Everyday functioning among older adults with subjective cognitive decline: a scoping review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-10 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2313127
Adora Chui, Gabriella Boccone, Paula Rico, Vivian Ngo, Alan Zhang, Heather Colquhoun, Shlomit Rotenberg
{"title":"Everyday functioning among older adults with subjective cognitive decline: a scoping review.","authors":"Adora Chui, Gabriella Boccone, Paula Rico, Vivian Ngo, Alan Zhang, Heather Colquhoun, Shlomit Rotenberg","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2313127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) experience cognitive difficulties without objectively measurable cognitive impairments but which may affect their everyday functioning. However, everyday functioning in this population has not yet been characterized. We sought to describe the empirical literature on the everyday functioning of community-dwelling older adults with SCD, their recruitment methods, and the measurements used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted for primary research articles including at least one measure of everyday functioning. Retrieved records were independently screened. Data were extracted then analyzed using descriptive statistics and summative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6544 studies were screened; 21 studies were included. All were observational analytic studies. Most compared an SCD group with a group of healthy control (47.6%), mild cognitive impairment (71.5%), and/or dementia (33.3%). Subjective cognition was measured via interview (28.6%) or clinical question(s) (14.3%). Normal cognition was determined by a wide variety of cognitive tests. The most studied everyday functioning domain was instrumental activities of daily living (90.5%). Most studies used questionnaires (81.0%), and measured ability to do an everyday life task (76.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More research is needed on everyday functioning other than IADL, with greater focus on measures that consider an individual's real-life participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5761-5770"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2313127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) experience cognitive difficulties without objectively measurable cognitive impairments but which may affect their everyday functioning. However, everyday functioning in this population has not yet been characterized. We sought to describe the empirical literature on the everyday functioning of community-dwelling older adults with SCD, their recruitment methods, and the measurements used.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted for primary research articles including at least one measure of everyday functioning. Retrieved records were independently screened. Data were extracted then analyzed using descriptive statistics and summative content analysis.

Results: 6544 studies were screened; 21 studies were included. All were observational analytic studies. Most compared an SCD group with a group of healthy control (47.6%), mild cognitive impairment (71.5%), and/or dementia (33.3%). Subjective cognition was measured via interview (28.6%) or clinical question(s) (14.3%). Normal cognition was determined by a wide variety of cognitive tests. The most studied everyday functioning domain was instrumental activities of daily living (90.5%). Most studies used questionnaires (81.0%), and measured ability to do an everyday life task (76.2%).

Conclusions: More research is needed on everyday functioning other than IADL, with greater focus on measures that consider an individual's real-life participation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主观认知能力下降的老年人的日常功能:范围综述。
目的:患有主观认知衰退(SCD)的老年人会出现认知困难,但客观上无法测量其认知障碍,但这可能会影响他们的日常功能。然而,这一人群的日常功能尚未得到描述。我们试图描述有关患有 SCD 的社区老年人日常功能的实证文献、其招募方法以及所使用的测量方法:我们对至少包含一种日常功能测量方法的主要研究文章进行了范围审查。对检索到的记录进行了独立筛选。提取数据后使用描述性统计和总结性内容分析法进行分析:共筛选出 6544 项研究,其中包括 21 项研究。所有研究均为观察性分析研究。大多数研究将 SCD 组与健康对照组(47.6%)、轻度认知障碍组(71.5%)和/或痴呆组(33.3%)进行了比较。主观认知通过访谈(28.6%)或临床问题(14.3%)进行测量。正常认知能力是通过各种认知测试确定的。研究最多的日常功能领域是工具性日常生活活动(90.5%)。大多数研究使用了问卷调查(81.0%),并测量了完成一项日常生活任务的能力(76.2%):除工具性日常生活活动外,还需要对其他日常生活功能进行更多的研究,并更加注重考虑个人实际生活参与情况的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal associations between stroke-related neurologic deficits and course of basic activities of daily living up to six months after stroke. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the patellofemoral pain severity scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Spanish version of the King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Scale (KPPS). Understanding recovery of people recovering from COVID-19 receiving treatment from primary care allied health professionals: a mixed-methods study. The effectiveness of prehabilitation interventions on biopsychosocial and service outcomes pre and post upper gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1