首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Sports Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
A Novel Methodology for Establishing Best Values for MCID, SCB, and PASS Thresholds for Rotator Cuff Repair. 一种建立肌腱套修复中MCID、SCB和PASS阈值最佳值的新方法。
IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251380288
Alexander C Lee, Joshua Chiang, Xinning Li, Leesa M Galatz, Bradford O Parsons, William N Levine, John D Kelly, Robert L Parisien
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The heterogeneity of threshold values for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) as reported in the rotator cuff repair literature undermines the utility of these concepts. This systematic review identifies studies with published threshold values and proposes a methodologic framework for determining which values should be used for rotator cuff repair moving forward.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide recommendations for the MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds of commonly utilized patient-reported outcome measures for rotator cuff repair, as well as recommendations for how these thresholds should be calculated moving forward.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All studies reporting MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values after rotator cuff repair published between January 1, 2000, and May 31, 2022, were extracted via systematic review. The following data were collected: follow-up duration and patient attrition; reported threshold values; and data relevant to threshold calculation, including method, anchor questions and responses, area under the curve, and confidence intervals. The authors prioritized values calculated with an anchor question over those calculated without one, values from receiver operator characteristic analysis over those from mean change and logistic regression, and anchor questions with multiple response options over those with binary response options.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 41 studies were included in the systematic review: 37 (90%), 11 (27%), and 16 (39%) reported MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds, respectively. In addition, 12 studies calculated threshold values using anchor-based methods, and 6 calculated threshold values through distribution-based methods. The authors made recommendations for each threshold reported by at least 4 studies: for MCID, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) = 21, visual analog scale for pain = 1.5, single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) = 12, University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score = 6, and Constant-Murley score = 5.5; for SCB, ASES = 26 and SANE = 20; and for PASS, ASES = 78, visual analog scale for pain = 1.7, SANE = 71, and Constant-Murley score = 23.3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With standardized MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values for rotator cuff repair surgery, these concepts hold enormous potential to power future comparative studies, guide reimbursement policy, and aid patient decision-making. Future research on novel MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values should collect preoperative and 12-month postoperative patient-reported outcome measure data. Anchor questions should pertain to overall satisfaction with surgery and have multiple specific answer choices. These data should be correlated by receiver operator characteristic analysis, and an
背景:在肩袖修复文献中报道的最小临床重要差异(MCID)、实际临床获益(SCB)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值的异质性削弱了这些概念的实用性。本系统综述确定了已发表的阈值研究,并提出了一个方法学框架,以确定未来应使用哪些阈值进行肩袖修复。目的:为肩袖修复中常用的患者报告的预后指标提供MCID、SCB和PASS阈值的建议,以及如何计算这些阈值的建议。研究设计:系统评价;证据水平,3。方法:通过系统评价提取2000年1月1日至2022年5月31日期间发表的所有报道肩袖修复后MCID、SCB和PASS阈值的研究。收集以下数据:随访时间和患者减员;报告的阈值;以及与阈值计算相关的数据,包括方法、锚定问题和回答、曲线下面积和置信区间。作者将锚问题计算的值优先于没有锚问题计算的值,接收算子特征分析的值优先于均值变化和逻辑回归的值,具有多个响应选项的锚问题优先于具有二元响应选项的锚问题。结果:共有41项研究被纳入系统评价:分别有37项(90%)、11项(27%)和16项(39%)报告了MCID、SCB和PASS阈值。另外,有12项研究使用基于锚点的方法计算阈值,6项研究使用基于分布的方法计算阈值。作者对至少4项研究报告的每个阈值提出了建议:对于MCID, American Shoulder and肘部外科医生(ASES) = 21,疼痛视觉模拟量表= 1.5,单一评估数字评估(SANE) = 12,加州大学洛杉矶分校肩部评分= 6,Constant-Murley评分= 5.5;对于SCB, ase = 26, SANE = 20;pasas = 78,疼痛视觉模拟量表= 1.7,SANE = 71, Constant-Murley评分= 23.3。结论:有了标准化的MCID、SCB和PASS的肩袖修复手术阈值,这些概念在未来的比较研究、指导报销政策和帮助患者决策方面具有巨大的潜力。未来对新型MCID、SCB和PASS阈值的研究应收集术前和术后12个月患者报告的结果测量数据。锚定问题应该与手术的总体满意度有关,并有多个具体的答案选择。这些数据应通过接收算子特征分析进行关联,然后将任何阈值与平均值的标准误差或最小可检测变化进行比较,以确保统计显著性。
{"title":"A Novel Methodology for Establishing Best Values for MCID, SCB, and PASS Thresholds for Rotator Cuff Repair.","authors":"Alexander C Lee, Joshua Chiang, Xinning Li, Leesa M Galatz, Bradford O Parsons, William N Levine, John D Kelly, Robert L Parisien","doi":"10.1177/03635465251380288","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251380288","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The heterogeneity of threshold values for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) as reported in the rotator cuff repair literature undermines the utility of these concepts. This systematic review identifies studies with published threshold values and proposes a methodologic framework for determining which values should be used for rotator cuff repair moving forward.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Purpose: &lt;/strong&gt;To provide recommendations for the MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds of commonly utilized patient-reported outcome measures for rotator cuff repair, as well as recommendations for how these thresholds should be calculated moving forward.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Study design: &lt;/strong&gt;Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;All studies reporting MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values after rotator cuff repair published between January 1, 2000, and May 31, 2022, were extracted via systematic review. The following data were collected: follow-up duration and patient attrition; reported threshold values; and data relevant to threshold calculation, including method, anchor questions and responses, area under the curve, and confidence intervals. The authors prioritized values calculated with an anchor question over those calculated without one, values from receiver operator characteristic analysis over those from mean change and logistic regression, and anchor questions with multiple response options over those with binary response options.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;In total, 41 studies were included in the systematic review: 37 (90%), 11 (27%), and 16 (39%) reported MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds, respectively. In addition, 12 studies calculated threshold values using anchor-based methods, and 6 calculated threshold values through distribution-based methods. The authors made recommendations for each threshold reported by at least 4 studies: for MCID, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) = 21, visual analog scale for pain = 1.5, single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) = 12, University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score = 6, and Constant-Murley score = 5.5; for SCB, ASES = 26 and SANE = 20; and for PASS, ASES = 78, visual analog scale for pain = 1.7, SANE = 71, and Constant-Murley score = 23.3.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;With standardized MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values for rotator cuff repair surgery, these concepts hold enormous potential to power future comparative studies, guide reimbursement policy, and aid patient decision-making. Future research on novel MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values should collect preoperative and 12-month postoperative patient-reported outcome measure data. Anchor questions should pertain to overall satisfaction with surgery and have multiple specific answer choices. These data should be correlated by receiver operator characteristic analysis, and an","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3635465251380288"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictive Factors for Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Nonfailure Reoperations After Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 半月板移植后患者报告的预后指标变化的预测因素和不失败的再手术:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251383058
Ameer A Haider, Daniel E Fulkerson, Tanya Boghosian, Michele N Christy, Andrew W Kuhn, James Lee Pace, Matthew J Matava

Background: Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has been established as a safe, effective treatment for meniscal deficiency. However, questions remain regarding pre- and perioperative factors that affect MAT outcomes.

Purpose: To assess predictive factors for preoperative to postoperative change in Lysholm score (ΔLysholm) and nonfailure reoperations after MAT.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: The Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were systematically searched for studies investigating clinical outcomes after MAT, including Lysholm scores, failure, complications, or reoperations. Study characteristics, predictive factors, and outcomes were extracted. The primary outcomes included ΔLysholm scores and nonfailure reoperations. Nonfailure reoperation was defined as any nonfailure meniscus-related procedure after primary MAT aiming to improve knee function. Failure was defined as conversion to total/unilateral knee arthroplasty, total or subtotal meniscectomy/allograft removal, or revision MAT. Relationships between predictive factors and outcomes were analyzed by meta-analysis or by weighted linear regression. Significant factors were included in a multivariable meta-regression.

Results: Of 2347 screened titles, 154 met inclusion criteria. A total of 11,413 patients and 11,548 transplanted menisci were identified. The estimated pooled ΔLysholm score was 24.2 (SD, 6.08), and the nonfailure reoperation incidence rate was 3.36% (SD, 7.46%). No prognostic factors were significantly associated with differing ΔLysholm scores from meta-analysis. Lateral MATs had greater risk of nonfailure reoperation than medial MATs (ln[RR], -0.74; 95% CI, -1.37 to -0.108; P = .022). From multivariable regression, shorter time between meniscectomy and MAT (P = .007) and older age (P = .02) predicted less favorable cohort ΔLysholm scores. Longer intervals between injury and MAT (P = .039) and bone-bridge graft fixation for medial MAT compared with bone-plug fixation (P < .001) predicted higher risk of nonfailure reoperation.

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified lateral MAT as a significant risk factor for nonfailure reoperation. Older age and shorter time interval between meniscectomy and MAT were significantly associated with less favorable ΔLysholm scores. A longer meniscal injury-MAT time interval and bone-bridge compared with bone-plug fixation technique for medial MAT were significantly associated with higher reoperation risk.

背景:半月板同种异体移植(半月板移植)是一种安全、有效的半月板缺陷治疗方法。然而,关于术前和围手术期因素影响MAT结果的问题仍然存在。目的:评估术前至术后Lysholm评分变化(ΔLysholm)和mat术后无再手术失败的预测因素。研究设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析;证据等级,4级。方法:系统地检索Ovid Medline、Embase、Scopus和Clinicaltrials.gov数据库,以调查MAT后的临床结果,包括Lysholm评分、失败、并发症或再手术。提取研究特征、预测因素和结果。主要结果包括ΔLysholm评分和无失败再手术。非失败再手术被定义为在初次MAT后任何非失败的半月板相关手术,旨在改善膝关节功能。失败被定义为转为全/单侧膝关节置换术、全或次全半月板切除术/同种异体移植物切除术或MAT翻修。通过荟萃分析或加权线性回归分析预测因素与结果之间的关系。在多变量元回归中纳入了重要因素。结果:在筛选的2347个标题中,有154个符合纳入标准。共鉴定了11413例患者和11548例移植半月板。估计合并ΔLysholm评分为24.2 (SD, 6.08),不失败再手术发生率为3.36% (SD, 7.46%)。meta分析显示,预后因素与ΔLysholm评分差异无显著相关性。外侧垫比内侧垫有更大的再手术风险(ln[RR], -0.74; 95% CI, -1.37至-0.108;P = 0.022)。从多变量回归中,半月板切除术和MAT之间的时间较短(P = .007)和年龄较大(P = .02)预测较不利的队列ΔLysholm评分。损伤与MAT之间的间隔时间较长(P = 0.039),与骨栓固定相比,内侧MAT的骨桥移植固定(P < 0.001)预示着再手术失败的风险更高。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析确定外侧MAT是再次手术成功的重要危险因素。年龄越大,半月板切除术和MAT之间的时间间隔越短,ΔLysholm评分越低。较长的半月板损伤-MAT时间间隔和骨桥与内侧MAT的骨栓固定技术相比,具有较高的再手术风险。
{"title":"Predictive Factors for Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Nonfailure Reoperations After Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Ameer A Haider, Daniel E Fulkerson, Tanya Boghosian, Michele N Christy, Andrew W Kuhn, James Lee Pace, Matthew J Matava","doi":"10.1177/03635465251383058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251383058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has been established as a safe, effective treatment for meniscal deficiency. However, questions remain regarding pre- and perioperative factors that affect MAT outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess predictive factors for preoperative to postoperative change in Lysholm score (ΔLysholm) and nonfailure reoperations after MAT.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were systematically searched for studies investigating clinical outcomes after MAT, including Lysholm scores, failure, complications, or reoperations. Study characteristics, predictive factors, and outcomes were extracted. The primary outcomes included ΔLysholm scores and nonfailure reoperations. Nonfailure reoperation was defined as any nonfailure meniscus-related procedure after primary MAT aiming to improve knee function. Failure was defined as conversion to total/unilateral knee arthroplasty, total or subtotal meniscectomy/allograft removal, or revision MAT. Relationships between predictive factors and outcomes were analyzed by meta-analysis or by weighted linear regression. Significant factors were included in a multivariable meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2347 screened titles, 154 met inclusion criteria. A total of 11,413 patients and 11,548 transplanted menisci were identified. The estimated pooled ΔLysholm score was 24.2 (SD, 6.08), and the nonfailure reoperation incidence rate was 3.36% (SD, 7.46%). No prognostic factors were significantly associated with differing ΔLysholm scores from meta-analysis. Lateral MATs had greater risk of nonfailure reoperation than medial MATs (ln[RR], -0.74; 95% CI, -1.37 to -0.108; <i>P</i> = .022). From multivariable regression, shorter time between meniscectomy and MAT (<i>P</i> = .007) and older age (<i>P</i> = .02) predicted less favorable cohort ΔLysholm scores. Longer intervals between injury and MAT (<i>P</i> = .039) and bone-bridge graft fixation for medial MAT compared with bone-plug fixation (<i>P</i> < .001) predicted higher risk of nonfailure reoperation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis identified lateral MAT as a significant risk factor for nonfailure reoperation. Older age and shorter time interval between meniscectomy and MAT were significantly associated with less favorable ΔLysholm scores. A longer meniscal injury-MAT time interval and bone-bridge compared with bone-plug fixation technique for medial MAT were significantly associated with higher reoperation risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3635465251383058"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence of Reporting Bias in Abstracts of Meniscal Transplant Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Increased Association With Study Age: A Systematic Review. 半月板移植系统综述和荟萃分析摘要中报告偏倚的普遍性:与研究年龄增加的相关性:一项系统综述。
IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251380850
Cailan L Feingold, Eric H Lin, Pranit Kumaran, Mallory A Podosin, Avinesh Agarwalla, Joseph N Liu

Background: Spin is a form of reporting bias in which study results are presented more favorably than justified by the data. It often appears in abstracts and conclusions, where selective emphasis or misleading interpretation can distort readers' understanding and influence clinical decision-making.

Purpose: To identify the prevalence of spin, a reporting bias in which authors overemphasize beneficial or significant results and underreport weaknesses, in abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT), as well as to investigate associations between spin and study characteristics.

Study design: Systematic review, Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the PubMed, Web of Science, and Medscape databases were searched using the terms "menisc* transplant" OR "menisc* transplantation." Studies were included if they were systematic reviews or meta-analyses published in the English language and in peer-reviewed journals. Studies excluded were case reports, case series, animal or cadaveric studies, studies not published in the English language, and studies without an accessible full text. Data extracted included year of publication, journal, level of evidence, funding, Scopus CiteScore, and Clarivate impact factor. Abstracts were then analyzed for the 15 most common types of spin. Statistical analyses were performed using the Fisher exact test and linear regression with significance set at a P value <.05.

Results: After search screening, 41 studies met the inclusion criteria. Spin was identified in 19 (46.3%) abstracts. Type 3 spin ("Selective reporting of or overemphasis on efficacy outcomes or analysis favoring the beneficial effect of the experimental intervention") was the most common type of spin, seen in 7 (17.1%) abstracts. Misleading reporting was the most common category of spin, found in 20 (48.8%) abstracts. Studies from earlier years of publication had significantly more spin than studies published more recently (P = .005).

Conclusion: Spin is found in nearly half of abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating MAT, with misleading reporting being the most common modality of spin. Early studies on MAT exhibited a higher prevalence of spin in comparison with more recent investigations. Clinicians should be aware of the presence of spin and exercise judgment before making conclusions from study abstracts without assessing the full text.

背景:Spin是一种报告偏倚的形式,其中研究结果比数据更有利。它经常出现在摘要和结论中,选择性的强调或误导性的解释会扭曲读者的理解,影响临床决策。目的:确定自旋的普遍性,即作者在半月板同种异体移植(MAT)的系统综述和荟萃分析摘要中过度强调有益或重要的结果而低估缺点的报道偏倚,以及调查自旋与研究特征之间的关系。研究设计:系统评价,证据水平,4。方法:按照PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南,使用术语“半月板*移植”或“半月板*移植”检索PubMed、Web of Science和Medscape数据库。如果研究是用英语和同行评议的期刊发表的系统综述或荟萃分析,则纳入其中。排除的研究包括病例报告、病例系列、动物或尸体研究、未以英语发表的研究以及无法获得全文的研究。提取的数据包括发表年份、期刊、证据水平、资助、Scopus CiteScore和Clarivate影响因子。然后分析了15种最常见的自旋类型的摘要。采用Fisher精确检验和线性回归进行统计学分析,显著性设置为P值。结果:经检索筛选,41项研究符合纳入标准。在19篇(46.3%)摘要中发现Spin。3型自旋(“选择性报告或过分强调疗效结果或有利于实验干预有益效果的分析”)是最常见的自旋类型,在7篇(17.1%)摘要中看到。在20篇(48.8%)摘要中发现了误导性报道,这是最常见的spin类别。早期发表的研究明显比最近发表的研究有更多的spin (P = 0.005)。结论:在研究MAT的系统综述和荟萃分析的近一半摘要中发现了自旋,误导性报道是最常见的自旋形式。与最近的研究相比,早期的MAT研究显示出更高的自旋流行率。临床医生在没有评估全文的情况下从研究摘要中得出结论之前,应该意识到谎言的存在,并进行判断。
{"title":"Prevalence of Reporting Bias in Abstracts of Meniscal Transplant Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Increased Association With Study Age: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Cailan L Feingold, Eric H Lin, Pranit Kumaran, Mallory A Podosin, Avinesh Agarwalla, Joseph N Liu","doi":"10.1177/03635465251380850","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251380850","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spin is a form of reporting bias in which study results are presented more favorably than justified by the data. It often appears in abstracts and conclusions, where selective emphasis or misleading interpretation can distort readers' understanding and influence clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify the prevalence of spin, a reporting bias in which authors overemphasize beneficial or significant results and underreport weaknesses, in abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT), as well as to investigate associations between spin and study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review, Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the PubMed, Web of Science, and Medscape databases were searched using the terms \"menisc<sup>*</sup> transplant\" OR \"menisc<sup>*</sup> transplantation.\" Studies were included if they were systematic reviews or meta-analyses published in the English language and in peer-reviewed journals. Studies excluded were case reports, case series, animal or cadaveric studies, studies not published in the English language, and studies without an accessible full text. Data extracted included year of publication, journal, level of evidence, funding, Scopus CiteScore, and Clarivate impact factor. Abstracts were then analyzed for the 15 most common types of spin. Statistical analyses were performed using the Fisher exact test and linear regression with significance set at a <i>P</i> value <.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After search screening, 41 studies met the inclusion criteria. Spin was identified in 19 (46.3%) abstracts. Type 3 spin (\"Selective reporting of or overemphasis on efficacy outcomes or analysis favoring the beneficial effect of the experimental intervention\") was the most common type of spin, seen in 7 (17.1%) abstracts. Misleading reporting was the most common category of spin, found in 20 (48.8%) abstracts. Studies from earlier years of publication had significantly more spin than studies published more recently (<i>P</i> = .005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spin is found in nearly half of abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating MAT, with misleading reporting being the most common modality of spin. Early studies on MAT exhibited a higher prevalence of spin in comparison with more recent investigations. Clinicians should be aware of the presence of spin and exercise judgment before making conclusions from study abstracts without assessing the full text.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3635465251380850"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Midterm Outcomes in Patients Aged 40 Years and Older With Borderline Dysplasia After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. 40岁及以上股骨髋臼撞击髋关节镜术后边缘性发育不良患者的中期结果:倾向匹配分析
IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251397621
Eric Y Hu, Thomas E Moran, Jesus E Cervantes, Myles Atkins, Shane J Nho
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Age has been shown to play a role in patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS), but little is known regarding this relationship in the population with borderline dysplasia.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare patient outcomes and reoperation rates in patients aged ≥40 years and <40 years with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS at 2- and 5-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were acquired preoperatively and at 2 and 5 years postoperatively for patients undergoing surgery between January 2012 and June 2019. PROs included the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score, and visual analog scale for pain and satisfaction. Clinically significant outcomes included the minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). Patients diagnosed with BHD (lateral central-edge angle, 18°-25°) were stratified into cohorts ≥40 and <40 years old. Older patients were propensity matched 1:1 to younger patients controlling for sex, body mass index (BMI), and acetabular cartilage grade. PROs, clinically significant outcomes, and survivorship were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three patients aged ≥40 years with BHD (mean ± SD age, 48.4 ± 5.7 years; 68.8% female; BMI, 26.6 ± 5.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were successfully matched to 93 patients aged <40 years with BHD (age, 26.8 ± 7.6 years; 76.3% female; BMI, 25.9 ± 5.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Older patients had lower rates of weekly physical activity as compared with younger patients (<i>P</i> < .001). Older patients with BHD had significantly lower HOS-SS scores than younger patients preoperatively (<i>P</i> = .021) and at 5 years postoperatively (<i>P</i> = .040). However, there were no differences in improvement of any PRO from presurgery to 5-year follow-up between groups. Older patients had similar achievements of the minimal clinically important difference (<i>P</i> > .188) but achieved the PASS at a significantly lower rate for the HOS-SS (61.1% vs 79.7%; <i>P</i> = .024). Older patients also underwent conversion to total hip arthroplasty at a significantly higher rate (12.8% vs 1.4%; <i>P</i> = .010) when compared with younger patients, with a mean conversion time of 4.58 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study concludes that patients with BHD aged ≥40 years treated with contemporary hip arthroscopy for FAIS achieved similar function, pain, and satisfaction at 5-year follow-up but worse sports function and sports-related PASS achievement when compared with patients with BHD aged <40 years. Furthermore, while patients ≥40 years old had a higher rate of total hip arthroplasty conversion, they demonstrated similar overall reoperat
背景:年龄已被证明在髋关节镜治疗股髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)后的患者预后中起作用,但对于边缘性发育不良人群的这种关系知之甚少。目的:比较年龄≥40岁患者的预后和再手术率。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:对2012年1月至2019年6月期间接受手术的患者进行术前、术后2年和5年的患者报告结果(pro)分析。PROs包括髋关节预后评分-日常生活活动、髋关节预后评分-运动分量表(HOS-SS)、改良Harris髋关节评分和疼痛和满意度视觉模拟量表。临床显著性结果包括最小临床重要差异和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)。结果:93例年龄≥40岁的BHD患者(平均±SD年龄48.4±5.7岁,女性68.8%,BMI 26.6±5.3 kg/m2)与93例年龄2岁的BHD患者成功匹配。与年轻患者相比,老年患者的每周体力活动率较低(P < 0.001)。老年BHD患者术前(P = 0.021)和术后5年(P = 0.040)的HOS-SS评分明显低于年轻患者。然而,从手术到5年随访,两组间PRO的改善没有差异。老年患者在最小临床重要差异(P = 0.188)方面取得了类似的成就,但在HOS-SS中获得PASS的比例明显较低(61.1% vs 79.7%; P = 0.024)。老年患者转换为全髋关节置换术的比例明显高于年轻患者(12.8% vs 1.4%; P = 0.010),平均转换时间为4.58年。结论:本研究得出,与年龄≥40岁的BHD患者相比,采用现代髋关节镜治疗FAIS的患者在5年随访中获得了相似的功能、疼痛和满意度,但运动功能和运动相关PASS成绩较差
{"title":"Midterm Outcomes in Patients Aged 40 Years and Older With Borderline Dysplasia After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.","authors":"Eric Y Hu, Thomas E Moran, Jesus E Cervantes, Myles Atkins, Shane J Nho","doi":"10.1177/03635465251397621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251397621","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Age has been shown to play a role in patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS), but little is known regarding this relationship in the population with borderline dysplasia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Purpose: &lt;/strong&gt;To compare patient outcomes and reoperation rates in patients aged ≥40 years and &lt;40 years with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS at 2- and 5-year follow-up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Study design: &lt;/strong&gt;Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were acquired preoperatively and at 2 and 5 years postoperatively for patients undergoing surgery between January 2012 and June 2019. PROs included the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score, and visual analog scale for pain and satisfaction. Clinically significant outcomes included the minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). Patients diagnosed with BHD (lateral central-edge angle, 18°-25°) were stratified into cohorts ≥40 and &lt;40 years old. Older patients were propensity matched 1:1 to younger patients controlling for sex, body mass index (BMI), and acetabular cartilage grade. PROs, clinically significant outcomes, and survivorship were compared between groups.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Ninety-three patients aged ≥40 years with BHD (mean ± SD age, 48.4 ± 5.7 years; 68.8% female; BMI, 26.6 ± 5.3 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) were successfully matched to 93 patients aged &lt;40 years with BHD (age, 26.8 ± 7.6 years; 76.3% female; BMI, 25.9 ± 5.3 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;). Older patients had lower rates of weekly physical activity as compared with younger patients (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; &lt; .001). Older patients with BHD had significantly lower HOS-SS scores than younger patients preoperatively (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = .021) and at 5 years postoperatively (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = .040). However, there were no differences in improvement of any PRO from presurgery to 5-year follow-up between groups. Older patients had similar achievements of the minimal clinically important difference (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; &gt; .188) but achieved the PASS at a significantly lower rate for the HOS-SS (61.1% vs 79.7%; &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = .024). Older patients also underwent conversion to total hip arthroplasty at a significantly higher rate (12.8% vs 1.4%; &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = .010) when compared with younger patients, with a mean conversion time of 4.58 years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;This study concludes that patients with BHD aged ≥40 years treated with contemporary hip arthroscopy for FAIS achieved similar function, pain, and satisfaction at 5-year follow-up but worse sports function and sports-related PASS achievement when compared with patients with BHD aged &lt;40 years. Furthermore, while patients ≥40 years old had a higher rate of total hip arthroplasty conversion, they demonstrated similar overall reoperat","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3635465251397621"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145890586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Animal Model of Bone Grafting Procedure for Anterior Shoulder Instability and Strategies for Accelerating Graft Healing. 前肩不稳定植骨手术的动物模型及加速植骨愈合的策略。
IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251396152
Qingfa Song, Xingzuan Lin, Aofei Gao, Wen Fan, Dong Jiang, Guoqing Cui, Zhenxing Shao

Background: Bone grafting is a common and effective treatment for anterior shoulder instability. Graft healing is critical for the success of this procedure; however, few studies have investigated methods to enhance the healing process. Furthermore, suitable animal models are scarce for this type of surgery.

Purpose: To (1) establish an animal model of anterior shoulder instability, and (2) evaluate whether a surgical modification based on an inlay structure (creating a groove on the glenoid and shaping the graft to match it) along with postoperative administration of the bone anabolic agent parathyroid hormone 1-34 (PTH1-34) could accelerate graft healing.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: A rabbit model of anterior shoulder instability was established, and autologous iliac bone grafting was performed. Gross morphological observation, micro-computed tomography imaging and analysis, and histological staining and evaluation were employed to assess whether the inlay-based surgical modification and postoperative intermittent subcutaneous injection of PTH1-34 could enhance graft healing.

Results: The modified inlay technique increased the expression of Runx2 and type I collagen within the graft, accelerated graft integration with the glenoid, promoted more rapid callus remodeling and maturation, and reduced graft resorption. Additionally, for both the modified inlay and classic onlay bone grafting procedures, postoperative intermittent subcutaneous injection of PTH1-34 enhanced osteogenic capacity of the autograft and glenoid, increased new bone volume, and shortened the graft healing time.

Conclusion: We successfully developed an animal model of autologous bone grafting for anterior shoulder instability. Using this model, we demonstrated that the modified inlay bone grafting procedure improves osteogenic ability, shortens healing time, and promotes callus maturation. Intermittent subcutaneous administration of PTH1-34 after surgery further enhanced graft-glenoid healing.

Clinical relevance: The modified inlay technique and postoperative intermittent PTH1-34 administration may improve graft healing rates after bone grafting procedures for anterior shoulder instability.

背景:骨移植是治疗肩前路不稳的一种常见且有效的方法。移植物愈合是手术成功的关键;然而,很少有研究调查了增强愈合过程的方法。此外,适合这种手术的动物模型很少。目的:(1)建立肩前路不稳定动物模型,(2)评估基于嵌体结构的手术修饰(在肩关节上形成凹槽并塑造与之匹配的移植物)以及术后给予骨合成代谢剂甲状旁腺激素1-34 (PTH1-34)是否可以加速移植物愈合。研究设计:实验室对照研究。方法:建立兔肩关节前路失稳模型,行自体髂骨移植术。采用大体形态学观察、显微计算机断层成像与分析、组织学染色与评价等方法评价植体基础的手术修饰及术后间断皮下注射PTH1-34是否能促进移植物愈合。结果:改良的镶嵌技术增加了移植物内Runx2和I型胶原的表达,加速了移植物与关节盂的融合,促进了愈伤组织更快的重塑和成熟,减少了移植物的吸收。此外,改良嵌体和传统嵌体植骨术后间歇皮下注射PTH1-34增强了自体移植物和关节盂的成骨能力,增加了新骨体积,缩短了移植物愈合时间。结论:成功地建立了自体骨移植治疗肩前路不稳的动物模型。利用该模型,我们证明了改良的嵌体骨移植程序提高了成骨能力,缩短了愈合时间,促进了骨痂成熟。术后间歇皮下注射PTH1-34进一步促进移植物肩关节愈合。临床意义:改良的嵌体技术和术后间歇给药PTH1-34可提高前肩不稳植骨术后移植物愈合率。
{"title":"An Animal Model of Bone Grafting Procedure for Anterior Shoulder Instability and Strategies for Accelerating Graft Healing.","authors":"Qingfa Song, Xingzuan Lin, Aofei Gao, Wen Fan, Dong Jiang, Guoqing Cui, Zhenxing Shao","doi":"10.1177/03635465251396152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251396152","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone grafting is a common and effective treatment for anterior shoulder instability. Graft healing is critical for the success of this procedure; however, few studies have investigated methods to enhance the healing process. Furthermore, suitable animal models are scarce for this type of surgery.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To (1) establish an animal model of anterior shoulder instability, and (2) evaluate whether a surgical modification based on an inlay structure (creating a groove on the glenoid and shaping the graft to match it) along with postoperative administration of the bone anabolic agent parathyroid hormone 1-34 (PTH1-34) could accelerate graft healing.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rabbit model of anterior shoulder instability was established, and autologous iliac bone grafting was performed. Gross morphological observation, micro-computed tomography imaging and analysis, and histological staining and evaluation were employed to assess whether the inlay-based surgical modification and postoperative intermittent subcutaneous injection of PTH1-34 could enhance graft healing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified inlay technique increased the expression of Runx2 and type I collagen within the graft, accelerated graft integration with the glenoid, promoted more rapid callus remodeling and maturation, and reduced graft resorption. Additionally, for both the modified inlay and classic onlay bone grafting procedures, postoperative intermittent subcutaneous injection of PTH1-34 enhanced osteogenic capacity of the autograft and glenoid, increased new bone volume, and shortened the graft healing time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We successfully developed an animal model of autologous bone grafting for anterior shoulder instability. Using this model, we demonstrated that the modified inlay bone grafting procedure improves osteogenic ability, shortens healing time, and promotes callus maturation. Intermittent subcutaneous administration of PTH1-34 after surgery further enhanced graft-glenoid healing.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The modified inlay technique and postoperative intermittent PTH1-34 administration may improve graft healing rates after bone grafting procedures for anterior shoulder instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3635465251396152"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145890570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Disease in 2025 and Beyond. 富血小板血浆在2025年及以后治疗肌肉骨骼疾病中的应用。
IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251395284
Benjamin B Rothrauff, Joseph T Featherall, Tyler J Uppstrom, Greta Gohring, Anna-Laura Nelson, Thos A Evans, Peter J Millett, Matthew T Provencher, Marc J Philippon, Johnny Huard

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a blood-based orthobiologic used to treat a myriad of musculoskeletal conditions. While in vitro and preclinical studies on PRP have been promising, clinical results have been mixed. The heterogeneity in clinical benefits is attributable to both the complexity and variability of PRP as a biologic as well as the diversity of targeted tissues and ailments. Many variables have been proposed to affect PRP's bioactivity and clinical effects, with differing levels of evidence demonstrated for each variable. These variables can be broadly categorized as biological, technical, and abnormality-specific factors. Additionally, insufficient characterization of PRP in clinical studies has been a major limitation in both determining the efficacy of PRP for a given clinical condition and understanding the basic biology of PRP. This review highlights the current landscape of PRP as a treatment of musculoskeletal conditions, including both the regulatory environment and clinical applications, and considers the influence of numerous factors affecting PRP's bioactivity and clinical effects. Emerging technologies that may further enhance the utility of PRP as an orthobiologic are also discussed. Rigorous basic, translational, and clinical research remains fundamental to realize the promise of PRP treatment for musculoskeletal disease.

富血小板血浆(PRP)是一种以血液为基础的骨科产品,用于治疗各种肌肉骨骼疾病。虽然PRP的体外和临床前研究很有希望,但临床结果却喜忧参半。临床获益的异质性归因于PRP作为一种生物制剂的复杂性和可变性,以及靶向组织和疾病的多样性。已经提出了许多变量来影响PRP的生物活性和临床效果,每个变量的证据水平不同。这些变量可以大致分为生物因素、技术因素和异常因素。此外,临床研究中对PRP的描述不足是确定PRP对特定临床条件的疗效和了解PRP基本生物学的主要限制。本文综述了PRP作为肌肉骨骼疾病治疗的现状,包括调控环境和临床应用,并考虑了影响PRP生物活性和临床效果的众多因素。新兴技术可能进一步提高PRP作为一种骨科的效用也进行了讨论。严格的基础、转化和临床研究仍然是实现PRP治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的承诺的基础。
{"title":"Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Disease in 2025 and Beyond.","authors":"Benjamin B Rothrauff, Joseph T Featherall, Tyler J Uppstrom, Greta Gohring, Anna-Laura Nelson, Thos A Evans, Peter J Millett, Matthew T Provencher, Marc J Philippon, Johnny Huard","doi":"10.1177/03635465251395284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251395284","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a blood-based orthobiologic used to treat a myriad of musculoskeletal conditions. While in vitro and preclinical studies on PRP have been promising, clinical results have been mixed. The heterogeneity in clinical benefits is attributable to both the complexity and variability of PRP as a biologic as well as the diversity of targeted tissues and ailments. Many variables have been proposed to affect PRP's bioactivity and clinical effects, with differing levels of evidence demonstrated for each variable. These variables can be broadly categorized as biological, technical, and abnormality-specific factors. Additionally, insufficient characterization of PRP in clinical studies has been a major limitation in both determining the efficacy of PRP for a given clinical condition and understanding the basic biology of PRP. This review highlights the current landscape of PRP as a treatment of musculoskeletal conditions, including both the regulatory environment and clinical applications, and considers the influence of numerous factors affecting PRP's bioactivity and clinical effects. Emerging technologies that may further enhance the utility of PRP as an orthobiologic are also discussed. Rigorous basic, translational, and clinical research remains fundamental to realize the promise of PRP treatment for musculoskeletal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3635465251395284"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145890573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reinjury and Return to Sport in Adolescent Athletes: Increased Risk in Younger Age and Earlier Time to Return to Sport. 青少年运动员前交叉韧带再损伤和重返运动的预测因素:年龄越小,重返运动的时间越早,风险越大。
IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251395297
Bhargavi Maheshwer, Kallie J Chen, Andrew S Paliobeis, Penelope Halkiadakis, Abdus Sattar, Jacob G Calcei, James E Voos

Background: The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries is increasing among the adolescent population, with a peak occurring in the high school age range.

Purpose: To (1) characterize recent epidemiologic trends of ACL injuries and graft failure rates in high school adolescents, and (2) determine variables associated with sustaining a secondary ACL injury.

Study design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed for all patients ≤18 years who underwent primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) between 2015 and 2020. Odds ratios were calculated for baseline patient characteristics and their association with the risk of recurrent tear. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the relationship between recurrent tear and specific categorical variables.

Results: A total of 431 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 64.9 months (range, 24-87 months). Recurrent primary graft failure was experienced in 9% of patients, and 11.1% sustained a contralateral ACL tear. The median time to postoperative graft failure was 14 months (interquartile range, 9-41.5 months). Patients with a secondary ACL injury (eg, graft failure or contralateral ACL injury) were younger than those who did not sustain a subsequent injury (mean age, 15.7 ± 1.8 years [graft failure] and 15.5 ± 1.3 [contralateral ACL injury] vs 16.2 ± 1.5 years, respectively; P = .007). Survival analysis demonstrated that younger age at primary ACLR and earlier time to return to sport (RTS) were significantly associated with an increased rate of secondary ACL injury (P < .05). With respect to combined secondary ACL injuries, as age at primary ACLR increases by 1 year, the rate of secondary ACL injury decreases by 27%. Similarly, for every subsequent 1-month delay in RTS, the risk of secondary ACL injury decreased by 13%.

Conclusion: Younger age and earlier time to RTS after ACL injury are independent risk factors associated with sustaining both primary ACL recurrent tear and contralateral ACL injury in the adolescent patient population. Counseling of adolescent athletes should include physical therapy compliance and allow for adequate healing and time to RTS.

背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的发生率在青少年人群中呈上升趋势,在高中年龄段达到高峰。目的:(1)描述高中青少年前交叉韧带损伤和移植物失败率的最新流行趋势,(2)确定与维持继发性前交叉韧带损伤相关的变量。研究设计:病例对照研究;证据等级,4级。方法:回顾性分析2015 - 2020年间所有≤18岁接受初级ACL重建(ACLR)的患者。计算了基线患者特征及其与复发性撕裂风险的关系的优势比。采用多变量Cox回归分析确定复发性撕裂与特定分类变量的关系。结果:共纳入431例患者,中位随访时间64.9个月(范围24-87个月)。9%的患者复发性移植物失败,11.1%的患者对侧ACL撕裂。术后移植失败的中位时间为14个月(四分位数范围为9-41.5个月)。继发性ACL损伤(如移植物失败或对侧ACL损伤)的患者比未发生后续损伤的患者年轻(平均年龄分别为15.7±1.8岁(移植物失败)和15.5±1.3岁(对侧ACL损伤)vs 16.2±1.5岁,P = .007)。生存分析表明,原发性ACLR发病年龄越小、重返运动时间越早与继发性ACL损伤发生率增加显著相关(P < 0.05)。对于合并继发性ACL损伤,随着原发性ACLR年龄的增加1岁,继发性ACL损伤的发生率降低27%。同样,RTS每延迟1个月,继发性ACL损伤的风险降低13%。结论:年轻的年龄和更早的前交叉韧带损伤后RTS时间是青少年患者维持原发性前交叉韧带复发性撕裂和对侧前交叉韧带损伤的独立危险因素。青少年运动员的咨询应包括物理治疗依从性,并允许足够的愈合和RTS时间。
{"title":"Predictors of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reinjury and Return to Sport in Adolescent Athletes: Increased Risk in Younger Age and Earlier Time to Return to Sport.","authors":"Bhargavi Maheshwer, Kallie J Chen, Andrew S Paliobeis, Penelope Halkiadakis, Abdus Sattar, Jacob G Calcei, James E Voos","doi":"10.1177/03635465251395297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251395297","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries is increasing among the adolescent population, with a peak occurring in the high school age range.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To (1) characterize recent epidemiologic trends of ACL injuries and graft failure rates in high school adolescents, and (2) determine variables associated with sustaining a secondary ACL injury.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case-control study; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed for all patients ≤18 years who underwent primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) between 2015 and 2020. Odds ratios were calculated for baseline patient characteristics and their association with the risk of recurrent tear. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the relationship between recurrent tear and specific categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 431 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 64.9 months (range, 24-87 months). Recurrent primary graft failure was experienced in 9% of patients, and 11.1% sustained a contralateral ACL tear. The median time to postoperative graft failure was 14 months (interquartile range, 9-41.5 months). Patients with a secondary ACL injury (eg, graft failure or contralateral ACL injury) were younger than those who did not sustain a subsequent injury (mean age, 15.7 ± 1.8 years [graft failure] and 15.5 ± 1.3 [contralateral ACL injury] vs 16.2 ± 1.5 years, respectively; <i>P</i> = .007). Survival analysis demonstrated that younger age at primary ACLR and earlier time to return to sport (RTS) were significantly associated with an increased rate of secondary ACL injury (<i>P</i> < .05). With respect to combined secondary ACL injuries, as age at primary ACLR increases by 1 year, the rate of secondary ACL injury decreases by 27%. Similarly, for every subsequent 1-month delay in RTS, the risk of secondary ACL injury decreased by 13%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Younger age and earlier time to RTS after ACL injury are independent risk factors associated with sustaining both primary ACL recurrent tear and contralateral ACL injury in the adolescent patient population. Counseling of adolescent athletes should include physical therapy compliance and allow for adequate healing and time to RTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"54 1","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145879142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Factors for Progression to Glenohumeral Arthritis After Arthroscopic Anterior Stabilization in a Young and High-Demand Population. 在年轻和高需求人群中,关节镜前固定术后进展为盂肱关节炎的危险因素。
IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251390551
Bobby G Yow, Ashley B Bozzay, Benjamin W Hoyt, Sean E Slaven, Zein Aburish, Kelly G Kilcoyne, Jonathan F Dickens

Background: While arthroscopic stabilization for anterior glenohumeral instability is successful in preventing recurrent dislocations, progression to glenohumeral arthritis remains concerning. Age, anchor number, and capsular volume shrinkage have been previously established as risk factors for progression to arthritis in patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior stabilization. However, the rate of and risk factors for arthritis in young populations have not been well characterized.

Purpose: To evaluate the rate of progression to glenohumeral arthritis and identify potential risk factors after arthroscopic anterior stabilization in a young population.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: This study included 287 patients who underwent an index primary arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization procedure at a single institution and had a minimum of 4 years of postoperative imaging available over a 12-year period. Patients were excluded if imaging or operative reports were unavailable. The presence of arthritis was defined using radiographic parameters. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were estimated for the development of arthritis and compared by patient characteristics using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs associated with patient characteristics as predictors of the development of glenohumeral arthritis, adjusted for confounders identified in univariate analyses.

Results: Among the 287 patients, 8% (23/287) developed glenohumeral arthritis. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 22.7 years (SD, 5.26). The median time from surgery to diagnosis of arthritis was 8 years, and the median follow-up time was 9 years (interquartile range, 6-11). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed differences in time to arthritis among patient groups, with earlier arthritis observed when stratified by age >25 years, use of <3 anchors at index surgery, and undergoing revision surgery after index stabilization. Adjusted for potential confounders in a multivariable Cox regression model, risk factors for the development of glenohumeral arthritis included older age at index surgery (HR per 1-SD increase in years, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.34-2.55]), lower anchor number (HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.107-2.14]), and revision surgery (HR, 2.83 [95% CI, 1.150-.95]).

Conclusion: Progression to glenohumeral arthritis after anterior stabilization occurred in 8% of a young patient population. The age and number of anchors used are statistically significant risk factors for progression to arthritis. Additionally, revision surgery was identified as a risk factor, which has not been previously reported in the literature.

背景:虽然关节镜下固定术治疗肱骨前关节不稳可成功预防复发性脱位,但进展为肱骨盂关节炎仍值得关注。年龄、锚钉数目和关节囊体积缩小是关节镜前路稳定患者进展为关节炎的危险因素。然而,在年轻人群中关节炎的发病率和危险因素还没有很好地表征。目的:评估年轻人群关节镜前路稳定后盂肱关节炎的进展率,并确定潜在的危险因素。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:本研究纳入了287例患者,这些患者在同一家机构接受了一级关节镜肩关节前稳定手术,在12年的时间里至少有4年的术后影像学记录。如果没有影像学或手术报告,则排除患者。使用影像学参数确定关节炎的存在。估计关节炎发展的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,并使用log-rank检验比较患者特征。使用Cox比例风险模型计算95% ci与患者特征相关的风险比(hr),作为盂肱关节炎发展的预测因子,并根据单因素分析中发现的混杂因素进行调整。结果:287例患者中,8%(23/287)发生肩关节关节炎。患者手术时的平均年龄为22.7岁(SD, 5.26)。从手术到诊断为关节炎的中位时间为8年,中位随访时间为9年(四分位数范围6-11)。Kaplan-Meier曲线揭示了患者组间关节炎发生时间的差异,按年龄分层观察到早期关节炎,结论:8%的年轻患者在前路稳定后进展为盂肱关节炎。使用锚的年龄和数量是关节炎进展的统计学显著危险因素。此外,翻修手术被确定为一个危险因素,这在以前的文献中没有报道。
{"title":"Risk Factors for Progression to Glenohumeral Arthritis After Arthroscopic Anterior Stabilization in a Young and High-Demand Population.","authors":"Bobby G Yow, Ashley B Bozzay, Benjamin W Hoyt, Sean E Slaven, Zein Aburish, Kelly G Kilcoyne, Jonathan F Dickens","doi":"10.1177/03635465251390551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251390551","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While arthroscopic stabilization for anterior glenohumeral instability is successful in preventing recurrent dislocations, progression to glenohumeral arthritis remains concerning. Age, anchor number, and capsular volume shrinkage have been previously established as risk factors for progression to arthritis in patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior stabilization. However, the rate of and risk factors for arthritis in young populations have not been well characterized.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the rate of progression to glenohumeral arthritis and identify potential risk factors after arthroscopic anterior stabilization in a young population.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 287 patients who underwent an index primary arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization procedure at a single institution and had a minimum of 4 years of postoperative imaging available over a 12-year period. Patients were excluded if imaging or operative reports were unavailable. The presence of arthritis was defined using radiographic parameters. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were estimated for the development of arthritis and compared by patient characteristics using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs associated with patient characteristics as predictors of the development of glenohumeral arthritis, adjusted for confounders identified in univariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 287 patients, 8% (23/287) developed glenohumeral arthritis. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 22.7 years (SD, 5.26). The median time from surgery to diagnosis of arthritis was 8 years, and the median follow-up time was 9 years (interquartile range, 6-11). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed differences in time to arthritis among patient groups, with earlier arthritis observed when stratified by age >25 years, use of <3 anchors at index surgery, and undergoing revision surgery after index stabilization. Adjusted for potential confounders in a multivariable Cox regression model, risk factors for the development of glenohumeral arthritis included older age at index surgery (HR per 1-SD increase in years, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.34-2.55]), lower anchor number (HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.107-2.14]), and revision surgery (HR, 2.83 [95% CI, 1.150-.95]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Progression to glenohumeral arthritis after anterior stabilization occurred in 8% of a young patient population. The age and number of anchors used are statistically significant risk factors for progression to arthritis. Additionally, revision surgery was identified as a risk factor, which has not been previously reported in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"54 1","pages":"135-140"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145879450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty Rates 10 Years After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Severe Chondrolabral Junction Breakdown. 患者报告的严重关节关节破裂患者在髋关节镜检查后10年的预后和转到全髋关节置换术的比率。
IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251395216
Nicholas J Lemme, Eric Y Hu, Jesus E Cervantes, Andrew S Bi, Shane J Nho

Background: The chondrolabral junction (CLJ) plays an important role in maintaining hip dynamics, and there is a paucity in the literature examining the effect of CLJ breakdown on long-term outcomes after hip arthroscopy.

Purpose: To identify patient-reported outcomes (PROs), achievement of clinically significant outcomes, and reoperation rates at 10-year follow-up in patients with severe CLJ breakdown undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: PROs were obtained preoperatively and at 10-year follow-up for patients undergoing surgery between January 2012 and June 2014. PROs included the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, international Hip Outcome Tool-12, and visual analog scale for pain. Clinically significant outcomes included the minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State. Patients were categorized as having severe CLJ breakdown if their Beck classification was between 3 and 4 and mild if their classification was 1 to 2. Those with severe breakdown were propensity matched 1:1 to patients who had mild breakdown, controlling for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Independent t tests and Fisher exact tests were used to compare PROs and rates of hip arthroscopy revision and total hip arthroplasty conversion between groups, respectively.

Results: In this study, 53 patients with severe CLJ breakdown (25 females; mean ± SD age, 38.6 ± 12.2 years; BMI, 25.9 ± 4.9 kg/m2) were matched successfully 1:1 by age, sex, and BMI to 53 patients with mild CLJ breakdown (27 females; age, 37.8 ± 11.3 years; BMI, 25.9 ± 4.9 kg/m2). Preoperatively, there were no differences in PROs between patients with severe and mild CLJ breakdown. At final 10-year follow-up, PRO scores were also similar between groups. However, at 10 years, patients with severe CLJ breakdown underwent conversion to total hip arthroplasty at significantly higher rates than those with mild breakdown (28.4% vs 5.7%; P = .003).

Conclusion: Patients with severe CLJ junction breakdown undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement achieve similar PROs at long-term follow-up but undergo hip arthroplasty significantly more often when compared with patients with mild breakdown.

背景:关节软骨关节(CLJ)在维持髋关节动力学方面起着重要作用,目前缺乏关于关节软骨关节破裂对髋关节镜术后长期预后影响的文献。目的:确定重度CLJ骨折患者行股髋臼撞击髋关节镜治疗后10年随访的患者报告结局(PROs)、临床显著结局的实现和再手术率。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:对2012年1月至2014年6月接受手术的患者进行术前及10年随访。PROs包括髋关节结局评分-日常生活活动、髋关节结局评分-运动亚量表、改良Harris髋关节评分、国际髋关节结局工具-12和疼痛视觉模拟量表。临床显著性结果包括最小临床重要差异和患者可接受症状状态。如果患者的Beck分类在3到4之间,则被归类为重度CLJ分解,如果他们的Beck分类在1到2之间,则被归类为轻度CLJ分解。在控制年龄、性别和身体质量指数(BMI)的情况下,重度精神崩溃患者与轻度精神崩溃患者的倾向性匹配为1:1。分别采用独立t检验和Fisher精确检验比较两组间髋关节镜翻修和全髋关节置换术的PROs和发生率。结果:本研究53例重度CLJ衰竭患者(女性25例,平均±SD年龄38.6±12.2岁,BMI 25.9±4.9 kg/m2)与53例轻度CLJ衰竭患者(女性27例,年龄37.8±11.3岁,BMI 25.9±4.9 kg/m2)按年龄、性别、BMI 1:1匹配成功。术前,重度和轻度CLJ衰竭患者的PROs无差异。在最后的10年随访中,两组之间的PRO评分也相似。然而,在10年时,严重CLJ破裂的患者转行全髋关节置换术的比例明显高于轻度破裂的患者(28.4% vs 5.7%; P = 0.003)。结论:严重CLJ连接处破裂的患者在接受股髋臼撞击的髋关节镜治疗后,在长期随访中获得了相似的PROs,但与轻度破裂的患者相比,接受髋关节置换术的患者明显更多。
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes and Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty Rates 10 Years After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Severe Chondrolabral Junction Breakdown.","authors":"Nicholas J Lemme, Eric Y Hu, Jesus E Cervantes, Andrew S Bi, Shane J Nho","doi":"10.1177/03635465251395216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251395216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The chondrolabral junction (CLJ) plays an important role in maintaining hip dynamics, and there is a paucity in the literature examining the effect of CLJ breakdown on long-term outcomes after hip arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify patient-reported outcomes (PROs), achievement of clinically significant outcomes, and reoperation rates at 10-year follow-up in patients with severe CLJ breakdown undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PROs were obtained preoperatively and at 10-year follow-up for patients undergoing surgery between January 2012 and June 2014. PROs included the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, international Hip Outcome Tool-12, and visual analog scale for pain. Clinically significant outcomes included the minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State. Patients were categorized as having severe CLJ breakdown if their Beck classification was between 3 and 4 and mild if their classification was 1 to 2. Those with severe breakdown were propensity matched 1:1 to patients who had mild breakdown, controlling for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Independent <i>t</i> tests and Fisher exact tests were used to compare PROs and rates of hip arthroscopy revision and total hip arthroplasty conversion between groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 53 patients with severe CLJ breakdown (25 females; mean ± SD age, 38.6 ± 12.2 years; BMI, 25.9 ± 4.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were matched successfully 1:1 by age, sex, and BMI to 53 patients with mild CLJ breakdown (27 females; age, 37.8 ± 11.3 years; BMI, 25.9 ± 4.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Preoperatively, there were no differences in PROs between patients with severe and mild CLJ breakdown. At final 10-year follow-up, PRO scores were also similar between groups. However, at 10 years, patients with severe CLJ breakdown underwent conversion to total hip arthroplasty at significantly higher rates than those with mild breakdown (28.4% vs 5.7%; <i>P</i> = .003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with severe CLJ junction breakdown undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement achieve similar PROs at long-term follow-up but undergo hip arthroplasty significantly more often when compared with patients with mild breakdown.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"54 1","pages":"82-88"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145879548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical and Cosmetic Results After Double-Row Reconstruction of the Distal Triceps Tendon in an Athletic Population: A Retrospective Case Series of 70 Patients With a Mean Follow-up of 6 Years. 运动人群三头远端肌腱双排重建的临床和美容结果:70例患者的回顾性病例系列,平均随访6年。
IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/03635465251389010
Lorenz Fritsch, Lucca Lacheta, Nicolas Kühne, Sebastian Lappen, Maximilian Hinz, Sebastian Siebenlist, Mathias Ritsch

Background: Clinical outcomes after surgical repair of the distal triceps tendon are scarce and represented in small, heterogeneous case series.

Purpose: To evaluate clinical and cosmetic outcomes after double-row repair in a high-demand athlete population.

Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: All patients who participated in regular weight lifting and underwent distal triceps tendon repairs between 2000 and 2021 in 2 centers were retrospectively contacted for informed consent and follow-up examination. Patients who received distal triceps tendon repair in double-row fashion with a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS; without instability), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were surveyed. General satisfaction on a scale from 0 (very unsatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied) was evaluated. In addition, a customized sporting activities questionnaire including subjective strength perception (0%-100%), time to return to sport, sports performance (bench and triceps press), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, cosmetic results, complications, and failures (rerupture or reoperation) was administered.

Results: A total of 70 patients (all male) with a mean age of 50.9 ± 8.7 years were included in this study. The mean follow-up was 86.9 ± 51.4 months. The postoperative outcome scores were as follows: 97.8 ± 4.8 for the ASES score, 93.6 ± 10.9 for the SANE score, 2.2 ± 5.5 for the DASH score, and 98.1 ± 6.4 points for the MEPS. The median satisfaction score was 10 (IQR, 10-10). Postoperatively, patients subjectively achieved a 94% return of prior strength after a median of 7 months. In bench and triceps press, pre- to postoperative weight loads were a mean of 162.03 ± 53.1 kg to 134.7 ± 52.1 kg (P = .001) and a median of 70 kg (IQR, 50-85 kg) to 60 kg (IQR, 50-60 kg) (P = .001), respectively. The preoperative VAS score was 5.7 ± 2.7 versus 0.2 ± 0.6 postoperatively (P = .001). Overall, 85.7% of patients were satisfied with the cosmetic result. In total, 6 reruptures (8.6%) and 1 infection (1.4%) were observed. All 7 patients underwent surgical revision.

Conclusion: Double-row reconstruction of distal triceps tendon ruptures achieved good clinical and cosmetic results with a low complication rate in this high-demand patient population. Subjectively, maximum strength was regained after a median of 7 months; however, selective triceps strength during bench and triceps press resulted in significantly reduced weight loads postoperatively.

背景:手术修复远端肱三头肌肌腱后的临床结果很少,而且是在小的、不均匀的病例系列中。目的:评价高需求运动员双排修复术后的临床和美容效果。研究设计:病例系列;证据等级,4级。方法:回顾性联系2000年至2021年间在2个中心进行常规举重和远端肱三头肌腱修复的所有患者,以获得知情同意并进行随访检查。以双排方式接受远端肱三头肌腱修复的患者至少随访24个月。调查了美国肩关节外科医生(ASES)评分、单一评估数字评估(SANE)评分、梅奥肘部功能评分(MEPS;无不稳定性)和臂、肩和手残疾(DASH)评分。总体满意度从0(非常不满意)到10(非常满意)进行评估。此外,还进行了一项定制的体育活动问卷调查,包括主观力量感知(0%-100%)、恢复运动的时间、运动表现(卧推和三头肌按压)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、美容结果、并发症和失败(再破裂或再手术)。结果:共纳入70例患者(均为男性),平均年龄50.9±8.7岁。平均随访86.9±51.4个月。术后预后评分为:as评分97.8±4.8分,SANE评分93.6±10.9分,DASH评分2.2±5.5分,MEPS评分98.1±6.4分。满意度中位数为10分(IQR, 10-10)。术后,患者主观上在平均7个月后恢复了94%的先前强度。在卧推和肱三头肌按压中,术前至术后体重负荷平均为162.03±53.1 kg至134.7±52.1 kg (P = 0.001),中位数为70 kg (IQR, 50-85 kg)至60 kg (IQR, 50-60 kg) (P = 0.001)。术前VAS评分为5.7±2.7,术后评分为0.2±0.6 (P = 0.001)。总体而言,85.7%的患者对美容效果满意。术后复发6例(8.6%),感染1例(1.4%)。7例患者均行手术翻修。结论:双排重建肱三头肌腱远端断裂具有良好的临床和美容效果,并发症发生率低。主观上,中位7个月后恢复最大强度;然而,在仰卧和肱三头肌按压时选择性肱三头肌力量可显著减少术后重量负荷。
{"title":"Clinical and Cosmetic Results After Double-Row Reconstruction of the Distal Triceps Tendon in an Athletic Population: A Retrospective Case Series of 70 Patients With a Mean Follow-up of 6 Years.","authors":"Lorenz Fritsch, Lucca Lacheta, Nicolas Kühne, Sebastian Lappen, Maximilian Hinz, Sebastian Siebenlist, Mathias Ritsch","doi":"10.1177/03635465251389010","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251389010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical outcomes after surgical repair of the distal triceps tendon are scarce and represented in small, heterogeneous case series.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate clinical and cosmetic outcomes after double-row repair in a high-demand athlete population.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case series; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who participated in regular weight lifting and underwent distal triceps tendon repairs between 2000 and 2021 in 2 centers were retrospectively contacted for informed consent and follow-up examination. Patients who received distal triceps tendon repair in double-row fashion with a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS; without instability), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were surveyed. General satisfaction on a scale from 0 (very unsatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied) was evaluated. In addition, a customized sporting activities questionnaire including subjective strength perception (0%-100%), time to return to sport, sports performance (bench and triceps press), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, cosmetic results, complications, and failures (rerupture or reoperation) was administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70 patients (all male) with a mean age of 50.9 ± 8.7 years were included in this study. The mean follow-up was 86.9 ± 51.4 months. The postoperative outcome scores were as follows: 97.8 ± 4.8 for the ASES score, 93.6 ± 10.9 for the SANE score, 2.2 ± 5.5 for the DASH score, and 98.1 ± 6.4 points for the MEPS. The median satisfaction score was 10 (IQR, 10-10). Postoperatively, patients subjectively achieved a 94% return of prior strength after a median of 7 months. In bench and triceps press, pre- to postoperative weight loads were a mean of 162.03 ± 53.1 kg to 134.7 ± 52.1 kg (<i>P</i> = .001) and a median of 70 kg (IQR, 50-85 kg) to 60 kg (IQR, 50-60 kg) (<i>P</i> = .001), respectively. The preoperative VAS score was 5.7 ± 2.7 versus 0.2 ± 0.6 postoperatively (<i>P</i> = .001). Overall, 85.7% of patients were satisfied with the cosmetic result. In total, 6 reruptures (8.6%) and 1 infection (1.4%) were observed. All 7 patients underwent surgical revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Double-row reconstruction of distal triceps tendon ruptures achieved good clinical and cosmetic results with a low complication rate in this high-demand patient population. Subjectively, maximum strength was regained after a median of 7 months; however, selective triceps strength during bench and triceps press resulted in significantly reduced weight loads postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"54 1","pages":"174-179"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12757430/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145879458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Sports Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1