Comparing Voluntary Assisted Dying Laws in Victoria and Western Australia: Western Australian Stakeholders' Perspectives.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01
Casey M Haining, Lindy Willmott, Ben P White
{"title":"Comparing Voluntary Assisted Dying Laws in Victoria and Western Australia: Western Australian Stakeholders' Perspectives.","authors":"Casey M Haining, Lindy Willmott, Ben P White","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2021, two years after voluntary assisted dying (VAD) laws commenced in Victoria, Western Australia (WA) was the second Australian jurisdiction to permit VAD. While the two regimes are broadly similar, key differences exist. This article reports on findings from a qualitative study of WA participants with VAD experience across four stakeholder groups (patients and families; health practitioners; regulators and VAD system personnel; and health and professional organisation representatives), focusing particularly on participants' reflections on aspects of the WA VAD regime which differs from that in Victoria and the practical implications of those differences. Globally, participants viewed VAD as operating smoothly in Western Australia and, despite identifying some areas for improvement, that WA's model was more functional and accessible than Victoria's. By comparing two different VAD models, this article's findings add to growing empirical evidence about VAD in Australia and can inform future VAD reforms and reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"30 3","pages":"716-744"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2021, two years after voluntary assisted dying (VAD) laws commenced in Victoria, Western Australia (WA) was the second Australian jurisdiction to permit VAD. While the two regimes are broadly similar, key differences exist. This article reports on findings from a qualitative study of WA participants with VAD experience across four stakeholder groups (patients and families; health practitioners; regulators and VAD system personnel; and health and professional organisation representatives), focusing particularly on participants' reflections on aspects of the WA VAD regime which differs from that in Victoria and the practical implications of those differences. Globally, participants viewed VAD as operating smoothly in Western Australia and, despite identifying some areas for improvement, that WA's model was more functional and accessible than Victoria's. By comparing two different VAD models, this article's findings add to growing empirical evidence about VAD in Australia and can inform future VAD reforms and reviews.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较维多利亚州和西澳大利亚州的自愿协助死亡法:西澳大利亚利益相关者的观点。
2021 年,在维多利亚州开始实施自愿协助死亡(VAD)法律两年后,西澳大利亚州(WA)成为澳大利亚第二个允许自愿协助死亡的司法管辖区。虽然两地的制度大体相似,但也存在关键差异。本文报告了对西澳大利亚州四个利益相关群体(患者和家属、医疗从业人员、监管机构和自愿死亡评估系统人员、医疗和专业组织代表)中具有自愿死亡评估经验的参与者进行定性研究的结果,尤其侧重于参与者对西澳大利亚州自愿死亡评估制度与维多利亚州制度不同之处的反思,以及这些不同之处的实际影响。总体而言,与会者认为西澳大利亚州的 VAD 运行平稳,尽管也发现了一些需要改进的地方,但西澳大利亚州的模式比维多利亚州的模式更实用、更方便。通过比较两种不同的志愿援助和发展模式,本文的研究结果补充了澳大利亚志愿援助和发展方面越来越多的经验证据,并可为未来的志愿援助和发展改革及审查提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Challenging Pandemic Law: From Vaccine Mandates to Judicial Review of Vaccine Approvals. Cystic Fibrosis and the Law: The Ramifications of New Treatments. Denial of Desire for Death in Dementia: Why Is Dementia Excluded from Australian Voluntary Assisted Dying Legislation? Informed Consent and the Duty to Warn: More than the Mere Provision of Information. Insight and the Capacity to Refuse Treatment with Electroconvulsive Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1