Polyethylene Glycol-Mediated Axonal Fusion Promotes Early Sensory Recovery after Digital Nerve Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011334
Sriya Nemani, Sara Chaker, Helen Ismail, Julia Yao, Monal Chang, Hakmook Kang, Mihir Desai, Douglas Weikert, Panambur L Bhandari, Brian Drolet, Brinkley Sandvall, John B Hill, Wesley Thayer
{"title":"Polyethylene Glycol-Mediated Axonal Fusion Promotes Early Sensory Recovery after Digital Nerve Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sriya Nemani, Sara Chaker, Helen Ismail, Julia Yao, Monal Chang, Hakmook Kang, Mihir Desai, Douglas Weikert, Panambur L Bhandari, Brian Drolet, Brinkley Sandvall, John B Hill, Wesley Thayer","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral nerve repair is limited by Wallerian degeneration coupled with the slow and inconsistent rates of nerve regrowth. In more proximal injuries, delayed nerve regeneration can cause debilitating muscle atrophy. Topical application of polyethylene glycol (PEG) during neurorrhaphy facilitates the fusion of severed axonal membranes, immediately restoring action potentials across the coaptation site. In preclinical animal models, PEG fusion resulted in remarkable early functional recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is the first randomized clinical trial comparing functional outcomes between PEG fusion and standard neurorrhaphy. Participants with digital nerve transections were followed up at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was assessed using the Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) rating for sensory recovery at each time point. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and static 2-point discrimination determined MRCC ratings. Postoperative quality of life was measured using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight transected digital nerves (25 control and 23 PEG) across 22 patients were analyzed. PEG-fused nerves demonstrated significantly higher MRCC scores at 2 weeks (OR, 16.95; 95% CI, 1.79 to 160.38; P = 0.008) and 1 month (OR, 13.40; 95% CI, 1.64 to 109.77; P = 0.009). Participants in the PEG cohort also had significantly higher average Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire scores at 2 weeks (Hodge g , 1.28; 95% CI, 0.23 to 2.30; P = 0.0163) and 1 month (Hodge g , 1.02; 95% CI, 0.04 to 1.99; P = 0.049). No participants had adverse events related to the study drug.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PEG fusion promotes early sensory recovery and improved patient well-being following peripheral nerve repair of digital nerves.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, II.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1247-1256"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011334","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peripheral nerve repair is limited by Wallerian degeneration coupled with the slow and inconsistent rates of nerve regrowth. In more proximal injuries, delayed nerve regeneration can cause debilitating muscle atrophy. Topical application of polyethylene glycol (PEG) during neurorrhaphy facilitates the fusion of severed axonal membranes, immediately restoring action potentials across the coaptation site. In preclinical animal models, PEG fusion resulted in remarkable early functional recovery.

Methods: This is the first randomized clinical trial comparing functional outcomes between PEG fusion and standard neurorrhaphy. Participants with digital nerve transections were followed up at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was assessed using the Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) rating for sensory recovery at each time point. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and static 2-point discrimination determined MRCC ratings. Postoperative quality of life was measured using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.

Results: Forty-eight transected digital nerves (25 control and 23 PEG) across 22 patients were analyzed. PEG-fused nerves demonstrated significantly higher MRCC scores at 2 weeks (OR, 16.95; 95% CI, 1.79 to 160.38; P = 0.008) and 1 month (OR, 13.40; 95% CI, 1.64 to 109.77; P = 0.009). Participants in the PEG cohort also had significantly higher average Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire scores at 2 weeks (Hodge g , 1.28; 95% CI, 0.23 to 2.30; P = 0.0163) and 1 month (Hodge g , 1.02; 95% CI, 0.04 to 1.99; P = 0.049). No participants had adverse events related to the study drug.

Conclusion: PEG fusion promotes early sensory recovery and improved patient well-being following peripheral nerve repair of digital nerves.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, II.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聚乙二醇介导的轴突融合可促进数字神经损伤后的早期感觉恢复:随机临床试验
背景:外周神经的修复受限于 Wallerian 退化以及缓慢和不一致的神经再生速度。在较近端损伤中,神经再生延迟会导致肌肉萎缩,使人衰弱。在神经剥脱术中局部应用聚乙二醇(PEG)可促进断裂的轴索膜融合,立即恢复融合部位的动作电位。在临床前动物模型中,PEG 融合可显著促进早期功能恢复:这是首次比较 PEG 融合术和标准神经止血术功能效果的随机临床试验。在术后 2 周、1 个月和 3 个月对数字神经横断的参与者进行了随访。主要结果采用医学研究委员会分类(MRCC)对每个时间点的感觉恢复情况进行评分。塞姆斯-韦恩斯坦单丝和静态两点辨别法确定了 MRCC 评级。术后生活质量采用密歇根手部问卷(MHQ)进行测量:对 22 名患者的 48 条横断数字神经(25 条对照神经、23 条 PEG 神经)进行了分析。PEG 融合神经在 2 周(OR 16.95,95% CI:1.79 - 160.38,p = 0.008)和 1 个月(OR 13.40,95% CI:1.64 - 109.77,p = 0.009)时的 MRCC 评分明显更高。PEG 队列中的参与者在 2 周(Hodge's g 1.28,95% CI:0.23 - 2.30,p = 0.0163)和 1 个月(Hodge's g 1.02,95% CI:0.04 - 1.99,p = 0.049)时的平均 MHQ 分数也明显更高。没有参与者出现与研究药物相关的不良事件:结论:PEG-融合可促进数字神经周围神经修复术后的早期感觉恢复,改善患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
期刊最新文献
Management of the Posthemangioma Nose: 5 Key Rhinoplasty Components. (Epi)genotype and Timing of Tongue Reduction Predict Safety and Long-Term Outcomes in Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome. The Importance of Remodeling the Physiological Mandibular Angle: Mandibular V-Line versus Long Curved Ostectomy. Characterization and Risk Factors of Folliculitis after Hair Transplantation: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Surgical Occlusion Setup and Skeletal Stability of Correcting Cleft-Associated Class III Deformity Using Surgery-First Bimaxillary Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1