The influence of large scale land acquisition on smallholder farming productivity - the case of Zambia

IF 2.2 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES World Development Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.wdp.2024.100565
Mintewab Bezabih , Hailemariam Teklewold , Samuel A. Zewdie
{"title":"The influence of large scale land acquisition on smallholder farming productivity - the case of Zambia","authors":"Mintewab Bezabih ,&nbsp;Hailemariam Teklewold ,&nbsp;Samuel A. Zewdie","doi":"10.1016/j.wdp.2024.100565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper utilizes household level panel data from Zambia to analyze the impact of a LSLA on small holder farmers’ productivity, differentiated by male and female-owned farms. Our results suggest that while LSLA is not a significant determinant of smallholder agricultural productivity overall, female-headed households seem to gain a moderate productivity increase. There is also evidence of beneficial spillover effects in terms of technology use, with increase in modern seed use as a result of LSLA (but not on fertilizer use or crop diversification). However, the results do not show significant gender-differentiated impacts of LSLA neither on technological spillover, nor on tenure security. In sum, while LSLA seems to benefit women overall, the two potential avenues through which LSLA affects men and women differently-technological spillover and tenure insecurity, do not seem to have gender-based impacts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37831,"journal":{"name":"World Development Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245229292400002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper utilizes household level panel data from Zambia to analyze the impact of a LSLA on small holder farmers’ productivity, differentiated by male and female-owned farms. Our results suggest that while LSLA is not a significant determinant of smallholder agricultural productivity overall, female-headed households seem to gain a moderate productivity increase. There is also evidence of beneficial spillover effects in terms of technology use, with increase in modern seed use as a result of LSLA (but not on fertilizer use or crop diversification). However, the results do not show significant gender-differentiated impacts of LSLA neither on technological spillover, nor on tenure security. In sum, while LSLA seems to benefit women overall, the two potential avenues through which LSLA affects men and women differently-technological spillover and tenure insecurity, do not seem to have gender-based impacts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大规模征地对小农生产率的影响--赞比亚案例
本文利用赞比亚家庭层面的面板数据,分析了按男性和女性拥有的农场划分的土地共有法对小农户生产率的影响。我们的研究结果表明,虽然整体而言,LSLA 对小农户的农业生产率没有显著的决定作用,但女户主家庭的生产率似乎得到了适度的提高。还有证据表明,LSLA 增加了现代种子的使用,从而在技术使用方面产生了有益的溢出效应(但对化肥使用或作物多样化的影响不大)。然而,结果并未显示 LSLA 对技术溢出效应和土地权保障产生了显著的性别差异影响。总之,尽管整地耕作法似乎总体上有利于妇女,但整地耕作法对男女产生不同影响的两个潜在途径--技术溢出效应和土地权不安全,似乎并没有产生基于性别的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Development Perspectives
World Development Perspectives Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: World Development Perspectives is a multi-disciplinary journal of international development. It seeks to explore ways of improving human well-being by examining the performance and impact of interventions designed to address issues related to: poverty alleviation, public health and malnutrition, agricultural production, natural resource governance, globalization and transnational processes, technological progress, gender and social discrimination, and participation in economic and political life. Above all, we are particularly interested in the role of historical, legal, social, economic, political, biophysical, and/or ecological contexts in shaping development processes and outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Is seed aid distribution still justified in South Sudan? Crowding-out effect of tobacco consumption on household food expenditures in Cameroon Analysis of the ‘Good’ performance indicators of Non-Governmental Development Organizations Voluntary sustainability standards and technical efficiency of Honduran smallholder coffee producers Colonial status and income inequality in developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1