Implications for respiratory muscle training in patients with stroke-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2314159
Ming Wu, Ming-Yu Mo, Xiao-Dan Huang, Jing Wei
{"title":"Implications for respiratory muscle training in patients with stroke-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Ming Wu, Ming-Yu Mo, Xiao-Dan Huang, Jing Wei","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2314159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of respiratory muscle training on improving lung function in patients with stroke-associated pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic retrieval was conducted using the databases of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, the Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest, and others. Studies involving patients who received respiratory muscle training with/without a breathing trainer and those who adopted routine post-stroke rehabilitation training were included in the systematic review. The statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included involving 850 patients with stroke. According to the results of the meta-analysis, compared with the control group, there were statistically significant differences in forced vital capacity (FVC) measurements (mean difference (MD) = 0.93, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and improvement values for FEV1/FVC (MD = 0.65, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) in the experimental group. The FEV1 value was higher in the experimental group than in the control group (MD = 5.89, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Furthermore, respiratory muscle training was superior to routine rehabilitation training for improving the PI<sub>max</sub> of patients with stroke (MD = 9.20, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The patients had better respiratory tolerance after respiratory muscle training intervention (MD = 73.40, <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of respiratory muscle training can improve FVC and FEV lung function indicators, inspiratory muscle strength and the 6-min walk test results in patients with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5791-5797"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2314159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of respiratory muscle training on improving lung function in patients with stroke-associated pneumonia.

Materials and methods: A systematic retrieval was conducted using the databases of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, the Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest, and others. Studies involving patients who received respiratory muscle training with/without a breathing trainer and those who adopted routine post-stroke rehabilitation training were included in the systematic review. The statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results: Fourteen studies were included involving 850 patients with stroke. According to the results of the meta-analysis, compared with the control group, there were statistically significant differences in forced vital capacity (FVC) measurements (mean difference (MD) = 0.93, p < 0.0001) and improvement values for FEV1/FVC (MD = 0.65, p < 0.00001) in the experimental group. The FEV1 value was higher in the experimental group than in the control group (MD = 5.89, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, respiratory muscle training was superior to routine rehabilitation training for improving the PImax of patients with stroke (MD = 9.20, p < 0.0001). The patients had better respiratory tolerance after respiratory muscle training intervention (MD = 73.40, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: The implementation of respiratory muscle training can improve FVC and FEV lung function indicators, inspiratory muscle strength and the 6-min walk test results in patients with stroke.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风相关肺炎患者呼吸肌训练的意义:一项荟萃分析。
目的:评估呼吸肌训练对改善中风相关肺炎患者肺功能的效果:使用 Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、ProQuest 等数据库进行了系统检索。系统性综述纳入的研究涉及接受呼吸肌训练的患者,包括使用/不使用呼吸训练器的患者,以及采用常规卒中后康复训练的患者。统计分析使用 RevMan 5.3 软件进行:结果:共纳入 14 项研究,涉及 850 名脑卒中患者。实施呼吸肌训练可改善脑卒中患者的 FVC 和 FEV 肺功能指标、吸气肌力和 6 分钟步行测试结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal associations between stroke-related neurologic deficits and course of basic activities of daily living up to six months after stroke. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the patellofemoral pain severity scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Spanish version of the King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Scale (KPPS). Understanding recovery of people recovering from COVID-19 receiving treatment from primary care allied health professionals: a mixed-methods study. The effectiveness of prehabilitation interventions on biopsychosocial and service outcomes pre and post upper gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1