Pub Date : 2026-03-13DOI: 10.1177/03635465251410548
David R Maldonado, Elizabeth G Walsh, Andrew R Schab, Benjamin G Domb
Background: Data on midterm outcomes in patients with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) based on sex differences after hip arthroscopy are scarce.
Purpose: To report sex-based differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), clinical benefit, and survivorship in patients with BHD who underwent hip arthroscopy at a minimum 5-year follow-up.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Data were retrospectively reviewed for all patients with BHD who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) between 18° and 25° from 2008 to 2018. The exclusion criteria were as follows: LCEA <18º or >25º, previous ipsilateral hip surgery or conditions, and Tönnis grade >1. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and patient satisfaction were reported. Clinical benefit was assessed via minimal clinically important difference (MCID), the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and the maximum outcome improvement (MOI). Survivorship was defined as nonconversion to total hip arthroplasty. A sex-based propensity-matched comparison was made in a 1-to-1 ratio based on age, body mass index (BMI), and Tönnis grade.
Results: Propensity-score matching created a cohort of 152 hips, 76 per group. Significant and comparable improvements in all PROMs were observed at a minimum 5-year follow-up, with high achievement rates for the MCID, PASS, and MOI in both groups. However, improvements were significantly higher for women for MCID for the mHHS (86.8% vs 69.7%; P = .0105), MCID for the NAHS (88.2% vs 61.8%; P = .0002), MCID for the VAS for pain (84.2% vs 64.5%; P = .005), PASS for the mHHS (90.8% vs 78.9%; P = .041), and MOI for the NAHS (77.6% vs 55.3%; P = .0057). Survivorship was similar for men (94.74%) and women (89.47%) (P = .229).
Conclusion: At a minimum 5-year follow-up, a propensity-matched comparison of female and male patients with BHD who underwent primary hip arthroscopy demonstrated significant improvement and comparable PROMs and survivorship. Clinical benefit was significantly higher in women, as evidenced by higher achievement rates on the MCID, PASS, and MOI.
背景:基于性别差异的交界性髋关节发育不良(BHD)患者髋关节镜术后中期预后的数据很少。目的:报告在至少5年随访中,接受髋关节镜检查的BHD患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)、临床获益和生存率的性别差异。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:回顾性分析2008年至2018年所有行外侧中心角(LCEA)在18°至25°之间的原发性髋关节镜检查的BHD患者的数据。排除标准如下:LCEA 25º,既往同侧髋关节手术或情况,Tönnis分级>1。采用改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)、非关节炎髋关节评分(NAHS)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)评定疼痛和患者满意度。通过最小临床重要差异(MCID)、患者可接受症状状态(PASS)和最大预后改善(MOI)来评估临床获益。生存率定义为未转为全髋关节置换术。基于年龄、身体质量指数(BMI)和Tönnis等级,以1比1的比例进行基于性别的倾向匹配比较。结果:倾向得分匹配创建了152个队列,每组76个。在至少5年的随访中,观察到所有prom的显着和可比的改善,两组的MCID, PASS和MOI的成功率都很高。然而,女性在mHHS的MCID (86.8% vs 69.7%, P = 0.0105)、NAHS的MCID (88.2% vs 61.8%, P = 0.0002)、VAS疼痛的MCID (84.2% vs 64.5%, P = 0.005)、mHHS的PASS (90.8% vs 78.9%, P = 0.041)和NAHS的MOI (77.6% vs 55.3%, P = 0.0057)方面的改善明显更高。男性(94.74%)和女性(89.47%)的生存率相似(P = 0.229)。结论:在至少5年的随访中,接受初级髋关节镜检查的女性和男性BHD患者的倾向匹配比较显示出显着的改善和相当的PROMs和生存率。女性的临床获益明显更高,这一点可以从MCID、PASS和MOI的完成率中得到证明。
{"title":"Sex-Based Differences in Outcomes, Clinical Benefit, and Survivorship in Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up: A Propensity-Matched Comparison Study.","authors":"David R Maldonado, Elizabeth G Walsh, Andrew R Schab, Benjamin G Domb","doi":"10.1177/03635465251410548","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251410548","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on midterm outcomes in patients with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) based on sex differences after hip arthroscopy are scarce.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report sex-based differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), clinical benefit, and survivorship in patients with BHD who underwent hip arthroscopy at a minimum 5-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively reviewed for all patients with BHD who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) between 18° and 25° from 2008 to 2018. The exclusion criteria were as follows: LCEA <18º or >25º, previous ipsilateral hip surgery or conditions, and Tönnis grade >1. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and patient satisfaction were reported. Clinical benefit was assessed via minimal clinically important difference (MCID), the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and the maximum outcome improvement (MOI). Survivorship was defined as nonconversion to total hip arthroplasty. A sex-based propensity-matched comparison was made in a 1-to-1 ratio based on age, body mass index (BMI), and Tönnis grade.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propensity-score matching created a cohort of 152 hips, 76 per group. Significant and comparable improvements in all PROMs were observed at a minimum 5-year follow-up, with high achievement rates for the MCID, PASS, and MOI in both groups. However, improvements were significantly higher for women for MCID for the mHHS (86.8% vs 69.7%; <i>P</i> = .0105), MCID for the NAHS (88.2% vs 61.8%; <i>P</i> = .0002), MCID for the VAS for pain (84.2% vs 64.5%; <i>P</i> = .005), PASS for the mHHS (90.8% vs 78.9%; <i>P</i> = .041), and MOI for the NAHS (77.6% vs 55.3%; <i>P</i> = .0057). Survivorship was similar for men (94.74%) and women (89.47%) (<i>P</i> = .229).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At a minimum 5-year follow-up, a propensity-matched comparison of female and male patients with BHD who underwent primary hip arthroscopy demonstrated significant improvement and comparable PROMs and survivorship. Clinical benefit was significantly higher in women, as evidenced by higher achievement rates on the MCID, PASS, and MOI.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3635465251410548"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147445985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1177/03635465251410592
Michael Nocek, Alan D Villegas Meza, Caroline B Herrmann, Nolan A Kim, Tyler J Uppstrom, Lorenz Fritsch, Ayham Jaber, Eric C McCarty, Peter J Millett
Background: Authorship patterns in medical journals continue to evolve with expanding team science, academic incentives, and updated authorship guidance. Previous American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM) work (1994-2014) reported rising author counts and a growing share of international contributors.
Hypothesis/purpose: To update AJSM authorship trends (2014, 2019, 2020, and 2024) and test whether the past decade shows greater mean authors per article, more international and/or academic groups, and a higher proportion of nonphysician first authors.
Study design: Cross-sectional bibliometric analysis.
Methods: We reviewed AJSM articles in 2014, 2019, 2020, and 2024 via the journal archive; editorials, letters, society news, and corrigenda were excluded. For each article, we recorded the first/last author's highest degree and sex, the number of authors, country (United States vs international), and institution type (academic vs nonacademic). Articles with >20 authors were excluded. Differences across years were tested with a chi-square test (Bonferroni-adjusted α = .0083) and a 1-way analysis of variance with the Tukey honest significant difference post hoc test.
Results: A total of 1482 articles met the inclusion criteria (2014: n = 336; 2019: n = 383; 2020: n = 383; and 2024: n = 380). Article volume did not differ significantly across years (χ2[3] = 4.30; P = .23). From 2014 to 2024, article volume increased by 13.1%. Mean authors per article increased from 5.82 (2014) to 6.47 (2019), 6.55 (2020), and 7.02 (2024) (F[3,1470] = 15.69; P < .0001); all but the 2019 versus 2020 pairwise contrasts were significant. International groups increased from 42.6% (2014) to 51.3% (2024) (χ2[3] = 8.92; P = .03). No pairwise comparison met the Bonferroni threshold (α =.0083); the lowest P value was .0097 (2014 vs 2019). Bachelor of Arts/Bachelor of Science first authorship rose (χ2[3] = 13.78; P = .003), reaching 9% (2020) and 11% (2024). Sex distributions for first and last authors did not change (all P > .05). Twelve articles exceeded the >20-author cutoff and were excluded.
Conclusion: From 2014 to 2024, AJSM authorship shows expanding team size, increased international participation, and a higher proportion of bachelor's-level first authors-largely medical trainees-while sex representation remained stable. These patterns underscore the need for transparent contributorship and mentorship to maintain rigor as collaboration intensifies.
背景:医学期刊的作者模式随着团队科学的发展、学术激励和作者指导的更新而不断发展。《美国运动医学杂志》(AJSM)之前的工作(1994-2014)报告了作者数量和国际贡献者比例的上升。假设/目的:更新AJSM作者趋势(2014年、2019年、2020年和2024年),并测试过去十年是否显示每篇文章的平均作者更多、国际和/或学术团体更多、非医师第一作者比例更高。研究设计:横断面文献计量分析。方法:通过期刊档案检索2014年、2019年、2020年和2024年的AJSM文章;社论、信件、社会新闻和勘误表被排除在外。对于每篇文章,我们记录了第一/最后一位作者的最高学位和性别、作者数量、国家(美国vs国际)和机构类型(学术vs非学术)。作者超过20人的文章被排除在外。采用卡方检验(Bonferroni-adjusted α = .0083)和单因素方差分析,采用Tukey honest显著性差异事后检验。结果:共有1482篇文章符合纳入标准(2014年:n = 336; 2019年:n = 383; 2020年:n = 383; 2024年:n = 380)。文章量在不同年份间无显著差异(χ2[3] = 4.30; P = 0.23)。2014 - 2024年,文章量增长13.1%。每篇文章的平均作者从5.82人(2014年)增加到6.47人(2019年)、6.55人(2020年)和7.02人(2024年)(F[3,1470] = 15.69; P < 0.0001);除了2019年和2020年的两两对比外,其他都是显著的。国际组从2014年的42.6%上升到2024年的51.3% (χ2[3] = 8.92; P = 0.03)。没有两两比较达到Bonferroni阈值(α = 0.0083);P值最低。0097 (2014 vs 2019)。文学学士/理学学士第一作者比例上升(χ2[3] = 13.78; P = 0.003),分别达到9%(2020年)和11%(2024年)。第一作者和最后作者的性别分布没有变化(P均为0.05)。12篇文章超过了20位作者的截止日期,被排除在外。结论:从2014年到2024年,AJSM作者团队规模扩大,国际参与增加,本科水平的第一作者比例更高,主要是医学培训生,而性别代表保持稳定。这些模式强调需要透明的贡献和指导,以便在协作加强时保持严谨性。
{"title":"Trends in Authorship Characteristics in <i>The American Journal of Sports Medicine</i>, 2014 to 2024: A Follow-up Analysis.","authors":"Michael Nocek, Alan D Villegas Meza, Caroline B Herrmann, Nolan A Kim, Tyler J Uppstrom, Lorenz Fritsch, Ayham Jaber, Eric C McCarty, Peter J Millett","doi":"10.1177/03635465251410592","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251410592","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Authorship patterns in medical journals continue to evolve with expanding team science, academic incentives, and updated authorship guidance. Previous <i>American Journal of Sports Medicine</i> (<i>AJSM</i>) work (1994-2014) reported rising author counts and a growing share of international contributors.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis/purpose: </strong>To update <i>AJSM</i> authorship trends (2014, 2019, 2020, and 2024) and test whether the past decade shows greater mean authors per article, more international and/or academic groups, and a higher proportion of nonphysician first authors.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional bibliometric analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed <i>AJSM</i> articles in 2014, 2019, 2020, and 2024 via the journal archive; editorials, letters, society news, and corrigenda were excluded. For each article, we recorded the first/last author's highest degree and sex, the number of authors, country (United States vs international), and institution type (academic vs nonacademic). Articles with >20 authors were excluded. Differences across years were tested with a chi-square test (Bonferroni-adjusted α = .0083) and a 1-way analysis of variance with the Tukey honest significant difference post hoc test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1482 articles met the inclusion criteria (2014: n = 336; 2019: n = 383; 2020: n = 383; and 2024: n = 380). Article volume did not differ significantly across years (χ<sup>2</sup>[3] = 4.30; <i>P</i> = .23). From 2014 to 2024, article volume increased by 13.1%. Mean authors per article increased from 5.82 (2014) to 6.47 (2019), 6.55 (2020), and 7.02 (2024) (<i>F</i>[3,1470] = 15.69; <i>P</i> < .0001); all but the 2019 versus 2020 pairwise contrasts were significant. International groups increased from 42.6% (2014) to 51.3% (2024) (χ<sup>2</sup>[3] = 8.92; <i>P</i> = .03). No pairwise comparison met the Bonferroni threshold (α =.0083); the lowest <i>P</i> value was .0097 (2014 vs 2019). Bachelor of Arts/Bachelor of Science first authorship rose (χ<sup>2</sup>[3] = 13.78; <i>P</i> = .003), reaching 9% (2020) and 11% (2024). Sex distributions for first and last authors did not change (all <i>P</i> > .05). Twelve articles exceeded the >20-author cutoff and were excluded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From 2014 to 2024, <i>AJSM</i> authorship shows expanding team size, increased international participation, and a higher proportion of bachelor's-level first authors-largely medical trainees-while sex representation remained stable. These patterns underscore the need for transparent contributorship and mentorship to maintain rigor as collaboration intensifies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"705-711"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146127476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-02-07DOI: 10.1177/03635465251412731
Jesús Jiménez-Martínez, Alejandro Gutiérrez-Capote, Francisco Alarcón-López, Jonathan Hughes, José Javier López-Morales, David Cárdenas-Vélez
Background: Cognitive load is an important factor influencing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. However, few studies have systematically manipulated and quantified cognitive load to examine its biomechanical and neurophysiological consequences.
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the impact of varying cognitive load levels on biomechanical variables associated with ACL injury risk. The study further explored whether individual cognitive performance was related to alterations in ACL injury risk indicators and examined prefrontal cortical activity as an objective marker of mental workload.
Study design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: A total of 30 athletes engaged in team sports performed a single-leg drop vertical jump (SL-DVJ) under 5 cognitive conditions of varying complexity using a modified Go/No-Go task. Biomechanics, behavioral, and prefrontal hemodynamic data variables were recorded. Cognitive performance was assessed through a computerized Go/No-Go task.
Results: Higher cognitive load significantly increased peak ground-reaction forces and altered joint kinematics, specifically reducing knee flexion and increasing knee abduction during landing, especially in conditions that required high cognitive demand (P < .001). These changes were accompanied by increased prefrontal hemoglobin (OxyHb) concentrations, suggesting elevated cortical activation. Furthermore, lower cognitive performance, notably lower accuracy and higher precision-adjusted response time, was associated with more pronounced biomechanical patterns (such as greater ground-reaction forces) and an increase in the risk of ACL injury (r = -0.471, P < .01; r = 0.650, P < .001, respectively).
Conclusion: An increased cognitive load altered the biomechanics of movement during an SL-DVJ, leading to a potential for increased risk of ACL injury. Moreover, athletes with poorer cognitive control may have been more susceptible to these effects. Prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity increased under conditions of higher cognitive demand. The pattern of regional activation varied according to the type of stimulus (eg, higher OxyHb concentrations for the ventrolateral PFC were observed during the change goal-stimulus condition), suggesting a specific functional organization of the PFC according to the particular demands of executive control.
Clinical relevance: These findings highlight the importance of integrating cognitive challenges into injury prevention and rehabilitation strategies. The findings emphasize the need to consider cognitive load as a central variable in injury risk mitigation and to evaluate cognitive performance as a potential prognostic indicator.
背景:认知负荷是影响前交叉韧带损伤的重要因素。然而,很少有研究系统地操纵和量化认知负荷,以检查其生物力学和神经生理学后果。目的:本研究旨在探讨不同认知负荷水平对与前交叉韧带损伤风险相关的生物力学变量的影响。该研究进一步探讨了个体认知表现是否与前交叉韧带损伤风险指标的改变有关,并检验了前额皮质活动作为精神负荷的客观标志。研究设计:实验室对照研究。方法:30名团体运动运动员在5种不同复杂程度的认知条件下,使用改进的围棋/不围棋任务进行单腿落体垂直跳(ls - dvj)。记录生物力学、行为学和前额叶血流动力学数据变量。认知表现通过计算机化的Go/No-Go任务来评估。结果:较高的认知负荷显著增加了峰值地反力,改变了关节运动学,特别是在着陆时膝关节屈曲和膝关节外展减少,特别是在需要高认知需求的情况下(P < 0.001)。这些变化伴随着前额叶血红蛋白(OxyHb)浓度的增加,表明皮质激活升高。此外,较低的认知表现,特别是较低的准确性和较高的精度调整反应时间,与更明显的生物力学模式(如更大的地面反作用力)和ACL损伤风险增加相关(r = -0.471, P < 0.01; r = 0.650, P < 0.001)。结论:认知负荷的增加改变了SL-DVJ期间运动的生物力学,导致前交叉韧带损伤的潜在风险增加。此外,认知控制能力较差的运动员可能更容易受到这些影响。前额叶皮层(PFC)活动在高认知需求条件下增加。区域激活模式根据刺激类型而变化(例如,在改变目标刺激条件下,观察到腹侧PFC的高氧血红蛋白浓度),表明PFC根据执行控制的特定需求具有特定的功能组织。临床相关性:这些发现强调了将认知挑战整合到损伤预防和康复策略中的重要性。研究结果强调有必要将认知负荷作为减轻损伤风险的中心变量,并将认知表现作为潜在的预后指标进行评估。
{"title":"The Effect of Different Cognitive Demands on ACL Risk Biomechanics and Prefrontal Activation During a Single-Leg Drop Jump.","authors":"Jesús Jiménez-Martínez, Alejandro Gutiérrez-Capote, Francisco Alarcón-López, Jonathan Hughes, José Javier López-Morales, David Cárdenas-Vélez","doi":"10.1177/03635465251412731","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251412731","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive load is an important factor influencing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. However, few studies have systematically manipulated and quantified cognitive load to examine its biomechanical and neurophysiological consequences.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the impact of varying cognitive load levels on biomechanical variables associated with ACL injury risk. The study further explored whether individual cognitive performance was related to alterations in ACL injury risk indicators and examined prefrontal cortical activity as an objective marker of mental workload.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 athletes engaged in team sports performed a single-leg drop vertical jump (SL-DVJ) under 5 cognitive conditions of varying complexity using a modified Go/No-Go task. Biomechanics, behavioral, and prefrontal hemodynamic data variables were recorded. Cognitive performance was assessed through a computerized Go/No-Go task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher cognitive load significantly increased peak ground-reaction forces and altered joint kinematics, specifically reducing knee flexion and increasing knee abduction during landing, especially in conditions that required high cognitive demand (<i>P</i> < .001). These changes were accompanied by increased prefrontal hemoglobin (OxyHb) concentrations, suggesting elevated cortical activation. Furthermore, lower cognitive performance, notably lower accuracy and higher precision-adjusted response time, was associated with more pronounced biomechanical patterns (such as greater ground-reaction forces) and an increase in the risk of ACL injury (<i>r</i> = -0.471, <i>P</i> < .01; <i>r</i> = 0.650, <i>P</i> < .001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An increased cognitive load altered the biomechanics of movement during an SL-DVJ, leading to a potential for increased risk of ACL injury. Moreover, athletes with poorer cognitive control may have been more susceptible to these effects. Prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity increased under conditions of higher cognitive demand. The pattern of regional activation varied according to the type of stimulus (eg, higher OxyHb concentrations for the ventrolateral PFC were observed during the change goal-stimulus condition), suggesting a specific functional organization of the PFC according to the particular demands of executive control.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of integrating cognitive challenges into injury prevention and rehabilitation strategies. The findings emphasize the need to consider cognitive load as a central variable in injury risk mitigation and to evaluate cognitive performance as a potential prognostic indicator.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"580-589"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146133555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-02-07DOI: 10.1177/03635465251412678
Jesus E Cervantes, Jose F Vega, Eric Hu, Thomas E Moran, Shane J Nho
Background: Bilateral hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has demonstrated favorable short-term outcomes. However, the long-term results remain unclear and warrant further investigation.
Hypothesis/purpose: To compare 10-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs), clinically significant outcomes (CSOs), and reoperation-free survivorship between bilateral and unilateral HA. It was hypothesized that both groups would demonstrate comparable PROs, CSO achievement, and survivorship.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: A prospective repository was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients undergoing bilateral HA for FAIS between January 2012 and January 2015 with 10-year follow-up. Patients were propensity-matched 1:1 to unilateral HA patients controlling for age, sex, body mass index, and Tönnis grade. Exclusions included revision HA, concomitant procedures, congenital hip disorders, non-FAIS pathologies, staged periacetabular osteotomy, Tönnis grade >1, and missing 10-year follow-up. Hip Outcome Score (HOS) subscale for Activities of Daily Living and the HOS Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), International Hip Outcome Tool, modified Harris Hip Score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain/satisfaction were collected. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and reoperation-free survivorship were compared. Improvements from baseline to 10 years were correlated between hips. Analysis of variance evaluated differences based on bilateral HA timing.
Results: A total of 80 hips in 40 patients with bilateral HA were matched to 80 hips in 80 patients with unilateral HA. Mean follow-up was 10.4 ± 0.6 years. PROs at all time points were comparable. MCID and PASS achievement rates were similar between groups. Reoperation-free survivorship was comparable (P = .70). Change in index hip scores positively correlated with contralateral hip changes. A 0- to 3-month interval demonstrated superior preoperative HOS-SS compared with 6 to 12 months, whereas a 3- to 6-month interval demonstrated superior 10-year VAS-Pain score compared with 0 to 3 months.
Conclusions: Bilateral HA achieved long-term outcomes and reoperation-free survivorship comparable to those of unilateral HA. Index and contralateral hip outcomes were positively correlated. Shorter intervals between procedures were associated with better preoperative function, whereas intermediate intervals were associated with lower long-term pain, but finding this requires further investigation with larger sample sizes.
{"title":"Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy Compared with Unilateral Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Long-term Outcomes and Procedural Timing.","authors":"Jesus E Cervantes, Jose F Vega, Eric Hu, Thomas E Moran, Shane J Nho","doi":"10.1177/03635465251412678","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251412678","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bilateral hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has demonstrated favorable short-term outcomes. However, the long-term results remain unclear and warrant further investigation.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis/purpose: </strong>To compare 10-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs), clinically significant outcomes (CSOs), and reoperation-free survivorship between bilateral and unilateral HA. It was hypothesized that both groups would demonstrate comparable PROs, CSO achievement, and survivorship.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective repository was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients undergoing bilateral HA for FAIS between January 2012 and January 2015 with 10-year follow-up. Patients were propensity-matched 1:1 to unilateral HA patients controlling for age, sex, body mass index, and Tönnis grade. Exclusions included revision HA, concomitant procedures, congenital hip disorders, non-FAIS pathologies, staged periacetabular osteotomy, Tönnis grade >1, and missing 10-year follow-up. Hip Outcome Score (HOS) subscale for Activities of Daily Living and the HOS Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), International Hip Outcome Tool, modified Harris Hip Score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain/satisfaction were collected. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and reoperation-free survivorship were compared. Improvements from baseline to 10 years were correlated between hips. Analysis of variance evaluated differences based on bilateral HA timing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 hips in 40 patients with bilateral HA were matched to 80 hips in 80 patients with unilateral HA. Mean follow-up was 10.4 ± 0.6 years. PROs at all time points were comparable. MCID and PASS achievement rates were similar between groups. Reoperation-free survivorship was comparable (<i>P</i> = .70). Change in index hip scores positively correlated with contralateral hip changes. A 0- to 3-month interval demonstrated superior preoperative HOS-SS compared with 6 to 12 months, whereas a 3- to 6-month interval demonstrated superior 10-year VAS-Pain score compared with 0 to 3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral HA achieved long-term outcomes and reoperation-free survivorship comparable to those of unilateral HA. Index and contralateral hip outcomes were positively correlated. Shorter intervals between procedures were associated with better preoperative function, whereas intermediate intervals were associated with lower long-term pain, but finding this requires further investigation with larger sample sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"658-669"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146133559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-02-07DOI: 10.1177/03635465251412741
Timothy McAleese, Neil Welch, Enda King, Kieran A Moran, Mark Jackson, Daniel Withers, Ray Moran, Brian M Devitt
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meniscal tears occur at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in 55% to 65% of patients. These tears exhibit different healing patterns and behavior compared with meniscal tears in a stable knee. The optimal management of different medial, lateral and bicompartmental tears during primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) has yet to be defined.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the reoperation rates associated with different meniscal treatment strategies and analyze the effect of medial, lateral, and bicompartmental meniscal tears on ACLR outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigation included 1137 patients undergoing primary ACLR with a concomitant meniscal injury. Patients with chondral defects and multiligament knee injuries were excluded. Meniscal treatments were divided into 3 categories: left in situ (LIS), partial meniscectomy (PM), and repair. Reoperation was defined as the primary endpoint, and multivariable analysis was conducted to identify patient and tear characteristics associated with reoperation. The influence of different treatment strategies on return to play (RTP), ACL reinjury rate, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was reported at 2 years. The PROMs recorded were the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the Marx Activity Rating Scale, and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 24.0 ± 6.9 years, and 76% of patients were male. Most injuries were noncontact (64.9%), commonly resulting from pivoting/sidestepping (50.1%). No significant differences in injury mechanism, playing surface, or footwear type were found between medial, lateral, or bicompartmental tears. Reoperation rates for patients were low for lateral (1.3%), medial (2.6%), and bicompartmental tears (3.2%) LIS at the time of ACLR. The rate of reoperation/subsequent meniscectomy for medial meniscal repairs (14.8%) was significantly higher than for other medial treatments (hazard ratio 12.8; <i>P</i> < .001). Patients who underwent meniscal repair with a concomitant tear in the opposite compartment (repair + PM/LIS) had the highest reoperation rates (16.7%) and lowest RTP rates (60%). IKDC scores were significantly lower for patients who underwent lateral meniscal repair (81.1 ± 15.3) compared with other types of lateral meniscal management (<i>P</i> < .027). ACL reinjury rate was not influenced by meniscal treatment. A higher preoperative Marx score increased the risk of reoperation in all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stable meniscal tears LIS during ACLR had low reoperation rates and good patient-reported outcomes, including patients with bicompartmental tears. Medial meniscal repairs had the highest risk of reoperation, particularly when another tear was present in the lateral compartment. Lateral meniscal repairs
{"title":"Reoperation Rates for Medial, Lateral, and Bicompartmental Meniscal Tears Managed During Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Timothy McAleese, Neil Welch, Enda King, Kieran A Moran, Mark Jackson, Daniel Withers, Ray Moran, Brian M Devitt","doi":"10.1177/03635465251412741","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251412741","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meniscal tears occur at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in 55% to 65% of patients. These tears exhibit different healing patterns and behavior compared with meniscal tears in a stable knee. The optimal management of different medial, lateral and bicompartmental tears during primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) has yet to be defined.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the reoperation rates associated with different meniscal treatment strategies and analyze the effect of medial, lateral, and bicompartmental meniscal tears on ACLR outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigation included 1137 patients undergoing primary ACLR with a concomitant meniscal injury. Patients with chondral defects and multiligament knee injuries were excluded. Meniscal treatments were divided into 3 categories: left in situ (LIS), partial meniscectomy (PM), and repair. Reoperation was defined as the primary endpoint, and multivariable analysis was conducted to identify patient and tear characteristics associated with reoperation. The influence of different treatment strategies on return to play (RTP), ACL reinjury rate, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was reported at 2 years. The PROMs recorded were the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the Marx Activity Rating Scale, and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 24.0 ± 6.9 years, and 76% of patients were male. Most injuries were noncontact (64.9%), commonly resulting from pivoting/sidestepping (50.1%). No significant differences in injury mechanism, playing surface, or footwear type were found between medial, lateral, or bicompartmental tears. Reoperation rates for patients were low for lateral (1.3%), medial (2.6%), and bicompartmental tears (3.2%) LIS at the time of ACLR. The rate of reoperation/subsequent meniscectomy for medial meniscal repairs (14.8%) was significantly higher than for other medial treatments (hazard ratio 12.8; <i>P</i> < .001). Patients who underwent meniscal repair with a concomitant tear in the opposite compartment (repair + PM/LIS) had the highest reoperation rates (16.7%) and lowest RTP rates (60%). IKDC scores were significantly lower for patients who underwent lateral meniscal repair (81.1 ± 15.3) compared with other types of lateral meniscal management (<i>P</i> < .027). ACL reinjury rate was not influenced by meniscal treatment. A higher preoperative Marx score increased the risk of reoperation in all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stable meniscal tears LIS during ACLR had low reoperation rates and good patient-reported outcomes, including patients with bicompartmental tears. Medial meniscal repairs had the highest risk of reoperation, particularly when another tear was present in the lateral compartment. Lateral meniscal repairs ","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"526-536"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146133549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-26DOI: 10.1177/03635465251411298
Michael A Mastroianni, Morgan R Dillon, Nicholas Frappa, Andrew J Luzzi, James Muscat, Danil Chernov, Frank J Alexander, Kristen F Nicholson, Robert Ablove, Christopher S Ahmad
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries remain highly prevalent among baseball pitchers across all competitive levels, and there is a need for improved prevention and early detection. The increasing availability of advanced pitch-tracking data allows for granular evaluation of pitching changes that may precede UCL injury, offering a potential tool to identify risk factors and warning signs for injury.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify baseline pitch-tracking risk factors present in the preinjury season and to detect temporal warning signs of UCL injuries across sequential time windows, including the offseason and the outings immediately preceding injured list placement.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case-control study; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers who met the inclusion criteria and underwent UCL surgery from 2021 to 2025 (n = 78) were matched 2 to 1 with controls (n = 156) by season, age, handedness, and workload. Fastball metrics were evaluated in 3 stages: (1) baseline differences in mean values and intra-outing variability during the full preinjury season; (2) within-pitcher changes across 3 defined intervals-late versus early preinjury season (ΔS1), early injury season versus late preinjury season (ΔOffseason), and immediately preinjury versus early injury season (ΔS2); and (3) linear trends over the final 5 outings before injury list placement. Mixed-effects models and paired comparisons assessed differences in mean values and intra-outing variability for 6 mechanical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Injured pitchers showed greater variability in velocity (<i>P</i> = .012) and horizontal release position (<i>P</i> = .005) at baseline. A medial shift in release point was observed during ΔS1 (<i>P</i> < .001), followed by a lateral shift during ΔOffseason (<i>P</i> = .004). Extension variability increased in ΔS1 (<i>P</i> = .038) and significantly decreased across the offseason (<i>P</i> = .007). The spin rate rose significantly in ΔS2 (<i>P</i> = .019). Injured pitchers also demonstrated progressive velocity decline across their final 5 outings (<i>P</i> = .019); controls remained stable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified distinct patterns of mechanical variability and short-term changes in fastball pitch-tracking metrics among MLB pitchers who ultimately underwent UCL surgery. Greater intra-outing variability in fastball velocity and horizontal release position emerged as potential risk factors, suggesting that less repeatable mechanics may be linked to injury. A cascade of warning signs also appeared across time points, including shifts in horizontal release point and fluctuations in extension variability which intensified before injured list placement, increased spin rate throughout the season, and a progressive decline in velocity in the final outings. By focusing on intra-pitcher variability wit
{"title":"Pitch-Tracking Risk Factors and Warning Signs for Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Major League Baseball Pitchers.","authors":"Michael A Mastroianni, Morgan R Dillon, Nicholas Frappa, Andrew J Luzzi, James Muscat, Danil Chernov, Frank J Alexander, Kristen F Nicholson, Robert Ablove, Christopher S Ahmad","doi":"10.1177/03635465251411298","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251411298","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries remain highly prevalent among baseball pitchers across all competitive levels, and there is a need for improved prevention and early detection. The increasing availability of advanced pitch-tracking data allows for granular evaluation of pitching changes that may precede UCL injury, offering a potential tool to identify risk factors and warning signs for injury.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify baseline pitch-tracking risk factors present in the preinjury season and to detect temporal warning signs of UCL injuries across sequential time windows, including the offseason and the outings immediately preceding injured list placement.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case-control study; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers who met the inclusion criteria and underwent UCL surgery from 2021 to 2025 (n = 78) were matched 2 to 1 with controls (n = 156) by season, age, handedness, and workload. Fastball metrics were evaluated in 3 stages: (1) baseline differences in mean values and intra-outing variability during the full preinjury season; (2) within-pitcher changes across 3 defined intervals-late versus early preinjury season (ΔS1), early injury season versus late preinjury season (ΔOffseason), and immediately preinjury versus early injury season (ΔS2); and (3) linear trends over the final 5 outings before injury list placement. Mixed-effects models and paired comparisons assessed differences in mean values and intra-outing variability for 6 mechanical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Injured pitchers showed greater variability in velocity (<i>P</i> = .012) and horizontal release position (<i>P</i> = .005) at baseline. A medial shift in release point was observed during ΔS1 (<i>P</i> < .001), followed by a lateral shift during ΔOffseason (<i>P</i> = .004). Extension variability increased in ΔS1 (<i>P</i> = .038) and significantly decreased across the offseason (<i>P</i> = .007). The spin rate rose significantly in ΔS2 (<i>P</i> = .019). Injured pitchers also demonstrated progressive velocity decline across their final 5 outings (<i>P</i> = .019); controls remained stable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified distinct patterns of mechanical variability and short-term changes in fastball pitch-tracking metrics among MLB pitchers who ultimately underwent UCL surgery. Greater intra-outing variability in fastball velocity and horizontal release position emerged as potential risk factors, suggesting that less repeatable mechanics may be linked to injury. A cascade of warning signs also appeared across time points, including shifts in horizontal release point and fluctuations in extension variability which intensified before injured list placement, increased spin rate throughout the season, and a progressive decline in velocity in the final outings. By focusing on intra-pitcher variability wit","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"694-704"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146054998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1177/03635465251380288
Alexander C Lee, Joshua Chiang, Xinning Li, Leesa M Galatz, Bradford O Parsons, William N Levine, John D Kelly, Robert L Parisien
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The heterogeneity of threshold values for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) as reported in the rotator cuff repair literature undermines the utility of these concepts. This systematic review identifies studies with published threshold values and proposes a methodologic framework for determining which values should be used for rotator cuff repair moving forward.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide recommendations for the MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds of commonly utilized patient-reported outcome measures for rotator cuff repair, as well as recommendations for how these thresholds should be calculated moving forward.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All studies reporting MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values after rotator cuff repair published between January 1, 2000, and May 31, 2022, were extracted via systematic review. The following data were collected: follow-up duration and patient attrition; reported threshold values; and data relevant to threshold calculation, including method, anchor questions and responses, area under the curve, and confidence intervals. The authors prioritized values calculated with an anchor question over those calculated without one, values from receiver operator characteristic analysis over those from mean change and logistic regression, and anchor questions with multiple response options over those with binary response options.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 41 studies were included in the systematic review: 37 (90%), 11 (27%), and 16 (39%) reported MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds, respectively. In addition, 12 studies calculated threshold values using anchor-based methods, and 6 calculated threshold values through distribution-based methods. The authors made recommendations for each threshold reported by at least 4 studies: for MCID, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) = 21, visual analog scale for pain = 1.5, single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) = 12, University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score = 6, and Constant-Murley score = 5.5; for SCB, ASES = 26 and SANE = 20; and for PASS, ASES = 78, visual analog scale for pain = 1.7, SANE = 71, and Constant-Murley score = 23.3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With standardized MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values for rotator cuff repair surgery, these concepts hold enormous potential to power future comparative studies, guide reimbursement policy, and aid patient decision-making. Future research on novel MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values should collect preoperative and 12-month postoperative patient-reported outcome measure data. Anchor questions should pertain to overall satisfaction with surgery and have multiple specific answer choices. These data should be correlated by receiver operator characteristic analysis, and an
{"title":"A Novel Methodology for Establishing Best Values for MCID, SCB, and PASS Thresholds for Rotator Cuff Repair.","authors":"Alexander C Lee, Joshua Chiang, Xinning Li, Leesa M Galatz, Bradford O Parsons, William N Levine, John D Kelly, Robert L Parisien","doi":"10.1177/03635465251380288","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251380288","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The heterogeneity of threshold values for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) as reported in the rotator cuff repair literature undermines the utility of these concepts. This systematic review identifies studies with published threshold values and proposes a methodologic framework for determining which values should be used for rotator cuff repair moving forward.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide recommendations for the MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds of commonly utilized patient-reported outcome measures for rotator cuff repair, as well as recommendations for how these thresholds should be calculated moving forward.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All studies reporting MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values after rotator cuff repair published between January 1, 2000, and May 31, 2022, were extracted via systematic review. The following data were collected: follow-up duration and patient attrition; reported threshold values; and data relevant to threshold calculation, including method, anchor questions and responses, area under the curve, and confidence intervals. The authors prioritized values calculated with an anchor question over those calculated without one, values from receiver operator characteristic analysis over those from mean change and logistic regression, and anchor questions with multiple response options over those with binary response options.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 41 studies were included in the systematic review: 37 (90%), 11 (27%), and 16 (39%) reported MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds, respectively. In addition, 12 studies calculated threshold values using anchor-based methods, and 6 calculated threshold values through distribution-based methods. The authors made recommendations for each threshold reported by at least 4 studies: for MCID, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) = 21, visual analog scale for pain = 1.5, single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) = 12, University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score = 6, and Constant-Murley score = 5.5; for SCB, ASES = 26 and SANE = 20; and for PASS, ASES = 78, visual analog scale for pain = 1.7, SANE = 71, and Constant-Murley score = 23.3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With standardized MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values for rotator cuff repair surgery, these concepts hold enormous potential to power future comparative studies, guide reimbursement policy, and aid patient decision-making. Future research on novel MCID, SCB, and PASS threshold values should collect preoperative and 12-month postoperative patient-reported outcome measure data. Anchor questions should pertain to overall satisfaction with surgery and have multiple specific answer choices. These data should be correlated by receiver operator characteristic analysis, and an","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"748-757"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-02-08DOI: 10.1177/03635465251414661
W Alexander Cantrell, Robert H Brophy, Charles L Cox, David C Flanigan, Laura J Huston, Yuxuan Jin, Christopher C Kaeding, Robert A Magnussen, Robert G Marx, Matthew J Matava, Eric C McCarty, Richard D Parker, Andrew J Sheean, Matthew V Smith, Rick W Wright, Morgan H Jones, Kurt P Spindler
Background: Persistent knee pain can develop after anterior cruciate ligament injury with subsequent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) despite a functionally intact graft.
Purpose: To identify the prevalence of clinically significant knee pain in patients at 2, 6, and 10 years after ACLR.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: 3272 patients were enrolled into the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) between 2002 and 2008 across 7 centers. Each patient completed a questionnaire at baseline that included demographic characteristics, injury factors, participation in sports, and validated outcome measures including the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain subscale (scored 0-100 with higher scores signifying less pain). Each patient completed the questionnaire again at 2, 6, and 10 years postoperatively. Three different criteria were used to define clinically significant knee pain: KOOS pain ≤70 points, KOOS pain ≤80 points, or responding "moderate,""severe," or "extreme" to a KOOS pain question.
Results: Median age in the cohort was 23 years (interquartile range, 17-27 years) at the time of enrollment, and 44% of patients were female. A total of 2798 patients (85%) responded to the questionnaire at 2 years postoperatively, with 2759 (84%) responding at 6 years and 2526 (77%) at 10 years. The prevalence of those with KOOS pain ≤70 was 9.3%, 9.0%, and 9.1% at 2, 6, and 10 years after surgery, respectively. The prevalence of KOOS pain ≤80 was 16.6%, 16.3%, and 15.7% at each timepoint, respectively. When a KOOS pain response of "moderate,""severe," or "extreme" was used, the prevalence was 26.3%, 22.9%, and 22.6% at 2, 6, and 10 years, respectively. Interestingly, very few patients had persistent pain at all 3 follow-up points: 48 (1.6%) reported a KOOS pain score ≤70 points, 103 (3.5%) reported a KOOS pain score ≤80 points, and 161 (5.6%) reported moderate or severe pain.
Conclusion: The prevalence of clinically significant postoperative knee pain after ACLR was up to 26% at 2 years postoperatively, a percentage that remained unchanged or slightly decreased at 6- and 10-year follow-up. Despite this finding, it was uncommon for individual patients to report clinically significant knee pain at multiple follow-up timepoints.
{"title":"Prevalence of Postoperative Knee Pain After ACL Reconstruction at 2, 6, and 10 Years of Follow-up: Data From the MOON Group.","authors":"W Alexander Cantrell, Robert H Brophy, Charles L Cox, David C Flanigan, Laura J Huston, Yuxuan Jin, Christopher C Kaeding, Robert A Magnussen, Robert G Marx, Matthew J Matava, Eric C McCarty, Richard D Parker, Andrew J Sheean, Matthew V Smith, Rick W Wright, Morgan H Jones, Kurt P Spindler","doi":"10.1177/03635465251414661","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251414661","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent knee pain can develop after anterior cruciate ligament injury with subsequent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) despite a functionally intact graft.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify the prevalence of clinically significant knee pain in patients at 2, 6, and 10 years after ACLR.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>3272 patients were enrolled into the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) between 2002 and 2008 across 7 centers. Each patient completed a questionnaire at baseline that included demographic characteristics, injury factors, participation in sports, and validated outcome measures including the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain subscale (scored 0-100 with higher scores signifying less pain). Each patient completed the questionnaire again at 2, 6, and 10 years postoperatively. Three different criteria were used to define clinically significant knee pain: KOOS pain ≤70 points, KOOS pain ≤80 points, or responding \"moderate,\"\"severe,\" or \"extreme\" to a KOOS pain question.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age in the cohort was 23 years (interquartile range, 17-27 years) at the time of enrollment, and 44% of patients were female. A total of 2798 patients (85%) responded to the questionnaire at 2 years postoperatively, with 2759 (84%) responding at 6 years and 2526 (77%) at 10 years. The prevalence of those with KOOS pain ≤70 was 9.3%, 9.0%, and 9.1% at 2, 6, and 10 years after surgery, respectively. The prevalence of KOOS pain ≤80 was 16.6%, 16.3%, and 15.7% at each timepoint, respectively. When a KOOS pain response of \"moderate,\"\"severe,\" or \"extreme\" was used, the prevalence was 26.3%, 22.9%, and 22.6% at 2, 6, and 10 years, respectively. Interestingly, very few patients had persistent pain at all 3 follow-up points: 48 (1.6%) reported a KOOS pain score ≤70 points, 103 (3.5%) reported a KOOS pain score ≤80 points, and 161 (5.6%) reported moderate or severe pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of clinically significant postoperative knee pain after ACLR was up to 26% at 2 years postoperatively, a percentage that remained unchanged or slightly decreased at 6- and 10-year follow-up. Despite this finding, it was uncommon for individual patients to report clinically significant knee pain at multiple follow-up timepoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"537-543"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146144775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-26DOI: 10.1177/03635465251409151
Elizabeth R Dennis, William A Marmor, Natalie K Pahapill, Bennett E Propp, Simone Gruber, Joseph T Nguyen, Beth E Shubin Stein
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of patellofemoral instability is complex. It is not known whether the outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL) with concomitant tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) performed in the revision setting after a failed surgery for patellar instability equal the outcomes of an MPFL-Reconstruction +TTO performed as a primary procedure.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Both groups would have low recurrent instability rates, significantly improved subjective outcomes, and return to sport (RTS) percentages equivalent to or higher than those currently established in the literature. Additionally, we hypothesized that the revision group would have poorer subjective outcomes postoperatively compared with the primary surgery group.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of data from March 2014 to December 2018 was conducted for analysis. The inclusion criteria were surgical stabilization with combined MPFL-Reconstruction +TTO performed as either a primary or revision procedure. Instability events included both dislocations and subluxations and were based on patient reports, physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Patients were included in the revision group if they had undergone previous surgical intervention for patellar instability. Patients were excluded if they lacked baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) or had a concomitant distal femoral osteotomy at the time of their index patellofemoral surgery. Patients were separated into 2 groups: MPFL-Reconstructiom + TTO as a primary procedure, and those who underwent MPFL-Reconstruction + TTO after a previously failed surgical attempt for patellar stabilization. Standard knee radiographs and MRIs were obtained preoperatively in all patients. Radiographic measurements included the Caton-Dechamps index (CDI), patellar trochlear index (PTI),<sup>4</sup> tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG), patellar tendon-lateral trochlear ridge (PT-LTR),<sup>20</sup> and trochlear depth index (TDI). Evaluation of subjective measures included several knee-specific PROMs, collected pre- and postoperatively at 1 and 2 years. These PROMs included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Quality of Life (KOOS-QoL), KOOS-Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), subjective knee form, Kujala Knee Score, and Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (Pedi-FABS). Episodes of recurrent instability and patients' ability to RTS were documented at each postoperative visit and yearly with subjective outcome assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 58 knees (51 patients) underwent primary surgery, and 33 knees (32 patients) underwent revision surgery, of which 90% and 88% had at least a 2-year follow-up, respectively. There was no difference between groups in patient char
背景:髌股不稳定的治疗是复杂的。目前尚不清楚内侧髌股韧带重建术(MPFL)合并胫骨结节截骨术(TTO)在髌骨不稳手术失败后进行翻修的结果是否等同于将内侧髌股韧带重建术+TTO作为主要手术的结果。假设:两组患者复发性不稳定发生率均较低,主观预后显著改善,重返运动(RTS)的百分比等于或高于目前文献中所建立的水平。此外,我们假设翻修组的术后主观预后较初次手术组差。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:回顾性分析2014年3月至2018年12月的数据。纳入标准是手术稳定联合mpfl重建+TTO作为初级或翻修手术。不稳定事件包括脱位和半脱位,基于患者报告、体格检查和磁共振成像(MRI)结果。如果患者之前因髌骨不稳而接受过手术干预,则将其纳入翻修组。如果患者缺乏基线患者报告的结果测量(PROM)或在其髌股手术时同时进行股骨远端截骨,则将患者排除在外。患者被分为两组:以mpfl重建+ TTO作为主要手术,以及在先前手术失败后接受mpfl重建+ TTO的患者。所有患者术前均进行标准膝关节x线片和mri检查。x线测量包括Caton-Dechamps指数(CDI)、髌骨滑车指数(PTI)、胫骨结节-滑车沟距离(TT-TG)、髌骨肌腱-外侧滑车脊(PT-LTR)、20和滑车深度指数(TDI)。主观测量的评估包括几个膝关节特异性PROMs,在术前和术后1年和2年收集。这些PROMs包括膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分-生活质量(KOOS-QoL)、koos -身体功能简短表(KOOS-PS)、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)、主观膝关节形式、Kujala膝关节评分和儿科功能活动简短量表(pedic - fabs)。每次术后就诊时记录复发性不稳定发作和患者RTS能力,并每年进行主观结果评估。结果:共有58个膝关节(51例)接受了初次手术,33个膝关节(32例)接受了翻修手术,其中90%和88%分别有至少2年的随访。两组患者特征无差异,包括年龄(23.8 vs 22.5; P = .442)、性别(85% vs 82%; P = .742)或体重指数(28% vs . 16%; P = .176)。两组患者中均有三分之一的患者进行了伴随软骨修复手术(34% vs 33%; P = .911),包括颗粒状幼年关节软骨和髌股关节骨软骨移植。再发不稳定在翻修组中没有发生,而在初始组中发生率为7%。初级手术组的RTS率为88%,而翻修组为83%,但差异无统计学意义。从基线到1年随访,两组患者均有显著的获益,2年随访时结果评分持续。对伴有关节软骨手术的患者进行的初步分层分析发现,随着时间的推移,两组患者的结局评分均无影响。结论:本研究表明,无论是在初诊还是翻修中,mpfl重建+ TTO都是一种可靠且可重复的治疗方法。接受初次手术和翻修手术的患者报告,随着时间的推移,几乎所有PROMs的临床和统计学改善,两组患者的复发不稳定性低,RTS率高。
{"title":"Outcomes of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With Concomitant Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy for Failed Surgery for Patellar Instability Versus Primary Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With Concomitant Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy.","authors":"Elizabeth R Dennis, William A Marmor, Natalie K Pahapill, Bennett E Propp, Simone Gruber, Joseph T Nguyen, Beth E Shubin Stein","doi":"10.1177/03635465251409151","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251409151","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of patellofemoral instability is complex. It is not known whether the outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL) with concomitant tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) performed in the revision setting after a failed surgery for patellar instability equal the outcomes of an MPFL-Reconstruction +TTO performed as a primary procedure.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Both groups would have low recurrent instability rates, significantly improved subjective outcomes, and return to sport (RTS) percentages equivalent to or higher than those currently established in the literature. Additionally, we hypothesized that the revision group would have poorer subjective outcomes postoperatively compared with the primary surgery group.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of data from March 2014 to December 2018 was conducted for analysis. The inclusion criteria were surgical stabilization with combined MPFL-Reconstruction +TTO performed as either a primary or revision procedure. Instability events included both dislocations and subluxations and were based on patient reports, physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Patients were included in the revision group if they had undergone previous surgical intervention for patellar instability. Patients were excluded if they lacked baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) or had a concomitant distal femoral osteotomy at the time of their index patellofemoral surgery. Patients were separated into 2 groups: MPFL-Reconstructiom + TTO as a primary procedure, and those who underwent MPFL-Reconstruction + TTO after a previously failed surgical attempt for patellar stabilization. Standard knee radiographs and MRIs were obtained preoperatively in all patients. Radiographic measurements included the Caton-Dechamps index (CDI), patellar trochlear index (PTI),<sup>4</sup> tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG), patellar tendon-lateral trochlear ridge (PT-LTR),<sup>20</sup> and trochlear depth index (TDI). Evaluation of subjective measures included several knee-specific PROMs, collected pre- and postoperatively at 1 and 2 years. These PROMs included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Quality of Life (KOOS-QoL), KOOS-Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), subjective knee form, Kujala Knee Score, and Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (Pedi-FABS). Episodes of recurrent instability and patients' ability to RTS were documented at each postoperative visit and yearly with subjective outcome assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 58 knees (51 patients) underwent primary surgery, and 33 knees (32 patients) underwent revision surgery, of which 90% and 88% had at least a 2-year follow-up, respectively. There was no difference between groups in patient char","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"590-601"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146055048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: After rotator cuff repair, immobilization (IM) is routinely employed to limit mechanical loading at the repaired enthesis and reduce the risk of reinjury. However, prolonged IM can lead to stiffness, muscle atrophy, and impaired healing, including fatty degeneration and abnormal matrix remodeling.
Hypothesis/purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether adjunctive electrical stimulation (ES) during postoperative IM mitigates disuse-related impairments and promotes tendon-to-bone healing and functional recovery after rotator cuff repair in a rat model. ES applied during IM would mitigate IM-related impairments, enhance tendon-bone healing, and accelerate functional recovery.
Study design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: A total of 45 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent unilateral supraspinatus repair and were randomized to the control, IM, or IM with ES (IM/ES) groups. IM was achieved by forelimb fixation, and the IM/ES group received daily transcutaneous ES. Outcomes at 2 and 4 weeks included histology, magnetic resonance imaging mapping, biomechanical testing, and gait analysis.
Results: Rats that underwent IM/ES exhibited a more mature tendon-bone interface with increased proteoglycan deposition and collagen organization compared with the control and IM groups (P < .001). Chondrogenic marker expression was upregulated, whereas fatty infiltration (FABP4) was suppressed. At 4 weeks, the IM/ES group demonstrated lower T2 relaxation times (140.2 ± 24.4 ms) and higher ultimate failure load (27.7 ± 2.1 N) versus the IM (16.6 ± 1.7 N) and control groups (13.9 ± 1.3 N) (P < .0001). Gait analysis confirmed superior functional recovery.
Conclusion: ES administered during IM improved tendon-bone healing by reducing FABP4 and enhancing fibrocartilaginous remodeling, resulting in superior structural, biomechanical, and functional outcomes.
Clinical relevance: These findings suggest that adjunctive ES during the IM after rotator cuff repair may offset the detrimental effects of disuse and promote earlier and stronger tendon-bone healing, supporting its potential translation to postoperative rehabilitation strategies.
{"title":"Electrical Stimulation and Its Role in Offsetting the Detrimental Effects of Immobilization After Rotator Cuff Repair in a Rat Model.","authors":"Meiguang Xu, Lang Bai, Bingyan Li, Yixiang Ai, Shuai Wang, Jintao Xiu, Qiaonan Liu, Baojun Chen, Jing Zhang, Zhanhai Yin","doi":"10.1177/03635465251411310","DOIUrl":"10.1177/03635465251411310","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After rotator cuff repair, immobilization (IM) is routinely employed to limit mechanical loading at the repaired enthesis and reduce the risk of reinjury. However, prolonged IM can lead to stiffness, muscle atrophy, and impaired healing, including fatty degeneration and abnormal matrix remodeling.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis/purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine whether adjunctive electrical stimulation (ES) during postoperative IM mitigates disuse-related impairments and promotes tendon-to-bone healing and functional recovery after rotator cuff repair in a rat model. ES applied during IM would mitigate IM-related impairments, enhance tendon-bone healing, and accelerate functional recovery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 45 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent unilateral supraspinatus repair and were randomized to the control, IM, or IM with ES (IM/ES) groups. IM was achieved by forelimb fixation, and the IM/ES group received daily transcutaneous ES. Outcomes at 2 and 4 weeks included histology, magnetic resonance imaging mapping, biomechanical testing, and gait analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rats that underwent IM/ES exhibited a more mature tendon-bone interface with increased proteoglycan deposition and collagen organization compared with the control and IM groups (<i>P</i> < .001). Chondrogenic marker expression was upregulated, whereas fatty infiltration (FABP4) was suppressed. At 4 weeks, the IM/ES group demonstrated lower T2 relaxation times (140.2 ± 24.4 ms) and higher ultimate failure load (27.7 ± 2.1 N) versus the IM (16.6 ± 1.7 N) and control groups (13.9 ± 1.3 N) (<i>P</i> < .0001). Gait analysis confirmed superior functional recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ES administered during IM improved tendon-bone healing by reducing FABP4 and enhancing fibrocartilaginous remodeling, resulting in superior structural, biomechanical, and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>These findings suggest that adjunctive ES during the IM after rotator cuff repair may offset the detrimental effects of disuse and promote earlier and stronger tendon-bone healing, supporting its potential translation to postoperative rehabilitation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"889-899"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146055067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}