Frequency-Following Responses in Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1007/s10162-024-00932-7
Laura Jacxsens, Lana Biot, Carles Escera, Annick Gilles, Emilie Cardon, Vincent Van Rompaey, Willem De Hertogh, Marc J W Lammers
{"title":"Frequency-Following Responses in Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Laura Jacxsens, Lana Biot, Carles Escera, Annick Gilles, Emilie Cardon, Vincent Van Rompaey, Willem De Hertogh, Marc J W Lammers","doi":"10.1007/s10162-024-00932-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aims to assess the impact of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) on various frequency-following response (FFR) parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to January 2023. Studies evaluating FFRs in patients with SNHL and normal hearing controls were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen case-control studies were included, revealing variability in acquisition parameters. In the time domain, patients with SNHL exhibited prolonged latencies. The specific waves that were prolonged differed across studies. There was no consensus regarding wave amplitude in the time domain. In the frequency domain, focusing on studies that elicited FFRs with stimuli of 170 ms or longer, participants with SNHL displayed a significantly smaller fundamental frequency (F<sub>0</sub>). Results regarding changes in the temporal fine structure (TFS) were inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with SNHL may require more time for processing (speech) stimuli, reflected in prolonged latencies. However, the exact timing of this delay remains unclear. Additionally, when presenting longer stimuli (≥ 170 ms), patients with SNHL show difficulties tracking the F<sub>0</sub> of (speech) stimuli. No definite conclusions could be drawn on changes in wave amplitude in the time domain and the TFS in the frequency domain. Patient characteristics, acquisition parameters, and FFR outcome parameters differed greatly across studies. Future studies should be performed in larger and carefully matched subject groups, using longer stimuli presented at the same intensity in dB HL for both groups, or at a carefully determined maximum comfortable loudness level.</p>","PeriodicalId":56283,"journal":{"name":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"131-147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11018579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-024-00932-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review aims to assess the impact of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) on various frequency-following response (FFR) parameters.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to January 2023. Studies evaluating FFRs in patients with SNHL and normal hearing controls were included.

Results: Sixteen case-control studies were included, revealing variability in acquisition parameters. In the time domain, patients with SNHL exhibited prolonged latencies. The specific waves that were prolonged differed across studies. There was no consensus regarding wave amplitude in the time domain. In the frequency domain, focusing on studies that elicited FFRs with stimuli of 170 ms or longer, participants with SNHL displayed a significantly smaller fundamental frequency (F0). Results regarding changes in the temporal fine structure (TFS) were inconsistent.

Conclusion: Patients with SNHL may require more time for processing (speech) stimuli, reflected in prolonged latencies. However, the exact timing of this delay remains unclear. Additionally, when presenting longer stimuli (≥ 170 ms), patients with SNHL show difficulties tracking the F0 of (speech) stimuli. No definite conclusions could be drawn on changes in wave amplitude in the time domain and the TFS in the frequency domain. Patient characteristics, acquisition parameters, and FFR outcome parameters differed greatly across studies. Future studies should be performed in larger and carefully matched subject groups, using longer stimuli presented at the same intensity in dB HL for both groups, or at a carefully determined maximum comfortable loudness level.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感音神经性听力损失的频率随动反应:系统回顾
目的:本系统综述旨在评估感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)对各种频率跟随反应(FFR)参数的影响:方法:根据 PRISMA 指南,使用 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库对截至 2023 年 1 月的研究进行了系统性综述。结果:共纳入了 16 项病例对照研究:结果:共纳入 16 项病例对照研究,发现采集参数存在差异。在时域中,SNHL 患者的潜伏期延长。不同研究中被延长的特定波形各不相同。在时域波幅方面没有达成共识。在频域方面,重点关注使用 170 毫秒或更长刺激激发 FFR 的研究,SNHL 患者的基频(F0)明显较小。有关时间精细结构(TFS)变化的结果不一致:结论:SNHL 患者可能需要更多时间来处理(语音)刺激,这反映在延迟时间的延长上。结论:SNHL 患者可能需要更多时间来处理(言语)刺激,这反映在延迟时间的延长上,但这种延迟的确切时间仍不清楚。此外,当呈现较长的刺激(≥ 170 毫秒)时,SNHL 患者难以追踪(语音)刺激的 F0。关于时域波幅和频域 TFS 的变化,尚无法得出明确结论。不同研究的患者特征、采集参数和 FFR 结果参数差异很大。今后的研究应在更大的规模和仔细匹配的受试者群体中进行,使用更长的刺激,两组受试者的刺激强度以 dB HL 为单位相同,或以仔细确定的最大舒适响度水平为单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JARO is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to otolaryngology and communications sciences, including hearing, balance, speech and voice. JARO welcomes submissions describing experimental research that investigates the mechanisms underlying problems of basic and/or clinical significance. Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the kinds of papers carried by JARO by looking at past issues. Clinical case studies and pharmaceutical screens are not likely to be considered unless they reveal underlying mechanisms. Methods papers are not encouraged unless they include significant new findings as well. Reviews will be published at the discretion of the editorial board; consult the editor-in-chief before submitting.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Correlation Between Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Group Delays and Tuning Sharpness in a Cochlear Model. Tuning and Timing of Organ of Corti Vibrations at the Apex of the Intact Chinchilla Cochlea. Vital Dye Uptake of YO-PRO-1 and DASPEI Depends Upon Mechanoelectrical Transduction Function in Zebrafish Hair Cells. Investigating the Effect of Blurring and Focusing Current in Cochlear Implant Users with the Panoramic ECAP Method. Eric Daniel Young.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1