Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Open Fetal Spina Bifida Repair.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-10 DOI:10.1159/000537758
Julia Zepf, Anita Züger, Ladina Vonzun, Ladina Rüegg, Nele Strübing, Franziska Krähenmann, Martin Meuli, Luca Mazzone, Ueli Moehrlen, Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble
{"title":"Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Open Fetal Spina Bifida Repair.","authors":"Julia Zepf, Anita Züger, Ladina Vonzun, Ladina Rüegg, Nele Strübing, Franziska Krähenmann, Martin Meuli, Luca Mazzone, Ueli Moehrlen, Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble","doi":"10.1159/000537758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For open fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair, a maternal laparotomy is required. Hence, enhanced maternal recovery after surgery (ERAS) is paramount. A revision of our ERAS protocol was made, including changes in operative techniques and postoperative pain management. This study investigates eventual benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study included 111 women with open fSB repair at our center. The old protocol group (group 1) either received a transverse incision of the fascia with transection of the rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) or a longitudinal incision of the fascia without RAM transection, depending on placental location. The new protocol required longitudinal incisions in all patients (group 2). Postoperative pain management was changed from tramadol to oxycodone/naloxone. Outcomes of the two different protocol groups were analyzed and compared regarding the primary endpoint, the length of hospital stay (LOS) after fetal surgery, as well as regarding the following secondary endpoints: postoperative pain scores, day of first mobilization, removal of urinary catheter, bowel movement, and the occurrence of maternal and fetal complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 111 women, 82 (73.9%) were in group 1 and 29 (26.1%) were in group 2. Women in group 2 showed a significantly shorter LOS (18 [14-23] days vs. 27 [18-39] days, p = 0.002), duration until mobilization (3 [2-3] days vs. 3 [3-4] days, p = 0.03), and removal of urinary catheter (day 3 [3-3] vs. day 4 [3-4], p = 0.004). Group 2 less often received morphine subcutaneously (0% vs. 35.4%, p &lt; 0.001) or intravenously (0% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.02) but more often oxycodone (69.0% vs. 18.3%, p &lt; 0.001). No significant differences were seen regarding pain scores, bowel movement, and maternal and/or fetal complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new ERAS protocol that combined changes in surgical technique and pain medication led to better outcomes while reducing LOS. Continuous revisions of current ERAS protocols are essential to improve patient care continuously.</p>","PeriodicalId":12189,"journal":{"name":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"267-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537758","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: For open fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair, a maternal laparotomy is required. Hence, enhanced maternal recovery after surgery (ERAS) is paramount. A revision of our ERAS protocol was made, including changes in operative techniques and postoperative pain management. This study investigates eventual benefits.

Methods: Our study included 111 women with open fSB repair at our center. The old protocol group (group 1) either received a transverse incision of the fascia with transection of the rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) or a longitudinal incision of the fascia without RAM transection, depending on placental location. The new protocol required longitudinal incisions in all patients (group 2). Postoperative pain management was changed from tramadol to oxycodone/naloxone. Outcomes of the two different protocol groups were analyzed and compared regarding the primary endpoint, the length of hospital stay (LOS) after fetal surgery, as well as regarding the following secondary endpoints: postoperative pain scores, day of first mobilization, removal of urinary catheter, bowel movement, and the occurrence of maternal and fetal complications.

Results: Out of 111 women, 82 (73.9%) were in group 1 and 29 (26.1%) were in group 2. Women in group 2 showed a significantly shorter LOS (18 [14-23] days vs. 27 [18-39] days, p = 0.002), duration until mobilization (3 [2-3] days vs. 3 [3-4] days, p = 0.03), and removal of urinary catheter (day 3 [3-3] vs. day 4 [3-4], p = 0.004). Group 2 less often received morphine subcutaneously (0% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001) or intravenously (0% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.02) but more often oxycodone (69.0% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen regarding pain scores, bowel movement, and maternal and/or fetal complications.

Conclusion: The new ERAS protocol that combined changes in surgical technique and pain medication led to better outcomes while reducing LOS. Continuous revisions of current ERAS protocols are essential to improve patient care continuously.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在开放式胎儿脊柱裂修复手术中加强术后恢复(ERAS)。
介绍:开放式胎儿脊柱裂(fSB)修补术需要对产妇进行开腹手术。因此,加强产妇术后恢复(ERAS)至关重要。我们对ERAS方案进行了修订,包括改变手术技术和术后疼痛管理。本研究调查了最终的收益:我们的研究包括 111 名在本中心接受开放式 fSB 修复术的女性。根据胎盘位置,旧方案组(第1组)采用横切筋膜并横断腹直肌(RAM),或纵切筋膜但不横断腹直肌(RAM)。新方案要求对所有患者(第 2 组)进行纵向切口。术后疼痛治疗由曲马多改为羟考酮/纳洛酮。对两个不同方案组的主要终点--胎儿手术后住院时间(LOS)以及以下次要终点--术后疼痛评分、首次活动天数、拔除导尿管、排便以及母体和胎儿并发症的发生情况进行了分析和比较:在 111 名产妇中,82 人(73.9%)属于第一组,29 人(26.1%)属于第二组。第二组产妇的住院时间(18 [14-23] 天 vs. 27 [18-39] 天,p = 0.002)、活动时间(3 [2-3] 天 vs. 3 [3-4] 天,p = 0.03)和拔除导尿管时间(第 3 [3-3] 天 vs. 第 4 [3-4] 天,p = 0.004)均明显缩短。第二组接受吗啡皮下注射(0% vs. 35.4%,p < 0.001)或静脉注射(0% vs. 17.1%,p = 0.02)的频率较低,但接受羟考酮(69.0% vs. 18.3%,p < 0.001)的频率较高。在疼痛评分、肠蠕动、母体和/或胎儿并发症方面没有发现明显差异:结论:新的ERAS方案结合了手术技巧和止痛药物的改变,在缩短住院时间的同时取得了更好的效果。不断修订当前的ERAS方案对于持续改善患者护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The first journal to focus on the fetus as a patient, ''Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy'' provides a wide range of biomedical specialists with a single source of reports encompassing the common discipline of fetal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Transplacental sirolimus for reversal of fetal heart failure due to fetal cardiac rhabdomyoma: fetal and maternal considerations. A rare case of dichorionic twins concordant for arterial tortuosity syndrome: case report and review of the literature. Reflections on the 40th IFMSS meeting Visby-Stockholm 2023. Fetal Extrahepatic Porto systemic Venous Shunts: prenatal diagnosis management and therapy: 21 years of evolving insights. Medical and early developmental outcomes for patients with congenital ventriculomegaly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1