Anodal tDCS of the left inferior parietal cortex enhances memory for correct information without affecting recall of misinformation.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Memory Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1080/09658211.2024.2316174
Céline C Haciahmet, Maximilian A Friehs, Christian Frings, Bernhard Pastötter
{"title":"Anodal tDCS of the left inferior parietal cortex enhances memory for correct information without affecting recall of misinformation.","authors":"Céline C Haciahmet, Maximilian A Friehs, Christian Frings, Bernhard Pastötter","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2024.2316174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>False memories during testimony are an enormous challenge for criminal trials. Exposure to post-event misinformation can lead to inadvertent creation of false memories, known as the misinformation effect. We investigated anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the left inferior parietal lobe (IPL) during recall testing to enhance accurate recall while addressing the misinformation effect. Participants (<i>N</i> = 60) watched a television series depicting a fictional terrorist attack, then received an audio recording with misinformation, consistent information, and control information. During cued recall testing, participants received anodal or sham tDCS. Results revealed a robust misinformation effect in both groups, with participants falsely recalling on average 26.6% of the misinformed items. Bayesian statistics indicated substantial evidence in favour of the null hypothesis that there was no difference between groups in the misinformation effect. Regarding correct recall however, the anodal group exhibited significantly improved recall for items from the original video. Together, these results demonstrate that anodal tDCS of the left IPL enhances correct recall of the episodes from the original event without affecting false recall of misinformation. The findings support the IPL's role in recollection and source attribution of episodic memories.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":" ","pages":"1371-1380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2024.2316174","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

False memories during testimony are an enormous challenge for criminal trials. Exposure to post-event misinformation can lead to inadvertent creation of false memories, known as the misinformation effect. We investigated anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the left inferior parietal lobe (IPL) during recall testing to enhance accurate recall while addressing the misinformation effect. Participants (N = 60) watched a television series depicting a fictional terrorist attack, then received an audio recording with misinformation, consistent information, and control information. During cued recall testing, participants received anodal or sham tDCS. Results revealed a robust misinformation effect in both groups, with participants falsely recalling on average 26.6% of the misinformed items. Bayesian statistics indicated substantial evidence in favour of the null hypothesis that there was no difference between groups in the misinformation effect. Regarding correct recall however, the anodal group exhibited significantly improved recall for items from the original video. Together, these results demonstrate that anodal tDCS of the left IPL enhances correct recall of the episodes from the original event without affecting false recall of misinformation. The findings support the IPL's role in recollection and source attribution of episodic memories.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左侧下顶叶皮层的阳极 tDCS 可增强对正确信息的记忆,但不会影响对错误信息的回忆。
作证期间的错误记忆是刑事审判面临的巨大挑战。暴露于事件后的错误信息会导致无意中产生错误记忆,即所谓的错误信息效应。我们研究了在回忆测试期间对左侧下顶叶(IPL)进行阳极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)的方法,以增强准确回忆,同时解决误导效应。参与者(N = 60)观看了一部描述虚构恐怖袭击的电视连续剧,然后接收了一段包含错误信息、一致信息和控制信息的录音。在提示回忆测试中,参与者接受了阳极或假的 tDCS。结果显示,两组受试者都出现了强烈的错误信息效应,受试者平均错误回忆了 26.6% 的错误信息项目。贝叶斯统计表明,有大量证据支持错误信息效应在组间无差异的零假设。然而,在正确回忆方面,阳极组对原始视频中项目的回忆能力明显提高。这些结果共同表明,左侧 IPL 的阳极 tDCS 可增强对原始事件情节的正确回忆,而不会影响对错误信息的错误回忆。这些研究结果支持 IPL 在回忆和外显记忆来源归因中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
期刊最新文献
Cultural life scripts as schema: recalling schema congruent and incongruent events from a hypothetical life story. Embracing strengths and avoiding weaknesses: a meta-analysis of the mnemic neglect effect. Similar phonemes create interference in the serial recall task. Executive control contributes little to prospective memory function in older age: evidence from more ecologically valid paradigms. The mediating role of impulsivity in the relationship between executive functions (working memory, inhibition) and prospective memory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1