Adopters and non-adopters of drones in humanitarian operations: An empirical evidence from a developing country

IF 2.6 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Progress in Disaster Science Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100314
Bertha Maya Sopha , Anna Maria Sri Asih , Juhri Iwan Agriawan
{"title":"Adopters and non-adopters of drones in humanitarian operations: An empirical evidence from a developing country","authors":"Bertha Maya Sopha ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Sri Asih ,&nbsp;Juhri Iwan Agriawan","doi":"10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), are becoming more popular as a means of assisting with humanitarian operations. However, divisive concerns toward drone implementation exist. The present study aims to characterize drone adopters and non-adopters and explore significant determinants underlying drone acceptance for humanitarian operations in a developing country. A disaster-prone developing country of Indonesia was selected as a studied case. An empirical survey involving 439 rescuers from governmental disaster agencies, international and national non-governmental organizations was conducted in 2023. Independent <em>t</em>-test/chi-squared test and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression were used for characterization and determinant identification, respectively. The drone adopters and non-adopters are significantly different with respect to age, gender, education, regions, work experiences, knowledge, personal innovativeness, and perceptions of drone durability, institutional support/policy, regulation, standard. Gender, education, knowledge, awareness, personal innovativeness, technology maturity, drone durability, reliability in extreme weather, GPS signal, optimal drone routing, noise and visual pollution, and misuse risk, are significant determinants contributing to potential adoption. The findings imply that initiatives encouraging drone should be customized for the intended individuals and that not only drone technology but also the facilitation of efficient operation should be enabled to drive the further uptake of drones. Future research extending the study in various disaster-prone areas and exploring the interrelationships among driving forces on drone acceptance, drone adoption decision making involving various stakeholders, and other customized strategies targeting specific rescuers are hence suggested.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52341,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Disaster Science","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000048/pdfft?md5=6b756b5a3f0bc7848203f166c0ff119b&pid=1-s2.0-S2590061724000048-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Disaster Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), are becoming more popular as a means of assisting with humanitarian operations. However, divisive concerns toward drone implementation exist. The present study aims to characterize drone adopters and non-adopters and explore significant determinants underlying drone acceptance for humanitarian operations in a developing country. A disaster-prone developing country of Indonesia was selected as a studied case. An empirical survey involving 439 rescuers from governmental disaster agencies, international and national non-governmental organizations was conducted in 2023. Independent t-test/chi-squared test and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression were used for characterization and determinant identification, respectively. The drone adopters and non-adopters are significantly different with respect to age, gender, education, regions, work experiences, knowledge, personal innovativeness, and perceptions of drone durability, institutional support/policy, regulation, standard. Gender, education, knowledge, awareness, personal innovativeness, technology maturity, drone durability, reliability in extreme weather, GPS signal, optimal drone routing, noise and visual pollution, and misuse risk, are significant determinants contributing to potential adoption. The findings imply that initiatives encouraging drone should be customized for the intended individuals and that not only drone technology but also the facilitation of efficient operation should be enabled to drive the further uptake of drones. Future research extending the study in various disaster-prone areas and exploring the interrelationships among driving forces on drone acceptance, drone adoption decision making involving various stakeholders, and other customized strategies targeting specific rescuers are hence suggested.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人道主义行动中的无人机采用者和非采用者:一个发展中国家的经验证据
无人机(UAV)作为一种协助人道主义行动的手段,正变得越来越受欢迎。然而,人们对无人机的使用存在分歧。本研究旨在描述无人机采用者和未采用者的特征,并探讨发展中国家人道主义行动接受无人机的重要决定因素。本研究选择了印度尼西亚这个灾害频发的发展中国家作为研究案例。2023 年,对来自政府救灾机构、国际和国内非政府组织的 439 名救援人员进行了实证调查。分别采用独立 t 检验/卡方检验和普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归进行特征描述和决定因素识别。无人机采用者和非采用者在年龄、性别、教育程度、地区、工作经历、知识、个人创新能力以及对无人机耐用性、机构支持/政策、法规、标准的认知方面存在显著差异。性别、教育、知识、意识、个人创新能力、技术成熟度、无人机耐用性、极端天气下的可靠性、全球定位系统信号、无人机最佳航线、噪音和视觉污染以及误用风险是促进潜在采用的重要决定因素。研究结果表明,鼓励使用无人机的倡议应针对目标人群量身定制,不仅要采用无人机技术,还要促进高效操作,以推动无人机的进一步普及。因此,建议今后在各种灾害多发地区扩大研究范围,探索无人机接受驱动力之间的相互关系、涉及各利益相关方的无人机采用决策以及针对特定救援人员的其他定制战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Disaster Science
Progress in Disaster Science Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Disaster Science is a Gold Open Access journal focusing on integrating research and policy in disaster research, and publishes original research papers and invited viewpoint articles on disaster risk reduction; response; emergency management and recovery. A key part of the Journal's Publication output will see key experts invited to assess and comment on the current trends in disaster research, as well as highlight key papers.
期刊最新文献
Fire risk vulnerability and safety assessment of Farmgate area using fire risk index, Dhaka City and optimization of fire hydrant placement Small-grid urban flood prediction model using Twitter data and population GPS data - an example of the 2019 Nagano city flood Improving community understanding of cascading effects of critical infrastructure service failure: An experimental interactive learning process Climate-induced coastal occupational vulnerability and livelihood insecurity: Insights from coastal Bangladesh Morphological changes of river Bank Erosion and channel shifting assessment on Arial Khan River of Bangladesh using Landsat satellite time series images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1