Analysis of ultrasound findings and outcomes in fetuses with suspected congenital heart disease at less than 14 weeks' gestation compared to later gestations.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1159/000544033
Wenjia Lei, Jingjing Wang, Jijing Han, Yousheng Yan, Qingqing Wu
{"title":"Analysis of ultrasound findings and outcomes in fetuses with suspected congenital heart disease at less than 14 weeks' gestation compared to later gestations.","authors":"Wenjia Lei, Jingjing Wang, Jijing Han, Yousheng Yan, Qingqing Wu","doi":"10.1159/000544033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare the spectrum of cardiac anomalies, associated comorbidities, and outcomes in fetuses suspected of congenital heart disease (CHD) at less than 14 weeks' gestation with those in the later gestations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a three-year retrospective study involving 352 fetuses suspected of CHD at our institution. The fetuses were divided into two groups based on the gestational age at which the CHD was initially detected. Initial CHD suspicion was noted within 14 weeks, forming Group I. The remaining fetuses, initially suspected of CHD after 14 weeks, constituted Group II. The type of CHD, ultrasound soft markers (USMs), associated extracardiac structural abnormalities (ECSA), genetic testing results, and pregnancy outcomes were retrieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The types of CHD in Group I (n=76) were less varied than those in Group II (n=276). Isolated CHD was significantly more prevalent in Group II (OR=0.170, 95% CI: 0.092-0.316, p<0.001). The frequency of ECSA and USMs was significantly greater in Group I (OR=1.816, 95% CI: 1.180-2.795, p<0.01; OR=4.400, 95% CI: 3.375-5.737, p<0.001, respectively). Chromosomal abnormalities were more prevalent in Group I than in Group II (65.0% vs. 16.5%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in termination rates between the two groups (OR=1.099, 95% CI: 1.023-1.179, p=0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The spectrum of diagnosed cardiac abnormalities differs between early and mid stages. Non-isolated cardiac abnormalities and chromosomal anomalies are more readily detectable in the early stages of pregnancy before the formal establishment of early cardiac screening programs. Early suspicion of cardiac anomalies may not be the predominant factor driving the termination decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":12189,"journal":{"name":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the spectrum of cardiac anomalies, associated comorbidities, and outcomes in fetuses suspected of congenital heart disease (CHD) at less than 14 weeks' gestation with those in the later gestations.

Methods: We conducted a three-year retrospective study involving 352 fetuses suspected of CHD at our institution. The fetuses were divided into two groups based on the gestational age at which the CHD was initially detected. Initial CHD suspicion was noted within 14 weeks, forming Group I. The remaining fetuses, initially suspected of CHD after 14 weeks, constituted Group II. The type of CHD, ultrasound soft markers (USMs), associated extracardiac structural abnormalities (ECSA), genetic testing results, and pregnancy outcomes were retrieved.

Results: The types of CHD in Group I (n=76) were less varied than those in Group II (n=276). Isolated CHD was significantly more prevalent in Group II (OR=0.170, 95% CI: 0.092-0.316, p<0.001). The frequency of ECSA and USMs was significantly greater in Group I (OR=1.816, 95% CI: 1.180-2.795, p<0.01; OR=4.400, 95% CI: 3.375-5.737, p<0.001, respectively). Chromosomal abnormalities were more prevalent in Group I than in Group II (65.0% vs. 16.5%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in termination rates between the two groups (OR=1.099, 95% CI: 1.023-1.179, p=0.043).

Conclusion: The spectrum of diagnosed cardiac abnormalities differs between early and mid stages. Non-isolated cardiac abnormalities and chromosomal anomalies are more readily detectable in the early stages of pregnancy before the formal establishment of early cardiac screening programs. Early suspicion of cardiac anomalies may not be the predominant factor driving the termination decision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The first journal to focus on the fetus as a patient, ''Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy'' provides a wide range of biomedical specialists with a single source of reports encompassing the common discipline of fetal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Fetal Megacystis - A practical guide. First trimester universal one-time serology screening for cytomegalovirus. A pilot study at two tertiary referral centers in Barcelona (Catalunya, Spain). Analysis of ultrasound findings and outcomes in fetuses with suspected congenital heart disease at less than 14 weeks' gestation compared to later gestations. Late prenatal development of hindbrain herniation in open spina bifida. Psychological Impact in Early Pregnancy Loss. The Effects of Disclosing the Causative Chromosomal Anomaly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1