Effects of display technique, background complexity, and target size on visual performance evaluation–A case study using the “Spot The Difference” game

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103555
Po-Hung Lin , Hung-Jen Chen , Kuo-Wei Su , Yen-Ju Chou
{"title":"Effects of display technique, background complexity, and target size on visual performance evaluation–A case study using the “Spot The Difference” game","authors":"Po-Hung Lin ,&nbsp;Hung-Jen Chen ,&nbsp;Kuo-Wei Su ,&nbsp;Yen-Ju Chou","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study explores the effects of display technique, target size, and complexity of the background on searching accuracy, eye tracking performance, visual fatigue, and presence. Twenty-five participants were recruited in the experiment, where two types of display technique (2D, 3D), two types of background complexity (low, high), and two types of target size (200 × 200 pixels, 60 × 60 pixels) were examined on accuracy, fixation time, numbers of fixations, Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ), and iGroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ). The results indicated that display technique was significant on accuracy, fixation time, number of fixations, and SSQ. Though having inferior performance in accuracy and SSQ than 2D, 3D demonstrated better performance in the number of fixations and fixation time. Background complexity was significant on accuracy and IPQ, while low complexity has a better performance than that in accuracy and IPQ. Target size was significant in accuracy, where the accuracy of 200 × 200 pixels was better than that of 60 × 60 pixels. From the analysis of area of interest (AOI), participants tended to fix on revised pictures as compared with original pictures. The results of this study could serve as a reference for game manufacturers to design a 3D “Spot The Difference” game in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study explores the effects of display technique, target size, and complexity of the background on searching accuracy, eye tracking performance, visual fatigue, and presence. Twenty-five participants were recruited in the experiment, where two types of display technique (2D, 3D), two types of background complexity (low, high), and two types of target size (200 × 200 pixels, 60 × 60 pixels) were examined on accuracy, fixation time, numbers of fixations, Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ), and iGroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ). The results indicated that display technique was significant on accuracy, fixation time, number of fixations, and SSQ. Though having inferior performance in accuracy and SSQ than 2D, 3D demonstrated better performance in the number of fixations and fixation time. Background complexity was significant on accuracy and IPQ, while low complexity has a better performance than that in accuracy and IPQ. Target size was significant in accuracy, where the accuracy of 200 × 200 pixels was better than that of 60 × 60 pixels. From the analysis of area of interest (AOI), participants tended to fix on revised pictures as compared with original pictures. The results of this study could serve as a reference for game manufacturers to design a 3D “Spot The Difference” game in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
显示技术、背景复杂度和目标大小对视觉性能评估的影响--使用 "找不同 "游戏进行的案例研究
本研究探讨了显示技术、目标大小和背景复杂度对搜索准确性、眼动追踪性能、视觉疲劳和临场感的影响。实验共招募了 25 名参与者,考察了两种显示技术(2D、3D)、两种背景复杂度(低、高)和两种目标大小(200 × 200 像素、60 × 60 像素)对准确性、固定时间、固定次数、模拟器晕眩问卷(SSQ)和 iGroup 临场感问卷(IPQ)的影响。结果表明,显示技术对准确度、固定时间、固定次数和 SSQ 有显著影响。虽然 3D 在准确性和 SSQ 方面的表现不如 2D,但在固定次数和固定时间方面表现更好。背景复杂度对准确度和 IPQ 有显著影响,而低复杂度在准确度和 IPQ 方面的表现优于低复杂度。目标大小对准确度有显著影响,200 × 200 像素的准确度优于 60 × 60 像素的准确度。从兴趣区(AOI)的分析来看,与原始图片相比,被试更倾向于固定在修改过的图片上。本研究的结果可为游戏制造商今后设计三维 "找不同 "游戏提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the link between occupational risk factors, work-related musculoskeletal disorders and quality of work life: An analysis using PLS-SEM Ergonomic design of mastectomy bra based on emotion measurements Sedentary behavior and musculoskeletal symptoms among work from home employees Research on similarity bias in dual objective visual search based on nuclear power human-machine interface icons The impact of camera-monitor system viewing angles on drivers’ distance perception: A simulated driving study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1