Factors Associated with Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Persisting Sequelae of COVID-19

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL American Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.01.021
Aaron Bonner-Jackson PhD , Rohun Vangal BS , Yadi Li MEd , Nicolas Thompson MS , Shinjon Chakrabarti , Kamini Krishnan PhD
{"title":"Factors Associated with Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Persisting Sequelae of COVID-19","authors":"Aaron Bonner-Jackson PhD ,&nbsp;Rohun Vangal BS ,&nbsp;Yadi Li MEd ,&nbsp;Nicolas Thompson MS ,&nbsp;Shinjon Chakrabarti ,&nbsp;Kamini Krishnan PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Quantify cognitive deficits<span><span> in patients with postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) and identify key variables related to </span>cognitive impairment in PASC.</span></div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Patients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. The comparison group included patients without neurological disorders<span> determined by the neuropsychologist to be cognitively intact. Cognitive impairment was defined as impairment (Composite T ≤35) in 1 of 6 cognitive domains. The PASC group was split into impaired or intact based on the above criteria. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed predictors including demographics, COVID-19 severity, clinical characteristics, and mood.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 210 patients with PASC, predominantly female (73.3%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), without other demographic differences when compared with 369 normal controls. Patients with PASC were more likely to have cognitive impairment (odds ratio 3.61; 95% confidence interval, 2.36-5.54; <em>P</em><span> &lt; .001) compared with controls, with significantly lower scores in domains of memory, language, processing speed, visuospatial function, executive function (</span><em>P</em> &lt; .001), and higher depressive (<em>P</em> = .004) and anxiety symptoms (<em>P</em><span> = .003). Patients with PASC who demonstrated cognitive impairment (n = 93) had higher body mass index compared with those with PASC without cognitive impairment (n = 117), without differences in other predictors.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div><span>Patients with PASC are almost 4 times more likely to evidence cognitive dysfunction compared with normal controls. Forty-four percent of patients with PASC demonstrated cognitive deficits about 7 months from infection. Estimated premorbid intelligence significantly correlated with impairment. Higher </span>body mass index was the only metric shown to differentiate those with PASC and cognitive impairment from those with PASC who were cognitively intact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":"138 2","pages":"Pages 337-345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002934324000585","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Quantify cognitive deficits in patients with postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) and identify key variables related to cognitive impairment in PASC.

Method

Patients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. The comparison group included patients without neurological disorders determined by the neuropsychologist to be cognitively intact. Cognitive impairment was defined as impairment (Composite T ≤35) in 1 of 6 cognitive domains. The PASC group was split into impaired or intact based on the above criteria. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed predictors including demographics, COVID-19 severity, clinical characteristics, and mood.

Results

There were 210 patients with PASC, predominantly female (73.3%, P < .001), without other demographic differences when compared with 369 normal controls. Patients with PASC were more likely to have cognitive impairment (odds ratio 3.61; 95% confidence interval, 2.36-5.54; P < .001) compared with controls, with significantly lower scores in domains of memory, language, processing speed, visuospatial function, executive function (P < .001), and higher depressive (P = .004) and anxiety symptoms (P = .003). Patients with PASC who demonstrated cognitive impairment (n = 93) had higher body mass index compared with those with PASC without cognitive impairment (n = 117), without differences in other predictors.

Conclusion

Patients with PASC are almost 4 times more likely to evidence cognitive dysfunction compared with normal controls. Forty-four percent of patients with PASC demonstrated cognitive deficits about 7 months from infection. Estimated premorbid intelligence significantly correlated with impairment. Higher body mass index was the only metric shown to differentiate those with PASC and cognitive impairment from those with PASC who were cognitively intact.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与 Covid-19 持续后遗症患者认知障碍相关的因素。
摘要量化 Covid-19 急性后遗症(PASC)患者的认知障碍,并确定与 PASC 认知障碍相关的关键变量:聚合酶链反应(PCR)确诊为Covid-19的患者接受了全面的神经心理学评估。对比组包括无神经系统疾病的患者,这些患者经神经心理学家认定认知功能完好。认知障碍的定义是六个认知领域之一出现障碍(复合 T ≤ 35)。根据上述标准,PASC 组被分为认知功能受损组和认知功能完好组。多变量逻辑回归模型评估了包括人口统计学、Covid-19 严重程度、临床特征和情绪在内的预测因素:与正常对照组相比,PASC 患者出现认知功能障碍的可能性几乎高出 4 倍。44%的PASC患者在感染后7个月左右出现认知障碍。估计的病前智力与认知障碍有明显的相关性。较高的体重指数(BMI)是区分认知障碍患者与认知功能正常的认知障碍患者的唯一指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
期刊最新文献
Early β-Blocker Use and Clinical Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Remarks To My Residents Upon Their Graduation. Dramatic Response to Renal Artery Stenting in a Single-Kidney Patient with Significant Renal Artery Stenosis: Renal Artery Stenting in a Single-Kidney Patient. What did the patient really eat? Pancake syndrome. Renal Vein Thrombosis in the Setting of Severe Klebsiella Pyelonephritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1