Rehabilitation clinicians' use of mainstream wireless technologies in practice: a scoping review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2316891
Brad E Dicianno, Angad Salh, Lindsey Morris, Yifan Xiang, Dan Ding
{"title":"Rehabilitation clinicians' use of mainstream wireless technologies in practice: a scoping review.","authors":"Brad E Dicianno, Angad Salh, Lindsey Morris, Yifan Xiang, Dan Ding","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2316891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This scoping review was conducted to understand the barriers, facilitators, and education and training needs of rehabilitation clinicians in their use of mainstream wireless technologies (MWT) to support people with disabilities and older adults. It was also conducted to understand the functional skills of clients that were targeted with MWT use.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This scoping review was reported using PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) and the Population (or Participants)/Concept/Context) framework. We searched PubMed; ProQuest to access APA PsycINFO; Web of Science Core Collection; and EBSCOhost to access Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Ovid MEDLINE ALL, and Education Resources Information Center (ERIC). Articles published between 2015-2022 were retrieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 articles were included. Most interventions were apps, smartphones, and tablets; were geared toward adults; and targeted motor, cognitive and speech skills. An infographic on barriers and facilitators was generated as a decision support tool for clinicians when implementing MWT. The topic, format, timing, and source of information clinicians need are also delineated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MWT such as apps, smartphones and tablets are being used by rehabilitation clinicians to address motor, cognitive, and speech skills, most commonly in adults. Clinicians voice a need for more education and training. Barriers and facilitators exist at the clinician-, technology-, client-, institution-, and policy levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"2742-2760"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2316891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This scoping review was conducted to understand the barriers, facilitators, and education and training needs of rehabilitation clinicians in their use of mainstream wireless technologies (MWT) to support people with disabilities and older adults. It was also conducted to understand the functional skills of clients that were targeted with MWT use.

Materials and methods: This scoping review was reported using PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) and the Population (or Participants)/Concept/Context) framework. We searched PubMed; ProQuest to access APA PsycINFO; Web of Science Core Collection; and EBSCOhost to access Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Ovid MEDLINE ALL, and Education Resources Information Center (ERIC). Articles published between 2015-2022 were retrieved.

Results: A total of 90 articles were included. Most interventions were apps, smartphones, and tablets; were geared toward adults; and targeted motor, cognitive and speech skills. An infographic on barriers and facilitators was generated as a decision support tool for clinicians when implementing MWT. The topic, format, timing, and source of information clinicians need are also delineated.

Conclusion: MWT such as apps, smartphones and tablets are being used by rehabilitation clinicians to address motor, cognitive, and speech skills, most commonly in adults. Clinicians voice a need for more education and training. Barriers and facilitators exist at the clinician-, technology-, client-, institution-, and policy levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康复临床医生在实践中对主流无线技术的使用:范围界定综述。
目的:本综述旨在了解康复临床医生在使用主流无线技术(MWT)为残障人士和老年人提供支持时遇到的障碍、促进因素以及教育和培训需求。研究还旨在了解使用 MWT 的目标客户的功能技能:本范围界定综述采用 PRISMA-ScR(范围界定综述扩展的系统综述和元分析首选报告项目)和 "人群(或参与者)/概念/背景 "框架进行报告。我们检索了 PubMed;ProQuest,以访问 APA PsycINFO;Web of Science Core Collection;以及 EBSCOhost,以访问 Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)、Ovid MEDLINE ALL 和 Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)。检索了 2015-2022 年间发表的文章:结果:共收录了 90 篇文章。大多数干预措施都是应用程序、智能手机和平板电脑;面向成年人;针对运动、认知和语言技能。研究人员制作了一份关于障碍和促进因素的信息图表,作为临床医生实施MWT时的决策支持工具。此外,还阐述了临床医生所需的信息主题、形式、时间和来源:康复临床医生正在使用应用程序、智能手机和平板电脑等移动工作站来解决运动、认知和言语技能问题,这在成人中最为常见。临床医生表示需要更多的教育和培训。在临床医生、技术、客户、机构和政策层面都存在障碍和促进因素。对康复的意义本范围综述共收录了 2015-2022 年间的 90 篇文章。大多数干预措施都是应用程序、智能手机和平板电脑;面向成年人;针对运动、认知和语言技能。本综述还讨论了研究结果对政策、技术开发和未来研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Sustained use of compensatory technology following brain injury: experiences from Neumind users. A case report on gait in spinocerebellar ataxia: evaluating the use of mixed reality from independent walking to integrated physical support. Fidelity of power mobility interventions for young children with disabilities: a systematic review. Design and development of a hybrid device to assist frail users in mobility, transfer and rehabilitation. Do first impressions matter? Comparing overall impression vs. individual item scores to make informed decisions on AAC apps.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1