Understanding information literacy among doctoral students: An ILDoc model and assessment tool

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Academic Librarianship Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102855
Magdalena Paul , Marek Deja , Małgorzata Kisilowska-Szurmińska , Ewa Głowacka , Marzena Świgoń , Maja Wojciechowska
{"title":"Understanding information literacy among doctoral students: An ILDoc model and assessment tool","authors":"Magdalena Paul ,&nbsp;Marek Deja ,&nbsp;Małgorzata Kisilowska-Szurmińska ,&nbsp;Ewa Głowacka ,&nbsp;Marzena Świgoń ,&nbsp;Maja Wojciechowska","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The research paper investigates doctoral students' information literacy (IL), a demographic often overlooked in IL studies. Focusing on the unique context of Polish doctoral schools, the paper explores the competences of young researchers. The methodological and descriptive objectives of the study include creating and validating the ILDoc tool and evaluating the self-efficacy in terms of information competences of doctoral students. The research employs the Computer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) technique, targeting doctoral students from five Polish universities (Jagiellonian University, University of Gdańsk, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, and University of Warsaw). Through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the study refines the ILDoc model, identifying four latent factors: Information Access, Information Retrieval, Reference Management, and Information Analysis. The findings highlight the critical importance of IL in academic librarianship, particularly underscoring gaps in advanced searching and reference management skills. While gender and age appear to have no significant impact, the year of study and successful midterm evaluations do influence IL self-efficacy. Additionally, the field of study affects students' abilities in information access and analysis. The study advocates for customized IL training and support for doctoral students. It also calls for ongoing IL training that aligns with the evolving research processes of doctoral students, emphasizing the collaborative role of librarians and faculty. The application of the ILDoc tool in this study yields significant benefits, offering academic institutions, libraries, and educators valuable insights for improving support strategies, thereby enriching the information literacy journey of doctoral students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324000168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research paper investigates doctoral students' information literacy (IL), a demographic often overlooked in IL studies. Focusing on the unique context of Polish doctoral schools, the paper explores the competences of young researchers. The methodological and descriptive objectives of the study include creating and validating the ILDoc tool and evaluating the self-efficacy in terms of information competences of doctoral students. The research employs the Computer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) technique, targeting doctoral students from five Polish universities (Jagiellonian University, University of Gdańsk, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, and University of Warsaw). Through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the study refines the ILDoc model, identifying four latent factors: Information Access, Information Retrieval, Reference Management, and Information Analysis. The findings highlight the critical importance of IL in academic librarianship, particularly underscoring gaps in advanced searching and reference management skills. While gender and age appear to have no significant impact, the year of study and successful midterm evaluations do influence IL self-efficacy. Additionally, the field of study affects students' abilities in information access and analysis. The study advocates for customized IL training and support for doctoral students. It also calls for ongoing IL training that aligns with the evolving research processes of doctoral students, emphasizing the collaborative role of librarians and faculty. The application of the ILDoc tool in this study yields significant benefits, offering academic institutions, libraries, and educators valuable insights for improving support strategies, thereby enriching the information literacy journey of doctoral students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解博士生的信息素养:ILDoc 模型和评估工具
本研究论文调查了博士生的信息素养(IL),这是信息素养研究中经常被忽视的一个群体。论文以波兰博士生学校的独特背景为重点,探讨了年轻研究人员的能力。研究的方法论和描述性目标包括创建和验证 ILDoc 工具,评估博士生在信息能力方面的自我效能。研究采用了计算机辅助网络访谈(CAWI)技术,对象是波兰五所大学(雅盖隆大学、格但斯克大学、托伦尼古拉斯-哥白尼大学、奥尔什京瓦尔米亚和马祖里大学以及华沙大学)的博士生。通过探索性因子分析 (EFA)、确认性因子分析 (CFA) 和结构方程建模 (SEM),该研究完善了 ILDoc 模型,确定了四个潜在因子:信息获取、信息检索、参考资料管理和信息分析。研究结果凸显了 IL 在学术图书馆员工作中的关键重要性,尤其强调了高级搜索和参考资料管理技能方面的差距。虽然性别和年龄似乎没有显著影响,但学习年份和成功的期中评估确实会影响 IL 的自我效能感。此外,学习领域也会影响学生的信息获取和分析能力。本研究提倡为博士生提供个性化的 IL 培训和支持。研究还呼吁根据博士生不断发展的研究过程持续开展 IL 培训,强调图书馆员和教师的合作作用。ILDoc 工具在本研究中的应用产生了巨大的效益,为学术机构、图书馆和教育工作者改进支持策略提供了宝贵的见解,从而丰富了博士生的信息素养之旅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
期刊最新文献
Understanding feelings, thoughts, and actions: Social work students and individual research consultations Growth of Knowledge Synthesis in a University Setting: Types, Disciplines, and Librarian Involvement An interdisciplinary assessment of information literacy instruction A holistic approach to understanding undergraduates: Campus engagement, library use and psychological factors The lifecycle of 3D data in academic libraries: A survey of methods and implications for information professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1