{"title":"Comparing Voluntary Assisted Dying Laws in Victoria and Western Australia: Western Australian Stakeholders' Perspectives.","authors":"Casey M Haining, Lindy Willmott, Ben P White","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2021, two years after voluntary assisted dying (VAD) laws commenced in Victoria, Western Australia (WA) was the second Australian jurisdiction to permit VAD. While the two regimes are broadly similar, key differences exist. This article reports on findings from a qualitative study of WA participants with VAD experience across four stakeholder groups (patients and families; health practitioners; regulators and VAD system personnel; and health and professional organisation representatives), focusing particularly on participants' reflections on aspects of the WA VAD regime which differs from that in Victoria and the practical implications of those differences. Globally, participants viewed VAD as operating smoothly in Western Australia and, despite identifying some areas for improvement, that WA's model was more functional and accessible than Victoria's. By comparing two different VAD models, this article's findings add to growing empirical evidence about VAD in Australia and can inform future VAD reforms and reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"30 3","pages":"716-744"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 2021, two years after voluntary assisted dying (VAD) laws commenced in Victoria, Western Australia (WA) was the second Australian jurisdiction to permit VAD. While the two regimes are broadly similar, key differences exist. This article reports on findings from a qualitative study of WA participants with VAD experience across four stakeholder groups (patients and families; health practitioners; regulators and VAD system personnel; and health and professional organisation representatives), focusing particularly on participants' reflections on aspects of the WA VAD regime which differs from that in Victoria and the practical implications of those differences. Globally, participants viewed VAD as operating smoothly in Western Australia and, despite identifying some areas for improvement, that WA's model was more functional and accessible than Victoria's. By comparing two different VAD models, this article's findings add to growing empirical evidence about VAD in Australia and can inform future VAD reforms and reviews.
2021 年,在维多利亚州开始实施自愿协助死亡(VAD)法律两年后,西澳大利亚州(WA)成为澳大利亚第二个允许自愿协助死亡的司法管辖区。虽然两地的制度大体相似,但也存在关键差异。本文报告了对西澳大利亚州四个利益相关群体(患者和家属、医疗从业人员、监管机构和自愿死亡评估系统人员、医疗和专业组织代表)中具有自愿死亡评估经验的参与者进行定性研究的结果,尤其侧重于参与者对西澳大利亚州自愿死亡评估制度与维多利亚州制度不同之处的反思,以及这些不同之处的实际影响。总体而言,与会者认为西澳大利亚州的 VAD 运行平稳,尽管也发现了一些需要改进的地方,但西澳大利亚州的模式比维多利亚州的模式更实用、更方便。通过比较两种不同的志愿援助和发展模式,本文的研究结果补充了澳大利亚志愿援助和发展方面越来越多的经验证据,并可为未来的志愿援助和发展改革及审查提供参考。