Bone Marrow Stimulation for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1177/03635465231213873
Eoghan T Hurley, Bryan S Crook, Richard M Danilkowicz, Laith M Jazrawi, Raffy Mirzayan, Jonathan F Dickens, Oke Anakwenze, Christopher S Klifto
{"title":"Bone Marrow Stimulation for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Eoghan T Hurley, Bryan S Crook, Richard M Danilkowicz, Laith M Jazrawi, Raffy Mirzayan, Jonathan F Dickens, Oke Anakwenze, Christopher S Klifto","doi":"10.1177/03635465231213873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been proposed to augment healing at the time of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) by creating several bone marrow vents in the footprint of the rotator cuff, allowing mesenchymal stem cells, platelets, and growth factors to cover the area as a \"crimson duvet.\"</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the outcomes after BMS and a control for those undergoing ARCR.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search of 3 databases was performed based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RCTs comparing BMS and a control for ARCR were included. Clinical outcomes were compared, and a <i>P</i> value <.05 was considered to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 RCTs with 576 patients were included. Overall, 18.8% of patients treated with BMS and 21.0% of patients treated with a control had a retear (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 43%; <i>P</i> = .61). With BMS, the mean Constant score was 88.2, and with the control, the mean Constant score was 86.7 (<i>P</i> = .12). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (94.3 vs 93.2, respectively; <i>P</i> = .31) or visual analog scale score (0.9 vs 0.9, respectively; <i>P</i> = .89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The level 1 evidence in the literature did not support BMS as a modality to improve retear rates or clinical outcomes after ARCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3167-3172"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231213873","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been proposed to augment healing at the time of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) by creating several bone marrow vents in the footprint of the rotator cuff, allowing mesenchymal stem cells, platelets, and growth factors to cover the area as a "crimson duvet."

Purpose: To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the outcomes after BMS and a control for those undergoing ARCR.

Study design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: A literature search of 3 databases was performed based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RCTs comparing BMS and a control for ARCR were included. Clinical outcomes were compared, and a P value <.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results: A total of 7 RCTs with 576 patients were included. Overall, 18.8% of patients treated with BMS and 21.0% of patients treated with a control had a retear (I2 = 43%; P = .61). With BMS, the mean Constant score was 88.2, and with the control, the mean Constant score was 86.7 (P = .12). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (94.3 vs 93.2, respectively; P = .31) or visual analog scale score (0.9 vs 0.9, respectively; P = .89).

Conclusion: The level 1 evidence in the literature did not support BMS as a modality to improve retear rates or clinical outcomes after ARCR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨髓刺激用于关节镜下肩袖修复术:随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。
背景:骨髓刺激(BMS)被认为是在关节镜下肩袖修复术(ARCR)时促进愈合的一种方法,它通过在肩袖的足底创建几个骨髓孔,让间充质干细胞、血小板和生长因子像 "深红色羽绒被 "一样覆盖该区域。目的:对随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析,比较BMS和对照组对肩袖修复术患者的治疗效果:研究设计:荟萃分析;证据等级,1.方法:在3个数据库中进行文献检索:根据PRISMA(系统综述和Meta分析首选报告项目)指南,对3个数据库进行了文献检索。纳入了比较 BMS 和 ARCR 对照的 RCT。比较临床结果和 P 值 结果:共纳入了 7 项 RCT,576 名患者。总体而言,18.8% 接受 BMS 治疗的患者和 21.0% 接受对照组治疗的患者发生了再撕裂(I2 = 43%;P = .61)。接受 BMS 治疗的患者平均 Constant 得分为 88.2,而接受对照组治疗的患者平均 Constant 得分为 86.7(P = .12)。此外,美国肩肘外科医生评分(分别为 94.3 vs 93.2;P = .31)或视觉模拟量表评分(分别为 0.9 vs 0.9;P = .89)也无明显差异:文献中的 1 级证据不支持 BMS 作为一种改善 ARCR 后再撕裂率或临床结果的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Revision and Primary Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation at Midterm Follow-up: Patient Reported Outcomes, Survivorship, and Reoperation Rates. Primary Fixation and Cyclic Performance of Posterior Horn Medial Meniscus Root Repair With Knotless Adjustable Suture Anchor-Based Fixation: A Human Biomechanical Evaluation Over 100,000 Loading Cycles. Association Between Global Overcoverage and Long-term Survivorship, Chondrolabral Junction Breakdown, and Reduced Joint Space Width: Minimum 8-Year Follow-up. Restriction of Posterior Tibial Translation During the Posterior Drawer Test in Internal or External Rotation Is Dependent on Peripheral Stabilizers of the Knee: A Biomechanical Robotic Investigation. Serial Changes in Muscle Strength and Dynamic Balance After Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 55 Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1