首页 > 最新文献

Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies最新文献

英文 中文
Is colonic J-pouch superior to other reconstructive techniques after total mesorectal excision? A systematic review with meta-analysis.
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2467040
Alberto Arezzo, Antonella Nicotera, Roberto Passera, Salvatore Pucciarelli, Edoardo Forcignanò, Steven Brown, Mario Morino

Background: Different reconstruction techniques after total mesorectal excision have been described, such as straight coloanal anastomosis, colonic J-pouch, side-to-end anastomosis and transverse coloplasty pouch. Establishing which technique is the best in functional terms is essential to improving a patient's quality of life.

Methods: We compared benefits and harms of different reconstructive techniques. The primary outcome was to compare functional results at 18 months after surgery (long-term). Secondary outcomes were the same as primary but at different time intervals (short-term and medium-term) and perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Results: Forty-one reports of 36 trials were included in the analysis. According to primary outcome, no significant difference was observed in terms of bowel frequency, while colonic J-pouch resulted in a lower incidence of faecal urgency only compared to side-to-end. Only up to 18 months after bowel restoration bowel frequency, fecal urgency and the number of individuals using anti-diarrheal medications were reduced in the colonic J-pouch group. No difference in mortality/morbidity could be assessed among the techniques, but a lower rate of anastomotic leak after side-to-end compared to straight coloanal anastomosis was observed.

Conclusions: Evidence suggests that reconstruction with colonic J-pouch offers similar long-term benefits to straight coloanal anastomosis and Transverse coloplasty pouch, while superior to side-to-end.

{"title":"Is colonic J-pouch superior to other reconstructive techniques after total mesorectal excision? A systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Alberto Arezzo, Antonella Nicotera, Roberto Passera, Salvatore Pucciarelli, Edoardo Forcignanò, Steven Brown, Mario Morino","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2467040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2025.2467040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different reconstruction techniques after total mesorectal excision have been described, such as straight coloanal anastomosis, colonic J-pouch, side-to-end anastomosis and transverse coloplasty pouch. Establishing which technique is the best in functional terms is essential to improving a patient's quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared benefits and harms of different reconstructive techniques. The primary outcome was to compare functional results at 18 months after surgery (long-term). Secondary outcomes were the same as primary but at different time intervals (short-term and medium-term) and perioperative morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one reports of 36 trials were included in the analysis. According to primary outcome, no significant difference was observed in terms of bowel frequency, while colonic J-pouch resulted in a lower incidence of faecal urgency only compared to side-to-end. Only up to 18 months after bowel restoration bowel frequency, fecal urgency and the number of individuals using anti-diarrheal medications were reduced in the colonic J-pouch group. No difference in mortality/morbidity could be assessed among the techniques, but a lower rate of anastomotic leak after side-to-end compared to straight coloanal anastomosis was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence suggests that reconstruction with colonic J-pouch offers similar long-term benefits to straight coloanal anastomosis and Transverse coloplasty pouch, while superior to side-to-end.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143441372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A new method for placental volume measurements using tracked 2D ultrasound and automatic image segmentation.
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2025.2449699
Karianne Sagberg, Torgrim Lie, Helene F Peterson, Vigdis Hillestad, Anne Eskild, Lars Eirik Bø

Background: Placental volume measurements can potentially identify high-risk pregnancies. We aimed to develop and validate a new method for placental volume measurements using tracked 2D ultrasound and automatic image segmentation.

Methods: We included 43 pregnancies at gestational week 27 and acquired placental images using a 2D ultrasound probe with position tracking, and trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic image segmentation. The automatically segmented 2D images were combined with tracking data to calculate placental volume. For 15 of the included pregnancies, placental volume was also estimated based on MRI examinations, 3D ultrasound and manually segmented 2D ultrasound images. The ultrasound methods were compared to MRI (gold standard).

Results: The CNN demonstrated good performance in automatic image segmentation (F1-score 0.84). The correlation with MRI-based placental volume was similar for tracked 2D ultrasound using automatically segmented images (absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.58, 95% CI 0.13-0.84) and manually segmented images (ICC 0.59, 95% CI 0.13-0.84). The 3D ultrasound method showed lower ICC (0.35, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.74) than the methods based on tracked 2D ultrasound.

Conclusions: Tracked 2D ultrasound with automatic image segmentation is a promising new method for placental volume measurements and has potential for further improvement.

{"title":"A new method for placental volume measurements using tracked 2D ultrasound and automatic image segmentation.","authors":"Karianne Sagberg, Torgrim Lie, Helene F Peterson, Vigdis Hillestad, Anne Eskild, Lars Eirik Bø","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2449699","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2025.2449699","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Placental volume measurements can potentially identify high-risk pregnancies. We aimed to develop and validate a new method for placental volume measurements using tracked 2D ultrasound and automatic image segmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 43 pregnancies at gestational week 27 and acquired placental images using a 2D ultrasound probe with position tracking, and trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic image segmentation. The automatically segmented 2D images were combined with tracking data to calculate placental volume. For 15 of the included pregnancies, placental volume was also estimated based on MRI examinations, 3D ultrasound and manually segmented 2D ultrasound images. The ultrasound methods were compared to MRI (gold standard).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CNN demonstrated good performance in automatic image segmentation (F1-score 0.84). The correlation with MRI-based placental volume was similar for tracked 2D ultrasound using automatically segmented images (absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.58, 95% CI 0.13-0.84) and manually segmented images (ICC 0.59, 95% CI 0.13-0.84). The 3D ultrasound method showed lower ICC (0.35, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.74) than the methods based on tracked 2D ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tracked 2D ultrasound with automatic image segmentation is a promising new method for placental volume measurements and has potential for further improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143365057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A meta-analysis: laparoscopic versus open liver resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma. 一项荟萃分析:腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗大肝细胞癌的比较。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-18 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2334762
Zha Peng, Zhuang-Rong Zhu, Cheng-Yi He, Hai Huang

Background: The indication of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for treating large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. In this study, we compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of LLR and open liver resection (OLR) for large HCC.

Material and methods: We searched eligible articles about LLR versus OLR for large HCC in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE and performed a meta-analysis.

Results: Eight publications involving 1,338 patients were included. Among them, 495 underwent LLR and 843 underwent OLR. The operation time was longer in the LLR group (MD: 22.23, 95% CI: 4.14-40.33, p = 0.02). but the postoperative hospital stay time was significantly shorter (MD : -4.88, CI: -5.55 to -4.23, p < 0.00001), and the incidence of total postoperative complications and major complications were significantly fewer (OR: 0.49, 95% CI:0.37-0.66, p < 0.00001; OR: 0.54, 95% CI:0.36 - 0.82, p = 0.003, respectively). Patients in the laparoscopic group had no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative transfusion rate, resection margin size, R0 resection rate, three-year overall survival (OS) and three-year disease-free survival (DFS).

Conclusion: LLR for large HCC is safe and feasible. This surgical strategy will not affect the long-term outcomes of patients.

背景:腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)治疗巨大肝细胞癌(HCC)的适应症存在争议。在这项研究中,我们比较了腹腔镜肝切除术和开腹肝切除术(OLR)治疗巨大肝细胞癌的短期和长期疗效:我们在 PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 EMBASE 中检索了符合条件的关于大块 HCC 的 LLR 与 OLR 的文章,并进行了荟萃分析:结果:共纳入8篇文献,涉及1338名患者。结果:共收录了 8 篇文献,涉及 1,338 例患者,其中 495 例接受了 LLR,843 例接受了 OLR。腹腔镜组的手术时间较长(MD:22.23,95% CI:4.14-40.33,P = 0.02),但术后住院时间明显较短(MD:-4.88,CI:-5.55--4.23,P = 0.003)。腹腔镜组患者的术中失血量、术中输血率、切除边缘大小、R0切除率、三年总生存率(OS)和三年无病生存率(DFS)均无明显差异:结论:大型 HCC 的 LLR 安全可行。结论:LLR 治疗大型 HCC 安全可行,这种手术策略不会影响患者的长期预后。
{"title":"A meta-analysis: laparoscopic versus open liver resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Zha Peng, Zhuang-Rong Zhu, Cheng-Yi He, Hai Huang","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2334762","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2334762","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The indication of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for treating large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. In this study, we compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of LLR and open liver resection (OLR) for large HCC.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We searched eligible articles about LLR versus OLR for large HCC in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE and performed a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight publications involving 1,338 patients were included. Among them, 495 underwent LLR and 843 underwent OLR. The operation time was longer in the LLR group (MD: 22.23, 95% CI: 4.14-40.33, <i>p</i> = 0.02). but the postoperative hospital stay time was significantly shorter (MD : -4.88, CI: -5.55 to -4.23, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), and the incidence of total postoperative complications and major complications were significantly fewer (OR: 0.49, 95% CI:0.37-0.66, <i>p</i> < 0.00001; OR: 0.54, 95% CI:0.36 - 0.82, <i>p</i> = 0.003, respectively). Patients in the laparoscopic group had no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative transfusion rate, resection margin size, R0 resection rate, three-year overall survival (OS) and three-year disease-free survival (DFS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLR for large HCC is safe and feasible. This surgical strategy will not affect the long-term outcomes of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"24-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140864536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Camera sheath with transformable head for minimally invasive surgical instruments. 带有可变换头部的相机鞘,用于微创手术器械。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-11 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2335540
Seongil Kwon, Veysi Adin, Chulmin Park, Hanyong Chun, Keri Kim, Chunwoo Kim

Introduction: This paper presents a camera sheath that can be assembled to various minimally invasive surgical instruments and provide the localized view of the instrument tip.

Material and methods: The advanced transformable head structure (ATHS) that overcomes the trade-off between the camera resolution and the instrument size is designed for the sheath. Design solutions to maintain the alignment between the camera's line of sight and the instrument tip direction during the transformation of the ATHS are derived and applied to the prototype of the sheath.

Results: The design solution ensured proper alignment between the line of sight and the tip direction. The prototype was used with the curved micro-debrider blades in simulated functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Deep regions of the sinus that were not observable with the conventional endoscopes was accessed and observed using the prototype.

Conclusions: The presented camera sheath allows the delivery of the instrument and camera to the surgical site with minimal increase in port size. It may be applied to various surgeries to reduce invasiveness and provide additional visual information to the surgeons.

导言:本文介绍了一种可装配到各种微创手术器械上并提供器械尖端局部视图的相机鞘:先进的可变换头部结构(ATHS)克服了相机分辨率和器械尺寸之间的权衡,是为鞘设计的。得出了在 ATHS 转换过程中保持相机视线与仪器尖端方向对齐的设计方案,并将其应用于鞘的原型:设计方案确保了视线与针尖方向的正确对准。在模拟功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)中使用了原型和弧形微型除渣器刀片。传统内窥镜无法观察到的鼻窦深部区域,通过原型进入并进行了观察:结论:新推出的相机鞘可将器械和相机运送到手术部位,而只需尽量缩小端口尺寸。它可用于各种手术,以减少侵入性,并为外科医生提供额外的视觉信息。
{"title":"Camera sheath with transformable head for minimally invasive surgical instruments.","authors":"Seongil Kwon, Veysi Adin, Chulmin Park, Hanyong Chun, Keri Kim, Chunwoo Kim","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2335540","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2335540","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This paper presents a camera sheath that can be assembled to various minimally invasive surgical instruments and provide the localized view of the instrument tip.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The advanced transformable head structure (ATHS) that overcomes the trade-off between the camera resolution and the instrument size is designed for the sheath. Design solutions to maintain the alignment between the camera's line of sight and the instrument tip direction during the transformation of the ATHS are derived and applied to the prototype of the sheath.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The design solution ensured proper alignment between the line of sight and the tip direction. The prototype was used with the curved micro-debrider blades in simulated functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Deep regions of the sinus that were not observable with the conventional endoscopes was accessed and observed using the prototype.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presented camera sheath allows the delivery of the instrument and camera to the surgical site with minimal increase in port size. It may be applied to various surgeries to reduce invasiveness and provide additional visual information to the surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"44-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140865059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lateral versus anterior approach for bladder neck dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a pair-matched analysis to evaluate urinary continence and surgical margins. 机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中膀胱颈切除术的侧方与前方方法:评估排尿连续性和手术切缘的配对分析。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2369096
Marco Oderda, Alessandro Marquis, Alberto Sasia, Giorgio Calleris, Alessandro Dematteis, Daniele D'Agate, Marco Falcone, Federico Lavagno, Giancarlo Marra, Gabriele Montefusco, Paolo Gontero

Introduction: The preservation of the bladder neck during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) could improve urinary continence recovery and limit the risk of positive surgical margins (PSMs). We refined our lateral approach to the bladder neck technique and compared its outcomes with those of the standard anterior approach.

Material and methods: From a retrospective analysis of 599 consecutive RARPs, 171 patients treated with the lateral and 171 patients treated with the anterior approach were pair-matched 1:1 on the basis of age, grade, and pathological stage. We described our surgical technique and compared the two approaches in terms of basal PSMs, recovery of urinary continence, and complications.

Results: As compared to the anterior approach, the lateral approach had shorter operative times and comparable rates of basal PSMs and postoperative complications. The rates of urinary continence after one, three, and 12 months were comparable between the two groups and were generally higher in localized disease. At regression analysis, predictors of urinary incontinence were only age, pathological stage T3b, ISUP grade 5 and nerve-sparing surgery.

Conclusions: The lateral approach leads to an anatomical dissection of the bladder neck without increasing the risk of PSMs. However, no significant benefits in terms of continence recovery were demonstrated over the standard anterior approach.

导言:在机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)中保留膀胱颈可改善尿失禁的恢复并限制手术切缘阳性(PSM)的风险。我们改进了膀胱颈侧方入路技术,并将其结果与标准前方入路进行了比较:在对 599 例连续 RARP 进行的回顾性分析中,根据年龄、等级和病理分期,将 171 例采用侧切法和 171 例采用前切法的患者进行了 1:1 配对。我们介绍了我们的手术技巧,并从基础 PSM、尿失禁恢复和并发症方面对两种方法进行了比较:结果:与前路相比,侧路的手术时间更短,基础 PSM 和术后并发症的发生率相当。两组患者术后1、3和12个月的尿失禁率相当,而局部疾病患者的尿失禁率普遍较高。回归分析显示,尿失禁的预测因素只有年龄、病理分期T3b、ISUP 5级和神经保留手术:结论:侧切法可对膀胱颈部进行解剖解剖,不会增加PSM的风险。结论:外侧入路可对膀胱颈部进行解剖学解剖,但不会增加PSM的风险,但在尿失禁恢复方面与标准前入路相比没有明显优势。
{"title":"Lateral versus anterior approach for bladder neck dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a pair-matched analysis to evaluate urinary continence and surgical margins.","authors":"Marco Oderda, Alessandro Marquis, Alberto Sasia, Giorgio Calleris, Alessandro Dematteis, Daniele D'Agate, Marco Falcone, Federico Lavagno, Giancarlo Marra, Gabriele Montefusco, Paolo Gontero","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2369096","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2369096","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The preservation of the bladder neck during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) could improve urinary continence recovery and limit the risk of positive surgical margins (PSMs). We refined our lateral approach to the bladder neck technique and compared its outcomes with those of the standard anterior approach.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>From a retrospective analysis of 599 consecutive RARPs, 171 patients treated with the lateral and 171 patients treated with the anterior approach were pair-matched 1:1 on the basis of age, grade, and pathological stage. We described our surgical technique and compared the two approaches in terms of basal PSMs, recovery of urinary continence, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As compared to the anterior approach, the lateral approach had shorter operative times and comparable rates of basal PSMs and postoperative complications. The rates of urinary continence after one, three, and 12 months were comparable between the two groups and were generally higher in localized disease. At regression analysis, predictors of urinary incontinence were only age, pathological stage T3b, ISUP grade 5 and nerve-sparing surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lateral approach leads to an anatomical dissection of the bladder neck without increasing the risk of PSMs. However, no significant benefits in terms of continence recovery were demonstrated over the standard anterior approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"8-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141446495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 老年患者结直肠癌机器人手术与腹腔镜手术:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-31 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2359705
Xinyu Wang, Rui Ma, Tiewei Hou, Hao Xu, Cheng Zhang, Chun Ye

Objective: Robotic surgery is being increasingly used for colorectal cancer surgery. However, its utility versus laparoscopic surgery in older patients is unclear. We systematically examined evidence to assess the differences in short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in older patients.

Material and methods: Comparative studies published on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched up to August 30th, 2023.

Results: Seven studies totaling 14,043 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed no difference in the operation time between the robotic and laparoscopic groups. Meta-analysis of ClavienDindo complications showed no difference between the robotic and laparoscopic groups for grades I and II or grades III and IV complications. Similarly, conversion to open surgery, reoperation rates and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups. Readmission rates and mortality rates were significantly lower with robotic surgery.

Conclusion: This first meta-analysis comparing outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery in older colorectal cancer patients shows that both approaches result in no difference in operating time, complication rates, conversion to open surgery, reoperation rates, and LOS. Scarce data shows that mortality and readmission rates may be lower with robotic surgery.

目的:机器人手术越来越多地被用于结直肠癌手术。然而,机器人手术与腹腔镜手术在老年患者中的应用尚不明确。我们系统地研究了相关证据,以评估老年患者结直肠癌机器人手术与腹腔镜手术短期疗效的差异:检索了截至2023年8月30日发表在PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和CENTRAL数据库中的对比研究:结果:共纳入七项研究,共计 14,043 名患者。Meta分析显示,机器人组和腹腔镜组的手术时间没有差异。ClavienDindo并发症的元分析显示,机器人组和腹腔镜组在I级和II级并发症或III级和IV级并发症方面没有差异。同样,两组患者转为开腹手术、再次手术率和住院时间也无明显差异。再次入院率和死亡率则明显低于机器人手术:这项首次比较老年结直肠癌患者机器人手术和腹腔镜手术结果的荟萃分析表明,两种方法在手术时间、并发症发生率、转为开腹手术率、再次手术率和住院时间方面均无差异。稀少的数据显示,机器人手术的死亡率和再入院率可能更低。
{"title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xinyu Wang, Rui Ma, Tiewei Hou, Hao Xu, Cheng Zhang, Chun Ye","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2359705","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2359705","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Robotic surgery is being increasingly used for colorectal cancer surgery. However, its utility versus laparoscopic surgery in older patients is unclear. We systematically examined evidence to assess the differences in short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in older patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Comparative studies published on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched up to August 30th, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies totaling 14,043 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed no difference in the operation time between the robotic and laparoscopic groups. Meta-analysis of ClavienDindo complications showed no difference between the robotic and laparoscopic groups for grades I and II or grades III and IV complications. Similarly, conversion to open surgery, reoperation rates and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups. Readmission rates and mortality rates were significantly lower with robotic surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This first meta-analysis comparing outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery in older colorectal cancer patients shows that both approaches result in no difference in operating time, complication rates, conversion to open surgery, reoperation rates, and LOS. Scarce data shows that mortality and readmission rates may be lower with robotic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141179982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is cryoablation a valid option for renal cell carcinomas in direct contact with critical organs? 对于直接接触重要器官的肾细胞癌,冷冻消融术是否是一种有效的选择?
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-17 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2354332
Shoma Nagata, Yusuke Matsui, Koji Tomita, Mayu Uka, Takahiro Kawabata, Noriyuki Umakoshi, Kazuaki Munetomo, Maria Kawada, Toshihiro Iguchi, Takao Hiraki

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) for renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) contacting critical organs without intervening fat tissue.

Material and methods: Twenty-three patients with 24 RCCs (mean size, 28.8 mm) contacting critical organs on preprocedural images were included. The organ displacement techniques, technical success, efficacy, and adverse events per Clavien-Dindo classification were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: The organs contacting the RCCs included the colon (n = 16), pancreas (n = 3), duodenum (n = 3), small intestine (n = 1), and stomach (n = 1). In all procedures, hydrodissection was conducted, and probe traction was additionally utilized in one to displace organs. Two procedures were terminated with an insufficient ice-ball margin (<6 mm) due to recurring proximity of the colon or thermal sink effect by renal hilar vessels, yielding a technical success rate of 91.6% (22/24). No severe adverse events were noted. All patients were alive without any metastases during a median follow-up of 34.4 months. The primary and secondary technical efficacy rates were 91.6% (22/24) and 95.8% (23/24) of tumors, respectively.

Conclusion: PCA can be a valid option for RCCs contacting critical organs with a good safety profile and sufficient technical efficacy.

目的:本研究旨在评估经皮冷冻消融术(PCA)治疗接触重要器官而无脂肪组织介入的肾细胞癌(RCC)的效果:纳入23例患者,这些患者有24个RCC(平均大小为28.8毫米)在术前图像上接触到重要器官。对器官移位技术、技术成功率、疗效以及按照 Clavien-Dindo 分类的不良事件进行了回顾性回顾:结果:接触 RCC 的器官包括结肠(16 个)、胰腺(3 个)、十二指肠(3 个)、小肠(1 个)和胃(1 个)。在所有手术中,都进行了水切,其中一次还使用了探针牵引来移位器官。有两例手术因冰球边缘不足而终止(结论:PCA 是一种有效的治疗方法,可用于肠癌、胃癌和肝癌的治疗:PCA是治疗接触重要器官的RCC的有效方法,具有良好的安全性和足够的技术效果。
{"title":"Is cryoablation a valid option for renal cell carcinomas in direct contact with critical organs?","authors":"Shoma Nagata, Yusuke Matsui, Koji Tomita, Mayu Uka, Takahiro Kawabata, Noriyuki Umakoshi, Kazuaki Munetomo, Maria Kawada, Toshihiro Iguchi, Takao Hiraki","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2354332","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2354332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) for renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) contacting critical organs without intervening fat tissue.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Twenty-three patients with 24 RCCs (mean size, 28.8 mm) contacting critical organs on preprocedural images were included. The organ displacement techniques, technical success, efficacy, and adverse events per Clavien-Dindo classification were retrospectively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The organs contacting the RCCs included the colon (<i>n</i> = 16), pancreas (<i>n</i> = 3), duodenum (<i>n</i> = 3), small intestine (<i>n</i> = 1), and stomach (<i>n</i> = 1). In all procedures, hydrodissection was conducted, and probe traction was additionally utilized in one to displace organs. Two procedures were terminated with an insufficient ice-ball margin (<6 mm) due to recurring proximity of the colon or thermal sink effect by renal hilar vessels, yielding a technical success rate of 91.6% (22/24). No severe adverse events were noted. All patients were alive without any metastases during a median follow-up of 34.4 months. The primary and secondary technical efficacy rates were 91.6% (22/24) and 95.8% (23/24) of tumors, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCA can be a valid option for RCCs contacting critical organs with a good safety profile and sufficient technical efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140958050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Partial splenic embolization with embosphere microspheres (700-900 µm) for the treatment of hypersplenism: comparison of selective superior splenic artery embolization and inferior splenic artery embolization. 使用栓塞球微球(700-900 微米)进行部分脾栓塞治疗脾功能亢进:选择性脾上动脉栓塞与脾下动脉栓塞的比较。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-12 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2339917
Chao Ma, Yan Wang, Heng Zhang, Feng Duan, Mao-Qiang Wang

Objective: To compare clinical outcomes of superior versus inferior splenic artery embolization in partial splenic embolization (PSE) and identify predictors of major complications.

Material and methods: This retrospective case-control study included 73 patients who underwent PSE between May 2005 and April 2021. They were divided into two groups: the superior and middle splenic artery embolization group (Group A, n = 37) and the inferior and middle splenic artery embolization group (Group B, n = 36). Outcome differences and major complications between the groups were assessed. Logistic regression was used to analyze potential predictors of major complications, and the optimal cutoff value for splenic embolization rates was determined using the Youden index.

Results: There were no significant differences in laboratory and radiological outcomes between the two groups. Group A had a significantly lower incidence of major complications than Group B (p = 0.049), a lower Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain (p = 0.036), and a shorter hospital stay (p = 0.022). Independent risk factors for major complications included inferior and middle splenic artery embolization (odds ratio [OR] = 3.672; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.028-13.120; p = 0.045) and a higher spleen embolization rate (OR = 1.108; 95% CI = 1.003-1.224; p = 0.044). The optimal cutoff for spleen embolization rate to predict major complications was 59.93% (sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 63.6%).

Conclusion: Using 500-700 µm microspheres for PSE, targeting the middle and superior splenic artery yields similar effects to targeting the middle and inferior artery, but results in lower rates of major complications and shorter hospital stays. To effectively minimize the risk of major complications, the embolization rate should be kept below 59.93%, regardless of the target vessel.

目的比较部分脾栓塞术(PSE)中上脾动脉栓塞与下脾动脉栓塞的临床效果,并确定主要并发症的预测因素。材料与方法:这项回顾性病例对照研究纳入了 2005 年 5 月至 2021 年 4 月间接受部分脾动脉栓塞术的 73 例患者。他们被分为两组:脾上、中动脉栓塞组(A 组,n = 37)和脾下、中动脉栓塞组(B 组,n = 36)。对两组之间的结果差异和主要并发症进行了评估。使用逻辑回归分析主要并发症的潜在预测因素,并使用尤登指数确定脾栓塞率的最佳临界值。结果两组患者的实验室和放射学结果无明显差异。A 组的主要并发症发生率明显低于 B 组(P = 0.049),疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分较低(P = 0.036),住院时间较短(P = 0.022)。主要并发症的独立风险因素包括下脾动脉和中脾动脉栓塞(几率比 [OR] = 3.672;95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.028-13.120;P = 0.045)和较高的脾脏栓塞率(OR = 1.108;95% CI = 1.003-1.224;P = 0.044)。脾脏栓塞率预测主要并发症的最佳临界值为 59.93%(敏感性 77.8%,特异性 63.6%)。结论使用 500-700 µm 的微球进行 PSE,以脾中线和上动脉为靶点与以脾中线和下动脉为靶点的效果相似,但主要并发症发生率较低,住院时间较短。为有效降低主要并发症的风险,无论采用哪种靶血管,栓塞率都应保持在 59.93% 以下。
{"title":"Partial splenic embolization with embosphere microspheres (700-900 µm) for the treatment of hypersplenism: comparison of selective superior splenic artery embolization and inferior splenic artery embolization.","authors":"Chao Ma, Yan Wang, Heng Zhang, Feng Duan, Mao-Qiang Wang","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2339917","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2339917","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes of superior versus inferior splenic artery embolization in partial splenic embolization (PSE) and identify predictors of major complications.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study included 73 patients who underwent PSE between May 2005 and April 2021. They were divided into two groups: the superior and middle splenic artery embolization group (Group A, <i>n</i> = 37) and the inferior and middle splenic artery embolization group (Group B, <i>n</i> = 36). Outcome differences and major complications between the groups were assessed. Logistic regression was used to analyze potential predictors of major complications, and the optimal cutoff value for splenic embolization rates was determined using the Youden index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in laboratory and radiological outcomes between the two groups. Group A had a significantly lower incidence of major complications than Group B (<i>p</i> = 0.049), a lower Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain (<i>p</i> = 0.036), and a shorter hospital stay (<i>p</i> = 0.022). Independent risk factors for major complications included inferior and middle splenic artery embolization (odds ratio [OR] = 3.672; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.028-13.120; <i>p</i> = 0.045) and a higher spleen embolization rate (OR = 1.108; 95% CI = 1.003-1.224; <i>p</i> = 0.044). The optimal cutoff for spleen embolization rate to predict major complications was 59.93% (sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 63.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using 500-700 µm microspheres for PSE, targeting the middle and superior splenic artery yields similar effects to targeting the middle and inferior artery, but results in lower rates of major complications and shorter hospital stays. To effectively minimize the risk of major complications, the embolization rate should be kept below 59.93%, regardless of the target vessel.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"61-70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140874702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
4DryField vs. hyalobarrier gel for preventing the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions - a pilot study. 4DryField 与 hyalobarrier 凝胶在预防宫腔内粘连复发方面的对比--一项试点研究。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2351829
Zdenka Lisa, Adela Richtarova, Kristyna Hlinecka, Barbora Boudova, David Kuzel, Michael Fanta, Michal Mara

Introduction: This was a single-center pilot study that sought to describe an innovative use of 4DryField® PH (premix) for preventing the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with Asherman's syndrome (AS).

Material and methods: Twenty-three patients with AS were enrolled and 20 were randomized (1:1 ratio) to intrauterine application of 4DryField® PH (n = 10) or Hyalobarrier® gel (n = 10) in a single-blind manner. We evaluated IUAs (American Fertility Society [AFS] score) during initial hysteroscopy and second-look hysteroscopy one month later. Patients completed a follow-up symptoms questionnaire three and reproductive outcomes questionnaire six months later.

Results: The demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as severity of IUAs, were comparable in both groups. The mean initial AFS score was 9 and 8.5 in the 4DryField® PH and Hyalobarrier® gel groups, respectively (p = .476). There were no between-group differences in AFS progress (5.9 vs. 5.6, p = .675), need for secondary adhesiolysis (7 vs. 7 patients, p = 1), and the follow-up outcomes.

Conclusion: 4DryField® PH could be a promising antiadhesive agent for preventing the recurrence of IUAs, showing similar effectiveness and safety to Hyalobarrier® gel. Our findings warrant prospective validation in a larger clinical trial.

Clinical trial registry number: ISRCTN15630617.

简介:这是一项单中心试点研究,旨在描述4DryField® PH(预混剂)在阿舍曼氏综合征(AS)患者宫腔镜粘连溶解术后预防宫腔内粘连(IUAs)复发的创新应用:23名AS患者被纳入研究,20名患者被随机(1:1的比例)在宫腔内应用4DryField® PH(n = 10)或Hyalobarrier®凝胶(n = 10)。我们在初次宫腔镜检查和一个月后的第二次宫腔镜检查中对 IUAs(美国生育协会 [AFS] 评分)进行了评估。患者在三个月后填写了随访症状问卷,六个月后填写了生殖结果问卷:结果:两组患者的人口统计学和临床特征以及 IUAs 的严重程度相当。4DryField® PH 组和 Hyalobarrier® 凝胶组的初始 AFS 平均得分分别为 9 分和 8.5 分(p = .476)。在 AFS 进展(5.9 vs. 5.6,p = .675)、二次粘连溶解需求(7 vs. 7 名患者,p = 1)和随访结果方面没有组间差异:4DryField®PH可能是一种很有前景的预防IUA复发的抗粘连剂,其有效性和安全性与Hyalobarrier®凝胶相似。临床试验登记号:ISRCTN15630617。
{"title":"4DryField vs. hyalobarrier gel for preventing the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions - a pilot study.","authors":"Zdenka Lisa, Adela Richtarova, Kristyna Hlinecka, Barbora Boudova, David Kuzel, Michael Fanta, Michal Mara","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2351829","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2351829","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This was a single-center pilot study that sought to describe an innovative use of 4DryField® PH (premix) for preventing the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with Asherman's syndrome (AS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Twenty-three patients with AS were enrolled and 20 were randomized (1:1 ratio) to intrauterine application of 4DryField® PH (<i>n</i> = 10) or Hyalobarrier<sup>®</sup> gel (<i>n</i> = 10) in a single-blind manner. We evaluated IUAs (American Fertility Society [AFS] score) during initial hysteroscopy and second-look hysteroscopy one month later. Patients completed a follow-up symptoms questionnaire three and reproductive outcomes questionnaire six months later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as severity of IUAs, were comparable in both groups. The mean initial AFS score was 9 and 8.5 in the 4DryField<sup>®</sup> PH and Hyalobarrier<sup>®</sup> gel groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = .476). There were no between-group differences in AFS progress (5.9 vs. 5.6, <i>p</i> = .675), need for secondary adhesiolysis (7 vs. 7 patients, <i>p</i> = 1), and the follow-up outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>4DryField<sup>®</sup> PH could be a promising antiadhesive agent for preventing the recurrence of IUAs, showing similar effectiveness and safety to Hyalobarrier<sup>®</sup> gel. Our findings warrant prospective validation in a larger clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry number: </strong>ISRCTN15630617.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"71-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141076282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The vaginal route for minimally invasive surgery: a practical guide for general surgeons. 微创手术的阴道路径:普通外科医生实用指南。
IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-08 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2359707
Matteo Pavone, Lise Lecointre, Barbara Seeliger, Riccardo Oliva, Cherif Akladios, Denis Querleu, Giovanni Scambia, Jacques Marescaux, Antonello Forgione

Introduction: Vaginal approaches have become routine in the field of gynecologic surgery, whereas in general surgery vaginal wall transection is an infrequent practice typically reserved for extensive tumor resections. Approximately two decades ago, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) revolutionized conventional boundaries by accessing the peritoneal cavity transorally, transrectally, or transvaginally, enabling general surgery without visible scars. Although transvaginal approaches have been successfully used for various abdominal procedures by general surgeons, a gap remains in comprehensive training to fully exploit the potential of this route.

Material and methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases were searched to retrieve relevant articles illustrating how general surgeons can adeptly manage vaginal approaches.

Results: The article presents a practical framework for general surgeons to execute a complete vaginal approach, addressing the management of vaginal specimen extraction and vaginal cuff closure, even in the absence of an experienced gynecologist.

Conclusion: The evolution of abdominal surgery is moving towards less invasive techniques, emphasizing the importance of understanding the nuances and challenges associated with the vaginal route. This approach is linked to minimal oncological, sexual, and infective complications, and to the absence of pregnancy-related complications. Such knowledge becomes increasingly crucial, particularly with the renewed demand for transvaginal access in robot-assisted NOTES procedures.

简介:在妇科手术领域,阴道手术已成为常规手术,而在普通外科,阴道壁横断通常只用于大面积肿瘤切除术,并不常见。大约二十年前,自然孔腔内镜手术(NOTES)通过经腹、经直肠或经阴道进入腹腔,实现了无明显疤痕的普外科手术,从而彻底改变了传统的手术界限。尽管普外科医生已成功将经阴道方法用于各种腹部手术,但在充分挖掘这一途径潜力的综合培训方面仍存在差距:搜索了PubMed、Google Scholar和Scopus数据库,以检索相关文章,说明普外科医生如何能够熟练地管理阴道入路:结果:文章为普外科医生提供了一个实用的框架,即使在没有经验丰富的妇科医生的情况下,也能实施完整的阴道手术,解决阴道标本提取和阴道袖带闭合的管理问题:腹部手术的发展正朝着微创技术的方向迈进,这强调了了解阴道途径的细微差别和相关挑战的重要性。这种方法可将肿瘤、性和感染并发症降至最低,而且不会出现与妊娠有关的并发症。这些知识变得越来越重要,尤其是在机器人辅助NOTES手术中,对经阴道入路的需求再次增加。
{"title":"The vaginal route for minimally invasive surgery: a practical guide for general surgeons.","authors":"Matteo Pavone, Lise Lecointre, Barbara Seeliger, Riccardo Oliva, Cherif Akladios, Denis Querleu, Giovanni Scambia, Jacques Marescaux, Antonello Forgione","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2359707","DOIUrl":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2359707","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaginal approaches have become routine in the field of gynecologic surgery, whereas in general surgery vaginal wall transection is an infrequent practice typically reserved for extensive tumor resections. Approximately two decades ago, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) revolutionized conventional boundaries by accessing the peritoneal cavity transorally, transrectally, or transvaginally, enabling general surgery without visible scars. Although transvaginal approaches have been successfully used for various abdominal procedures by general surgeons, a gap remains in comprehensive training to fully exploit the potential of this route.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases were searched to retrieve relevant articles illustrating how general surgeons can adeptly manage vaginal approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The article presents a practical framework for general surgeons to execute a complete vaginal approach, addressing the management of vaginal specimen extraction and vaginal cuff closure, even in the absence of an experienced gynecologist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evolution of abdominal surgery is moving towards less invasive techniques, emphasizing the importance of understanding the nuances and challenges associated with the vaginal route. This approach is linked to minimal oncological, sexual, and infective complications, and to the absence of pregnancy-related complications. Such knowledge becomes increasingly crucial, particularly with the renewed demand for transvaginal access in robot-assisted NOTES procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"78-87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141293555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1