Purpose: Reocclusion after endovascular therapy (EVT) may worsen the clinical outcome of patients undergoing EVT for intracranial atherothrombotic stroke with large vessel occlusion (AT-LVO), but the details and risk factors have not been fully investigated.
Methods: Patients with intracranial AT-LVO were enrolled in a multicenter retrospective registry study conducted at 51 centers in Japan and were divided into two groups based on whether reocclusion occurred within 90 days after recanalization of intracranial AT-LVO with EVT: the reocclusion group and the patent group. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days after EVT. Risk factors for reocclusion were also assessed.
Results: A total of 461 patients were enrolled, 66 (14.3%) in the reocclusion group and 395 (85.7%) in the patent group. Intracranial stenting and differences in antithrombotic regimens were not associated with reocclusion. The rate of patients with the primary outcome was significantly lower in the reocclusion group than in the patent group (15.4% vs. 46.4%, adjusted odds ratio 0.15 [95% confidence interval 0.06-0.33], P < 0.001). Reocclusion was associated with recurrent ischemic stroke, additional EVT or surgery, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause death. Direct aspiration and vessel perforation were independent factors for reocclusion (adjusted odds ratio 1.82 [95% confidence interval 1.02-3.25], P = 0.043; adjusted odds ratio 5.91 [95% confidence interval 1.005-35.35], P = 0.049, respectively).
Conclusions: Reocclusion after EVT was associated with recurrent ischemic stroke, additional EVT or surgery, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and poor clinical outcome at 90 days. Direct aspiration and vessel perforation were independent risk factors for reocclusion after EVT.
目的:血管内治疗(EVT)后再闭塞可能使颅内动脉粥样硬化性卒中合并大血管闭塞(AT-LVO)患者行EVT的临床结果恶化,但其细节和危险因素尚未得到充分研究。方法:在日本51个中心对颅内at - lvo患者进行多中心回顾性登记研究,根据EVT颅内at - lvo再通后90天内是否发生再闭塞分为再闭塞组和未闭塞组。主要结果是EVT后90天的修正Rankin量表评分0-2。再咬合的危险因素也被评估。结果:共纳入461例患者,其中牙合组66例(14.3%),专利组395例(85.7%)。颅内支架植入和抗血栓治疗方案的差异与再闭塞无关。再闭塞组出现主要转归的患者比例明显低于未闭塞组(15.4% vs. 46.4%,校正优势比0.15[95%可信区间0.06-0.33],P 结论:EVT后再闭塞与缺血性卒中复发、再EVT或手术、症状性颅内出血、90天临床转归差相关。直接误吸和血管穿孔是EVT术后再闭塞的独立危险因素。
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes and Factors Associated with Reocclusion after Endovascular Therapy for Intracranial Atherothrombotic Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion.","authors":"Hiroyuki Ikeda, Kazutaka Uchida, Masanori Kinosada, Minami Uezato, Hiroshi Yamagami, Nobuyuki Sakai, Manabu Shirakawa, Mikiya Beppu, Kazunori Toyoda, Yuji Matsumaru, Yasushi Matsumoto, Kenichi Todo, Mikito Hayakawa, Seigo Shindo, Shinzo Ota, Masafumi Morimoto, Masataka Takeuchi, Hirotoshi Imamura, Kanta Tanaka, Hideyuki Ishihara, Hiroto Kakita, Takanori Sano, Hayato Araki, Tatsufumi Nomura, Fumihiro Sakakibara, Shinichi Yoshimura, Masaki Chin","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01603-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01603-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Reocclusion after endovascular therapy (EVT) may worsen the clinical outcome of patients undergoing EVT for intracranial atherothrombotic stroke with large vessel occlusion (AT-LVO), but the details and risk factors have not been fully investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with intracranial AT-LVO were enrolled in a multicenter retrospective registry study conducted at 51 centers in Japan and were divided into two groups based on whether reocclusion occurred within 90 days after recanalization of intracranial AT-LVO with EVT: the reocclusion group and the patent group. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days after EVT. Risk factors for reocclusion were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 461 patients were enrolled, 66 (14.3%) in the reocclusion group and 395 (85.7%) in the patent group. Intracranial stenting and differences in antithrombotic regimens were not associated with reocclusion. The rate of patients with the primary outcome was significantly lower in the reocclusion group than in the patent group (15.4% vs. 46.4%, adjusted odds ratio 0.15 [95% confidence interval 0.06-0.33], P < 0.001). Reocclusion was associated with recurrent ischemic stroke, additional EVT or surgery, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause death. Direct aspiration and vessel perforation were independent factors for reocclusion (adjusted odds ratio 1.82 [95% confidence interval 1.02-3.25], P = 0.043; adjusted odds ratio 5.91 [95% confidence interval 1.005-35.35], P = 0.049, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reocclusion after EVT was associated with recurrent ischemic stroke, additional EVT or surgery, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and poor clinical outcome at 90 days. Direct aspiration and vessel perforation were independent risk factors for reocclusion after EVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145745336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1007/s00062-025-01601-9
Lydia Marleen Schilling, Anna-Lena Ciesla, Julia My Van Kube, Peter Dechent, Christian Heiner Riedel, Nicole E Neef
Purpose: Accurate reconstruction of language-related white matter pathways is essential for preoperative planning in brain surgery. While functional (f) MRI activation is often used to guide diffusion (d)MRI tractography, advanced automated protocols rely instead on subcortical anatomical priors. In this study, we evaluate the robustness of anatomically informed protocols without fMRI and compare them with fMRI-guided approaches.
Methods: Twenty healthy adults (aged 18-32) underwent fMRI during a language task and dMRI on a 3T MRI scanner. Six language-associated fiber bundles were reconstructed with XTRACT using unimodal and multimodal protocols. Reconstruction similarity was assessed using cross-correlations within-subjects, within-cohort, and across-cohorts. Normalized streamline counts served as a proxy for connectivity, and t-tests were used to quantify differences between tracking protocols.
Results: Protocols using anatomically informed subcortical seed and target masks, as well as their combination with functional masks, yielded higher agreement and greater normalized streamline counts than the fMRI-only protocol. The combined approach showed an additional advantage for reconstructing parieto-temporal white matter tracts.
Conclusions: These comparisons underscore how protocol choice shapes the reconstruction of language pathways and highlight the need to evaluate these tractography strategies in clinical cohorts.
{"title":"Evaluating Unimodal and Multimodal Tracking Strategies for the Reconstruction of Language-related White Matter Tracts.","authors":"Lydia Marleen Schilling, Anna-Lena Ciesla, Julia My Van Kube, Peter Dechent, Christian Heiner Riedel, Nicole E Neef","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01601-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01601-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate reconstruction of language-related white matter pathways is essential for preoperative planning in brain surgery. While functional (f) MRI activation is often used to guide diffusion (d)MRI tractography, advanced automated protocols rely instead on subcortical anatomical priors. In this study, we evaluate the robustness of anatomically informed protocols without fMRI and compare them with fMRI-guided approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty healthy adults (aged 18-32) underwent fMRI during a language task and dMRI on a 3T MRI scanner. Six language-associated fiber bundles were reconstructed with XTRACT using unimodal and multimodal protocols. Reconstruction similarity was assessed using cross-correlations within-subjects, within-cohort, and across-cohorts. Normalized streamline counts served as a proxy for connectivity, and t-tests were used to quantify differences between tracking protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Protocols using anatomically informed subcortical seed and target masks, as well as their combination with functional masks, yielded higher agreement and greater normalized streamline counts than the fMRI-only protocol. The combined approach showed an additional advantage for reconstructing parieto-temporal white matter tracts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These comparisons underscore how protocol choice shapes the reconstruction of language pathways and highlight the need to evaluate these tractography strategies in clinical cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145716485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1007/s00062-025-01599-0
Giancarlo Salsano, Bruno Del Sette, Marco Bruzzone, Nicola Mavilio, Davide Sassos, Alessandra Murialdo, Luca Scarcia, Andrea M Alexandre, Massimo Del Sette, Lucio Castellan
Background: Distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVO) in stroke patients represent a complex clinical challenge, primarily due to lack of conclusive evidence supporting the superiority of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) over best medical therapy (BMT). This meta-analysis aims to compare clinical outcomes between these two treatment strategies, focusing on functional outcomes assessed by means of modified Rankin Scale (mRS), overall mortality, early neurological improvement (ENI), and incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
Material and methods: Three investigators independently researched all main medical search engines (Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Library) to identify original papers comparing MT and BMT in patients with ischemic stroke due to primary DMVO. Primary endpoint was functional independence at 90 days (mRS 0-2), while secondary outcomes included excellent clinical outcome at 90 days (mRS 0-1), all-cause mortality, ENI, sICH and SAH.
Results: A total of 28 studies (3 randomized control trials and 25 retrospective observational studies) comparing MT to BMT, involving 7512 patients were included. Our findings indicate no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes, both for functional independence (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.91-1.21) and excellent outcome (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.92-1.24). No statistically significant differences were observed for overall mortality (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.80-1.27), ENI (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.67-2.51) and rate of sICH (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.55-1.58). Statistically significant results were seen on SAH rate which was higher in the MT group (OR: 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.11).
Conclusions: Our meta-analysis did not support the routine use of MT in the treatment of DMVO. Rather, it indicates that MT + BMT does not lead to an increased proportion of patients achieving functional independence or excellent outcome at 3 months, nor does it reduce mortality rates compared to BMT alone.
{"title":"Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Best Medical Treatment for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Primary Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion: a Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Giancarlo Salsano, Bruno Del Sette, Marco Bruzzone, Nicola Mavilio, Davide Sassos, Alessandra Murialdo, Luca Scarcia, Andrea M Alexandre, Massimo Del Sette, Lucio Castellan","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01599-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01599-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVO) in stroke patients represent a complex clinical challenge, primarily due to lack of conclusive evidence supporting the superiority of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) over best medical therapy (BMT). This meta-analysis aims to compare clinical outcomes between these two treatment strategies, focusing on functional outcomes assessed by means of modified Rankin Scale (mRS), overall mortality, early neurological improvement (ENI), and incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Three investigators independently researched all main medical search engines (Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Library) to identify original papers comparing MT and BMT in patients with ischemic stroke due to primary DMVO. Primary endpoint was functional independence at 90 days (mRS 0-2), while secondary outcomes included excellent clinical outcome at 90 days (mRS 0-1), all-cause mortality, ENI, sICH and SAH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 studies (3 randomized control trials and 25 retrospective observational studies) comparing MT to BMT, involving 7512 patients were included. Our findings indicate no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes, both for functional independence (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.91-1.21) and excellent outcome (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.92-1.24). No statistically significant differences were observed for overall mortality (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.80-1.27), ENI (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.67-2.51) and rate of sICH (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.55-1.58). Statistically significant results were seen on SAH rate which was higher in the MT group (OR: 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analysis did not support the routine use of MT in the treatment of DMVO. Rather, it indicates that MT + BMT does not lead to an increased proportion of patients achieving functional independence or excellent outcome at 3 months, nor does it reduce mortality rates compared to BMT alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145716571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1007/s00062-025-01597-2
Katja Döring, Zaid Abdel-Muhdy, Athanasia Warnecke, Michael Klintschar, Heinrich Lanfermann, Stefan Bleich, Johanna Seifert
Purpose: To assess the incidence and patterns of injuries after non-fatal self-inflicted (SIS) and non-self-inflicted strangulation (NSIS) and evaluate diagnostic utility of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis (2013-2024) of patients undergoing CT and/or MRI following SIS/NSIS. Demographics, psychiatric comorbidity, strangulation mechanism, clinical symptoms and imaging findings were analyzed. Imaging was assessed for strangulation-associated injuries (e.g., fractures of the hyoid-larynx-complex [HLC], soft tissue hematoma [STH], blunt cervicovascular injury [BCVI]). Descriptive statistics were performed to detect risk factors for strangulation-associated injuries.
Results: 106 patients (55.7% female; mean age 40.2 years) and 124 events of strangulation with subsequent neuroimaging were included (CT: 96.8%, MRI: 3.2%). SIS comprised 80.6% of cases, mostly ligature strangulation (68.0%), followed by near-hanging (29.0%). NSIS accounted for 18.5% of cases. Eleven patients sustained strangulation-associated injuries, primarily HLC fractures and STH (6 cases each), but no BCVI. Older age (odds ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.07; p = 0.021) showed a weak association and male sex (6.32, 1.31-30.59, p = 0.022), near-hanging (12.36, 3.19-47.81, p < 0.001) and intubation (8.65, 2.04-36.78, p < 0.001) a moderate association with strangulation-associated injuries. We identified a distinct patient subgroup with recurrent SIS, characterized by predominant female sex, younger age and psychiatric disorders presenting with emotional instability. Injuries were not detected in any of these cases.
Conclusion: Severe strangulation-associated injuries are rare. CT should be used selectively, particularly in alert patients lacking relevant clinical findings. MRI may be preferable in younger patients and for forensic evaluation, particularly in NSIS.
{"title":"Neuroimaging in Non-fatal Strangulation: a Retrospective Analysis of Injury Patterns, Clinical Features and Diagnostic Utility.","authors":"Katja Döring, Zaid Abdel-Muhdy, Athanasia Warnecke, Michael Klintschar, Heinrich Lanfermann, Stefan Bleich, Johanna Seifert","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01597-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01597-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the incidence and patterns of injuries after non-fatal self-inflicted (SIS) and non-self-inflicted strangulation (NSIS) and evaluate diagnostic utility of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective analysis (2013-2024) of patients undergoing CT and/or MRI following SIS/NSIS. Demographics, psychiatric comorbidity, strangulation mechanism, clinical symptoms and imaging findings were analyzed. Imaging was assessed for strangulation-associated injuries (e.g., fractures of the hyoid-larynx-complex [HLC], soft tissue hematoma [STH], blunt cervicovascular injury [BCVI]). Descriptive statistics were performed to detect risk factors for strangulation-associated injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>106 patients (55.7% female; mean age 40.2 years) and 124 events of strangulation with subsequent neuroimaging were included (CT: 96.8%, MRI: 3.2%). SIS comprised 80.6% of cases, mostly ligature strangulation (68.0%), followed by near-hanging (29.0%). NSIS accounted for 18.5% of cases. Eleven patients sustained strangulation-associated injuries, primarily HLC fractures and STH (6 cases each), but no BCVI. Older age (odds ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.07; p = 0.021) showed a weak association and male sex (6.32, 1.31-30.59, p = 0.022), near-hanging (12.36, 3.19-47.81, p < 0.001) and intubation (8.65, 2.04-36.78, p < 0.001) a moderate association with strangulation-associated injuries. We identified a distinct patient subgroup with recurrent SIS, characterized by predominant female sex, younger age and psychiatric disorders presenting with emotional instability. Injuries were not detected in any of these cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Severe strangulation-associated injuries are rare. CT should be used selectively, particularly in alert patients lacking relevant clinical findings. MRI may be preferable in younger patients and for forensic evaluation, particularly in NSIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145710151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1007/s00062-025-01584-7
Constantin Schareck, Caroline Florack, Roland Schwab, Erelle Fuchs, Peter Schramm
Purpose: The national diagnostic reference level (DRL) for intracranial aneurysm therapy is set at 20,000 cGy cm2 for the patient. An adjustment between the expected dosage and exposure time requirement among a variety of applicable techniques is not commonly provided. Therefore patient dose and exposure times were analyzed when using the following techinques; dosimetric data of coils (CE), flow diverter (FD), stent-assisted coiling (SAC), intra-aneurysmatic flow diverter (IaFD), balloon-assisted coiling (BAC), flow diverter assisted coiling (FDAC), IaFD-assisted coiling (IaFDAC), x, y or t‑remodeling stent-assisted coiling (xyt-SAC), and stent-assisted IaFD (SAIaFD).
Methods: A retrospective analysis of the German DeGIR-QS registry was conducted between 2018 and 2023. This study aimed to investigate the median dose-area product and exposure time for each technique, aneurysm location, type and size. The goal was to ascertain which technique is the most time- and dose-efficient.
Results: FD (84.13%/79.41%) and IaFD (89.64%/73.53%) exhibited superior performance in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency when compared to CE (100% dose-area product/100% exposure time). However, certain aneurysm types and location combinations resulted in lower dose-area product and exposure time when CE was used rather than IaFD or FD. A comparison of the median dose-area product technique with the DRL reveals that all of the aforementioned procedures fall below this value. Aneurysm size has little impact on the finding that FD and IaFD are more efficient in terms of dose and time consumption than CE.
Conclusion: Patients' exposure can be reduced by selecting a technique associated with lower exposure levels, depending on the aneurysm's location and type. However, conformity is provided for all techniques mentioned.
{"title":"Comparison of Patient Dose and Exposure Time Across Various Techniques Used to Treat Intracranial Aneurysms : Analysis of the German Neurointerventional Database (DeGIR/DGNR) from 2018 to 2023.","authors":"Constantin Schareck, Caroline Florack, Roland Schwab, Erelle Fuchs, Peter Schramm","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01584-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01584-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The national diagnostic reference level (DRL) for intracranial aneurysm therapy is set at 20,000 cGy cm<sup>2</sup> for the patient. An adjustment between the expected dosage and exposure time requirement among a variety of applicable techniques is not commonly provided. Therefore patient dose and exposure times were analyzed when using the following techinques; dosimetric data of coils (CE), flow diverter (FD), stent-assisted coiling (SAC), intra-aneurysmatic flow diverter (IaFD), balloon-assisted coiling (BAC), flow diverter assisted coiling (FDAC), IaFD-assisted coiling (IaFDAC), x, y or t‑remodeling stent-assisted coiling (xyt-SAC), and stent-assisted IaFD (SAIaFD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the German DeGIR-QS registry was conducted between 2018 and 2023. This study aimed to investigate the median dose-area product and exposure time for each technique, aneurysm location, type and size. The goal was to ascertain which technique is the most time- and dose-efficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FD (84.13%/79.41%) and IaFD (89.64%/73.53%) exhibited superior performance in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency when compared to CE (100% dose-area product/100% exposure time). However, certain aneurysm types and location combinations resulted in lower dose-area product and exposure time when CE was used rather than IaFD or FD. A comparison of the median dose-area product technique with the DRL reveals that all of the aforementioned procedures fall below this value. Aneurysm size has little impact on the finding that FD and IaFD are more efficient in terms of dose and time consumption than CE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients' exposure can be reduced by selecting a technique associated with lower exposure levels, depending on the aneurysm's location and type. However, conformity is provided for all techniques mentioned.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145662484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-06DOI: 10.1007/s00062-025-01572-x
Guoli Duan, Yuhang Zhang, Rui Zhao, Pengfei Yang, Jieqing Wan, Xuebin Hu, Ting Lei, Lei Wang, Ge Gao, Sheng Guan, Jing Xu, Shu Wan, Wenfeng Feng, Qingdong Guo, Bo Ying, Li Zhang, Zhe Li, Qiang Li, Jianmin Liu
Objectives: To conduct a comprehensive comparative assessment of clinical performance between the novel TaminoVIA stent and the LVIS stent for endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs).
Methods: This prospective, multi-center, randomized, open-label, parallel positive-controlled, non-inferiority trial was conducted by 13 centers in China. Patients with UIAs were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive endovascular treatment (EVT) with the TaminoVIA stent or the LVIS stent. The primary outcome was successful occlusion at 6‑month follow-up, assessed by a blinded core laboratory. The non-inferiority boundary was set at 12%. Secondary outcomes included immediate procedural success, recanalization rates, and safety endpoints.
Results: Between March 2022 and April 2024, 203 patients were enrolled and randomized. Full Analysis Set (FAS) analysis showed a 6-month successful occlusion rate of 89.90% (89/99) in the TaminoVIA stent group, compared to 87.00% (87/100) in the LVIS stent group, with a difference of +2.90% (95% CI, -5.97% to 11.77%; P < 0.01). Immediate occlusion rates were comparable (68.89% vs. 61.54%; P = 0.35), and recanalization rates at 6 months were identical (1.11% vs. 1.10%; P > 0.99). The incidence of severe adverse events (SAEs, 13.13% vs. 15.00%, P = 0.84), device-related complications (2.02% vs. 0%, P = 0.25) and procedure-related SAEs (2.02% vs. 2.00%, P > 0.99) were comparable between the two groups. Both PPS and FAS analyses exceeded the non-inferiority boundary.
Conclusions: The TaminoVIA stent demonstrated non-inferiority to LVIS in both efficacy and safety for IA embolization. These findings support its clinical adoption, though long-term durability requires further validation.
目的:对新型TaminoVIA支架与LVIS支架在血管内治疗颅内未破裂动脉瘤(UIAs)中的临床表现进行综合比较评价。方法:该前瞻性、多中心、随机、开放标签、平行、正对照、非劣效性试验在中国13个中心进行。UIAs患者按1:1的比例随机接受TaminoVIA支架或LVIS支架的血管内治疗(EVT)。主要结果是6个月随访时成功闭塞,由盲法核心实验室评估。非劣效性界限设为12%。次要终点包括即时手术成功、再通率和安全终点。结果:在2022年3月至2024年4月期间,203名患者入组并随机分组。全分析集(FAS)分析显示,TaminoVIA支架组6个月的闭塞成功率为89.90%(89/99),而LVIS支架组为87.00%(87/100),差异为+2.90% (95% CI, -5.97% ~ 11.77%; P 0.99)。两组严重不良事件(SAEs, 13.13% vs 15.00%, P = 0.84)、器械相关并发症(2.02% vs 0%, P = 0.25)和手术相关SAEs (2.02% vs 2.00%, P = 0.99)的发生率具有可比性。PPS和FAS分析均超过非劣效性边界。结论:TaminoVIA支架在IA栓塞的有效性和安全性上均优于LVIS。这些发现支持其临床应用,尽管长期耐久性需要进一步验证。临床试验注册号:ChiCTR2400092436。
{"title":"Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with TaminoVIA Intracranial Stent System: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Positive-controlled, Non-inferiority Trial.","authors":"Guoli Duan, Yuhang Zhang, Rui Zhao, Pengfei Yang, Jieqing Wan, Xuebin Hu, Ting Lei, Lei Wang, Ge Gao, Sheng Guan, Jing Xu, Shu Wan, Wenfeng Feng, Qingdong Guo, Bo Ying, Li Zhang, Zhe Li, Qiang Li, Jianmin Liu","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01572-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00062-025-01572-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To conduct a comprehensive comparative assessment of clinical performance between the novel TaminoVIA stent and the LVIS stent for endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multi-center, randomized, open-label, parallel positive-controlled, non-inferiority trial was conducted by 13 centers in China. Patients with UIAs were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive endovascular treatment (EVT) with the TaminoVIA stent or the LVIS stent. The primary outcome was successful occlusion at 6‑month follow-up, assessed by a blinded core laboratory. The non-inferiority boundary was set at 12%. Secondary outcomes included immediate procedural success, recanalization rates, and safety endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between March 2022 and April 2024, 203 patients were enrolled and randomized. Full Analysis Set (FAS) analysis showed a 6-month successful occlusion rate of 89.90% (89/99) in the TaminoVIA stent group, compared to 87.00% (87/100) in the LVIS stent group, with a difference of +2.90% (95% CI, -5.97% to 11.77%; P < 0.01). Immediate occlusion rates were comparable (68.89% vs. 61.54%; P = 0.35), and recanalization rates at 6 months were identical (1.11% vs. 1.10%; P > 0.99). The incidence of severe adverse events (SAEs, 13.13% vs. 15.00%, P = 0.84), device-related complications (2.02% vs. 0%, P = 0.25) and procedure-related SAEs (2.02% vs. 2.00%, P > 0.99) were comparable between the two groups. Both PPS and FAS analyses exceeded the non-inferiority boundary.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TaminoVIA stent demonstrated non-inferiority to LVIS in both efficacy and safety for IA embolization. These findings support its clinical adoption, though long-term durability requires further validation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>ChiCTR2400092436.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"639-648"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145234135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1007/s00062-025-01568-7
Senta Frol, Ahmed Ayad, René Chapot
{"title":"How Much Is ICAD Required to Justify Rescue Stenting?","authors":"Senta Frol, Ahmed Ayad, René Chapot","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01568-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00062-025-01568-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"615-617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145151670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-06-26DOI: 10.1007/s00062-025-01535-2
Esmira Bakhshaliyeva, Lara Noelle Reiner, Moudather Chelbi, Jawed Nawabi, Anna Tietze, Michael Scheel, Mike Wattjes, Andrea Dell'Orco, Aymen Meddeb
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a crucial tool for visualizing orbital structures and detecting eye pathologies. However, manual segmentation of orbital anatomy is challenging due to the complexity and variability of the structures. Recent advancements in deep learning (DL), particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), offer promising solutions for automated segmentation in medical imaging. This study aimed to train and evaluate a U-Net-based model for the automated segmentation of key orbital structures.
Methods: This retrospective study included 117 patients with various orbital pathologies who underwent orbital MRI. Manual segmentation was performed on four anatomical structures: the ocular bulb, ocular tumors, retinal detachment, and the optic nerve. Following the UNet autoconfiguration by nnUNet, we conducted a five-fold cross-validation and evaluated the model's performances using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Relative Absolute Volume Difference (RAVD) as metrics.
Results: nnU-Net achieved high segmentation performance for the ocular bulb (mean DSC: 0.931) and the optic nerve (mean DSC: 0.820). Segmentation of ocular tumors (mean DSC: 0.788) and retinal detachment (mean DSC: 0.550) showed greater variability, with performance declining in more challenging cases. Despite these challenges, the model achieved high detection rates, with ROC AUCs of 0.90 for ocular tumors and 0.78 for retinal detachment.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates nnU-Net's capability for accurate segmentation of orbital structures, particularly the ocular bulb and optic nerve. However, challenges remain in the segmentation of tumors and retinal detachment due to variability and artifacts. Future improvements in deep learning models and broader, more diverse datasets may enhance segmentation performance, ultimately aiding in the diagnosis and treatment of orbital pathologies.
{"title":"Deep Learning Model for Automated Segmentation of Orbital Structures in MRI Images.","authors":"Esmira Bakhshaliyeva, Lara Noelle Reiner, Moudather Chelbi, Jawed Nawabi, Anna Tietze, Michael Scheel, Mike Wattjes, Andrea Dell'Orco, Aymen Meddeb","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01535-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00062-025-01535-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a crucial tool for visualizing orbital structures and detecting eye pathologies. However, manual segmentation of orbital anatomy is challenging due to the complexity and variability of the structures. Recent advancements in deep learning (DL), particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), offer promising solutions for automated segmentation in medical imaging. This study aimed to train and evaluate a U-Net-based model for the automated segmentation of key orbital structures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 117 patients with various orbital pathologies who underwent orbital MRI. Manual segmentation was performed on four anatomical structures: the ocular bulb, ocular tumors, retinal detachment, and the optic nerve. Following the UNet autoconfiguration by nnUNet, we conducted a five-fold cross-validation and evaluated the model's performances using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Relative Absolute Volume Difference (RAVD) as metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>nnU-Net achieved high segmentation performance for the ocular bulb (mean DSC: 0.931) and the optic nerve (mean DSC: 0.820). Segmentation of ocular tumors (mean DSC: 0.788) and retinal detachment (mean DSC: 0.550) showed greater variability, with performance declining in more challenging cases. Despite these challenges, the model achieved high detection rates, with ROC AUCs of 0.90 for ocular tumors and 0.78 for retinal detachment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates nnU-Net's capability for accurate segmentation of orbital structures, particularly the ocular bulb and optic nerve. However, challenges remain in the segmentation of tumors and retinal detachment due to variability and artifacts. Future improvements in deep learning models and broader, more diverse datasets may enhance segmentation performance, ultimately aiding in the diagnosis and treatment of orbital pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"735-745"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12552280/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144498971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-05-22DOI: 10.1007/s00062-025-01526-3
Christiane Franz, Claudia Fleu, Sophia Honecker, Manuela Schmiech, Dimah Hasan, Hani Ridwan, Omid Nikoubashman, Sebastian Lemmen, Martin Wiesmann
Purpose: Bacterial contamination has been reported to occur during angiographies, although data on its frequency and relevance are limited. The purpose of our study was to determine whether angiographic materials such as catheters and guide wires remain sterile during angiographies. We sought to differentiate between different materials, and to detect the frequency, the extent and the spectrum of bacterial contamination.
Methods: We prospectively collected 698 fluid or material samples from 100 neuroangiographies. Per angiography we analyzed proximal ends and distal tips of catheters and guide wires, and fluid samples from the water container (working bowl) in which materials were stored during the angiography. We analyzed the frequency and extent of contamination and determined the bacterial spectrum.
Results: The majority of samples (51.4%) were contaminated. There was no angiography that showed no contamination (0%). The highest proportion of contaminated samples was found in the fluid from the working bowl after completion of the examination (92.9%). Catheters and wires were contaminated in 34.1-49.2% of samples. Contamination of the samples increased with longer duration of the angiographic procedures. Most of the bacterial species were environmental or skin contaminants (86.2%).
Conclusion: Bacterial contamination during diagnostic neuroangiographies or interventions is a frequent finding although its clinical significance is believed to be small. Bacterial contamination increases with longer duration of angiographic procedures.
{"title":"Bacterial Contamination of Angiographic Materials in Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroangiography.","authors":"Christiane Franz, Claudia Fleu, Sophia Honecker, Manuela Schmiech, Dimah Hasan, Hani Ridwan, Omid Nikoubashman, Sebastian Lemmen, Martin Wiesmann","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01526-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00062-025-01526-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bacterial contamination has been reported to occur during angiographies, although data on its frequency and relevance are limited. The purpose of our study was to determine whether angiographic materials such as catheters and guide wires remain sterile during angiographies. We sought to differentiate between different materials, and to detect the frequency, the extent and the spectrum of bacterial contamination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively collected 698 fluid or material samples from 100 neuroangiographies. Per angiography we analyzed proximal ends and distal tips of catheters and guide wires, and fluid samples from the water container (working bowl) in which materials were stored during the angiography. We analyzed the frequency and extent of contamination and determined the bacterial spectrum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of samples (51.4%) were contaminated. There was no angiography that showed no contamination (0%). The highest proportion of contaminated samples was found in the fluid from the working bowl after completion of the examination (92.9%). Catheters and wires were contaminated in 34.1-49.2% of samples. Contamination of the samples increased with longer duration of the angiographic procedures. Most of the bacterial species were environmental or skin contaminants (86.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bacterial contamination during diagnostic neuroangiographies or interventions is a frequent finding although its clinical significance is believed to be small. Bacterial contamination increases with longer duration of angiographic procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"689-696"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12552300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144129174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}