A novel model of divergent predictive perception.

IF 3.1 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL Neuroscience of Consciousness Pub Date : 2024-02-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/nc/niae006
Reshanne R Reeder, Giovanni Sala, Tessa M van Leeuwen
{"title":"A novel model of divergent predictive perception.","authors":"Reshanne R Reeder, Giovanni Sala, Tessa M van Leeuwen","doi":"10.1093/nc/niae006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predictive processing theories state that our subjective experience of reality is shaped by a balance of expectations based on previous knowledge about the world (i.e. priors) and confidence in sensory input from the environment. Divergent experiences (e.g. hallucinations and synaesthesia) are likely to occur when there is an imbalance between one's reliance on priors and sensory input. In a novel theoretical model, inspired by both predictive processing and psychological principles, we propose that predictable divergent experiences are associated with natural or environmentally induced prior/sensory imbalances: inappropriately strong or inflexible (i.e. maladaptive) high-level priors (beliefs) combined with low sensory confidence can result in reality discrimination issues, a characteristic of psychosis; maladaptive low-level priors (sensory expectations) combined with high sensory confidence can result in atypical sensory sensitivities and persistent divergent percepts, a characteristic of synaesthesia. Crucially, we propose that whether different divergent experiences manifest with dominantly sensory (e.g. hallucinations) or nonsensory characteristics (e.g. delusions) depends on mental imagery ability, which is a spectrum from aphantasia (absent or weak imagery) to hyperphantasia (extremely vivid imagery). We theorize that imagery is critically involved in shaping the sensory richness of divergent perceptual experience. In sum, to predict a range of divergent perceptual experiences in both clinical and general populations, three factors must be accounted for: a maladaptive use of priors, individual level of confidence in sensory input, and mental imagery ability. These ideas can be expressed formally using nonparametric regression modeling. We provide evidence for our theory from previous work and deliver predictions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":52242,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience of Consciousness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience of Consciousness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niae006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predictive processing theories state that our subjective experience of reality is shaped by a balance of expectations based on previous knowledge about the world (i.e. priors) and confidence in sensory input from the environment. Divergent experiences (e.g. hallucinations and synaesthesia) are likely to occur when there is an imbalance between one's reliance on priors and sensory input. In a novel theoretical model, inspired by both predictive processing and psychological principles, we propose that predictable divergent experiences are associated with natural or environmentally induced prior/sensory imbalances: inappropriately strong or inflexible (i.e. maladaptive) high-level priors (beliefs) combined with low sensory confidence can result in reality discrimination issues, a characteristic of psychosis; maladaptive low-level priors (sensory expectations) combined with high sensory confidence can result in atypical sensory sensitivities and persistent divergent percepts, a characteristic of synaesthesia. Crucially, we propose that whether different divergent experiences manifest with dominantly sensory (e.g. hallucinations) or nonsensory characteristics (e.g. delusions) depends on mental imagery ability, which is a spectrum from aphantasia (absent or weak imagery) to hyperphantasia (extremely vivid imagery). We theorize that imagery is critically involved in shaping the sensory richness of divergent perceptual experience. In sum, to predict a range of divergent perceptual experiences in both clinical and general populations, three factors must be accounted for: a maladaptive use of priors, individual level of confidence in sensory input, and mental imagery ability. These ideas can be expressed formally using nonparametric regression modeling. We provide evidence for our theory from previous work and deliver predictions for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分歧预测感知的新模型
预测加工理论认为,我们对现实的主观体验是由基于先前对世界的了解(即先验)和对来自环境的感官输入的信心的平衡所形成的。当一个人对先验和感官输入的依赖不平衡时,就有可能出现偏差体验(如幻觉和共感)。受预测处理和心理学原理的启发,我们提出了一个新颖的理论模型,即可预测的分化体验与自然或环境诱发的先验/感官失衡有关:不适当的强烈或不灵活(即适应不良)的高层次先验和感官失衡。不适当的强烈或不灵活(即适应不良)的高层次先验(信念)与低感官信心相结合,会导致现实辨别问题,这是精神病的一个特征;适应不良的低层次先验(感官预期)与高感官信心相结合,会导致非典型的感官敏感性和持续的分歧知觉,这是共感症的一个特征。最重要的是,我们提出,不同的发散性体验是以感官特征(如幻觉)为主还是以非感官特征(如妄想)为主,取决于心理意象能力,而心理意象能力是一个光谱,从意象缺失(意象缺失或意象薄弱)到意象亢进(意象极其生动)。我们的理论认为,意象在塑造丰富的感知体验时起着至关重要的作用。总之,要预测临床和普通人群的一系列发散性知觉体验,必须考虑三个因素:对先验的不适应使用、个人对感觉输入的信心水平以及心理想象能力。这些观点可以用非参数回归模型来正式表达。我们从以前的工作中为我们的理论提供了证据,并对未来的研究做出了预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience of Consciousness
Neuroscience of Consciousness Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
16
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Making sense of feelings. Within-subject comparison of near-death and psychedelic experiences: acute and enduring effects. Visual imagery vividness correlates with afterimage conscious perception. The influence of feature-based attention and response requirements on ERP correlates of auditory awareness. Content-state dimensions characterize different types of neuronal markers of consciousness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1