Mental health integrated care models in primary care and factors that contribute to their effective implementation: a scoping review.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Mental Health Systems Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1186/s13033-024-00625-x
Anton N Isaacs, Eleanor K L Mitchell
{"title":"Mental health integrated care models in primary care and factors that contribute to their effective implementation: a scoping review.","authors":"Anton N Isaacs, Eleanor K L Mitchell","doi":"10.1186/s13033-024-00625-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the state of Victoria, Australia, the 111-day lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the population's prevailing state of poor mental health. Of the 87% of Australians who visit their GP annually, 71% of health problems they discussed related to psychological issues. This review had two objectives: (1) To describe models of mental health integrated care within primary care settings that demonstrated improved mental health outcomes that were transferable to Australian settings, and (2) To outline the factors that contributed to the effective implementation of these models into routine practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was undertaken to synthesise the evidence in order to inform practice, policymaking, and research. Data were obtained from PubMed, CINAHL and APA PsycINFO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key elements of effective mental health integrated care models in primary care are: Co-location of mental health and substance abuse services in the primary care setting, presence of licensed mental health clinicians, a case management approach to patient care, ongoing depression monitoring for up to 24 months and other miscellaneous elements. Key factors that contributed to the effective implementation of mental health integrated care in routine practice are the willingness to accept and promote system change, integrated physical and mental clinical records, the presence of a care manager, adequate staff training, a healthy organisational culture, regular supervision and support, a standardised workflow plan and care pathways that included clear role boundaries and the use of outcome measures. The need to develop sustainable funding mechanisms has also been emphasized.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrated mental health care models typically have a co-located mental health clinician who works closely with the GP and the rest of the primary care team. Implementing mental health integrated care models in Australia requires a 'whole of system' change. Lessons learned from the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program could form the foundation on which this model is implemented in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10854062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-024-00625-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the state of Victoria, Australia, the 111-day lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the population's prevailing state of poor mental health. Of the 87% of Australians who visit their GP annually, 71% of health problems they discussed related to psychological issues. This review had two objectives: (1) To describe models of mental health integrated care within primary care settings that demonstrated improved mental health outcomes that were transferable to Australian settings, and (2) To outline the factors that contributed to the effective implementation of these models into routine practice.

Methods: A scoping review was undertaken to synthesise the evidence in order to inform practice, policymaking, and research. Data were obtained from PubMed, CINAHL and APA PsycINFO.

Results: Key elements of effective mental health integrated care models in primary care are: Co-location of mental health and substance abuse services in the primary care setting, presence of licensed mental health clinicians, a case management approach to patient care, ongoing depression monitoring for up to 24 months and other miscellaneous elements. Key factors that contributed to the effective implementation of mental health integrated care in routine practice are the willingness to accept and promote system change, integrated physical and mental clinical records, the presence of a care manager, adequate staff training, a healthy organisational culture, regular supervision and support, a standardised workflow plan and care pathways that included clear role boundaries and the use of outcome measures. The need to develop sustainable funding mechanisms has also been emphasized.

Conclusion: Integrated mental health care models typically have a co-located mental health clinician who works closely with the GP and the rest of the primary care team. Implementing mental health integrated care models in Australia requires a 'whole of system' change. Lessons learned from the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program could form the foundation on which this model is implemented in Australia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基层医疗中的精神健康综合护理模式及其有效实施的因素:范围界定综述。
背景:在澳大利亚维多利亚州,COVID-19 大流行导致的 111 天封锁加剧了民众普遍存在的心理健康问题。在每年到全科医生处就诊的 87% 的澳大利亚人中,他们所讨论的健康问题中有 71% 与心理问题有关。本综述有两个目的:(1) 描述初级医疗机构中的心理健康综合护理模式,这些模式显示出心理健康效果的改善,并可推广到澳大利亚的医疗机构中;(2) 概述有助于将这些模式有效实施到日常实践中的因素:方法:我们进行了一次范围界定审查,对证据进行了综合,以便为实践、决策和研究提供信息。数据来自 PubMed、CINAHL 和 APA PsycINFO:结果:初级医疗中有效的精神健康综合护理模式的关键要素包括结果:基层医疗机构中有效的精神健康综合护理模式的关键要素包括:在基层医疗机构中提供精神健康和药物滥用服务、有执照的精神健康临床医生、患者护理的个案管理方法、长达 24 个月的持续抑郁监测以及其他杂项要素。有助于在常规实践中有效实施精神健康综合护理的关键因素包括:愿意接受并推动系统变革、整合身体和精神临床记录、有护理经理、充分的员工培训、健康的组织文化、定期监督和支持、标准化的工作流程计划和护理路径,其中包括明确的角色界限和成果衡量标准的使用。建立可持续的资金机制的必要性也得到了强调:综合心理健康护理模式通常有一名与全科医生和初级医疗团队其他成员密切合作的精神健康临床医生。在澳大利亚实施精神健康综合护理模式需要 "全系统 "的变革。从精神健康护士激励计划中汲取的经验可以作为在澳大利亚实施这一模式的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of informal employment on individuals’ psychological well-being: microevidence from China Co-creating community wellbeing initiatives: what is the evidence and how do they work? Knowledge, attitudes, and practices on child and adolescent mental health among healthcare workers in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review. Diagnostic pattern of mental, neurological and substance use disorders at primary health care facilities in Uganda. Prevalence of common mental disorder and its association with perceived stigma and social support among people living with HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1