Differential role of fusiform gyrus coupling in depressive and anxiety symptoms during emotion perception.

Elliot Kale Edmiston, Henry W Chase, Neil Jones, Tiffany J Nhan, Mary L Phillips, Jay C Fournier
{"title":"Differential role of fusiform gyrus coupling in depressive and anxiety symptoms during emotion perception.","authors":"Elliot Kale Edmiston, Henry W Chase, Neil Jones, Tiffany J Nhan, Mary L Phillips, Jay C Fournier","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsae009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anxiety and depression co-occur; the neural substrates of shared and unique components of these symptoms are not understood. Given emotional alterations in internalizing disorders, we hypothesized that function of regions associated with emotion processing/regulation, including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), amygdala and fusiform gyrus (FG), would differentiate these symptoms. Forty-three adults with depression completed an emotional functional magnetic resonance imaging task and the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety Scales. We transformed these scales to examine two orthogonal components, one representing internalizing symptom severity and the other the type of internalizing symptoms (anxiety vs depression). We extracted blood oxygen level dependent signal from FG subregions, ACC, and amygdala and performed generalized psychophysiological interaction analyses to assess relationships between symptoms and brain function. Type of internalizing symptoms was associated with FG3-FG1 coupling (F = 8.14, P = 0.007). More coupling was associated with a higher concentration of depression, demonstrating that intra-fusiform coupling is differentially associated with internalizing symptom type (anxiety vs depression). We found an interaction between task condition and internalizing symptoms and dorsal (F = 4.51, P = 0.014) and rostral ACC activity (F = 4.27, P = 0.012). Post hoc comparisons revealed that less activity was associated with greater symptom severity during emotional regulation. Functional coupling differences during emotional processing are associated with depressive relative to anxiety symptoms and internalizing symptom severity. These findings could inform future treatments for depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":94208,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10908550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsae009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anxiety and depression co-occur; the neural substrates of shared and unique components of these symptoms are not understood. Given emotional alterations in internalizing disorders, we hypothesized that function of regions associated with emotion processing/regulation, including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), amygdala and fusiform gyrus (FG), would differentiate these symptoms. Forty-three adults with depression completed an emotional functional magnetic resonance imaging task and the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety Scales. We transformed these scales to examine two orthogonal components, one representing internalizing symptom severity and the other the type of internalizing symptoms (anxiety vs depression). We extracted blood oxygen level dependent signal from FG subregions, ACC, and amygdala and performed generalized psychophysiological interaction analyses to assess relationships between symptoms and brain function. Type of internalizing symptoms was associated with FG3-FG1 coupling (F = 8.14, P = 0.007). More coupling was associated with a higher concentration of depression, demonstrating that intra-fusiform coupling is differentially associated with internalizing symptom type (anxiety vs depression). We found an interaction between task condition and internalizing symptoms and dorsal (F = 4.51, P = 0.014) and rostral ACC activity (F = 4.27, P = 0.012). Post hoc comparisons revealed that less activity was associated with greater symptom severity during emotional regulation. Functional coupling differences during emotional processing are associated with depressive relative to anxiety symptoms and internalizing symptom severity. These findings could inform future treatments for depression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在情绪感知过程中,纺锤形回耦合在抑郁和焦虑症状中的不同作用
背景:焦虑和抑郁同时存在,但这些症状的共同和独特神经基质尚不清楚。鉴于内化障碍中的情绪改变,我们假设与情绪处理/调节相关的区域(包括前扣带皮层(ACC)、杏仁核和纺锤形回(FG))的功能将区分这些症状:方法:43 名成年抑郁症患者完成了一项情感 fMRI 任务和汉密尔顿抑郁与焦虑量表。我们对这些量表进行了转换,以检查两个正交成分,一个代表内化症状的严重程度,另一个代表内化症状的类型(焦虑与抑郁)。我们提取了FG亚区、ACC和杏仁核的BOLD信号,并进行了gPPI分析,以评估症状与大脑功能之间的关系:内化症状类型与 FG3-FG1 耦合相关(F=8.14,p=0.007)。更多的耦合与更高的抑郁浓度相关,这表明纺锤体内耦合与内化症状类型(焦虑与抑郁)有不同的关联。我们发现任务条件和内化症状与背侧(F=4.51,p=0.014)和喙侧 ACC 活动(F=4.27,p=0.012)之间存在交互作用。事后比较显示,在情绪调节过程中,较少的活动与较严重的症状有关:结论:情绪处理过程中的功能耦合差异与抑郁症状、焦虑症状和内化症状严重程度有关。这些发现可为未来的抑郁症治疗提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Brain encoding during perceived control as a prospective predictor of improvement in quality of life. Mother-Child Closeness and Adolescent Structural Neural Networks: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Low-Income Families. Neural bases of social facilitation and inhibition: how peer presence affects elementary eye movements. Empathy enhances decoding accuracy of human neurophysiological responses to emotional facial expressions of humans and dogs. Pain modulates brain potentials and behavioral responses to unfairness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1