Comparison of retrospective and prospective memory in subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL European Journal of Translational Myology Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.4081/ejtm.2024.12221
Mohammadtaghi Yazarloo, Mehdi Reza Sarafraz, Saeide Jabbari, Taraneh Gholipour, Touraj Hashemi
{"title":"Comparison of retrospective and prospective memory in subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder.","authors":"Mohammadtaghi Yazarloo, Mehdi Reza Sarafraz, Saeide Jabbari, Taraneh Gholipour, Touraj Hashemi","doi":"10.4081/ejtm.2024.12221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retrospective and prospective memory deficits play a role in maintaining and perpetuating the symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but less is known about these deficits in different subtypes of OCD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the retrospective and prospective memory in patients suffering from cleaning, checking, symmetry, and religious obsessions. In a comparative causal method, 60 participants aged 28 to 55, in 2023, were selected by convenience sampling and placed in five groups of individuals with cleaning, checking, symmetry, religious obsessions, and a healthy group. Participants completed self-report questionnaires and neurocognitive tools. Results showed that defects in retrospective memory were significant in all types of obsessions (p<0.05) except religious obsessions. Also, this defect was more severe in checking obsession disorder compared to other types of OCD. Also, the finding indicated that the defect in prospective memory was significant only in checking obsession disorder (p<0.05). Retrospective and prospective memory impairments and their relationship with deficits in executive functions can be different depending on the type of OCD. Based on the findings, impairment of executive function indirectly by impacting the impairment of other cognitive mechanisms diminishes confidence in retrospective and prospective memory which leads to compulsive behaviors in individuals with contamination and checking obsessions. Also, the impairment of retrospective memory in symmetry obsessions might have a relationship with information encoding, which in turn leads to difficulty recalling information from memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":46459,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Translational Myology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Translational Myology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2024.12221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retrospective and prospective memory deficits play a role in maintaining and perpetuating the symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but less is known about these deficits in different subtypes of OCD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the retrospective and prospective memory in patients suffering from cleaning, checking, symmetry, and religious obsessions. In a comparative causal method, 60 participants aged 28 to 55, in 2023, were selected by convenience sampling and placed in five groups of individuals with cleaning, checking, symmetry, religious obsessions, and a healthy group. Participants completed self-report questionnaires and neurocognitive tools. Results showed that defects in retrospective memory were significant in all types of obsessions (p<0.05) except religious obsessions. Also, this defect was more severe in checking obsession disorder compared to other types of OCD. Also, the finding indicated that the defect in prospective memory was significant only in checking obsession disorder (p<0.05). Retrospective and prospective memory impairments and their relationship with deficits in executive functions can be different depending on the type of OCD. Based on the findings, impairment of executive function indirectly by impacting the impairment of other cognitive mechanisms diminishes confidence in retrospective and prospective memory which leads to compulsive behaviors in individuals with contamination and checking obsessions. Also, the impairment of retrospective memory in symmetry obsessions might have a relationship with information encoding, which in turn leads to difficulty recalling information from memory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较强迫症亚型的回顾记忆和前瞻记忆。
回顾性和前瞻性记忆缺陷在维持和延续强迫症(OCD)症状方面起着一定的作用,但人们对不同亚型强迫症患者的这些缺陷知之甚少。本研究旨在评估清洁强迫症、检查强迫症、对称强迫症和宗教强迫症患者的回顾性记忆和前瞻性记忆。本研究采用因果关系比较法,通过便利抽样法选取了 2023 年年龄在 28 岁至 55 岁之间的 60 名参与者,并将其分为五组,即清洁强迫症、检查强迫症、对称强迫症、宗教强迫症患者组和健康组。参与者填写了自我报告问卷和神经认知工具。结果显示,在所有类型的强迫症中,回溯记忆的缺陷都很明显(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Translational Myology
European Journal of Translational Myology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
27.30%
发文量
74
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Treatment of Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study. Low level laser therapy and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Efficacy of electrical stimulation of the zygomaticus muscle in complete facial paralysis: evidence from facial grading and automated image analysis. Deceleration of denervated facial muscle atrophy through functional electrical stimulation: a sonographic quantification in patients with facial nerve paralysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1