How does social media use in the workplace affect employee voice? Uncovering the mediation effects of social identity and contingency role of job-social media fit

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Internet Research Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1108/intr-04-2023-0300
Wenjing Chen, Bowen Zheng, Hefu Liu
{"title":"How does social media use in the workplace affect employee voice? Uncovering the mediation effects of social identity and contingency role of job-social media fit","authors":"Wenjing Chen, Bowen Zheng, Hefu Liu","doi":"10.1108/intr-04-2023-0300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Employee voice is crucial for organizations to identify problems and make timely adjustments. However, promoting voice in organizations is challenging. This study aims to investigate how social media use (SMU) in the workplace affects employee voice by examining its intrinsic mechanisms and boundary conditions. Specifically, this study examines the mediating roles of social identifications and the moderating effects of job-social media fit on the relationship between SMU and social identifications.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study conducted a survey of 348 employees in China.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>First, SMU affects voice through social identifications. Second, distinct identifications have different effects on voice, such that organizational identification positively affects employee voice, while relational identification positively affects promotive voice and negatively affects prohibitive voice. Third, when social media is highly suitable for the job, the positive effect of work-related SMU on organizational identification is strengthened, while the positive effect of social-related SMU on organizational identification is weakened.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The results indicate that different identifications have distinct impacts on voice. Additionally, this study reveals a double-edged sword effect of SMU on voice through different social identifications. Further, job-social media fit moderates the relationship between SMU and social identifications. These findings have important implications for organizations adopting social media.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-04-2023-0300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Employee voice is crucial for organizations to identify problems and make timely adjustments. However, promoting voice in organizations is challenging. This study aims to investigate how social media use (SMU) in the workplace affects employee voice by examining its intrinsic mechanisms and boundary conditions. Specifically, this study examines the mediating roles of social identifications and the moderating effects of job-social media fit on the relationship between SMU and social identifications.

Design/methodology/approach

This study conducted a survey of 348 employees in China.

Findings

First, SMU affects voice through social identifications. Second, distinct identifications have different effects on voice, such that organizational identification positively affects employee voice, while relational identification positively affects promotive voice and negatively affects prohibitive voice. Third, when social media is highly suitable for the job, the positive effect of work-related SMU on organizational identification is strengthened, while the positive effect of social-related SMU on organizational identification is weakened.

Originality/value

The results indicate that different identifications have distinct impacts on voice. Additionally, this study reveals a double-edged sword effect of SMU on voice through different social identifications. Further, job-social media fit moderates the relationship between SMU and social identifications. These findings have important implications for organizations adopting social media.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作场所社交媒体的使用如何影响员工的声音?揭示社会身份的中介效应以及工作与社交媒体契合度的权变作用
目的员工的声音对于组织发现问题并及时做出调整至关重要。然而,在组织中促进员工发声具有挑战性。本研究旨在通过研究工作场所中社交媒体的使用(SMU)的内在机制和边界条件,探讨社交媒体的使用如何影响员工的声音。具体而言,本研究探讨了社会认同的中介作用,以及工作与社交媒体的契合度对 SMU 和社会认同之间关系的调节作用。第二,不同的认同对声音有不同的影响,如组织认同对员工声音有积极影响,而关系认同对促进性声音有积极影响,对禁止性声音有消极影响。第三,当社交媒体非常适合工作时,与工作相关的 SMU 对组织认同的积极影响会加强,而与社交相关的 SMU 对组织认同的积极影响会减弱。此外,本研究揭示了 SMU 通过不同的社会认同对话语权的双刃剑效应。此外,工作与社交媒体的契合度调节了 SMU 与社会认同之间的关系。这些发现对采用社交媒体的组织具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Research
Internet Research 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.20%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This wide-ranging interdisciplinary journal looks at the social, ethical, economic and political implications of the internet. Recent issues have focused on online and mobile gaming, the sharing economy, and the dark side of social media.
期刊最新文献
Can digital transformation alleviate corporate fraud? Evidence from China Gameful systems for corporate sustainability: systematic review, conceptual framework and research agenda on gamification and sustainable employee behavior in companies Why do people customize avatars in the metaverse? Curiosity and SOR model perspective “I am sorry for judging you”: conceptualizing sentiment reversal among followers in case of falsely alleged social media influencer transgression Unveiling factors and contingencies influencing exhaustion in professional esports players: evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1