Hybrid optical-vision tracking in laparoscopy: accuracy of navigation and ultrasound reconstruction.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1080/13645706.2024.2313032
Luca Boretto, Egidijus Pelanis, Alois Regensburger, Åsmund Avdem Fretland, Bjørn Edwin, Ole Jakob Elle
{"title":"Hybrid optical-vision tracking in laparoscopy: accuracy of navigation and ultrasound reconstruction.","authors":"Luca Boretto, Egidijus Pelanis, Alois Regensburger, Åsmund Avdem Fretland, Bjørn Edwin, Ole Jakob Elle","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2313032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of laparoscopic and robotic liver surgery is increasing. However, it presents challenges such as limited field of view and organ deformations. Surgeons rely on laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) for guidance, but mentally correlating ultrasound images with pre-operative volumes can be difficult. In this direction, surgical navigation systems are being developed to assist with intra-operative understanding. One approach is performing intra-operative ultrasound 3D reconstructions. The accuracy of these reconstructions depends on tracking the LUS probe.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study evaluates the accuracy of LUS probe tracking and ultrasound 3D reconstruction using a hybrid tracking approach. The LUS probe is tracked from laparoscope images, while an optical tracker tracks the laparoscope. The accuracy of hybrid tracking is compared to full optical tracking using a dual-modality tool. Ultrasound 3D reconstruction accuracy is assessed on an abdominal phantom with CT transformed into the optical tracker's coordinate system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hybrid tracking achieves a tracking error < 2 mm within 10 cm between the laparoscope and the LUS probe. The ultrasound reconstruction accuracy is approximately 2 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hybrid tracking shows promising results that can meet the required navigation accuracy for laparoscopic liver surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"176-183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2313032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of laparoscopic and robotic liver surgery is increasing. However, it presents challenges such as limited field of view and organ deformations. Surgeons rely on laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) for guidance, but mentally correlating ultrasound images with pre-operative volumes can be difficult. In this direction, surgical navigation systems are being developed to assist with intra-operative understanding. One approach is performing intra-operative ultrasound 3D reconstructions. The accuracy of these reconstructions depends on tracking the LUS probe.

Material and methods: This study evaluates the accuracy of LUS probe tracking and ultrasound 3D reconstruction using a hybrid tracking approach. The LUS probe is tracked from laparoscope images, while an optical tracker tracks the laparoscope. The accuracy of hybrid tracking is compared to full optical tracking using a dual-modality tool. Ultrasound 3D reconstruction accuracy is assessed on an abdominal phantom with CT transformed into the optical tracker's coordinate system.

Results: Hybrid tracking achieves a tracking error < 2 mm within 10 cm between the laparoscope and the LUS probe. The ultrasound reconstruction accuracy is approximately 2 mm.

Conclusion: Hybrid tracking shows promising results that can meet the required navigation accuracy for laparoscopic liver surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜手术中的混合光学视觉跟踪:导航和超声波重建的准确性。
简介腹腔镜和机器人肝脏手术的使用越来越多。然而,这也带来了一些挑战,如视野受限和器官变形。外科医生依靠腹腔镜超声波(LUS)进行引导,但将超声波图像与术前体积进行心理关联可能会很困难。因此,目前正在开发手术导航系统,以协助术中理解。一种方法是进行术中超声三维重建。这些重建的准确性取决于对 LUS 探头的跟踪:本研究采用混合追踪方法评估 LUS 探头追踪和超声三维重建的准确性。根据腹腔镜图像追踪 LUS 探头,同时使用光学追踪器追踪腹腔镜。混合跟踪的准确性与使用双模态工具的全光学跟踪进行了比较。在腹部模型上评估了超声三维重建的准确性,并将 CT 转换为光学跟踪器的坐标系:结果:在腹腔镜和 LUS 探头之间 10 厘米范围内,混合跟踪的跟踪误差小于 2 毫米。超声重建精度约为 2 毫米:结论:混合追踪技术显示出良好的效果,可满足腹腔镜肝脏手术所需的导航精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies (MITAT) is an international forum for endoscopic surgeons, interventional radiologists and industrial instrument manufacturers. It is the official journal of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT) whose membership includes representatives from a broad spectrum of medical specialities, instrument manufacturing and research. The journal brings the latest developments and innovations in minimally invasive therapy to its readers. What makes Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies unique is that we publish one or two special issues each year, which are devoted to a specific theme. Key topics covered by the journal include: interventional radiology, endoscopic surgery, imaging technology, manipulators and robotics for surgery and education and training for MIS.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic cardiac mucosal ligation: a novel minimally invasive procedure for gastroesophageal reflux disease. The effect of peritoneal flap fixation with curling technique on postoperative lymphocele formation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Right mini-thoracotomy for concomitant aortic valve replacement and right coronary artery bypass graft. Three-dimensional semiquantitative evaluation of reactive emphysema in magnesium implant models. Clash of the Titans: the first multi-center retrospective comparative study between da Vinci and Hugo RAS surgical systems for the treatment of deep endometriosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1