Treatment Patterns and FLT3 Mutation Testing Among Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in China: A Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2024-02-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S434556
Benfa Gong, Li-Jen Cheng, Christopher H Young, Prabhuram Krishnan, Ying Wang, Hui Wei, Chunlin Zhou, Shuning Wei, Yan Li, Qiuyun Fang, Jia Zhong, Eric Q Wu, Yingchang Mi, Jianxiang Wang
{"title":"Treatment Patterns and <i>FLT3</i> Mutation Testing Among Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in China: A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Benfa Gong, Li-Jen Cheng, Christopher H Young, Prabhuram Krishnan, Ying Wang, Hui Wei, Chunlin Zhou, Shuning Wei, Yan Li, Qiuyun Fang, Jia Zhong, Eric Q Wu, Yingchang Mi, Jianxiang Wang","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S434556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For acute myeloid leukemia (AML), prognosis is particularly poor in patients harboring FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (<i>FLT3</i>) gene mutations, though routine screening for these mutations at diagnosis has been shown to be insufficient. The understanding of the impact of <i>FLT3</i> mutations on treatment decisions is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, observational study, we investigated the key epidemiological characteristics, treatment patterns and responses among adult patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML in China, who initiated treatment from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, or progressed to relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML by December 31, 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 853 ND AML patients included, 63.4% were screened for <i>FLT3</i> status, and 20.1% tested positive (<i>FLT3</i><sup>MUT</sup>) at initial diagnosis. Of 289 patients who progressed to R/R AML during the study period, 24.9% were screened at the diagnosis of R/R AML, and 19.4% tested positive; 20.5% of screened patients changed <i>FLT3</i> status at first diagnosis of R/R AML. Initial treatment regimens or treatment responses did not seem to differ in patients with ND AML by <i>FLT3</i> mutation status. In patients with R/R AML, there was an apparent difference in second-line treatment choices by <i>FLT3</i> mutation status; however, the number of <i>FLT3</i>-mutated patients were limited to demonstrate any meaningful distinction. <i>FLT3</i>-mutated R/R AML was associated with shorter relapse time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study findings showed that there was a lack of routine testing for <i>FLT3</i> mutations at first diagnosis of R/R AML, and initial treatment decisions did not differ by <i>FLT3</i> mutation status. Given the clinical burden of <i>FLT3</i><sup>MUT</sup>, likelihood of <i>FLT3</i> status changes, and emerging FLT3 inhibitors, further routine <i>FLT3</i> screening is needed to optimize treatment of R/R AML.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10861151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S434556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: For acute myeloid leukemia (AML), prognosis is particularly poor in patients harboring FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene mutations, though routine screening for these mutations at diagnosis has been shown to be insufficient. The understanding of the impact of FLT3 mutations on treatment decisions is limited.

Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, we investigated the key epidemiological characteristics, treatment patterns and responses among adult patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML in China, who initiated treatment from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, or progressed to relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML by December 31, 2020.

Results: Of the 853 ND AML patients included, 63.4% were screened for FLT3 status, and 20.1% tested positive (FLT3MUT) at initial diagnosis. Of 289 patients who progressed to R/R AML during the study period, 24.9% were screened at the diagnosis of R/R AML, and 19.4% tested positive; 20.5% of screened patients changed FLT3 status at first diagnosis of R/R AML. Initial treatment regimens or treatment responses did not seem to differ in patients with ND AML by FLT3 mutation status. In patients with R/R AML, there was an apparent difference in second-line treatment choices by FLT3 mutation status; however, the number of FLT3-mutated patients were limited to demonstrate any meaningful distinction. FLT3-mutated R/R AML was associated with shorter relapse time.

Conclusion: Study findings showed that there was a lack of routine testing for FLT3 mutations at first diagnosis of R/R AML, and initial treatment decisions did not differ by FLT3 mutation status. Given the clinical burden of FLT3MUT, likelihood of FLT3 status changes, and emerging FLT3 inhibitors, further routine FLT3 screening is needed to optimize treatment of R/R AML.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国急性髓性白血病患者的治疗模式和 FLT3 基因突变检测:回顾性观察研究
简介:对于急性髓性白血病(AML)而言,携带FMS样酪氨酸激酶3(FLT3)基因突变的患者预后特别差,尽管在诊断时对这些突变进行常规筛查已被证明是不够的。人们对FLT3基因突变对治疗决策的影响了解有限:在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们调查了中国新诊断(ND)急性髓细胞性白血病成年患者的主要流行病学特征、治疗模式和反应,这些患者在2015年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间开始治疗,或在2020年12月31日之前进展为复发/难治(R/R)急性髓细胞性白血病:在纳入的853例ND AML患者中,63.4%的患者接受了FLT3状态筛查,20.1%的患者在初诊时检测出阳性(FLT3MUT)。在研究期间进展为R/R急性髓细胞性白血病的289名患者中,24.9%在诊断为R/R急性髓细胞性白血病时接受了筛查,19.4%检测结果呈阳性;20.5%的筛查患者在首次诊断为R/R急性髓细胞性白血病时FLT3状态发生了改变。在ND型急性髓细胞性白血病患者中,初始治疗方案或治疗反应似乎并不因FLT3突变状态而有所不同。在R/R急性髓细胞性白血病患者中,FLT3突变状态对二线治疗方案的选择存在明显差异;然而,FLT3突变患者的数量有限,无法显示任何有意义的区别。FLT3突变的R/R AML与较短的复发时间相关:研究结果表明,在首次诊断R/R急性髓细胞白血病时,缺乏对FLT3突变的常规检测,而最初的治疗决定并不因FLT3突变状态而异。鉴于FLT3MUT的临床负担、FLT3状态改变的可能性以及新出现的FLT3抑制剂,需要进一步进行常规FLT3筛查,以优化R/R AML的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
期刊最新文献
Experts’ Opinion in Fabry Disease Management and the Unmet Medical Need: The Saudi Perspective Thromboelastography in Long-Term Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients Diagnosed with Benign Prostate Hyperplasia Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Retrospective Study Drug Therapy Problems Identified by Clinical Pharmacists at a General Surgery Ward of an Academic Referral Hospital in Jordan Time in Therapeutic Range of Unfractionated Heparin-Based Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia Umbilical Vascular Thromboembolism: High-Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Management, and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1