Are Supra-Physiological Plant-Based Antioxidants Ready for the Clinic? A Scoping Review of Hormetic Influences Driving Positive Clinical Outcomes.

Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2024-02-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130241231508
Julie Wendt, Benjamin Knudsen, Leigh A Frame
{"title":"Are Supra-Physiological Plant-Based Antioxidants Ready for the Clinic? A Scoping Review of Hormetic Influences Driving Positive Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Julie Wendt, Benjamin Knudsen, Leigh A Frame","doi":"10.1177/27536130241231508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> A pro-inflammatory metabolic state is key to the chronic disease epidemic. Clinicians' ability to use nutrients to balance inflammation via oxidant homeostasis depends on the quality of antioxidants research. Understanding the intersection of two prominent theories for how antioxidants quell inflammation-nutritional hormesis and oxidant scavenging-will enable therapeutic antioxidant use in clinical practice. <b>Purpose:</b> We sought to survey the literature to answer the question: has the hormetic response of exogenous antioxidants been studied in humans and if so, what is its effect <b>Research Design:</b> This review investigates the less well-established theory, nutritional hormesis. To understand the state of hormetic response research, we conducted a literature review describing the relationship between exogenous antioxidants, hormesis, and chronic disease. We used an adaptive search strategy (PubMed and Scopus), retrieving 343 articles, of which 218 were unique. Most studies reviewed the hormetic response in plant and cell models (73.6%) while only 2.2% were in humans. <b>Results:</b> Given the limited robust evidence, clinicians lack research-based guidance on the appropriate therapeutic dose of exogenous antioxidants or, more concerning, supra-physiological dosing via supplements. A critical hurdle in searching the literature is the lack of standardized nomenclature describing the hormetic effect, challenging the ability of clinicians to make informed decisions. <b>Conclusion:</b> Non-human research shows a biphasic, hormetic relationship with antioxidants but observational studies have yet to translate this into the complexities of human biochemistry and physiology. Therefore, we cannot accurately translate this into clinical care. To remedy this insufficiency, we suggest: (1) Improved data collection quality: controlled diet, standardized antioxidant measurements, bioavailability assessed via biomarkers; (2) Larger, harmonized datasets: research subject transparency, keyword standardization, consensus on a hormesis definition.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10851731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130241231508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A pro-inflammatory metabolic state is key to the chronic disease epidemic. Clinicians' ability to use nutrients to balance inflammation via oxidant homeostasis depends on the quality of antioxidants research. Understanding the intersection of two prominent theories for how antioxidants quell inflammation-nutritional hormesis and oxidant scavenging-will enable therapeutic antioxidant use in clinical practice. Purpose: We sought to survey the literature to answer the question: has the hormetic response of exogenous antioxidants been studied in humans and if so, what is its effect Research Design: This review investigates the less well-established theory, nutritional hormesis. To understand the state of hormetic response research, we conducted a literature review describing the relationship between exogenous antioxidants, hormesis, and chronic disease. We used an adaptive search strategy (PubMed and Scopus), retrieving 343 articles, of which 218 were unique. Most studies reviewed the hormetic response in plant and cell models (73.6%) while only 2.2% were in humans. Results: Given the limited robust evidence, clinicians lack research-based guidance on the appropriate therapeutic dose of exogenous antioxidants or, more concerning, supra-physiological dosing via supplements. A critical hurdle in searching the literature is the lack of standardized nomenclature describing the hormetic effect, challenging the ability of clinicians to make informed decisions. Conclusion: Non-human research shows a biphasic, hormetic relationship with antioxidants but observational studies have yet to translate this into the complexities of human biochemistry and physiology. Therefore, we cannot accurately translate this into clinical care. To remedy this insufficiency, we suggest: (1) Improved data collection quality: controlled diet, standardized antioxidant measurements, bioavailability assessed via biomarkers; (2) Larger, harmonized datasets: research subject transparency, keyword standardization, consensus on a hormesis definition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超生理性植物抗氧化剂是否已准备好应用于临床?对推动积极临床结果的激素影响因素的范围审查。
背景:促炎症代谢状态是慢性疾病流行的关键。临床医生利用营养素通过氧化剂平衡来平衡炎症的能力取决于抗氧化剂研究的质量。了解抗氧化剂如何抑制炎症的两个重要理论--营养激素作用和氧化剂清除作用--的交叉点将有助于在临床实践中使用抗氧化剂进行治疗。目的:我们试图通过文献调查来回答以下问题:是否在人体中研究过外源性抗氧化剂的荷尔蒙反应,如果研究过,其效果如何?这篇综述调查了营养荷尔蒙作用这一不太成熟的理论。为了了解激素反应研究的现状,我们对描述外源性抗氧化剂、激素作用和慢性疾病之间关系的文献进行了综述。我们采用了适应性检索策略(PubMed 和 Scopus),检索到 343 篇文章,其中 218 篇为唯一文章。大多数研究(73.6%)回顾了植物和细胞模型中的激素反应,只有 2.2% 的研究涉及人类。研究结果由于有力的证据有限,临床医生在外源性抗氧化剂的适当治疗剂量方面缺乏基于研究的指导,更令人担忧的是通过补充剂进行超生理剂量的治疗。检索文献的一个关键障碍是缺乏描述激素效应的标准化术语,这对临床医生做出明智决定的能力提出了挑战。结论非人类研究表明,抗氧化剂与荷尔蒙有双相关系,但观察性研究尚未将其转化为复杂的人体生物化学和生理学。因此,我们无法准确地将其转化为临床治疗。为弥补这一不足,我们建议:(1) 提高数据收集质量:控制饮食、标准化抗氧化剂测量、通过生物标志物评估生物利用率;(2) 建立更大的、统一的数据集:研究对象透明化、关键词标准化、就激素作用的定义达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Needs and Preferences for Remote-Delivered Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Qualitative Study. Using PROMIS Methodology to Create Self-Report Measures of Mindfulness and Related Concepts. Patient Experience and Attitudes Toward Electronic Intake and Patient-Reported Outcomes Within an Outpatient Whole Health Center. A Validation Study of the Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching Assessment Criteria for Assessing Mindfulness-Based Intervention Teacher Skill: Inter-Rater Reliability and Predictive Validity. Efficacy and Safety of Bacillus coagulans LBSC in Drug Induced Constipation Associated With Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Interventional, Parallel, Controlled Trial a Clinical Study on Bacillus coagulans LBSC for Drug Induced Constipation Associated With FGIDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1