Artificial intelligence assistance in deciding management strategies for polytrauma and trauma patients.

Chayanin Angthong, Naruebade Rungrattanawilai, Chaiyapruk Pundee
{"title":"Artificial intelligence assistance in deciding management strategies for polytrauma and trauma patients.","authors":"Chayanin Angthong, Naruebade Rungrattanawilai, Chaiyapruk Pundee","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.9857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging technology with vast potential for use in several fields of medicine. However, little is known about the application of AI in treatment decisions for patients with polytrauma. In this systematic review, we investigated the benefits and performance of AI in predicting the management of patients with polytrauma and trauma.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were extracted from the PubMed and Google Scholar databases from their inception until November 2022, using the search terms \"Artificial intelligence,\" \"polytrauma,\" and \"decision.\" Seventeen articles were identified and screened for eligibility. Animal studies, review articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and studies that did not involve polytrauma or severe trauma management decisions were excluded. Eight studies were eligible for final review.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Eight studies focusing on patients with trauma, including two on military trauma, were included. The AI applications were mainly implemented for predictions and/or decisions on shock, bleeding, and blood transfusion. Few studies predicted death/survival. The identification of trauma patients using AI was proposed in a previous study. The overall performance of AI was good (six studies), excellent (one study), and acceptable (one study).&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Discussion:&lt;/b&gt; AI demonstrated satisfactory performance in decision-making and management prediction in patients with polytrauma/severe trauma, especially in situations of shock/bleeding.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Importance:&lt;/b&gt; The present study serves as a basis for further research to develop practical AI applications for the management of patients with trauma.&lt;/br&gt.</p>","PeriodicalId":501107,"journal":{"name":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","volume":"96 0","pages":"114-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging technology with vast potential for use in several fields of medicine. However, little is known about the application of AI in treatment decisions for patients with polytrauma. In this systematic review, we investigated the benefits and performance of AI in predicting the management of patients with polytrauma and trauma.</br> <b><br>Methods:</b> This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were extracted from the PubMed and Google Scholar databases from their inception until November 2022, using the search terms "Artificial intelligence," "polytrauma," and "decision." Seventeen articles were identified and screened for eligibility. Animal studies, review articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and studies that did not involve polytrauma or severe trauma management decisions were excluded. Eight studies were eligible for final review.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> Eight studies focusing on patients with trauma, including two on military trauma, were included. The AI applications were mainly implemented for predictions and/or decisions on shock, bleeding, and blood transfusion. Few studies predicted death/survival. The identification of trauma patients using AI was proposed in a previous study. The overall performance of AI was good (six studies), excellent (one study), and acceptable (one study).</br> <b><br>Discussion:</b> AI demonstrated satisfactory performance in decision-making and management prediction in patients with polytrauma/severe trauma, especially in situations of shock/bleeding.</br> <b><br>Importance:</b> The present study serves as a basis for further research to develop practical AI applications for the management of patients with trauma.</br>.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能协助决定多发性创伤和创伤患者的管理策略。
<b><br>引言:</b>人工智能(AI)是一项新兴技术,在多个医学领域具有巨大的应用潜力。然而,人们对人工智能在多发性创伤患者治疗决策中的应用知之甚少。在这篇系统综述中,我们研究了人工智能在预测多发性创伤和外伤患者管理方面的益处和性能。使用 "人工智能"、"多创伤 "和 "决策 "等检索词,从 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 数据库中提取了从开始到 2022 年 11 月的研究。确定了 17 篇文章,并对其进行了资格筛选。排除了动物研究、综述文章、系统综述、荟萃分析以及不涉及多发性创伤或严重创伤管理决策的研究。八项研究符合最终审查条件。</br> <b><br>结果:</b> 八项研究的重点是创伤患者,包括两项关于军事创伤的研究。人工智能应用主要用于预测和/或决定休克、出血和输血。预测死亡/存活的研究很少。之前的一项研究提出使用人工智能识别创伤患者。人工智能的总体表现为良好(6 项研究)、优秀(1 项研究)和可接受(1 项研究)</br> <b><br>讨论:</b> 人工智能在多发性创伤/严重创伤患者的决策和管理预测方面表现令人满意,尤其是在休克/出血的情况下。</br><b><br>重要性:</b>本研究为进一步研究人工智能在创伤患者管理中的实际应用奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of anal fissures using the new TRPM8 receptor therapy - own experience. Static reanimation of the paralyzed face using non-absorbable polypropylene mesh. Mesenteric cysts. Delayed diagnosis, disease and secondary prevention, especially in young patients with colorectal cancer. Perioperative Elective Management in Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants - Practical Guide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1