Enforcement actions and systemic risk

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Emerging Markets Review Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101115
Xiaoming Zhang , Yiming Tian , Chien-Chiang Lee
{"title":"Enforcement actions and systemic risk","authors":"Xiaoming Zhang ,&nbsp;Yiming Tian ,&nbsp;Chien-Chiang Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Enforcement actions aim to strengthen financial stability, and China has gradually bolstered the intensity of its own related actions. This research manually sorts out the enforcement action decision documents published by the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission one by one, constructs micro-level enforcement action indicators, uses <span><math><mo>△</mo><mi>CoVaR</mi></math></span> and connectedness, and empirically examines the relationship between enforcement actions and banking systemic risk from global and connectedness perspectives. We find that enforcement actions reduce systemic risk in banks and have a continuous reduction effect within three quarters after their initiation. The reduction impact of enforcement actions on connectedness is only reflected after two quarters of initiation. In addition, we adopt the <span><math><mo>△</mo><mi>CoVaR</mi></math></span> decomposition method and find that enforcement actions significantly reduce the tail risk of banks and lower their interconnectedness, but with a time lag effect. Lastly, we evaluate the systemic risk of enforcement actions on different types of banks and note that they substantially reduce such risk in high-capital and state-owned banks more than in low-capital and joint-stock banks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47886,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Markets Review","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101115"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Markets Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566014124000104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enforcement actions aim to strengthen financial stability, and China has gradually bolstered the intensity of its own related actions. This research manually sorts out the enforcement action decision documents published by the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission one by one, constructs micro-level enforcement action indicators, uses CoVaR and connectedness, and empirically examines the relationship between enforcement actions and banking systemic risk from global and connectedness perspectives. We find that enforcement actions reduce systemic risk in banks and have a continuous reduction effect within three quarters after their initiation. The reduction impact of enforcement actions on connectedness is only reflected after two quarters of initiation. In addition, we adopt the CoVaR decomposition method and find that enforcement actions significantly reduce the tail risk of banks and lower their interconnectedness, but with a time lag effect. Lastly, we evaluate the systemic risk of enforcement actions on different types of banks and note that they substantially reduce such risk in high-capital and state-owned banks more than in low-capital and joint-stock banks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
执法行动和系统性风险
执法行动旨在加强金融稳定,中国也逐步加大了自身相关行动的力度。本研究对中国银行保险监督管理委员会公布的执法行动决定文件逐一进行人工梳理,构建微观层面的执法行动指标,利用△CoVaR和关联性,从全局性和关联性的角度实证检验执法行动与银行系统性风险之间的关系。我们发现,执法行动降低了银行的系统性风险,并且在执法行动开始后的三个季度内具有持续的降低效果。执法行动对关联性的降低影响只在启动两个季度后才体现出来。此外,我们采用△CoVaR分解法,发现强制执行行动显著降低了银行的尾部风险,降低了银行的关联度,但存在时滞效应。最后,我们评估了执法行动对不同类型银行的系统性风险,并注意到执法行动对高资本和国有银行的系统性风险的大幅降低程度要高于低资本和股份制银行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
85
审稿时长
100 days
期刊介绍: The intent of the editors is to consolidate Emerging Markets Review as the premier vehicle for publishing high impact empirical and theoretical studies in emerging markets finance. Preference will be given to comparative studies that take global and regional perspectives, detailed single country studies that address critical policy issues and have significant global and regional implications, and papers that address the interactions of national and international financial architecture. We especially welcome papers that take institutional as well as financial perspectives.
期刊最新文献
From framing to priming: How does media coverage promote ESG preferences of institutional investors Disruptive technology and audit risks: Evidence from FTSE 100 companies Will Southeast Asia be the next global manufacturing hub? A multiway cointegration, causality, and dynamic connectedness analyses Climate policy and China's external balances International financial integration and financial stress of emerging market economies: The role of institutional quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1