Mechanical Thrombectomy for Aseptic, Atraumatic, Medically Refractory Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: a Systematic Review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1007/s00062-023-01373-0
John B Quealy
{"title":"Mechanical Thrombectomy for Aseptic, Atraumatic, Medically Refractory Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: a Systematic Review.","authors":"John B Quealy","doi":"10.1007/s00062-023-01373-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) follows a severe clinical course in 13.5% of cases. Practice guidelines recommend endovascular therapy (EVT); no randomised control trials (RCTs) exist comparing EVTs.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether specific EVTs are superior to alternatives.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, five other databases and four clinical trials registers. Grey literature searches, reference checking, citation searching, and author contact.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>All CVST cases treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) were includible. Paediatric, and trauma-related or infection-related thromboses were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Standard Cochrane review procedures. Primary outcome measures; clinical efficacy (modified Rankin Score, mRS), technical efficacy (recanalisation), and clinical safety (procedure-related complications and death). Subgroup analyses were performed, comparing outcome measures between demographic groups, clinico-radiological severity, interventional strategies, and degrees of recanalisation.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>In this study 124 papers were included (n = 486). All patients underwent MT, with 69.5% of patients receiving concomitant chemolysis. New/expanding intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) occurred in 5.1%; non-haemorrhagic complications in 1.4%; 10.7% died. Predictors of poor efficacy included age ≥ 55 years, altered mental status (AMS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 8. Predictive of poor safety outcomes included pre-existing ICH, deep system thrombosis, and AMS. Complete recanalisation was associated with improved clinical efficacy and safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The review is based on case reports/series, increasing bias-risk. Myriad of potentially includible studies were necessarily excluded due to lack of requisite details.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predictors of poor outcomes with medical therapy predict poor outcomes with MT; these measures should not dictate candidacy. Complete recanalisation predicts favorable clinical and safety outcomes. Local chemolysis is safe, improves recanalisation, and should be recommended, provided there is no contraindication. Clot maceration strategies and stent-retriever thrombectomy are associated with superior clinical efficacy and safety endpoints, as compared with balloon angioplasty and rheolysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"451-463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-023-01373-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) follows a severe clinical course in 13.5% of cases. Practice guidelines recommend endovascular therapy (EVT); no randomised control trials (RCTs) exist comparing EVTs.

Purpose: To determine whether specific EVTs are superior to alternatives.

Data sources: CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, five other databases and four clinical trials registers. Grey literature searches, reference checking, citation searching, and author contact.

Study selection: All CVST cases treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) were includible. Paediatric, and trauma-related or infection-related thromboses were excluded.

Data analysis: Standard Cochrane review procedures. Primary outcome measures; clinical efficacy (modified Rankin Score, mRS), technical efficacy (recanalisation), and clinical safety (procedure-related complications and death). Subgroup analyses were performed, comparing outcome measures between demographic groups, clinico-radiological severity, interventional strategies, and degrees of recanalisation.

Data synthesis: In this study 124 papers were included (n = 486). All patients underwent MT, with 69.5% of patients receiving concomitant chemolysis. New/expanding intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) occurred in 5.1%; non-haemorrhagic complications in 1.4%; 10.7% died. Predictors of poor efficacy included age ≥ 55 years, altered mental status (AMS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 8. Predictive of poor safety outcomes included pre-existing ICH, deep system thrombosis, and AMS. Complete recanalisation was associated with improved clinical efficacy and safety outcomes.

Limitations: The review is based on case reports/series, increasing bias-risk. Myriad of potentially includible studies were necessarily excluded due to lack of requisite details.

Conclusion: Predictors of poor outcomes with medical therapy predict poor outcomes with MT; these measures should not dictate candidacy. Complete recanalisation predicts favorable clinical and safety outcomes. Local chemolysis is safe, improves recanalisation, and should be recommended, provided there is no contraindication. Clot maceration strategies and stent-retriever thrombectomy are associated with superior clinical efficacy and safety endpoints, as compared with balloon angioplasty and rheolysis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无菌性、无创伤、药物难治性脑静脉窦血栓形成的机械取栓术:系统性综述。
背景:脑静脉窦血栓形成(CVST)有13.5%的病例临床症状严重。实践指南建议采用血管内治疗(EVT),但目前尚无比较 EVT 的随机对照试验(RCT):数据来源:CENTRAL、Medline、Embase、其他五个数据库和四个临床试验登记册。研究选择:所有采用机械血栓切除术(MT)治疗的 CVST 病例均包括在内。数据分析:数据分析:标准 Cochrane 综述程序。主要结果测量指标;临床疗效(改良Rankin评分,mRS)、技术疗效(再通)和临床安全性(手术相关并发症和死亡)。进行了分组分析,比较了不同人口统计学组、临床放射学严重程度、介入策略和再通程度之间的结果测量:本研究共纳入124篇论文(n = 486)。所有患者均接受了MT治疗,其中69.5%的患者同时接受了化疗。5.1%的患者出现新的/扩大性脑内出血(ICH);1.4%的患者出现非出血并发症;10.7%的患者死亡。疗效不佳的预测因素包括年龄≥ 55 岁、精神状态改变(AMS)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)局限性:综述基于病例报告/系列研究,增加了偏倚风险。由于缺乏必要的细节,无数可能被纳入的研究必然被排除在外:医学治疗效果不佳的预测因素预示着MT治疗效果不佳;这些措施不应决定候选者。完全再通预示着良好的临床和安全性。局部化疗是安全的,能改善再通情况,如果没有禁忌症,应推荐使用。与球囊血管成形术和流变溶解术相比,血栓浸润策略和支架截流血栓切除术的临床疗效和安全性终点更佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal Dentate Nucleus MRI Changes in Hypertrophic Olivary Degeneration: a Case Report. Epstein-Barr Virus Encephalitis Mimicking Herpes Encephalitis On Neuroimaging: A Case Report. Non-Stenotic Carotid Plaques and Rate of DWI-positive MRI in Patients with Lower-Risk Transient or Persistent Minor Neurologic Events: DOUBT Sub Study. Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign as a Predictor of First-Pass Recanalization and Favorable Outcomes in Direct Thrombectomy Patients. Microstructural Characteristics of Cervical Spinal Cord Using High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI) and Tractography in Healthy Subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1