Impact of Weight Concern on Post-Cessation Weight Management, Smoking Cessation, and Program Engagement.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1177/08901171241234136
Anjola Toyon, Zoran Bursac, Nicole Werner, Rebecca A Krukowski
{"title":"Impact of Weight Concern on Post-Cessation Weight Management, Smoking Cessation, and Program Engagement.","authors":"Anjola Toyon, Zoran Bursac, Nicole Werner, Rebecca A Krukowski","doi":"10.1177/08901171241234136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Weight concern is a barrier to smoking cessation. We examined the impact of weight concern on post-cessation weight gain, abstinence and program engagement.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized-controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Telephone-based and group-based intervention sessions.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>305 participants were randomized and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomized to receive a self-guided intervention, a weight loss intervention, or a weight stability intervention prior to all receiving the same smoking cessation intervention.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Level of weight concern on three measures, point-prevalence abstinence, weight change, and session attendance at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Continuous and discrete outcomes were compared between weight-concerned and non-weight-concerned participants using two-sample t-tests and chi-square tests respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in weight change (range: +1.77, -1.91 kg) when comparing weight-concerned and non-weight-concerned participants. Point-prevalence abstinence ranged from 36% to 64%, with no differences by condition based on level of weight concern. There were no significant differences in session attendance by weight concern (Weight sessions: 50-70%, Smoking cessation sessions: 41-56%, Booster sessions: 28-45%). Weight concern, on all measures, significantly decreased between screening and 2 months (after the weight management intervention), for most of the comparisons made overall and by condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It may not be necessary to screen for weight concerns in smoking cessation and/or post-cessation weight management programs, as the trial interventions were beneficial regardless of weight concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"797-808"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241234136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Weight concern is a barrier to smoking cessation. We examined the impact of weight concern on post-cessation weight gain, abstinence and program engagement.

Design: Randomized-controlled trial.

Setting: Telephone-based and group-based intervention sessions.

Subjects: 305 participants were randomized and analyzed.

Intervention: Participants were randomized to receive a self-guided intervention, a weight loss intervention, or a weight stability intervention prior to all receiving the same smoking cessation intervention.

Measures: Level of weight concern on three measures, point-prevalence abstinence, weight change, and session attendance at 12 months.

Analysis: Continuous and discrete outcomes were compared between weight-concerned and non-weight-concerned participants using two-sample t-tests and chi-square tests respectively.

Results: There were no significant differences in weight change (range: +1.77, -1.91 kg) when comparing weight-concerned and non-weight-concerned participants. Point-prevalence abstinence ranged from 36% to 64%, with no differences by condition based on level of weight concern. There were no significant differences in session attendance by weight concern (Weight sessions: 50-70%, Smoking cessation sessions: 41-56%, Booster sessions: 28-45%). Weight concern, on all measures, significantly decreased between screening and 2 months (after the weight management intervention), for most of the comparisons made overall and by condition.

Conclusion: It may not be necessary to screen for weight concerns in smoking cessation and/or post-cessation weight management programs, as the trial interventions were beneficial regardless of weight concern.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关注体重对戒烟后体重管理、戒烟和参与计划的影响。
目的:对体重的担忧是戒烟的一个障碍。我们研究了体重问题对戒烟后体重增加、戒烟率和戒烟计划参与度的影响:设计:随机对照试验:设计:随机对照试验:305 名参与者被随机分组并进行分析:干预:参与者在接受相同的戒烟干预之前,被随机分配接受自我指导干预、体重减轻干预或体重稳定干预:测量指标:三项测量指标中的体重关注度、戒烟点数、体重变化以及12个月的疗程出勤率:分析:分别使用双样本 t 检验和卡方检验对关注体重和不关注体重的参与者的连续和离散结果进行比较:结果:关注体重和不关注体重的参与者在体重变化(范围:+1.77,-1.91 千克)方面没有明显差异。戒酒率从 36% 到 64%不等,不同条件下对体重的关注程度没有差异。不同体重关注度的参与者在课程出席率上没有明显差异(体重课程:50%-70%;戒烟课程:50%-70%;戒酒课程:50%-70%):体重课程:50-70%,戒烟课程:41-5641%-56%,加强课程:28-45%).从筛查到 2 个月(体重管理干预后)期间,对体重的关注度在所有指标上都有明显下降,在整体上和按条件进行的大多数比较中都是如此:结论:在戒烟和/或戒烟后体重管理项目中,可能没有必要对体重问题进行筛查,因为无论体重问题如何,试验干预都是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
In Brief. The 'Natural' Accord of DuBois and Washington: An Environmentally Racialized Consciousness. Multi-Family Housing Environment and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Misaligned Supports: Differences in Reported Health Care Worker Well-being Supports Provided and Needed During the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Family-Based Approach to Promoting Pediatric Mental Health Recovery in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1