strategies, and determining the need for clinical breast exams and referrals for mammography. <b>Results:</b> The study demonstrated a clear correlation between the number of breast cancer risks identified and the extent of education provided to patients based on their specific risk profiles (0 vs. 1.5 risks; 2 vs. 4.6 educational components). Among patients under age 35, 80% opted for a clinical breast exam, while 100% of patients age 40 and above agreed to both clinical breast exams and referrals for mammography after discussing individual risks. <b>Conclusions:</b> The use of a breast cancer risk assessment tool provided an evidence-based foundation for the shared decision-making conversation between patient and nurse/provider on risk reduction. The discussion included current evidence on the risk versus benefit of age-based screening options for breast cancer, allowing for an informed decision made jointly between the patient and provider.</p>","PeriodicalId":54104,"journal":{"name":"Creative Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10784535241228582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The existing guidelines for breast cancer screening incorporate assessing individual risk but contain no universally recommended risk assessment tool in the primary care setting. Local Problem: A family planning program utilizing nurses and nurse practitioners for assessment, education, and referral lacked a risk assessment tool for assessing breast cancer risk. Methods: A breast cancer risk assessment tool was implemented in practice. Interventions: The interventions involved assessing the patient's risks, providing education on risk reduction strategies, and determining the need for clinical breast exams and referrals for mammography. Results: The study demonstrated a clear correlation between the number of breast cancer risks identified and the extent of education provided to patients based on their specific risk profiles (0 vs. 1.5 risks; 2 vs. 4.6 educational components). Among patients under age 35, 80% opted for a clinical breast exam, while 100% of patients age 40 and above agreed to both clinical breast exams and referrals for mammography after discussing individual risks. Conclusions: The use of a breast cancer risk assessment tool provided an evidence-based foundation for the shared decision-making conversation between patient and nurse/provider on risk reduction. The discussion included current evidence on the risk versus benefit of age-based screening options for breast cancer, allowing for an informed decision made jointly between the patient and provider.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在乳腺癌筛查中采用风险评估工具共同决策。
背景:现有的乳腺癌筛查指南包含了对个体风险的评估,但却没有普遍推荐用于初级保健的风险评估工具。当地问题:一项利用护士和执业护士进行评估、教育和转诊的计划生育计划缺乏用于评估乳腺癌风险的风险评估工具。方法:在实践中使用乳腺癌风险评估工具。干预措施:干预措施包括评估患者的风险、提供降低风险策略的教育、确定是否需要进行临床乳房检查和乳房 X 射线照相术转诊。结果研究表明,根据患者的具体风险情况(0 对 1.5 个风险;2 对 4.6 个教育内容),确定的乳腺癌风险数量与向患者提供的教育程度之间存在明显的相关性。在 35 岁以下的患者中,80% 的人选择进行临床乳房检查,而 40 岁及以上的患者在讨论了个人风险后,100% 都同意进行临床乳房检查和乳房 X 射线照相术转诊。结论乳腺癌风险评估工具的使用为患者与护士/医护人员就降低风险进行共同决策对话提供了循证基础。讨论内容包括以年龄为基础的乳腺癌筛查方案的风险与收益的最新证据,使患者和医疗服务提供者能够共同做出知情决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Creative Nursing
Creative Nursing NURSING-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Creative Nursing is an issue focused journal, unique in its recognition of the values inherent in the nursing profession. Excellence and professionalism are not exclusive to any one discipline or specialty, and the editors of Creative Nursing are dedicated to developing nursing leaders at all levels and in all settings. Today"s health care institutions need creative and innovative solutions. Nurses need to think creatively, to experiment, to take risks, and to innovate. Creative Nursing promotes best practices in all aspects of caring--caring for self, patients, families, colleagues, and communities.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Inpatient Sleep Environments: A Design Thinking Case Study. Human Communication Elements of the Continuity of Midwife Carer Newsletter: A Descriptive Case Report. Unlocking Job Involvement: Helping New Employees Navigate using Uncertainty Reduction Theory with Psychological Safety as a Mediator. Design Labs-the Power of With. Hierarchies of Actualization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1