Commercially available artificial intelligence tools for fracture detection: the evidence.

BJR open Pub Date : 2023-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/bjro/tzad005
Cato Pauling, Baris Kanber, Owen J Arthurs, Susan C Shelmerdine
{"title":"Commercially available artificial intelligence tools for fracture detection: the evidence.","authors":"Cato Pauling, Baris Kanber, Owen J Arthurs, Susan C Shelmerdine","doi":"10.1093/bjro/tzad005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Missed fractures are a costly healthcare issue, not only negatively impacting patient lives, leading to potential long-term disability and time off work, but also responsible for high medicolegal disbursements that could otherwise be used to improve other healthcare services. When fractures are overlooked in children, they are particularly concerning as opportunities for safeguarding may be missed. Assistance from artificial intelligence (AI) in interpreting medical images may offer a possible solution for improving patient care, and several commercial AI tools are now available for radiology workflow implementation. However, information regarding their development, evidence for performance and validation as well as the intended target population is not always clear, but vital when evaluating a potential AI solution for implementation. In this article, we review the range of available products utilizing AI for fracture detection (in both adults and children) and summarize the evidence, or lack thereof, behind their performance. This will allow others to make better informed decisions when deciding which product to procure for their specific clinical requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":72419,"journal":{"name":"BJR open","volume":"6 1","pages":"tzad005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjro/tzad005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Missed fractures are a costly healthcare issue, not only negatively impacting patient lives, leading to potential long-term disability and time off work, but also responsible for high medicolegal disbursements that could otherwise be used to improve other healthcare services. When fractures are overlooked in children, they are particularly concerning as opportunities for safeguarding may be missed. Assistance from artificial intelligence (AI) in interpreting medical images may offer a possible solution for improving patient care, and several commercial AI tools are now available for radiology workflow implementation. However, information regarding their development, evidence for performance and validation as well as the intended target population is not always clear, but vital when evaluating a potential AI solution for implementation. In this article, we review the range of available products utilizing AI for fracture detection (in both adults and children) and summarize the evidence, or lack thereof, behind their performance. This will allow others to make better informed decisions when deciding which product to procure for their specific clinical requirements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于骨折检测的商用人工智能工具:证据。
漏诊骨折是一个代价高昂的医疗问题,不仅会对患者的生活造成负面影响,导致潜在的长期残疾和停工,还会造成高额的医疗费用支出,而这些费用本可以用于改善其他医疗服务。当儿童骨折被忽视时,尤其令人担忧,因为可能会错失保障机会。人工智能(AI)在解读医学影像方面的协助可能会为改善患者护理提供一种可行的解决方案,目前已有几种商业人工智能工具可用于放射学工作流程的实施。然而,有关这些工具的开发、性能和验证证据以及目标人群的信息并不总是很清楚,但在评估潜在的人工智能解决方案时却至关重要。在本文中,我们将回顾利用人工智能进行骨折检测(成人和儿童)的现有产品范围,并总结其性能背后的证据或缺乏证据的情况。这将使其他人在决定采购哪种产品以满足其特定临床需求时能做出更明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence research in radiation oncology: a practical guide for the clinician on concepts and methods. Application of CT-based foundational artificial intelligence and radiomics models for prediction of survival for lung cancer patients treated on the NRG/RTOG 0617 clinical trial. Measuring brain perfusion by CT or MR as ancillary tests for diagnosis of brain death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Post-mortem CT service structures in non-suspicious death investigations. Coronary stent imaging in photon counting computed tomography: improved imaging of in-stent stenoses in a phantom with optimized reconstruction kernels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1