Associations between posttraumatic stress disorder and eating disorder symptoms among women veterans

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101851
Sarah E. Siegel , Rachel M. Ranney , Robin M. Masheb , Joy Huggins , Shira Maguen
{"title":"Associations between posttraumatic stress disorder and eating disorder symptoms among women veterans","authors":"Sarah E. Siegel ,&nbsp;Rachel M. Ranney ,&nbsp;Robin M. Masheb ,&nbsp;Joy Huggins ,&nbsp;Shira Maguen","doi":"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent research suggests high rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and eating disorder (ED) comorbidity in women veterans. This study aims to expand the literature by examining associations between PTSD and ED diagnoses and symptoms in this population. We assessed probable PTSD diagnosis and symptom clusters (intrusion, avoidance, arousal and reactivity, and negative alterations in cognition and mood [NACM]), as well as probable Binge Eating Disorder (BED) diagnosis and ED subscales (dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction) in a sample of women veterans (<em>N</em> = 371). We investigated significance at the standard <em>p</em> &lt; .05, and the Bonferroni-corrected <em>p</em> &lt; .005 cut-off to adjust for experiment-wise error. Overall, we found that probable PTSD was associated with provisional BED (<em>p</em> &lt; .001) using logistic regression at both cut-offs. Probable PTSD was associated with all ED subscales (all <em>p's</em> &lt; 0.003) using linear regression models also at both cut-offs. Provisional BED was associated with NACM at <em>p</em> &lt; .05 (<em>p</em> = .046), though it did not meet significance at our conservative cut-off. NACM was also associated with shape/weight overvaluation (<em>p</em> = .02) and a global ED score (<em>p</em> = .01) at <em>p</em> &lt; .05, but not at our conservative cut-off; arousal was associated with shape/weight overvaluation (<em>p</em> = .04) and the global ED score (<em>p</em> = .02) at <em>p</em> &lt; .05, but not at our conservative cut-off. Our findings may further guide how ED-related topics can be integrated in PTSD treatment for women veterans with comorbid PTSD and ED.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015324000102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research suggests high rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and eating disorder (ED) comorbidity in women veterans. This study aims to expand the literature by examining associations between PTSD and ED diagnoses and symptoms in this population. We assessed probable PTSD diagnosis and symptom clusters (intrusion, avoidance, arousal and reactivity, and negative alterations in cognition and mood [NACM]), as well as probable Binge Eating Disorder (BED) diagnosis and ED subscales (dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction) in a sample of women veterans (N = 371). We investigated significance at the standard p < .05, and the Bonferroni-corrected p < .005 cut-off to adjust for experiment-wise error. Overall, we found that probable PTSD was associated with provisional BED (p < .001) using logistic regression at both cut-offs. Probable PTSD was associated with all ED subscales (all p's < 0.003) using linear regression models also at both cut-offs. Provisional BED was associated with NACM at p < .05 (p = .046), though it did not meet significance at our conservative cut-off. NACM was also associated with shape/weight overvaluation (p = .02) and a global ED score (p = .01) at p < .05, but not at our conservative cut-off; arousal was associated with shape/weight overvaluation (p = .04) and the global ED score (p = .02) at p < .05, but not at our conservative cut-off. Our findings may further guide how ED-related topics can be integrated in PTSD treatment for women veterans with comorbid PTSD and ED.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性退伍军人中创伤后应激障碍与饮食失调症状之间的关联
最近的研究表明,女性退伍军人中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和进食障碍(ED)的合并率很高。本研究旨在通过考察该人群中创伤后应激障碍和进食障碍诊断与症状之间的关联来扩展相关文献。我们评估了女性退伍军人样本(样本数 = 371)中可能的创伤后应激障碍诊断和症状群(内隐、回避、唤醒和反应性、认知和情绪的负面改变 [NACM]),以及可能的暴饮暴食障碍 (BED) 诊断和 ED 分量表(饮食限制、体形/体重高估和身体不满意)。我们调查了标准 p < .05 和 Bonferroni 校正 p < .005 临界值的显著性,以调整实验误差。总体而言,我们发现,在两种截断条件下使用逻辑回归法,可能的创伤后应激障碍与临时性 BED 相关(p < .001)。使用线性回归模型,在两个截断值下,创伤后应激障碍可能与所有 ED 分量表相关(所有 p 均为 0.003)。Provisional BED 与 NACM 的相关性为 p < .05 (p = .046),但在我们保守的截止值下,其相关性并不显著。在 p < .05 时,NACM 还与体形/体重高估(p = .02)和总体 ED 评分(p = .01)相关,但在我们的保守截断值下不显著;在 p < .05 时,唤醒与体形/体重高估(p = .04)和总体 ED 评分(p = .02)相关,但在我们的保守截断值下不显著。我们的研究结果可进一步指导如何将与 ED 相关的主题纳入对合并有创伤后应激障碍和 ED 的女性退伍军人的创伤后应激障碍治疗中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1