Clinical outcomes for previously treated patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Future oncology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI:10.2217/fon-2023-0006
Mayur M Amonkar, Lauren A Abderhalden, Grace E Fox, Andrew M Frederickson, Torkia Grira, Alexander Gozman, Usha Malhotra, William Malbecq, Katherine G Akers
{"title":"Clinical outcomes for previously treated patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Mayur M Amonkar, Lauren A Abderhalden, Grace E Fox, Andrew M Frederickson, Torkia Grira, Alexander Gozman, Usha Malhotra, William Malbecq, Katherine G Akers","doi":"10.2217/fon-2023-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficacy of treatments for previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. <b>Materials & methods:</b> Databases were searched for studies evaluating treatments for advanced (unresectable and/or metastatic) BTC patients who progressed on prior therapy. Pooled estimates of objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using random effects meta-analysis. <b>Results:</b> Across 31 studies evaluating chemotherapy or targeted treatment regimens in an unselected advanced BTC patient population, pooled ORR was 6.9%, median OS was 6.6 months and median PFS was 3.2 months. <b>Conclusion:</b> The efficacy of conventional treatments for previously treated advanced BTC patients is poor and could be improved by novel therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"863-876"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2023-0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficacy of treatments for previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. Materials & methods: Databases were searched for studies evaluating treatments for advanced (unresectable and/or metastatic) BTC patients who progressed on prior therapy. Pooled estimates of objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using random effects meta-analysis. Results: Across 31 studies evaluating chemotherapy or targeted treatment regimens in an unselected advanced BTC patient population, pooled ORR was 6.9%, median OS was 6.6 months and median PFS was 3.2 months. Conclusion: The efficacy of conventional treatments for previously treated advanced BTC patients is poor and could be improved by novel therapies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
既往接受过治疗的晚期胆道癌患者的临床疗效:一项荟萃分析。
目的:通过系统综述和荟萃分析,评估针对既往接受过治疗的晚期胆道癌(BTC)患者的疗效。材料与方法:在数据库中搜索了对既往治疗进展的晚期(不可切除和/或转移性)胆道癌患者的治疗方法进行评估的研究。采用随机效应荟萃分析法计算客观反应率 (ORR)、中位总生存期 (OS) 和中位无进展生存期 (PFS) 的汇总估计值。结果31项研究评估了未经筛选的晚期BTC患者群体的化疗或靶向治疗方案,汇总的ORR为6.9%,中位OS为6.6个月,中位PFS为3.2个月。结论传统疗法对既往接受过治疗的晚期 BTC 患者疗效不佳,新型疗法可改善疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future oncology
Future oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
335
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.
期刊最新文献
Sotorasib for the treatment of locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Artificial intelligence and radiomics in desmoid-type fibromatosis: are we there yet? Evaluation of CDK4/6 inhibitors in first-line in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with metastatic breast cancer. Tislelizumab for consolidation therapy in patients with pathologically residual Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after definitive concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled phase II trial. Current practices for the management of advanced high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer in the UK: OC-NOW survey (2023).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1