Subjective evaluation of home environment and levels of self-reported depression in middle to old age: Results from the HCHS study

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1002/jclp.23656
Leonie Ascone, Anna Mascherek, Sandra Weber, Djo Fischer, Jobst Augustin, Bastian Cheng, Götz Thomalla, Matthias Augustin, Birgit-Christiane Zyriax, Jürgen Gallinat, Simone Kühn
{"title":"Subjective evaluation of home environment and levels of self-reported depression in middle to old age: Results from the HCHS study","authors":"Leonie Ascone,&nbsp;Anna Mascherek,&nbsp;Sandra Weber,&nbsp;Djo Fischer,&nbsp;Jobst Augustin,&nbsp;Bastian Cheng,&nbsp;Götz Thomalla,&nbsp;Matthias Augustin,&nbsp;Birgit-Christiane Zyriax,&nbsp;Jürgen Gallinat,&nbsp;Simone Kühn","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The immediate living environment might, like other lifestyle factors, be significantly related to mental well-being. The current study addresses the question whether five relevant subjective home environment variables (i.e., protection from disturbing nightlight, daylight entering the home, safety at home, quality of window views, and noise disturbance) are associated with levels of self-reported depression over and above well-known sociodemographic and common lifestyle variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data from the Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS) were analyzed. In <i>N</i> = 8757 with available PHQ-9 depression data, multiple linear regression models were computed, with demographic data, lifestyle variables, and variables describing the subjective evaluation of the home environment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The model explained 15% of variance in depression levels, with ratings for the subjective evaluation of home environment accounting for 6%. Better protection from disturbing light at night, more daylight entering the home, feeling safer, and perceived quality of the window views, were all significantly associated with lower, while more annoyance by noise was associated with higher levels of self-reported depression. Results did not differ if examining a sample of the youngest (middle-aged participants: 46−50 years) versus oldest (70−78 years) participants within HCHS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Beyond studying the role of lifestyle factors related to self-reported depression, people's homes may be important for subclinical levels of depression in middle and older age, albeit the direction of effects or causality cannot be inferred from the present study. The development of a consensus and tools for a standardized home environment assessment is needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"80 5","pages":"1115-1129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jclp.23656","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The immediate living environment might, like other lifestyle factors, be significantly related to mental well-being. The current study addresses the question whether five relevant subjective home environment variables (i.e., protection from disturbing nightlight, daylight entering the home, safety at home, quality of window views, and noise disturbance) are associated with levels of self-reported depression over and above well-known sociodemographic and common lifestyle variables.

Methods

Data from the Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS) were analyzed. In N = 8757 with available PHQ-9 depression data, multiple linear regression models were computed, with demographic data, lifestyle variables, and variables describing the subjective evaluation of the home environment.

Results

The model explained 15% of variance in depression levels, with ratings for the subjective evaluation of home environment accounting for 6%. Better protection from disturbing light at night, more daylight entering the home, feeling safer, and perceived quality of the window views, were all significantly associated with lower, while more annoyance by noise was associated with higher levels of self-reported depression. Results did not differ if examining a sample of the youngest (middle-aged participants: 46−50 years) versus oldest (70−78 years) participants within HCHS.

Conclusion

Beyond studying the role of lifestyle factors related to self-reported depression, people's homes may be important for subclinical levels of depression in middle and older age, albeit the direction of effects or causality cannot be inferred from the present study. The development of a consensus and tools for a standardized home environment assessment is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中老年人对家庭环境的主观评价和自我报告的抑郁程度:HCHS 研究的结果。
目的:与其他生活方式因素一样,直接居住环境也可能与心理健康密切相关。本研究探讨了五个相关的主观家庭环境变量(即防止夜间光线干扰、日光进入家庭、家庭安全、窗外景色质量和噪音干扰)是否与自我报告的抑郁水平相关,而非众所周知的社会人口学变量和常见生活方式变量:方法:分析了汉堡城市健康研究(HCHS)的数据。方法:对汉堡城市健康研究(HCHS)的数据进行了分析。在有 PHQ-9 抑郁症数据的 8757 人中,利用人口统计学数据、生活方式变量和描述家庭环境主观评价的变量计算了多元线性回归模型:结果:该模型解释了抑郁程度差异的 15%,其中对家庭环境主观评价的评分占 6%。更好地防止夜间光线干扰、更多的日光进入室内、更有安全感以及对窗外景色质量的感知都与抑郁水平的降低有显著关系,而更多的噪音干扰则与自我报告的抑郁水平升高有关。如果对家庭保健中心中最年轻(中年参与者:46-50 岁)和最年长(70-78 岁)的参与者进行抽样调查,结果并无不同:结论:除了研究生活方式因素对自我报告的抑郁症的作用外,人们的住所可能对中老年亚临床抑郁症水平也很重要,尽管本研究无法推断其影响方向或因果关系。需要就标准化家庭环境评估达成共识并开发相关工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
期刊最新文献
Expressive Suppression of Emotions in Bulimia Nervosa: An Electroencephalography Study. ACT for OCD: An Example of ACT and Values-Based Exposures. Strategies for Optimizing Traditional Exposure and Response Prevention: A Case Study Example in an Adolescent With Contamination-Based OCD. Forgiveness in Poland: Rye Forgiveness Scale Adaptation and Its Longitudinal Impact on Mental Health in HIV-Positive Individuals. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1