Urban Teen Perspectives on Gun Violence: a Mixed Methods Study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1007/s11524-023-00822-y
Ivy Tam, Eniola F A Yeates, Alyssa H Silver
{"title":"Urban Teen Perspectives on Gun Violence: a Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Ivy Tam, Eniola F A Yeates, Alyssa H Silver","doi":"10.1007/s11524-023-00822-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to explore perspectives of teenagers on their exposure to gun violence (GV), their knowledge and attitudes towards firearm injury prevention (FIP) efforts, and how to counsel them about FIP. Teens from two single-sex Bronx Catholic high schools participated in videoconferencing focus groups. Participants completed an online survey collecting demographic information and Likert-scale scoring of attitudes towards GV. Quantitative data was analyzed with descriptive statistics. Focus group discussions were recorded and transcribed. Using Dedoose, two investigators independently coded data and achieved consensus using content analysis. Six focus groups (3 from each school, n = 28 participants) were held from October-November 2020. A total of 27 participants completed the survey. Eighty-one percent of respondents agreed \"Doctors should talk to teens about gun safety.\" During focus groups, participants reported personal, community, and entertainment media exposure to GV. GV elicited many emotions, including fear and frustration. Teens identified factors contributing to GV that should be addressed, including poverty, racism, and mental illness. Most had not received prior FIP education and desired more information from trusted adults. They preferred discussions over written materials and information given over time. Teens were open to doctors counseling on FIP during healthcare visits and suggested including screening questions on surveys, conversations during healthcare maintenance visits, and classroom talks by physicians. Bronx teens are exposed to and distressed by community GV. They desired more FIP education, including physician counseling during healthcare visits. Next steps are to create and test FIP guidance for adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":49964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10897084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-023-00822-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to explore perspectives of teenagers on their exposure to gun violence (GV), their knowledge and attitudes towards firearm injury prevention (FIP) efforts, and how to counsel them about FIP. Teens from two single-sex Bronx Catholic high schools participated in videoconferencing focus groups. Participants completed an online survey collecting demographic information and Likert-scale scoring of attitudes towards GV. Quantitative data was analyzed with descriptive statistics. Focus group discussions were recorded and transcribed. Using Dedoose, two investigators independently coded data and achieved consensus using content analysis. Six focus groups (3 from each school, n = 28 participants) were held from October-November 2020. A total of 27 participants completed the survey. Eighty-one percent of respondents agreed "Doctors should talk to teens about gun safety." During focus groups, participants reported personal, community, and entertainment media exposure to GV. GV elicited many emotions, including fear and frustration. Teens identified factors contributing to GV that should be addressed, including poverty, racism, and mental illness. Most had not received prior FIP education and desired more information from trusted adults. They preferred discussions over written materials and information given over time. Teens were open to doctors counseling on FIP during healthcare visits and suggested including screening questions on surveys, conversations during healthcare maintenance visits, and classroom talks by physicians. Bronx teens are exposed to and distressed by community GV. They desired more FIP education, including physician counseling during healthcare visits. Next steps are to create and test FIP guidance for adolescents.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市青少年对枪支暴力的看法:一项混合方法研究。
我们旨在探讨青少年对枪支暴力(GV)的看法、他们对枪支伤害预防(FIP)工作的了解和态度,以及如何向他们提供有关枪支伤害预防的咨询。来自布朗克斯区两所单一性别天主教高中的青少年参加了视频会议焦点小组。参与者完成了一项在线调查,收集了人口统计信息和对枪支伤害态度的李克特量表评分。对定量数据进行了描述性统计分析。对焦点小组的讨论进行了记录和转录。两名调查人员使用 Dedoose 对数据进行独立编码,并通过内容分析达成共识。2020 年 10 月至 11 月期间,共举行了 6 次焦点小组讨论(每所学校 3 次,n = 28 名参与者)。共有 27 名参与者完成了调查。81%的受访者同意 "医生应该与青少年谈论枪支安全"。在焦点小组中,参与者报告了个人、社区和娱乐媒体对龙虎国际app首页的接触情况。GV 引发了许多情绪,包括恐惧和沮丧。青少年指出了导致 GV 的应予以解决的因素,包括贫困、种族主义和精神疾病。大多数青少年以前没有接受过 FIP 教育,他们希望从可信赖的成年人那里获得更多信息。他们更喜欢讨论,而不是书面材料和长期提供的信息。青少年对医生在就诊时提供有关 FIP 的咨询持开放态度,并建议在调查问卷中加入筛查问题、在医疗保健维护就诊时进行谈话,以及由医生在课堂上进行讲座。布朗克斯区的青少年受到社区龙卷风的影响和困扰。他们希望获得更多的 FIP 教育,包括在就诊时由医生提供咨询。下一步是为青少年制定和测试 FIP 指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Urban Health is the premier and authoritative source of rigorous analyses to advance the health and well-being of people in cities. The Journal provides a platform for interdisciplinary exploration of the evidence base for the broader determinants of health and health inequities needed to strengthen policies, programs, and governance for urban health. The Journal publishes original data, case studies, commentaries, book reviews, executive summaries of selected reports, and proceedings from important global meetings. It welcomes submissions presenting new analytic methods, including systems science approaches to urban problem solving. Finally, the Journal provides a forum linking scholars, practitioners, civil society, and policy makers from the multiple sectors that can influence the health of urban populations.
期刊最新文献
Increasing Access, Equitability, and Rigor in the Assessment of Neighborhood Mortgage Discrimination. Vertical Living and Longevity: Examining Mortality by Floor of Residence in an Elderly Population. Urban Environments, Health, and Environmental Sustainability: Findings From the SALURBAL Study. From Neighborhood to Household: Connections Between Neighborhood Vacant and Abandoned Property and Family Violence. Less-Lethal Weapons and Civilian Injury in Police Use of Force Encounters: A Multi-agency Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1