Pyrolysis experiments of model compounds to explore carbon isotope fractionation in propane from natural gas

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Organic Geochemistry Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2024.104752
Wen Liu , Yun Li , Wenmin Jiang , Ping'an Peng , Yongqiang Xiong
{"title":"Pyrolysis experiments of model compounds to explore carbon isotope fractionation in propane from natural gas","authors":"Wen Liu ,&nbsp;Yun Li ,&nbsp;Wenmin Jiang ,&nbsp;Ping'an Peng ,&nbsp;Yongqiang Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.orggeochem.2024.104752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Investigating the mechanisms that determine the bulk and position-specific carbon isotopic distributions of propane in natural gas will help elucidate its formation and evolution. We used octadecane and squalane as model compounds that give simple precursors for gas production in gold-tube isothermal pyrolysis experiments to study the variations in intermolecular and intramolecular distributions of isotopes in the generated gaseous hydrocarbons. The δ<sup>13</sup>C values of the products and inverses of their carbon numbers (1/<em>n</em> where <em>n</em> = C<sub>1</sub>–C<sub>5</sub>) showed a negative linear relationship versus maturity, indicating that they formed by homolytic cleavage of C–C bonds and that the precursors showed homogeneous distributions of carbon isotopes. However, the significant difference in the kinetic isotopic effects (KIEs) of the gas generated by cracking of two model compounds under the same experimental conditions is not readily explained by single homolytic bond cleavage. The results indicate that besides the KIE of C–C bond cleavage, the bulk and position-specific carbon isotopic compositions of propane are related to the chemical and isotopic structures of the precursors and the propane transformation ratio. Based on the sites of C–C bond cleavage, two isotopic fractionation patterns (i.e., normal propyl and isopropyl models) may explain the bulk and position-specific carbon isotopic distributions of the generated propane. According to the propyl model, propane originates from (normal) propyl structures (CH<sub>3</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>*) in the precursor via C–C bond cleavage at a terminal site of a propyl group, while the isopropyl model involves propane derived from isopropyl structures (CH<sub>3</sub>CH*CH<sub>3</sub>) in the precursor, with C–C bond cleavage at the central site. Simulations show that these distributions for propane cracked from octadecane closely follow the propyl model, whereas propane generated from squalane showed mixed contributions from both models, and its bulk and position-specific carbon isotopic distributions depend on the proportions of propyl and isopropyl structures in the precursors. Variations of propane’s position-specific carbon isotopic distributions during the main stage of propane generation indicate that free radical reactions are the main pathway for thermogenic propane formation, resulting in similar KIEs for propane terminal and central carbons. Therefore, the position-specific carbon isotopic distribution of propane can provide evidence of its formation mechanism and shows potential for revealing the origin and evolution of natural gas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":400,"journal":{"name":"Organic Geochemistry","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 104752"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146638024000172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investigating the mechanisms that determine the bulk and position-specific carbon isotopic distributions of propane in natural gas will help elucidate its formation and evolution. We used octadecane and squalane as model compounds that give simple precursors for gas production in gold-tube isothermal pyrolysis experiments to study the variations in intermolecular and intramolecular distributions of isotopes in the generated gaseous hydrocarbons. The δ13C values of the products and inverses of their carbon numbers (1/n where n = C1–C5) showed a negative linear relationship versus maturity, indicating that they formed by homolytic cleavage of C–C bonds and that the precursors showed homogeneous distributions of carbon isotopes. However, the significant difference in the kinetic isotopic effects (KIEs) of the gas generated by cracking of two model compounds under the same experimental conditions is not readily explained by single homolytic bond cleavage. The results indicate that besides the KIE of C–C bond cleavage, the bulk and position-specific carbon isotopic compositions of propane are related to the chemical and isotopic structures of the precursors and the propane transformation ratio. Based on the sites of C–C bond cleavage, two isotopic fractionation patterns (i.e., normal propyl and isopropyl models) may explain the bulk and position-specific carbon isotopic distributions of the generated propane. According to the propyl model, propane originates from (normal) propyl structures (CH3CH2CH2*) in the precursor via C–C bond cleavage at a terminal site of a propyl group, while the isopropyl model involves propane derived from isopropyl structures (CH3CH*CH3) in the precursor, with C–C bond cleavage at the central site. Simulations show that these distributions for propane cracked from octadecane closely follow the propyl model, whereas propane generated from squalane showed mixed contributions from both models, and its bulk and position-specific carbon isotopic distributions depend on the proportions of propyl and isopropyl structures in the precursors. Variations of propane’s position-specific carbon isotopic distributions during the main stage of propane generation indicate that free radical reactions are the main pathway for thermogenic propane formation, resulting in similar KIEs for propane terminal and central carbons. Therefore, the position-specific carbon isotopic distribution of propane can provide evidence of its formation mechanism and shows potential for revealing the origin and evolution of natural gas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模型化合物的热解实验,探索天然气中丙烷的碳同位素分馏
研究决定天然气中丙烷的总量和特定位置碳同位素分布的机制将有助于阐明其形成和演变过程。我们将十八烷和角鲨烷作为模型化合物,在金管等温热解实验中作为简单的产气前体,研究生成的气态碳氢化合物中分子间和分子内同位素分布的变化。生成物的δ13C 值及其碳数的倒数(1/n,其中 n = C1-C5)与成熟度呈负线性关系,表明它们是通过 C-C 键的同质裂解形成的,并且前驱体呈现出碳同位素的同质分布。然而,在相同的实验条件下,两种模型化合物裂解产生的气体的动力学同位素效应(KIE)存在显著差异,这并不能用单一的同质键裂解来解释。结果表明,除了 C-C 键裂解的 KIE 外,丙烷的总量和特定位置碳同位素组成还与前驱体的化学结构和同位素结构以及丙烷转化率有关。根据 C-C 键裂解的部位,有两种同位素分馏模式(即正常丙基模式和异丙基模式)可以解释生成的丙烷的总量和特定位置碳同位素分布。根据丙基模式,丙烷来自于前体中的(正常)丙基结构(CH3CH2CH2*),通过丙基末端位点的 C-C 键裂解而生成;而异丙基模式则涉及丙烷来自于前体中的异丙基结构(CH3CH*CH3),通过中心位点的 C-C 键裂解而生成。模拟结果表明,从十八烷裂解出的丙烷的这些分布与丙基模型密切相关,而从角鲨烷生成的丙烷则显示出两种模型的混合贡献,其总量和特定位置的碳同位素分布取决于前体中丙基和异丙基结构的比例。在丙烷生成的主要阶段,丙烷特定位置碳同位素分布的变化表明,自由基反应是热生丙烷形成的主要途径,从而导致丙烷末端碳和中心碳的 KIE 相似。因此,丙烷的特定位置碳同位素分布可以为其形成机制提供证据,并显示出揭示天然气起源和演化的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Organic Geochemistry
Organic Geochemistry 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
100
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Organic Geochemistry serves as the only dedicated medium for the publication of peer-reviewed research on all phases of geochemistry in which organic compounds play a major role. The Editors welcome contributions covering a wide spectrum of subjects in the geosciences broadly based on organic chemistry (including molecular and isotopic geochemistry), and involving geology, biogeochemistry, environmental geochemistry, chemical oceanography and hydrology. The scope of the journal includes research involving petroleum (including natural gas), coal, organic matter in the aqueous environment and recent sediments, organic-rich rocks and soils and the role of organics in the geochemical cycling of the elements. Sedimentological, paleontological and organic petrographic studies will also be considered for publication, provided that they are geochemically oriented. Papers cover the full range of research activities in organic geochemistry, and include comprehensive review articles, technical communications, discussion/reply correspondence and short technical notes. Peer-reviews organised through three Chief Editors and a staff of Associate Editors, are conducted by well known, respected scientists from academia, government and industry. The journal also publishes reviews of books, announcements of important conferences and meetings and other matters of direct interest to the organic geochemical community.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of carbazole compounds in ultra-deep marine oil from Fuman oilfield, Tarim Basin: Significance for thermal maturity assessment of crude oil Hydrogen isotope fractionation during aromatization to form alkylnaphthalene: Insights from pyrolysis experiments of 1-n-butyldecalin Porphyrin protonation induces decoupling of trace metals in petroleum Influencing factors of hydrogen isotopic fractionation of light hydrocarbons during evaporation and implications Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1