A comparative evaluation of fluoride release and rechargeability in conventional GIC (type II), pediatric GIC (type IX), and Cention-N: an in vitro study.
P Khadatkar, B Niranjan, A Bansal, S Sundaramurthy, K Choudhary, P Sijeria
{"title":"A comparative evaluation of fluoride release and rechargeability in conventional GIC (type II), pediatric GIC (type IX), and Cention-N: an in vitro study.","authors":"P Khadatkar, B Niranjan, A Bansal, S Sundaramurthy, K Choudhary, P Sijeria","doi":"10.1007/s40368-023-00856-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-chargeability in conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) (type II), Pediatric GIC (type IX), and Cention-N-an in vitro study at an interval of first, fourteenth, and twenty first days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three groups of test materials, each with twenty samples, were prepared. Measurements of the cumulative fluoride release [parts per million (ppm)] and re-release measured on the first, fourteenth, and twenty first days. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the means for different readings, and Tukey's post hoc analysis was used to compare each group with each other.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial and subsequent fluoride release of Cention-N at days one, fourteen, and twenty-one were all noticeably higher than those of conventional and pediatric GIC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the Conventional and Pediatric GIC restorative materials, Cention-N was more effective in the initial and fluoride re-release.</p>","PeriodicalId":47603,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-023-00856-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: A comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-chargeability in conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) (type II), Pediatric GIC (type IX), and Cention-N-an in vitro study at an interval of first, fourteenth, and twenty first days.
Methods: Three groups of test materials, each with twenty samples, were prepared. Measurements of the cumulative fluoride release [parts per million (ppm)] and re-release measured on the first, fourteenth, and twenty first days. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the means for different readings, and Tukey's post hoc analysis was used to compare each group with each other.
Results: Initial and subsequent fluoride release of Cention-N at days one, fourteen, and twenty-one were all noticeably higher than those of conventional and pediatric GIC.
Conclusion: Compared to the Conventional and Pediatric GIC restorative materials, Cention-N was more effective in the initial and fluoride re-release.
期刊介绍：
The aim and scope of European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry for children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs. The EAPD focuses on the publication and critical evaluation of clinical and basic science research related to children. The EAPD will consider clinical case series reports, followed by the relevant literature review, only where there are new and important findings of interest to Paediatric Dentistry and where details of techniques or treatment carried out and the success of such approaches are given.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
