Addition of contrast in ultrasound screening for hepatocellular carcinoma

Kathryn McGillen , Nabeal Aljabban , Robert Wu , Benjamin Shin , Ian Schreibman , Franklin Luke , James Birkholz
{"title":"Addition of contrast in ultrasound screening for hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"Kathryn McGillen ,&nbsp;Nabeal Aljabban ,&nbsp;Robert Wu ,&nbsp;Benjamin Shin ,&nbsp;Ian Schreibman ,&nbsp;Franklin Luke ,&nbsp;James Birkholz","doi":"10.1016/j.redii.2023.100039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Screening ultrasound for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) identifies lesions which require further characterization by a contrast-enhanced exam to non-invasively diagnose HCC. While ultrasound is recommended in screening, some HCC can be occult on grayscale imaging. The purpose of this study was to determine if the addition of ultrasound contrast (sulfahexafluoride) to screening ultrasound for HCC can identify more HCC lesions than grayscale sonographic imaging alone.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All HCC screening ultrasounds that also had contrast were evaluated in this retrospective study. Patients with a focal lesion seen only after administration of contrast (OAC) were noted, as well as any follow-up imaging or pathology results. Additional variables collected included patient demographics, cirrhosis type, and laboratory values.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>230 unique patients were included, of which 160 had imaging or pathology follow-up. 18 of these patients had an OAC lesion, of which 17 had follow-up. Among these OACs, there was one LIRADS M lesion (1/18, 5.6 %) and one bland portal vein thrombus identified, which were both confirmed on follow-up imaging. All LIRADS 4 OAC lesions were downgraded. No additional HCC were identified on follow-up imaging or pathology of these patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Addition of contrast to screening ultrasound did identify additional lesions, portal vein thrombus, and high grade malignancy. However, as the incidence of OAC lesions was low (7.8 %, 18/230) and most of the lesions were not malignant, addition of post contrast sweeps through the liver is of low value in the low to medium at-risk cirrhotic population in identifying occult HCC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74676,"journal":{"name":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100039"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772652523000182/pdfft?md5=45ff1f5c2f11de69586c2f7ff8c67cb7&pid=1-s2.0-S2772652523000182-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772652523000182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Screening ultrasound for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) identifies lesions which require further characterization by a contrast-enhanced exam to non-invasively diagnose HCC. While ultrasound is recommended in screening, some HCC can be occult on grayscale imaging. The purpose of this study was to determine if the addition of ultrasound contrast (sulfahexafluoride) to screening ultrasound for HCC can identify more HCC lesions than grayscale sonographic imaging alone.

Methods

All HCC screening ultrasounds that also had contrast were evaluated in this retrospective study. Patients with a focal lesion seen only after administration of contrast (OAC) were noted, as well as any follow-up imaging or pathology results. Additional variables collected included patient demographics, cirrhosis type, and laboratory values.

Results

230 unique patients were included, of which 160 had imaging or pathology follow-up. 18 of these patients had an OAC lesion, of which 17 had follow-up. Among these OACs, there was one LIRADS M lesion (1/18, 5.6 %) and one bland portal vein thrombus identified, which were both confirmed on follow-up imaging. All LIRADS 4 OAC lesions were downgraded. No additional HCC were identified on follow-up imaging or pathology of these patients.

Conclusion

Addition of contrast to screening ultrasound did identify additional lesions, portal vein thrombus, and high grade malignancy. However, as the incidence of OAC lesions was low (7.8 %, 18/230) and most of the lesions were not malignant, addition of post contrast sweeps through the liver is of low value in the low to medium at-risk cirrhotic population in identifying occult HCC.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在肝细胞癌超声筛查中加入造影剂
目的通过超声波筛查肝细胞癌(HCC)可发现病变,这些病变需要通过造影剂增强检查来进一步确定特征,从而对 HCC 进行无创诊断。虽然超声波是筛查的推荐方法,但一些 HCC 在灰度成像中可能是隐匿性的。本研究的目的是确定在 HCC 超声筛查中加入超声造影剂(氟化磺胺)是否能比单独的灰度超声成像识别出更多的 HCC 病灶。这项回顾性研究对所有使用造影剂的 HCC 筛查超声波进行了评估,并记录了使用造影剂(OAC)后才发现病灶的患者,以及任何后续成像或病理结果。收集的其他变量包括患者的人口统计学特征、肝硬化类型和实验室值。这些患者中有 18 人有 OAC 病变,其中 17 人接受了随访。在这些 OAC 中,发现了一个 LIRADS M 病变(1/18,5.6%)和一个门静脉血栓,这两个病变均在随访造影中得到证实。所有 LIRADS 4 OAC 病变均被降级。结论 在超声筛查中加入造影剂确实能发现更多病变、门静脉血栓和高级别恶性肿瘤。然而,由于OAC病变的发生率很低(7.8%,18/230),而且大多数病变都不是恶性的,因此在中低风险肝硬化患者中增加造影剂后肝脏扫描对识别隐匿性HCC的价值很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dedicated software to harmonize the follow-up of oncological patients Glenoid morphology variation between patients with hypermobile shoulder joints and controls: Identification of hyperlaxity-related morphologic bone changes Efficacity of CT-guided intra-articular cervical facet steroid injection for cervical radiculopathy Evaluation of a new beads reflux control microcatheter in drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization Chest tube placement incidence when using gelatin sponge torpedoes after pulmonary radiofrequency ablation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1