Reconceptualizing resilience and vulnerability in liberal feminist discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Womens Studies International Forum Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102870
Yumeng Jing
{"title":"Reconceptualizing resilience and vulnerability in liberal feminist discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Yumeng Jing","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The COVID-19 outbreak has prompted the growing recognition and reevaluation of vulnerability theory as proposed by Fineman (2008), which emphasizes the central role of the state in protecting citizens from their ‘vulnerability’ by providing their access to ‘resilience’. It challenges the traditional construction of ‘vulnerability’ and ‘resilience’ in liberal discourse, which has typically emphasized individual capabilities over community roles. To investigate the impact of this recognition on the construction of ‘vulnerability’ and ‘resilience’ in liberal feminism discourse during COVID-19, discourse analysis was conducted among nine COVID-19-related briefings from the Fawcett Society website. Two main changes in liberal feminism discourse were revealed in this research. First, there has been a shift from a focus on self-resilience among women's groups to an acknowledgement of their weakened resilience in front of COVID-19. Second, liberal feminists delve into the passive characteristic of ‘vulnerability’ during COVID-19, recognizing the susceptibility of women's groups to their inner mental issues. The discourse constructed by liberal feminists during COVID-19, as evidenced by the collected briefings from the Fawcett Society website, also reveals the ‘hidden social inequality’ that existed in the long-standing undervaluation of socially reproductive workers, which has been exposed by the pandemic and necessary the need for increased social recognition of their role in maintaining daily social functions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539524000086/pdfft?md5=ce78d95138c7f4b905a497bba6acb201&pid=1-s2.0-S0277539524000086-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539524000086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak has prompted the growing recognition and reevaluation of vulnerability theory as proposed by Fineman (2008), which emphasizes the central role of the state in protecting citizens from their ‘vulnerability’ by providing their access to ‘resilience’. It challenges the traditional construction of ‘vulnerability’ and ‘resilience’ in liberal discourse, which has typically emphasized individual capabilities over community roles. To investigate the impact of this recognition on the construction of ‘vulnerability’ and ‘resilience’ in liberal feminism discourse during COVID-19, discourse analysis was conducted among nine COVID-19-related briefings from the Fawcett Society website. Two main changes in liberal feminism discourse were revealed in this research. First, there has been a shift from a focus on self-resilience among women's groups to an acknowledgement of their weakened resilience in front of COVID-19. Second, liberal feminists delve into the passive characteristic of ‘vulnerability’ during COVID-19, recognizing the susceptibility of women's groups to their inner mental issues. The discourse constructed by liberal feminists during COVID-19, as evidenced by the collected briefings from the Fawcett Society website, also reveals the ‘hidden social inequality’ that existed in the long-standing undervaluation of socially reproductive workers, which has been exposed by the pandemic and necessary the need for increased social recognition of their role in maintaining daily social functions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 大流行期间重新认识自由女权主义话语中的复原力和脆弱性
COVID-19 的爆发促使人们越来越认识到 Fineman(2008 年)提出的脆弱性理论并对其进行重新评估,该理论强调国家在保护公民免受 "脆弱性 "影响方面的核心作用,即为公民提供获得 "复原力 "的途径。它挑战了自由主义话语中对 "脆弱性 "和 "复原力 "的传统建构,这种建构通常强调个人能力而非社区作用。为了研究这一认识对 COVID-19 期间自由派女权主义话语中 "脆弱性 "和 "复原力 "构建的影响,我们对福赛特协会网站上与 COVID-19 相关的九份简报进行了话语分析。本研究揭示了自由主义女权主义话语的两大变化。首先,从关注妇女团体的自我复原能力转变为承认她们在 COVID-19 面前的复原能力被削弱。其次,自由主义女权主义者在 COVID-19 期间深入探讨了 "脆弱性 "这一被动特征,承认妇女群体容易受到其内在精神问题的影响。自由派女权主义者在 COVID-19 期间构建的话语(从福赛特协会网站收集的简报中可见一斑)也揭示了 "隐藏的社会不平等",即长期以来社会生育工作者的价值被低估,而这种不平等在大流行病中暴露无遗,因此有必要提高社会对她们在维持日常社会功能方面的作用的认可度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
期刊最新文献
Between gendered walls: Assessing the impact of single-sex and co-education on student achievement, self-confidence, and communication skills “Leave me out of it and raise my salary”: Invisible work in the labor market and the gender wage gap “I feel free and comfortable”: The Escape the Corset Movement in South Korea and the question of women's agency “Feeling like” upholding conservative politics: The material and affective dimensions of women's support for AKP Navigating restrictions: External funding and WPS implementation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1