The Impact of Military Tobacco Control Policy: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Military Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1093/milmed/usad507
Muhamad Arham Bin Hashim, Khairul Fikri Bin Sebri, Muhammad Faiz Bin Mohd Hanim, Diyana Shereen Binti Anwar, Nawwal Alwani Binti Mohd Radzi, Ahmad Farhan Bin Ahmad Fuad, Budi Aslinie Binti Md Sabri
{"title":"The Impact of Military Tobacco Control Policy: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Muhamad Arham Bin Hashim, Khairul Fikri Bin Sebri, Muhammad Faiz Bin Mohd Hanim, Diyana Shereen Binti Anwar, Nawwal Alwani Binti Mohd Radzi, Ahmad Farhan Bin Ahmad Fuad, Budi Aslinie Binti Md Sabri","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usad507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tobacco use is synonymous with the military. Despite that military personnel are trained to follow commands, opportunities exist to implement various tobacco control strategies. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the impact of tobacco control policy employed in military settings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched for published English articles in Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using relevant subject headings without year restriction. We included randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, case-control, cohort, controlled before and after, and uncontrolled before and after studies evaluating the impact of tobacco control policy in the military population. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, three independent reviewers independently screened initially identified articles, reviewed the full text, and extracted the data and any disagreements resolved by consensus after data recheck. Five reviewers used a validated tool to assess the quality of the included studies. The primary outcome was the reduction of any tobacco or nicotine-contained products (TNCPs) use among the troops. The impacts of the tobacco control policy were synthesized and analyzed qualitatively. This study is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (CRD42022314117).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included in the analysis from 5372 studies screened. Most of the studies were from the USA, and fractions were from Thailand, France, and Taiwan. These studies were methodologically heterogeneous. Most studies employed a total ban policy on TNCP use during basic military training or operational deployment as the primary strategy. Other methods utilized were the brief tobacco intervention, targeted treatment, support, and counseling provided through telephone or mailing systems, the adjunctive behavioral intervention, providing free nicotine gum, the \"Pharsai clinic\", active and regular smoking restriction, and interventions aimed at intrapersonal, interpersonal, and organizational levels. There is a moderate quality of evidence that the tobacco control policies effectively reduced the prevalence of TNCP use, increased the cessation rate, reduced the intake, and lowered the dependency. The adjunctive interventions provided after the total ban on TNCP use may increase its effectiveness. However, findings from this review need to be carefully considered as the definition of TNCP use status was not universal between studies and lacked a biochemical validation procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is reasonable evidence to support that the tobacco control policy employed in the military population has multiple positive impacts in reducing the prevalence of TNCP use, increasing the cessation rates, reducing the intake, and lowering dependency. Other evidence-based strategies need to be fully utilized to materialize the tobacco endgame.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usad507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tobacco use is synonymous with the military. Despite that military personnel are trained to follow commands, opportunities exist to implement various tobacco control strategies. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the impact of tobacco control policy employed in military settings.

Materials and methods: We searched for published English articles in Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using relevant subject headings without year restriction. We included randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, case-control, cohort, controlled before and after, and uncontrolled before and after studies evaluating the impact of tobacco control policy in the military population. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, three independent reviewers independently screened initially identified articles, reviewed the full text, and extracted the data and any disagreements resolved by consensus after data recheck. Five reviewers used a validated tool to assess the quality of the included studies. The primary outcome was the reduction of any tobacco or nicotine-contained products (TNCPs) use among the troops. The impacts of the tobacco control policy were synthesized and analyzed qualitatively. This study is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (CRD42022314117).

Results: Fourteen studies were included in the analysis from 5372 studies screened. Most of the studies were from the USA, and fractions were from Thailand, France, and Taiwan. These studies were methodologically heterogeneous. Most studies employed a total ban policy on TNCP use during basic military training or operational deployment as the primary strategy. Other methods utilized were the brief tobacco intervention, targeted treatment, support, and counseling provided through telephone or mailing systems, the adjunctive behavioral intervention, providing free nicotine gum, the "Pharsai clinic", active and regular smoking restriction, and interventions aimed at intrapersonal, interpersonal, and organizational levels. There is a moderate quality of evidence that the tobacco control policies effectively reduced the prevalence of TNCP use, increased the cessation rate, reduced the intake, and lowered the dependency. The adjunctive interventions provided after the total ban on TNCP use may increase its effectiveness. However, findings from this review need to be carefully considered as the definition of TNCP use status was not universal between studies and lacked a biochemical validation procedure.

Conclusions: There is reasonable evidence to support that the tobacco control policy employed in the military population has multiple positive impacts in reducing the prevalence of TNCP use, increasing the cessation rates, reducing the intake, and lowering dependency. Other evidence-based strategies need to be fully utilized to materialize the tobacco endgame.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军事烟草控制政策的影响:系统回顾。
介绍:吸烟是军人的代名词。尽管军人接受的训练是服从命令,但仍有机会实施各种烟草控制策略。我们进行了一项系统综述,以评估在军事环境中采用的烟草控制政策的影响:我们使用相关主题词在 Medline、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 数据库中搜索已发表的英文文章,没有年份限制。我们纳入了评估控烟政策对军队人群影响的随机对照试验、非随机对照试验、病例对照、队列、前后对照和前后非对照研究。按照《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,三位独立审稿人独立筛选了初步确定的文章,审阅了全文,提取了数据,并在数据复核后就任何分歧达成了共识。五位审稿人使用有效工具对纳入研究的质量进行评估。主要结果是部队中任何烟草或含尼古丁产品(TNCPs)使用的减少。对控烟政策的影响进行了综合和定性分析。本研究已在国际系统综述前瞻性注册中心注册(CRD42022314117):从筛选出的 5372 项研究中,有 14 项被纳入分析。大部分研究来自美国,部分来自泰国、法国和台湾。这些研究在方法上存在差异。大多数研究采用了在基础军事训练或作战部署期间全面禁止使用 TNCP 的政策作为主要策略。其他方法包括简短烟草干预、通过电话或邮件系统提供有针对性的治疗、支持和咨询、辅助行为干预、提供免费尼古丁口香糖、"Pharsai 诊所"、积极定期限制吸烟,以及针对人内、人际和组织层面的干预。有中等质量的证据表明,控烟政策有效降低了 TNCP 的使用率,提高了戒烟率,减少了摄入量,降低了依赖性。全面禁止TNCP使用后提供的辅助干预措施可能会提高其有效性。然而,由于各研究对TNCP使用状况的定义不尽相同,且缺乏生化验证程序,因此需要谨慎考虑本综述的结论:有合理的证据支持在军队人群中采用的控烟政策在降低TNCP使用率、提高戒烟率、减少摄入量和降低依赖性方面具有多重积极影响。要实现烟草终极目标,还需要充分利用其他循证策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
期刊最新文献
Fatigue and Sleep-related Impairment as Predictors of the Effect of Nonpharmacological Therapies for Active duty Service Members With Chronic Pain: A Secondary Analysis of a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial. Challenges to School Success Among Children in U.S. Military Families. Combat-Relevant Anesthesia Fellowships Help Sustain the Army's Multidomain Medical Force. Preparing Military Interprofessional Health Care Teams for Effective Collaboration. Synopsis of the 2023 U.S. Department of VA and U.S. DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1