Integrating a Community Advisory Board Into a Pragmatic Trial of Mindfulness for Chronic Low Back Pain.

Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2024-02-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130241231736
Natalia E Morone, Elondra D Harr, Jose E Baez, Ruth D Rodriguez, Suzanne M Lawrence, Jessica L Barnhill, Isabel Roth
{"title":"Integrating a Community Advisory Board Into a Pragmatic Trial of Mindfulness for Chronic Low Back Pain.","authors":"Natalia E Morone, Elondra D Harr, Jose E Baez, Ruth D Rodriguez, Suzanne M Lawrence, Jessica L Barnhill, Isabel Roth","doi":"10.1177/27536130241231736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To improve the implementation of clinical trial interventions, there is a need to facilitate communication between key stakeholders and research teams. Community Advisory Boards (CAB) bring together a range of stakeholders not historically included in the research process to inform and work collaboratively with research teams.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe our procedures and processes for (1) integration of a CAB into a pragmatic clinical trial of a telehealth-delivered group mindfulness program for persons with chronic low back pain (cLBP) within primary care, and (2) for the rapid uptake and implementation of CAB recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CAB we convened includes persons with cLBP who have undergone the mindfulness intervention, health care system leadership, advocacy groups, and mindfulness experts. The CAB members underwent a two hour initial training that introduced the research process and the CAB's role as research partners. The CAB met monthly for 1 hour. We used the Lighting Report method to summarize meetings and share feedback with the research team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recommendations of the CAB during the first year they met were divided into recruitment, informed consent, and survey recommendations. The study website also was overhauled based on recommendations, including a more engaging first page with rotating images of nature and testimonials. The language on the website was edited to be more concise and participant-friendly. The CAB recommended talking points to discuss with participants during screening or informed consent about the benefits of participating in research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We established a CAB that represented diverse perspectives, organizations, and experience with cLBP and mindfulness. The differing perspectives of the CAB resulted in recommendations that the research team itself would not have decided on their own. The Lightning Reports were also an effective way to efficiently communicate the CAB recommendations to the research team.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":"13 ","pages":"27536130241231736"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10845977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130241231736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To improve the implementation of clinical trial interventions, there is a need to facilitate communication between key stakeholders and research teams. Community Advisory Boards (CAB) bring together a range of stakeholders not historically included in the research process to inform and work collaboratively with research teams.

Objective: To describe our procedures and processes for (1) integration of a CAB into a pragmatic clinical trial of a telehealth-delivered group mindfulness program for persons with chronic low back pain (cLBP) within primary care, and (2) for the rapid uptake and implementation of CAB recommendations.

Methods: The CAB we convened includes persons with cLBP who have undergone the mindfulness intervention, health care system leadership, advocacy groups, and mindfulness experts. The CAB members underwent a two hour initial training that introduced the research process and the CAB's role as research partners. The CAB met monthly for 1 hour. We used the Lighting Report method to summarize meetings and share feedback with the research team.

Results: The recommendations of the CAB during the first year they met were divided into recruitment, informed consent, and survey recommendations. The study website also was overhauled based on recommendations, including a more engaging first page with rotating images of nature and testimonials. The language on the website was edited to be more concise and participant-friendly. The CAB recommended talking points to discuss with participants during screening or informed consent about the benefits of participating in research.

Conclusion: We established a CAB that represented diverse perspectives, organizations, and experience with cLBP and mindfulness. The differing perspectives of the CAB resulted in recommendations that the research team itself would not have decided on their own. The Lightning Reports were also an effective way to efficiently communicate the CAB recommendations to the research team.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将社区咨询委员会纳入 "正念治疗慢性腰痛 "的实用性试验中。
背景:为改善临床试验干预措施的实施,需要促进主要利益相关者与研究团队之间的沟通。社区咨询委员会(CAB)汇集了一系列历来未被纳入研究过程的利益相关者,为研究团队提供信息并与之合作:描述我们在以下方面的程序和过程:(1)将社区咨询委员会纳入针对初级保健中的慢性腰背痛(cLBP)患者的远程医疗团体正念计划的实用临床试验;(2)快速采纳和实施社区咨询委员会的建议:我们召集的正念咨询委员会成员包括接受过正念干预的慢性腰背痛患者、医疗保健系统领导、倡导团体和正念专家。CAB 成员接受了两小时的初步培训,培训内容包括研究过程和 CAB 作为研究合作伙伴的角色。咨询委员会每月召开一次会议,每次一小时。我们采用照明报告法对会议进行总结,并与研究团队分享反馈意见:CAB 在第一年会议上提出的建议分为招募建议、知情同意建议和调查建议。研究网站也根据建议进行了全面改版,包括一个更吸引人的首页,上面有自然和推荐的旋转图片。网站上的语言经过编辑,更加简洁,对参与者更加友好。CAB 建议在筛选或知情同意时与参与者讨论参与研究的益处:我们成立的心理咨询委员会代表了不同的观点、组织以及在 cLBP 和正念方面的经验。CAB 的不同观点产生了研究团队自己无法决定的建议。闪电报告 "也是向研究团队有效传达咨询委员会建议的有效方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Group-Based Integrative Pain Management in Primary Care: A Study Protocol for Multilevel Interventions to Address Health Disparities. Qigong and Tai Chi for ME/CFS: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Protocol for a Pilot Study on the Neurocardiac Mechanism of an Interoceptive Compassion-Based Heart-Smile Training for Depression. Preliminary Findings From a Pilot Professional Coaching Program on the Components of Burnout in a Diverse Group of Physician Leaders. Contribution of Ethnomedical Use Data to the Marketing Authorization of Traditional Herbal Medicines in Mali.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1